Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 16, Issue 7, pp 1500–1514 | Cite as

Evaluation of the integrated multi-satellite retrievals for global precipitation measurement over the Tibetan Plateau

  • Lu Ma
  • Lin ZhaoEmail author
  • Li-ming Tian
  • Li-ming Yuan
  • Yao Xiao
  • Le-le Zhang
  • De-fu Zou
  • Yong-ping Qiao
Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

The availability of high-resolution satellite precipitation measurement products provides an opportunity to monitor precipitation over large and complex terrain and thus accurately evaluate the climatic, hydrological and ecological conditions in those regions. The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission is an important new program designed for global satellite precipitation estimation, but little information has been reported on the applicability of the GPM’s products for the Tibetan Plateau (TP). The object of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Final Run product under different terrain and climate conditions over the TP by using 78 ground gauges from April 2014 to December 2017. The results showed the following: (1) the 3-year average daily precipitation estimation in the IMERG agrees well with the rain gauge observations (R2=0.58, P<0.01), and IMERG also has a considerable ability to detect precipitation, as indicated by a high probability of detection (78%–98%) and critical success index (65%–85%); (2) IMERG performed better at altitudes from 3000 m to 4000 m with a small relative bias (RB) of 6.4%. Precipitation change was not significantly affected by local relief; (3) the climate system of the TP was divided into four climate groups with a total of 12 climate types based on the Köppen climate classification system, and IMERG performed well in all climate types with the exception of the arid-desert-cold climate (Bwk) type. Furthermore, although IMERG showed the potential to detect snowfall, it still exhibits deficiencies in identifying light and moderate snow. These results indicate that IMERG could provide more accurate precipitation data if its retrieval algorithm was improved for complex terrain and arid regions.

Keywords

GPM IMERG Rain gauge Topography Köppen climate classification Tibetan Plateau 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KJZD-EW-G03-02), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41705139), the Youth Science Fund of China (41401085), and the project of the State Key Laboratory of Cryosphere Science (SKLCS-ZZ-2017).

