Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 243–255 | Cite as

Bank erosion in an Andean páramo river system: Implications for hydro-development and carbon dynamics in the neotropical Andes

  • Derek J MartinEmail author
  • Christopher Ely
  • Beverley C Wemple


The páramo of the Northern Andes provide critically important ecosystem services to the Northern Andean region in the form of water provisioning and carbon sequestration, both of which are a result of the páramo’s organic-rich soils. Little is known, however, about the hydro-geomorphic characteristics of the rivers that drain these ecosystems. With impending plans for widespread hydro-development and increasing implementation of carbon-sequestering compensation for ecosystem services programs in the region it is imperative that we develop a thorough understanding of the hydrogeomorphic role that rivers play in this unique ecosystem. The objective of this study was to quantify bank erosion along an Amazonian headwater stream draining a small, relatively undisturbed páramo catchment to gain a better understanding of the natural erosion regime and the resulting sediment contributions from this unique ecosystem. This study implemented a combination of field, laboratory, and Geographic Information Systems techniques to quantify bank erosion rates and determine a bank erosion sediment yield from the Ningar River, a small páramo catchment (22.7 km2) located in the eastern Andean cordillera of Ecuador. Results show that bank erosion rates range from 3.0 to ≥ 390.0 mm/yr, are highly episodic, and yield at least 487 tons of sediment annually to the Ningar River. These results imply that 1) páramo ecosystems substantially contribute to the sediment load of the Amazon River basin; 2) bank erosion is a potentially significant flux component of basin-scale carbon cycles in páramo ecosystems; and 3) hydrologic alteration campaigns (dam building) will likely critically alter these contributions and concomitantly disconnect a critical source of sediment and nutrients to downstream ecosystems.


Bank erosion Páramo Fluvial geomorphology Andes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



First and foremost the authors would like to thank the funding sources that supported this research. Those sources include an Oak Ridge Associated Universities Junior Faculty Enhancement Award, an Appalachian State University Board of Trustees International Research Grant, and an Appalachian State University Research Council grant awarded to PI Martin, and a Fulbright Foundation Science and Technology grant awarded to PI Wemple. Additionally, the authors extend sincere thanks to Pablo Arévalo Moscoso of the Universidad Politécnica Salesiana in Cuenca, Ecuador for use of the Biotechnology laboratory facility as well as to Catherine Schloegel, Molly Roske and Stuart White of the Fundación Cordillera Tropical in Cuenca, Ecuador for their granting of access to the research sites, logistical support, and local knowledge. Finally, the authors would like to thank the reviewers for their insightful comments that helped improve the quality of the original manuscript.


  1. Anderson EP, Marengo J, Villalba R, et al. (2011) Consequences of climate change for ecosystem services in the Tropical Andes. In: Climate Change and Biodiversity in the Tropical Andes. MacArthur Foundation, Inter-American Institute for global Change Research (IAI, Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), 1–5.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson EP, Jenkinis CN, Heilpern S, et al. (2018) Fragmentation of Andes-to-Amazon connectivity by hydropower dams. Science Advances 4(1): 1–7. Google Scholar
  3. Balthazar V, Vanacker V, Molina A, et al. (2015) Impacts of forest cover change on ecosystem services in high Andean mountains. Ecological Indicators 48: 63–75. Google Scholar
  4. Beck W, Isenhart T, Moore P, et al. (2018) Streambank alluvial unit contributions to suspended sediment and total phosphorus loads, Walnut Creek, Iowa, USA. Water 10(2).
  5. Bremmer LL, Farley KA, Lopez-Carr D (2014a) What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador’s SocioPáramo program. Land Use Policy 36: 122–133. Google Scholar
  6. Bremmer LL, Farley KA, Lopez-Carr D, et al. (2014b) Conservation and livelihood outcomes of payment for ecosystem services in the Ecuadorian Andes: What is the potential for ‘win-win’? Ecosystem Services 8: 148–165. Google Scholar
  7. Bremmer LL, Farley KA, Chadwick OA, et al. (2016) Changes in carbon storage with land management promoted by payment for ecosystem services. Environmental Conservation 43(4): 397–406. Google Scholar
  8. Buytaert W (2004) The properties of the soils of the south Ecuadorian Páramo and the impact of land use changes on their hydrology. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 228pp. Google Scholar
  9. Buytaert W, Wyseure G, De Bièvre B, et al. (2005a) The effect of land-use changes on the hydrological behavior of Histic Andosols in south Ecuador. Hydrologic Processes 19(20): 3985–3997. Google Scholar
  10. Buytaert W, Sevink J, De Leeuw B, et al. (2005b) Clay minerology of the soils in the south Ecuadorian páramo region. Geoderma 127(1-2): 114–129. Google Scholar
  11. Buytaert W, Célleri B, De Bièvre B, et al. (2006a) Human impact on the hydrology of the Andean páramos. Earth-Science Reviews 79(1-2): 53–72. Google Scholar
  12. Buytaert W, Deckers J, Wyseure G (2006b) Description and classification of nonallophanic Andosols in south Ecuadorian alpine grasslands. Geomorphology 73(3-4): 207–221. Google Scholar
  13. Célleri R, Feyen J (2009) The hydrology of tropical Andean ecosystems: Importance, knowledge, status, and perspectives. Mountain Research and Development. Google Scholar
  14. Correa A, Windhorst D, Tetzlaff D, et al. (2017) Temporal dynamics in dominant runoff sources and flow paths in the Andean páramo. Water Resources Research 53(7): 5998–6017. Google Scholar
  15. Crespo P, Célleri R, Buytaert W, et al. (2010) Land use change impacts on the hydrology of wet Andean páramo ecosystems. Proceedings of the Workshop held at Goslar-Hahnenklee, April 2009.Google Scholar
  16. Eguiguren-Velepucha P, Chamba J, Aguirre Mendoza N, et al. (2016) Tropical ecosystem vulnerability to climate change in southern Ecuador. Tropical Conservation Science 9(4): 1–17.Google Scholar
  17. Ely CP, Martin DJ (2018). Investigating the geomorphic characteristics of an Amazonian headwater stream draining a Páramo ecosystem. Physical Geography. Google Scholar
  18. Evans M, Warburton J (2005) Sediment budget for an eroding peat-moorland catchment in northern England. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30: 557–577. Google Scholar
  19. Farley K, Kelly E, Hofstede R (2004) Soil organic carbon and water retention after conversion of grasslands to pine plantations in the Ecuadorian Andes. Ecosystems 7(7): 729–739. Google Scholar
  20. Farley K, Anderson, W, Bremer L, et al. (2011) Compensation for ecosystem services: An evaluation of efforts to achieve conservation and development in Ecuadorian páramo grasslands. Environmental Conservation 38(4): 393–405. Google Scholar
  21. Farley K, Bremer L, Harden C, et al. (2013) Changes in carbon storage under alternative land uses in biodiverse Andean grasslands: Implications for payment for ecosystem services. Google Scholar
  22. Farley K, Bremer L (2017) “Water is Life”: Local perceptions of páramo grasslands and land management strategies associated with payment for ecosystem services. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107(2): 371–381. Google Scholar
  23. Finer M, Jenkins C (2012) Proliferation of hydroelectric dams in the Andean Amazon and implications for Andes-Amazon connectivity. PLoS ONE 7(4).
  24. Florsheim JL, Mount JF, Chin A (2008) Bank erosion as a desirable attribute of rivers. Bioscience 58(6): 519–529. Google Scholar
  25. Forsberg B, Melack J, Denne T, et al. (2017) The potential impact of new Andean dams on Amazon fluvial ecosystems. PLoS ONE 12(8). Google Scholar
  26. Galy V, Peucker-Ehrenbrink B, Eglinton T (2015) Global carbon export from the terrestrial biosphere controlled by erosion. Nature 521, 204–207. Google Scholar
  27. Harden CP, Foster W, Morris C, et al. (2013a) Rates and process of streambank erosion in tributaries of the Little River, Tennessee. Physical Geography 30(1): 1–16. Google Scholar
  28. Harden CP, Hartsig J, Farley KA, et al. (2013b) Effects of landuse change on water in Andean páramo grassland soils. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103(2)375–384. Google Scholar
  29. Hilton RG, Galy A, Hovius N, et al. (2012) Climatic and geomorphic controls on the erosion of terrestrial biomass from subtropical mountain forest. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 26, GB 3014. Google Scholar
  30. Hilton RG (2017) Climate regulates the erosional carbon export from the terrestrial biosphere. Geomorphology 277, 118–132. Google Scholar
  31. Hooke JM (1979) An analysis of the processes of river bank erosion. Journal of Hydrology 42(1-2):39–62. Google Scholar
  32. Hooke JM (1980) Magnitude and distribution of rates of river bank erosion. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 5(2):143–157. Google Scholar
  33. Hribljan J, Cooper D, Sueltenfuss J, et al. (2015) Carbon storage and long-term rate of accumulation in high-altitude Andean peatlands of Bolivia. Mires and Peat 15(12):1–14.Google Scholar
  34. Hribljan J, Suárez E, Heckman K, et al. (2016) Peatland carbon stocks and accumulation rates in the Ecuadorian páramo. Wetlands Ecology and Management 24(2) 113–127. Google Scholar
  35. Hribljan J, Suárez E, Bourgeau-Chavez L,et al. (2017) Multidate, multisensory remote sensing reveals high density of carbonrich mountain peatlands in the páramo of Ecuador. Global Change Biology 23(12): 5412–5425. Google Scholar
  36. Joslin A, Jepson W (2018) Territory and authority of water fund payments for ecosystem services in Ecuador’s Andes. Geoforum 91:10–20.Google Scholar
  37. Laceby J, Saxton N, Smolders K, et al. (2017) Marine and Freshwater Research 68(11):2041–2051. Google Scholar
  38. Latrubesse E, Arima E, Dunne T, et al. (2017) Damming the rivers of the Amazon basin. Nature 546: 363–369. Google Scholar
  39. Lawler DM (1993) The measurement of river bank erosion and lateral channel change: A review. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 18(9):777–821. Google Scholar
  40. Lyons J, Trimble S, Paine L (2000) Grass versus trees: Managing riparian areas to benefit streams of central North America. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36(4): 919–930. Google Scholar
  41. Empresa Municipal de Agua Potable de Azogues - EMAPAL (2012) Estudios de factibilidad del componente de agua potable del projecto multifinalitario PUMA, Azogues, pp34.Google Scholar
  42. Montgomery D, Buffington J (1997) Channel reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin 109(5): 596–611.<0596:CRMIMD>2.3.CO;2 Google Scholar
  43. Mosquera G, Célleri R, Lazo P, et al. (2016) Combined use of isotopic and hydrometric data to conceptualize ecohydrological processes in a high-elevation tropical ecosystem. Hydrological Processes 30(17): 2930–2947. Google Scholar
  44. Osborne L, Kovacic D (1993) Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshwater Biology 29(2):243–258. Google Scholar
  45. Padrón R, Wilcox B, Crespo, P, et al. (2015) Rainfall in the Andean páramo: New insights from high-resolution monitoring in Southern Ecuador. Journal of the American Meteorological Society 16: 985–996. Google Scholar
  46. Piégay H, Cuaz M, Javelle E, et al. (1997) Bank erosion management based on geomorphological, ecological and economic criteria on the Galaure River, France. Regulated Rivers-Research & Management 13(5):433-448.<433::AID-RRR467>3.0.CO;2-LGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodriguez N, Armenteras D, Retana J (2015) National ecosystem services priorities for planning carbon and water resource management in Colombia. Land Use Policy. 42:609–618. Google Scholar
  48. Rolando J, Turin C, Ramirez D, et al. (2017) Key ecosystem services and ecological intensification of agriculture in the tropical high-Andean Puna as affected by land-use and climate changes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 236(2): 221–233. Google Scholar
  49. Sánchez M, Chimner R, Hribljan J, et al. (2017) Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in grazed and undisturbed mountain peatlands in the Ecuadorian Andes. Mires and Peat 19(20)1–18. Google Scholar
  50. Schumm S (1985) Patterns of alluvial rivers. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 13(1): 5–27. Google Scholar
  51. Stallard RF (1998) Terrestrial sedimentation and the carbon cycle: coupling weathering and erosion to carbon burial. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 12(2): 231–257. Google Scholar
  52. Tenorio G, Vanacker V, Campforts B, et al. (2018) Tracking spatial variation in river load from Andean highlands to inter- Andean valleys. Geomorphology 308: 175–189. Google Scholar
  53. Thorne CR (1981) Field measurements of rates of bank erosion and bank material strength. Erosion and Sediment Transport Measurement: Proceedings of the Florence Symposium, June 1981. IAHS Publ. no. 133.Google Scholar
  54. Tonneijck F, Jansen B, Nierop K, et al. (2010) Towards understanding of carbon stocks and stabilization in volcanic ash soils in natural Andean ecosystems of northern Ecuador. European Journal of Soil Science 61(3): 392–405. Google Scholar
  55. Trimble S (1977) The fallacy of stream equilibrium in contemporary denudation studies. American Journal of Science. Google Scholar
  56. Trimble S (1997) Contribution of stream channel erosion to sediment yield from an urbanizing watershed. Science 278(5342):1442–1444. Google Scholar
  57. Trimble S (2009) Fluvial processes, morphology and sediment budgets in the Coon Creek Basin, Wisconsin, USA, 1975–1993. Geomorphology 108(1-2): 8–23. Google Scholar
  58. Vanacker V, von Blanckenburg F, Govers G, et al. (2015) Transient river response, captured by channel steepness and its concavity. Geomorphology 228: 234–243. Google Scholar
  59. Vuille M (2013) Climate Change and water resources in the tropical Andes. Inter-American Development Bank 29.Google Scholar
  60. Wolman M (1967) A Cycle of sedimentation and erosion in urban river channels. Geografiska Annaler. Series A, Physical Geography 49(2/4): 385–395. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and PlanningAppalachian State UniversityBooneUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations