Advertisement

Influences of Reservoir Heterogeneity and Anisotropy on CO2 Sequestration and Heat Extraction for CO2-based Enhanced Geothermal System

  • Changlong WangEmail author
  • Zhijia Huang
  • Yuehong Lu
  • Gang Tang
  • Huan Li
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) have a great potential to extract geothermal energy and have attracted much interest. In this paper, based on a 3D thermal-hydrologic model considering CO2 sequestration, the influences of reservoir heterogeneity and anisotropy on CO2 sequestration and heat extraction in CO2-based EGS are investigated. Different heterogeneous reservoirs and homogeneous reservoir are compared, and different ratios among reservoir permeability components are compared. The results show that greater reservoir heterogeneity enhances CO2 sequestration and restrains heat extraction. Higher ratio between horizontal (x and y directions) and vertical permeability components enhances CO2 sequestration and heat extraction, and vertical permeability component has a little effect. With the increasing ratio between x-directional (perpendicular to the line of the injection well and the production well) and y-directional (perpendicular to x direction) reservoir permeability components (i.e. kx:ky), both CO2 sequestration amount and steady-state heat extraction rate first increase and then decrease, and thermal breakthrough time increases, showing that there exists an optimum kx:ky, which is about 1:1. The results of this paper indicate that reservoir heterogeneity and anisotropy have important influences on CO2 sequestration and heat extraction.

Keywords

enhanced geothermal system CO2 sequestration heat extraction reservoir heterogeneity reservoir anisotropy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51478001) and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1808085QE178) for the financial support.

References

  1. [1]
    Zhu J.L., Hu K.Y., Lu X.L., et al., A review of geothermal energy resources, development, and applications in China: Current status and prospects. Energy, 2015, 93: 466–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Feng Y., Chen X., Xu X.F., Current status and potentials of enhanced geothermal system in China: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 33: 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    McClure M.W., Horne R.N., An investigation of stimulation mechanisms in enhanced geothermal systems, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2014, 72: 242–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Watanabe N., Wang W., McDermott C.I., et al., Uncertainty analysis of thermo-hydro-mechanical coupled processes in heterogeneous porous media, Computational Mechanics, 2010, 45: 263–280.ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Xu C., Dowd P.A., Wyborn D., Optimisation of a stochastic rock fracture model using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation, Mining Technology, 2013, 122(3): 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Alghalandis Y.F., Dowd P.A., Xu C., The RANSAC method for generating fracture networks from microseismic event data. Mathematical Geosciences, 2013, 45: 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Vogt C., Kosack C., Marquart G., Stochastic inversion of the tracer experiment of the enhanced geothermal system demonstration reservoir in Soultz-sous-Forets—Revealing pathways and estimating permeability distribution, Geothermics, 2012, 42: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Vogt C., Klitzsch N., Rath V., On self-potential data for estimating permeability in enhanced geothermal systems, Geothermics, 2014, 51: 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Chen J.L., Jiang F.M., Designing multi-well layout for enhanced geothermal system to better exploit hot dry rock geothermal energy, Renewable Energy, 2015, 74: 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Benim A.C., Cicek A., Eker A.M., A computational investigation of the thermohydraulics of an EGS project. Journal of Thermal Science, 2018, 27(5): 405–412.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Taron J., Elsworth D., Min K.B., Numerical simulation of thermal-hydrologic-mechanical-chemical processes in deformable, fractured porous media, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2009, 46: 842–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Doe T., McLaren R., Dershowitz W., Discrete fracture network simulations of enhanced geothermal systems. Proceedings in 39th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, California, 2014.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Pandey S.N., Chaudhuri A., Rajaram H., et al., Fracture transmissivity evolution due to silica dissolution/precipitation during geothermal heat extraction, Geothermics, 2015, 57: 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Huang W.B., Cao W.J., Jiang F.M., Heat extraction performance of EGS with heterogeneous reservoir: A numerical evaluation, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 108: 645–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kalinina E., McKenna S.A., Hadgu T., et al., Analysis of the effects of heterogeneity on heat extraction in an EGS represented with the continuum fracture model. Proceedings in 37th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, California, 2012.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Hadgu T., Kalinina E., Lowry T.S., Modeling of heat extraction from variably fractured porous media in Enhanced Geothermal Systems, Geothermics, 2016, 61: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Llanos E.M., Zarrouk S.J., Hogarth R.A., Numerical model of the Habanero geothermal reservoir, Australia, Geothermics, 2015, 53: 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Zimmermann G., Reinicke A., Blöcher G., et al., Well path design and stimulation treatments at the geothermal research well GtGrSk 4/05 in Groß Schönebeck. Proceedings in 32nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, California, 2007.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Wang C.L., Cheng W.L., Nian Y.L., et al., Simulation of heat extraction from CO2-based enhanced geothermal systems considering CO2 sequestration, Energy, 2018, 142: 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Cheng W.L., Wang C.L., Nian Y.L., et al., Analysis of influencing factors of heat extraction from enhanced geothermal systems considering water losses, Energy, 2016, 115: 274–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Cheng W.L., Li T.T., Nian Y.L., et al., Studies on geothermal power generation using abandoned oil wells, Energy, 2013, 59: 248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Cheng W.L., Huang Y.H., Lu D.T., et al., A novel analytical transient heat-conduction time function for heat transfer in steam injection wells considering the wellbore heat capacity. Energy, 2011, 36: 4080–4088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Nian Y.L., Cheng W.L., Insights into heat transport for thermal oil recovery, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 151: 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Chen Y.L., Zhu M.M., Physical fluid dynamics. Press of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 2008.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Jiang F.M., Chen J.L., Huang W.B., et al., A three-dimensional transient model for EGS subsurface thermohydraulic process. Energy, 2014, 72: 300–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Pan C., Chavez O., Romero C.E., et al., Heat mining assessment for geothermal reservoirs in Mexico using supercritical CO2 injection, Energy, 2016, 102: 148–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Nathenson M., The dependence of permeability on effective stress from flow tests at hot dry rock reservoirs at Rosemanowes (Cornwall) and Fenton Hill (New Mexico), Geothermics, 1990, 28: 315–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Changlong Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zhijia Huang
    • 1
  • Yuehong Lu
    • 1
  • Gang Tang
    • 1
  • Huan Li
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureAnhui University of TechnologyMa’anshanChina

Personalised recommendations