References

  1. Anjum M N, Ding Y, Shangguan D, et al. (2018) Performance evaluation of latest integrated multi-satellite retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) over the northern highlands of Pakistan. Atmospheric Research 205: 134–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battaglia A, Rustemeier E, Tokay A, et al. (2010) PARSIVEL Snow Observations: A Critical Assessment. Journal of Atmospheric &amp; Oceanic Technology 27(2): 333–344.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1332.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr N, Kirstetter P E, Hong Y, et al. (2015) The influence of surface and precipitation characteristics on TRMM microwave imager rainfall retrieval uncertainty. Journal of Hydrometeorology 16(4): 44–47.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0194.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen D, Tian Y, Yao T, et al. (2016) Satellite measurements reveal strong anisotropy in spatial coherence of climate variations over the Tibet Plateau. Scientific Reports 6: 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Ebert EE, Walsh KJE, et al. (2013) Evaluation of TMPA 3B42 daily precipitation estimates of tropical cyclone rainfall over Australia. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 118(21): 11–11: 978.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020319 Google Scholar
  6. Darand M, Amanollahi J, Zandkarimi S (2017) Evaluation of the performance of TRMM Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) estimation over Iran. Atmospheric Research 190: 121–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding Y, Yang D, Ye B, et al. (2007) Effects of bias correction on precipitation trend over China. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 112(13): 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007938 Google Scholar
  8. Ding Y, Zhang S, Liu F, et al. (2016) Hydrometeorological Observation and Study in High Altitude Area. Advances in Meteorology.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1372464
  9. El Kenawy AM, Lopez-Moreno JI, McCabe MF, et al. (2015) Evaluation of the TMPA-3B42 precipitation product using a high-density rain gauge network over complex terrain in northeastern Iberia. Global and Planetary Change 133: 188–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geng H, Pan B, Huang B, et al. (2017) The spatial distribution of precipitation and topography in the Qilian Shan Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Geomorphology 297: 43–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.08.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guijarro JA, Guijarro M (2018) Package ‘climatol’. Available online at: https://doi.org/CRAN.R-project.org/package=climatol (Accessed on 4 May 2018)
  12. Guilloteau C, Roca R, Gosset M (2016) A multiscale evaluation of the detection capabilities of high-resolution satellite precipitation products in West Africa. Journal of Hydrometeorology 17(7): 2041–2059.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0148.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo H, Chen S, Bao A, et al (2016) Early assessment of Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement over China. Atmospheric Research 176–177: 121–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hermance JF, Sulieman HM (2018) Adequacy of the daily TMPA 3B42 high-resolution satellite precipitation product for monitoring hydrometeorological hazards in the Southeast Sahel of Africa. International Journal of Remote Sensing 39: 8, 2579–2596.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1430405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hou AY, Kakar RK, Neeck S, et al. (2014) The global precipitation measurement mission. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95(5): 701–722.  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT, Nelkin EJ (2015a) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Technical Documentation. Available online at: https://doi.org/pmm.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/document_files/TMPA-toIMERG_transition_161025.pdf (Accessed on 19 June 2015)
  17. Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT, Nelkin EJ (2015b) Day 1 IMERG Final Run Release Notes. Available online at: https://doi.org/pmm.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/document_files/IMERG_FinalRun_Day1_release_notes.pdf (Accessed on 31 January 2015)
  18. Huffman GJ, Bolvin DT, Nelkin EJ, et al. (2007) The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. Journal of Hydrometeorology 8: 38–55.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iguchi T, Seto S, Meneghini R, et al (2010) GPM/DPR level-2 algorithm theoretical basis document. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD. Available online at: https://doi.org/pps.gsfc.nasa.gov/Documents/ATBD_DPR_2015_whole_a.pdf (Accessed on August 2015)
  20. Liu J, Chen R (2016) Discriminating types of precipitation in Qilian Mountains, Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies 5(C): 20–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.11.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu M, Xu X, Sun AY, et al. (2014) Evaluation of high-resolution satellite rainfall products using rain gauge data over complex terrain in southwest China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 119(1–2): 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1092-4 Google Scholar
  22. Locatelli JD, Hobbs PV (1974) Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles. Journal of Geophysical Research 79(79): 2185–2197.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JC079i015p02185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ma Y, Tang G, Long D, et al. (2016) Similarity and error intercomparison of the GPM and Its predecessor-TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis using the best available hourly gauge network over the Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sensing 8(7): 569.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mayor GY, Tereshchenko I, Fonseca-Hernández M, et al (2017) Evaluation of error in IMERG precipitation estimates under different topographic conditions and temporal scales over Mexico. Remote Sensing 9(5): 503.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050503-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mei Y, Anagnostou EN, Nikolopoulos EI, et al. (2014) Error Analysis of Satellite Precipitation Products in Mountainous Basins. Journal of Hydrometeorology 15: 1778–1793.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Montgomery DR, Brandon MT (2002) Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges. Earth &amp; Planetary Science Letters 201(3): 481–489.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00725-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mugnai A, Michele SD, Smith EA, et al. (2007) Snowfall measurements by proposed european GPM mission. Measuring Precipitation from Space. Springer Netherlands. pp 655–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Omranian E, Sharif HO (2018) Evaluation of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite rainfall products over the lower Colorado river basin, Texas. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 54(4): 882–898.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salio P, María Paula Hobouchian, Yanina García Skabar, et al. (2015) Evaluation of high-resolution satellite precipitation estimates over southern South America using a dense rain gauge network. Atmospheric Research 163: 146–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, Mcmahon TA (2007) Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology &amp; Earth System Sciences 11(3): 259–263.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007 Google Scholar
