Journal of Thermal Science

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 239–245 | Cite as

Unsteady flow analysis of an axial flow hydraulic turbine with collection devices comprising a different number of blades

  • Yasuyuki Nishi
  • Terumi Inagaki
  • Yanrong Li
  • Sou Hirama
  • Norio Kikuchi


We previously devised a new type of portable hydraulic turbine that uses the kinetic energy of an open-channel flow to improve output power by catching and accelerating the flow. The turbine contains an axial flow runner with an appended collection device and a diffuser section that is not axisymmetric. The objective of this study is to determine how interference between the collection device and the runner influences performance characteristics of the turbine. We investigated the performance characteristics of the turbine and flow field for different numbers of blades during both unsteady and steady flow. During an unsteady flow, the maximum values of power coefficients for three and two blades increased by approximately 8.8% and 21.4%, respectively, compared to those during a steady flow. For the three-blade runner, the power coefficient showed small fluctuations, but for the two-blade runner, the power coefficient showed large fluctuations. These fluctuations in the power coefficient are attributed to fluctuations in the loading coefficient, which were generated by interference between the runner and the diffuser section of the collection device.


Hydraulic Turbine Runner Collection Device Performance Unsteady Flow Analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Nicolet C., Zobeiri A., Maruzewski P. and Avellan F., Experimental Investigations on Upper Part Load Vortex Rope Pressure Fluctuations in Francis Turbine Draft Tube, International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2011, pp. 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Reynolds T. S., Stronger Than A Hundred Men: A History of the Vertical Water Wheel, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Fujiwara Y., Kado H. and Hosokawa Y., History and Performance of Traditional Water wheel in Western Europe, Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 90, No. 819, 1987, pp. 212–218.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Capecchi D., Over and Undershot Waterwheels in the 18th Century. Science-Technology Controversy, Advances in Historical Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2013, pp. 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Anyi M. and Kirke B., Evaluation of small axial flow hydrokinetic turbines for remote communities, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 14, 2010, pp. 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Inagaki A. and Kanemoto T., Performance of Gyro-Type Hydraulic Turbine Suitable for Shallow Stream, Turbomachinery, Vol. 33, No. 10, 2005, pp. 614–621.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Nakajima M., Iio S. and Ikeda T., Performance of Savonius Rotor for Environmentally Friendly Hydraulic Turbine, Journal of Fluid Science and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2008, pp. 420–429.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Inoue M., Sakurai A. and Ohya Y., A Simple Theory of Wind Turibine with Brimmed Diffuser, Turbomachinery, Vol. 30, No. 8, 2002, pp. 497–502.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Nishi Y., Inagaki T., Okubo K. and Kikuchi N., Study on the Development of an Axial Flow Hydraulic Turbine with a Collection Device, Turbomachinery, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2013, pp. 233–241.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Nishi Y., Inagaki T., Okubo K. and Kikuchi N., Study on an Axial Flow Hydraulic Turbine with Collection Device, International Journal of Rotating Machinery, Vol. 2014, Article ID 308058, 2014, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Nishi Y., Inagaki T., Okubo K., Hirama S. and Kikuchi N., Effect of Number of Blades on Performance of an Axial Flow Hydraulic Turbine with a Collection Device, Turbomachinery, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2014, pp. 107–117.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Ohya Y., Karasudani T. and Sakurai A., Development of High-Performance Wind Turbine with Brimmed Diffuser, Journal of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 50, No. 587, 2002, pp. 477–482.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Toshimitsu K., Nishikawa K., Haruki W., Oono S., Takao M. and Ohya Y., PIV Measurements of Flows around the Wind Turbines with a Flanged-Diffuser Shroud, Journal of Thermal Science, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2008, pp. 375–380.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Ohya Y. and Karasudani T., A Shrouded Wind Turbine Generating High Output Power with Wind-lens Technology, Energies, Vol. 3, 2010, pp. 634–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Khan M. J., Bhuyan G., Iqbal M. T. and Quaicoe J. E., Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems and assessment of horizontal and vertical axis turbines for river and tidal applications: A technology status review, Applied Energy, Vol. 86, 2009, pp. 1823–1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Gaden D. L. F. and Bibeau E. L., A numerical investigation into the effect of diffusers on the performance of hydro kinetic turbines using a validated momentum source turbine model, Renewable Energy, Vol. 35, 2010, pp. 1152–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Cui B., Song Z., Zhang Y., Jin Y. and Lin Y., Influence of Additional Device on Performance of the Marine Current Turbine, Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 2, 2012, pp. 305–310.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Sun H. and Kyozuka Y., Experimental Validation and Numerical Simulation Evaluation of a Shrouded Tidal Current Turbine, Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, Vol. 16, 2012, pp. 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Matsumiya H., Kogaki T., Iida M. and Kieda K., Development of a high performance airfoil, Turbomachinery, Vol. 29, No. 9, 2001, pp. 519–524.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    ANSYS, Inc., ANSYS CFX-Solver Modeling guide, 2010, pp. 142–145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasuyuki Nishi
    • 1
  • Terumi Inagaki
    • 1
  • Yanrong Li
    • 1
  • Sou Hirama
    • 2
  • Norio Kikuchi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIbaraki UniversityIbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Science and EngineeringIbaraki UniversityIbarakiJapan
  3. 3.Ibasei, Ltd.IbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations