Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 16, Issue 7, pp 1534–1545 | Cite as

Interrelationship between soil depth and soil properties of Pieniny National Park forest (Poland)

  • Justyna Sokołowska
  • Agnieszka JózefowskaEmail author
  • Karolina Woźnica
  • Tomasz Zaleski
Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between soil biota such as microbial activity, soil fauna (e.g., earthworms and enchytraeids), and soil physical and chemical properties. The study area was located in Pieniny National Park (PNP) in the Carpathian Mountains in southern Poland. Soil samples were collected from six forest monitoring areas of PNP from two soil layers (at 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm down, respectively). The investigated soils were classified to eutric cambisols and had silt or silt loam soil texture. Upon analysis, soil aggregate stability index was connected with other physical, chemical, and biological soil properties. It was noted that the stability index of 3 mm to 5 mm soil aggregates influenced pH and dissolved organic carbon. The stability index of 2 mm to 3 mm soil aggregates was positively correlated with dissolved organic carbon, soil moisture, microbial biomass carbon, total organic carbon, total nitrogen, and enchytraeid density, and negatively correlated with bulk density, particle density, porosity, and permanent wilting point. The stability index of 1 mm to 2 mm soil aggregates was positively correlated with total nitrogen, enchytraeid and earthworm density and negatively correlated with particle density, porosity, and permanent wilting point. The study has shown what factors create a stable soil structure in the forest soils of PNP.

Keywords

Aggregate stability Forest soils Microorganisms Earthworms Enchytraeids Physical properties Chemical properties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This Research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland, No. BM — 4175/17 and BM — 2111/18.

References

  1. Amézketa E (1999) Soil Aggregate Stability: A Review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 14(2–3): 83–151.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v14n02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayuke FO, Brussaard L, Vanlauwe B, et al. (2011). Soil fertility management: Impacts on soil macrofauna, soil aggregation and soil organic matter allocation. Applied Soil Ecology 48(1): 53–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldock J, Oades J, Vassallo A, et al. (1990) Solid-state CP/MAS 13C NMR analysis of bacterial and fungal cultures isolated from a soil incubated fith glucose. Australian Journal of Soil Research 28(2): 213–225.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9900213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barois I, Villemin G, Lavelle P, et al. (1993) Transformation of the soil structure through Pontoscolex corethrurus (Oligochaeta) intestinal tract. Soil Structure/Soil Biota Interrelationships 57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-81490-6.50010-8
  5. Beylich A, Oberholzer HR, Schrader S, et al. (2010) Evaluation of soil compaction effects on soil biota and soil biological processes in soils. Soil and Tillage Research 109(2): 133–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birkenmajer K (2014) Geological maps of the Pieniny KlippenGoogle Scholar
  7. Belt, West Carpathians (Poland). Pieniny — Przyroda i Cziowiek 8: 3–8. (In Polish)Google Scholar
  8. Blair GJ, Lefroy RD, Lisle L (1995) Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46(7): 1459–1466.  https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9951459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Particle density. In: Klute A (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison. p. 377–382.Google Scholar
  10. Blouin M, Hodson ME, Delgado EA, et al. (2013) A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Science 64: 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boix-Fayos C, Calvo-Cases A, Imeson A, et al. (2001) Influence of soil properties on the aggregation of some Mediterranean soils and the use of aggregate size and stability as land degradation indicators. CATENA 44(1): 47–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00176-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bossuyt H, Six J, Hendrix PF (2005) Protection of soil carbon by microaggregates within earthworm casts. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37(2): 251–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2004.07.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bossuyt H, Six J, Hendrix PF (2006) Interactive effects of functionally different earthworm species on aggregation and incorporation and decomposition of newly added residue carbon. Geoderma 130(1–2): 14–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bottinelli N, Jouquet P, Capowiez Y, et al. (2015) Why is the influence of soil macrofauna on soil structure only considered by soil ecologists? Soil and Tillage Research 146(PartA): 118–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2012) CANOCO (version 5): Software for multivariate data exploration, testing and summarization. Microcomput. Power, Ithaca, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Briones MJI, Ineson P, Heinemeyer A (2007) Predicting potential impacts of climate change on the geographical distribution of enchytraeids: A meta — analysis approach. Global Change Biology 13(11): 2252–2269.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01434.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005) Soil structure and management: A review. Geoderma 124(1–2): 3–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown GG, Barois I, Lavelle P (2000) Regulation of soil organic matter dynamics and microbial activity in the drilosphere and the role of interactions with other edaphic functional domainss. European Journal of Soil Biology 36(3–4): 177–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(00)01062-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bryk M, Kołodziej B, Słowińska-Jurkiewicz A, et al. (2017) Evaluation of soil structure and physical properties influenced by weather conditions during autumn-winter-spring season. Soil and Tillage Research 170: 66–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bullinger-Weber G, Le Bayon RC, Guenat C, et al. (2007). Influence of some physicochemical and biological parameters on soil structure formation in alluvial soils. European Journal of Soil Biology 43(1): 57–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burri K, Graf F, Böll A (2009) Revegetation measures improve soil aggregate stability: a case study of a landslide area in Central Switzerland. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 82(1): 45–60.Google Scholar
  22. Casida LE, Klein DA, Santoro T (1964) Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Science 98(6): 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chan KY, Bowman A, Oates A (2001) Oxidizible organic carbon fractions and soil quality changes in an oxic paleustalf under different pasture leys. Soil Science 166(1): 61–67.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-200101000-00009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chenu C (1993) Clay- or sand-polysaccharide associations as models for the interface between micro-organisms and soil: water related properties and microstructure. Geoderma 56(1–4): 143–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90106-U CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dimoyiannis DG, Tsadilas CD, Valmis S (1998) Factors affecting aggregate instability of Greek agricultural soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 29(9–10): 1239–1251.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629809370023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Don A, Steinberg B, Schöning I, et al. (2008) Organic carbon sequestration in earthworm burrows. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40(7): 1803–1812.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Drewnik M (2006) The effect of environmental conditions on the decomposition rate of cellulose in mountain soils. Geoderma 132(1–2): 116–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2005.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frouz J, Pižl V, Tajovský K (2007) The effect of earthworms and other saprophagous macrofauna on soil microstructure in reclaimed and un-reclaimed post-mining sites in Central Europe. European Journal of Soil Biology 43(1): 184–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Frouz J, Špaldoňová A, Fričová K, et al. (2014) The effect of earthworms (Lumbricus rubellus) and simulated tillage on soil organic carbon in a long-term microcosm experiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 78: 58–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2014.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Görres JH, Savin MC, Amador JA (2001) Soil micropore structure and carbon mineralization in burrows and casts of anecic earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris). Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33(14): 1881–1887.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00068-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris RF, Chesters G, Allen ON (1966) Dynamics of soil aggregation. Advances in Agronomy 18: 107–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60649-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaworski A, Jakubowska D (2011) The dynamics of changes in the structure and species composition of primary forest stands in selected areas of Pieniny National Park. Forest Research Papers 72(4): 339–356.  https://doi.org/10.2478/v10111-011-0034-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johannes A, Matter A, Schulin R, et al. (2017) Optimal organic carbon values for soil structure quality of arable soils. Does clay content matter? Geoderma 302: 14–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jongmans A, Pulleman M, Marinissen JCY (2001) Soil structure and earthworm activity in a marine silt loam under pasture versus arable land. Biology and Fertility of Soils 33(4): 279–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740000318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Józefowska A and Miechówka A (2015) Enzymatic activity and enchytraeids abundance in agricultural mountain soils. Soil Science Annual 66(3): 133–138.  https://doi.org/10.1515/ssa-2015-0029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Józefowska A, Miechówka A, Frouz J (2016) Comparison of earthworm populations in arable and grassland fields in the Outer Western Carpathians, South Poland. Biologia (Poland) 71(3): 316–322.  https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0035 Google Scholar