  31. Perkins SE, Argüeso D, White CJ (2015) Evaluation of error in TRMM 3B42V7 precipitation estimates over the Himalayan region. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 120: 8144–8164.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prakash S, Mitra AK, AghaKouchak A, et al. (2018) A preliminary assessment of GPM-based multi-satellite precipitation estimates over a monsoon dominated region. Journal of Hydrometeorology 556: 865–876.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rubel F, Kottek M (2010) Observed and projected climate shifts 1901–2100 depicted by world maps of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 19(2): 135–141.  https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2010/0430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Satgé F, Bonnet MP, Gosset M, et al. (2015) Assessment of satellite rainfall products over the Andean plateau. Atmospheric Research 167: 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharifi E, Steinacker R, Saghafian B (2016) Assessment of GPM-IMERG and other precipitation products against gauge data under different topographic and climatic conditions in Iran: Preliminary results. Remote Sensing 8(2): 135.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharifi E, Steinacker R, Saghafian B (2016) Assessment of GPM-IMERG and other precipitation products against gauge data under different topographic and climatic conditions in Iran: Preliminary Results. Remote Sensing 8(135): 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020135 Google Scholar
  37. Sharifi E, Steinacker R, Saghafian B (2018) Multi time-scale evaluation of high-resolution satellite-based precipitation products over northeast of Austria. Atmospheric Research 206: 46–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.02.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Siuki SK, Saghafian B, Moazami S (2017) Comprehensive evaluation of 3-hourly TRMM and half-hourly GPM-IMERG satellite precipitation products. International Journal of Remote Sensing 38(2): 558–571.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1268735 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tan J, Petersen WA, Tokay A (2016) A novel approach to identify sources of errors in IMERG for GPM ground validation. Journal of Hydrometeorology 17(9): 2477–2490.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0079.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tan ML, Ibrahim AL, Duan Z, et al. (2015) Evaluation of six high-resolution satellite and ground-based precipitation products over Malaysia. Remote Sensing 7(2): 1504–1528.  https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2010/0430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tan M, Duan Z (2017) Assessment of GPM and TRMM precipitation products over Singapore. Remote Sensing 9(7): 720.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tang G, Long D, Hong Y, et al. (2018) Documentation of multifactorial relationships between precipitation and topography of the Tibetan Plateau using spaceborne precipitation radars. Remote Sensing of Environment 208: 82–96.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tapiador FJ, Turk FJ, Petersen W, et al. (2012) Global precipitation measurement: Methods, datasets and applications. Atmospheric Research 104–105: 70–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.10.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tian F, Hou S, Yang L, et al. (2017) How does the evaluation of GPM IMERG rainfall product depend on gauge density and rainfall intensity? Journal of Hydrometeorology 19(2): 339–349.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-016L1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tokay A, Wolff DB, Petersen WA (2014) Evaluation of the new version of the laser-optical Disdrometer, OTT Parsivel2. Journal of Atmospheric &amp; Oceanic Technology 31(6): 1276–1288.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00174.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tong K, Su F, Yang D, et al. (2014) Tibetan Plateau precipitation as depicted by gauge observations, reanalyses and satellite retrievals. International Journal of Climatology 34(2): 265–285.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. World Meteorological Organization (2018) Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation, Chapter 14: 14–19.Google Scholar
  48. Xu R, Tian F, Yang L, et al (2017) Ground validation of GPM IMERG and TRMM 3B42V7 rainfall products over southern Tibetan Plateau based on a high-density rain gauge network. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 122(2): 910–924.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang, D, Jiang T, Zhang Y, et al. (1988) Analysis and correction of errors in precipitation measurement at the head of Urumqi River, Tianshan. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology 12(4): 69–77. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  50. Ye B, Yang D, Ding Y, et al. (2004) A Bias-corrected precipitation climatology for China. Journal of Hydrometeorology 5(6): 1147–1160.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-366.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. You Q, Min J, Zhang W, et al. (2015) Comparison of multiple datasets with gridded precipitation observations over the Tibetan Plateau. Climate Dynamics 45: 791–806.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2310-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yuter SE, Kingsmill DE, Nance LB, et al. (2006) Observations of precipitation size and fall speed characteristics within coexisting rain and wet snow. Journal of Applied Meteorology &amp; Climatology 45(10): 1450–1464.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2406.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhan C, Han J, Hu S, et al. (2018) Spatial downscaling of GPM annual and monthly precipitation using regression-based algorithms in a mountainous area. Advances in Meteorology 2(28):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1506017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang L, Zhao L, Xie C, et al. (2015) Intercomparison of solid precipitation derived from the weighting rain gauge and optical instruments in the interior Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Advances in Meteorology 12(4): 1210–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/936724 Google Scholar
  55. Zhang S, Wang D, Qin Z, et al. (2018) Assessment of the GPM and TRMM precipitation products using the rain gauge network over the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Meteorological Research 32(2): 324–336.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7067-0.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang Y, Ohata T, Yang D, et al. (2004) Bias correction of daily precipitation measurements for Mongolia. Hydrological Processes 18: 2991–3005.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5745 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zheng D, Li B (1990) Evolution and differentation of the physico-geographical environment of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau. Geophysical Research 9(2): 1–10. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  58. Zheng D, Zhang Q, Wu S (2000) Mountain geoecology and sustainable development of the Tibetan Plateau.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0965-2
  59. Zhou Y, Guo D, Qiu G, et al. (2000) Geocryology in China. Science Press China, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  60. Zhu Z, Yong B, Ke L, et al. (2018) Tracing the error sources of global satellite mapping of precipitation for GPM (GPM-GSMaP) Over the Tibetan Plateau, China. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 11(7): 2181–2191.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2825336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cryosphere Research Station on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and ResourcesChinese Academy of SciencesLanzhouChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory for Bio-resource and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life SciencesSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  4. 4.School of Geography ScienceQinghai Normal UniversityXiningChina

Personalised recommendations