  37. Józefowska A, Pietrzykowski M, Woś B, et al. (2017) The effects of tree species and substrate on carbon sequestration and chemical and biological properties in reforested post-mining soils. Geoderma 292: 9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kandeler E, Murer E (1993) Aggregate stability and soil microbial processes in a soil with different cultivation. Geoderma 56(1–4): 503–513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90130-D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kara Ö, Bolat I (2008) The effect of different land uses on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in Bart > n Province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 32: 281–288.Google Scholar
  40. Kay BD (1998) Soil structure and organic carbon: A review. Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle. p. 169–197Google Scholar
  41. Klute A, Dirksen C (1986) Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods. In: Klute A (ed), Methods of soil analysis. Madison, Wisconsin USA. p. 687–732.Google Scholar
  42. Kołwazn B, Adamik W, Grabas K, et al. (2006) Podstawy mikrobiologii w środowiska. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wroclawskiej, Wroclaw [Introduction to Environmental Microbiology. University of Technology, Wroclaw], pp. 112. (in Polish).Google Scholar
  43. Kondracki J (1998) Geografia regionalna Polski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa (in Polish).Google Scholar
  44. Lavelle P, Spain A (2001) Soil Ecology. Springer, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee KE (1985) Earthworms — Their Ecology and Relationship with Soils and Land Use. Academic Press, Sydney. Agricultural Sciences 1: 2.Google Scholar
  46. Lityński T, Jurkowska H, Gorlach E (1976) Chemical-agricultural Analysis. PWN, Warszawa (in Polish).Google Scholar
  47. Marinissen JCY, Didden WAM (1997) Influence of the Enchytraeid worm Buchholzia appendiculata on aggregate formation and organic matter decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29(3–4): 387–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00100-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martens DA, Frankenberger Jr. T (1992) Modification of Infiltration Rates in an Organic-Amended Irrigated. Agronomy Journal 84(4): 707–717. https://doi.org/agronj1992.00021962008400040032x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miechówka A, Gąsiorek M, Józefowska A, et al. (2010) Effect of soil management method on the content of microbial biomass carbon in soils of Śląskie and Ciężkowickie foothills. Roczniki Gleboznawcze LXI(4): 164–170.Google Scholar
  50. Natywa M, Sawicka A, Wolna-Maruwka A (2010) Microbial and enzymatic activity in the soil under maize crop in relation to differentiated nitrogen fertilisation. Water-Environment-Rural Areas 2(30): 111–120. (In Polish).Google Scholar
  51. Nielsen MN, Winding A (2002) Microorganisms as Indicators of Soil Health. NERI Technical Report No. 388. National Environmental Research Institute, Ministry of the Environment, Denmark.Google Scholar
  52. O’Connor FB (1962) The extraction of Enchytraeidae from soil. In: Murphy PW (ed) Progress in soil zoology. Butterworths, London. p. 279–285.Google Scholar
  53. Olszowska G (2015) Biochemical soil activity in Taxus baccata L. stands in forest reserves and managed forests. Forest Research Papers 75(4): 407–415.  https://doi.org/10.2478/frp-2014-0037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ouessar M, Hartmann R, De Smet J (1993) Modification of the aggregate stability indices for the wet sieving method and the water drop technique. Soil Technology 6(4): 329–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0933-3630(93)90023-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Paluszek J (2011) Criteria of evaluation of physical quality of Polish arable soils. Acta Agrophysica. Rozprawy i Monografie 2(191): 5–138. (in Polish).Google Scholar
  56. Pelosi C, Rombke J (2018) Enchytraeids as bioindicators of land use and management. Applied Soil Ecology 123: 775–779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Perzanowska J (2004) Climate of the Pieniny Mointains. Studia Naturae 49: 21–32.Google Scholar
  58. Phillips D, FitzPatrick E (1999) Biological influences on the morphology and micromorphology of selected Podzols (Spodosols) and Cambisols (Inceptisols) from the eastern United States and north-east Scotland. Geoderma 90(3–4): 327–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00121-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pižl V (2002) Earthworms of the Czech Republic. Přírodovědný klub v Uherském Hradišti.Google Scholar
  60. Poch RM, Antunez M (2010) Aggregate development and organic matter storage in Mediterranean mountain soils. Pedosohere 20 (6): 702–710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60060-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Porre R, van Groenigen J, De Deyn G, de Goede R, Lubbers I (2016) Exploring the relationship between soil mesofauna, soil structure and N2O emissions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 96: 55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reynolds S (1970) The gravimetric method of soil determination. Journal of Hydrology 11(3): 258–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90066-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Röhrig R, Langmaack M, Schrader S, et al. (1998) Tillage systems and soil compaction—their impact on abundance and vertical distribution of Enchytraeidae. Soil Tillage Research 46(1–2): 117–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(98)80113-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Römbke J, Jänsch S, Didden W (2005) The use of earthworms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 62(2): 249–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Römbke J, Jänsch S, Höfer H, Horak F, Roß-Nickoll M, Russell D, Toschki A (2013) State of knowledge of enchytraeid communities in German soils as a basis for biological soil quality assessment. Soil Organims 85(2): 123–146.Google Scholar
  66. Ruser R, Flessa H, Russow R, et al. (2006) Emission of N2O, N2 and CO2 from soil fertilized with nitrate: effect of compaction, soil moisture and rewetting. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38(2): 263–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Saxena N (2016) Methods for elucidating microbial biomass. International Journal of Applied Sciences 03(03): 375–387.  https://doi.org/10.21013/jas Google Scholar
  68. Schlesinger W (1990) Evidence from chronosequence studies for a low carbon-storage potential of soils. Nature 348: 232–234.  https://doi.org/10.1038/348232a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schrader S, Lingnau M (1997) Influence of soil tillage and soil compaction on microarthropods in agricultural land. Pedobiologia 41(1): 202–209.Google Scholar
  70. Schrader S, Rogasik H, Onasch I, et al. (2007) Assessment of soil structural differentiation around earthworm burrows by means of X-ray computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy. Geoderma 137(3–4): 378–387.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2006.08.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schulten HR, Leinweber P (2000) New insights into organic-mineral particles: Composition, properties and models of molecular structure. Biology and Fertility of Soils 30(5–6): 399–432.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schutter ME, Dick RP (2002) Microbial Community Profiles and Activities among Aggregates of Winter Fallow and Cover-Cropped Soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66: 142–153.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shaw C, Pawluk S (1986) Faecal microbiology of Octolasion tyrtaeum, Aporrectodea turgida and Lumbricus terrestris and its relation to the carbon budgets of three artificial soils. Pedobiologia 29: 377–389.Google Scholar
  74. Shipitalo MJ, Protz R (1988) Factors Influencing the Dispersibility of Clay in Worm Casts. Soil Water Managment 52(3): 764–769.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200030030x Google Scholar
  75. Singh LI, Yadava PS (2006) Spatial distribution of microbial biomass in relation to land-use in subtropical systems of north-east India. Tropical Ecology 47(1): 63–70.Google Scholar
  76. Tischer A, Blagodatskaya E, Hamer U (2014) Extracellular enzyme activities in a tropical mountain rainforest region of southern Ecuador affected by low soil P status and land-use change. Applied Soil Ecology 74: 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSOIL.2013.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Topoliantz S, Ponge JF, Viaux P (2000) Earthworm and enchytraeid activity under different arable farming systems, as exemplified by biogenic structures. Plant Soil 225(1–2): 39–51.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026537632468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Turski M, Witkowska-Walczak B (2004) Fizyczne właściwości gleb płowych wytworzonych z utworów pyłowych różnej genezy (in Polish). Acta agrophysica, Lublin. (In Polish).Google Scholar
  79. Van Vliet PCJ, West LT, Hendrix PF, Coleman DC (1993) The influence of Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta) on the soil porosity of small microcosms. Geoderma 56(1–4): 287–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90118-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Van Vliet PCJ, Coleman DC, Hendrix PF (1997) Population dynamics of Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta) in different agricultural systems. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 25(2): 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Vliet PCJ, Beare MH, Coleman DC, Hendrix PF (2004) Effects of enchytraeids (Annelida: Oligochaeta) on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in laboratory incubations. Applied Soil Ecology 25(2): 147–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Voroney P, Brookes PC, Beyaert RP (2007) Soil microbial biomass C, N P and S. In: Carter MR and Gregorich E (eds.) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis Publ. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. p. 637–642.Google Scholar
  83. Xiang S, Doyle A, Holden PA, et al. (2008) Drying and rewetting effects on C and N mineralization and microbial activity in surface and subsurface California grassland soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 40: 2281–2289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zaleski T, Mazurek R, Gąsiorek M, et al. (2016) Soils of the forest monitoring areas in the Pieniny National Park. Pieniny — Przyroda i Człowiek 14: 3–15.Google Scholar
  85. Zwoliński J (2008) Vertical distribution of microbial biomass in forest soil. Leśne Prace Badawcze 69(3): 225–231.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Institute of Soil Science and AgrophysicsUniversity of Agriculture in KrakowKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations