Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 15, Issue 10, pp 2307–2319 | Cite as

Determining the degree of saturation of rocks as a function of time: A case study from mountainous area of Turkey

  • Serhat Dağ
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study is to scrutinize whether, in terms of saturation, the 48 hour duration suggested by ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics) methods and ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) standard in rocks is sufficient or not, and to examine how the degree of saturation of rocks may be determined as a function of time. For this purpose, samples from five different rock groups including igneous (andesite, granite, andesitic tuff) and sedimentary (limestone, sandstone) exposed in Gümüşhane city which is from mountainous area of north-eastern Turkey, have been compiled. Measurements were taken on the samples left for saturation under laboratory conditions as a result of which the degree of saturation values at the end of these time periods were determined. Similarly, at the end of 48 hours, the samples were left to dry under atmospheric conditions in the laboratory environment and their time dependent degree of saturation were also calculated at different times. The changes as a function of time in the degree of saturation were then examined mathematically using non-linear, exponential and logarithmic functions. Graphs and equations related with the acquired time-degree of saturation values and the correlation coefficient (r) values for these equalities have indicated a high accordance between time and degree of saturation for the studied rock groups. The applied methodology will be beneficial for determining the degree of saturation based on time for engineering studies that will be carried out in similar lithologies.

Keywords

Degree of saturation Porosity Time Correlation coefficient 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author would like to express his sincerest gratitude to the editor, reviewers, Dr. Ayberk Kaya and Dr. Selçuk Alemdağ for their excellent comments. Thanks are due to the Ideo Translation Office and Lect. Çağlayan Doğan for improving the language of the manuscript.

References

  1. Alemdağ S, Gürocak Z (2011) The relationships between United Alteration Index (UAI) with physical, mechanical and chemical properties in the upper cretaseous basalts (Trabzon/Turkey). Fırat University Journal of Engineering Science 23(1): 1–10. (In Turkish).Google Scholar
  2. Arel E, Tugrul A (2001) Weathering and its relation to geomechanical properties of Cavusbasi granitic rocks in northwestern Turkey. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 60(2): 123–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s100640000091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atıcı Ü, Yünsel TY (2011) Evaluation of the dynamic and static modulus of elasticity for dry and saturated samples in granitic rocks. Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture 26(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
  4. Bell FG, Lindsay P (1999) The petrographic and geomechanical properties of sandstones from the newspaper member of the Natal Group near Durban, South Africa. Engineering Geology 53(1): 57–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(98)00081-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang C, Zoback MD, Khaksar A (2006) Empirical relations between rock strength and physıcal properties in sedimentary rocks. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 51(3–4): 223–237.  https://doi.org/10.1006/j.petrol.2006.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen X, Schmıtt DR, Kessler JA, et al. (2015) Empirical relations between ultrasonic P–wawe velocity, porosity and uniaxial compressive strength. Cseg Recorder 40(5): 24–29.Google Scholar
  7. Dağ S (2016) Comparison of the apparent porosity and porosity values on different rock types (Gümüşhane–Türkiye). In: Proceeding of International Conference on Engineering and Natural Sciences (ICENS), Sarajevo 3: 705–712.Google Scholar
  8. Dağ S, Soysal Z (2017) The effect of anisotropy on some rock properties in sandstones. In: Proceeding of 2nd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies, Rome, 109.Google Scholar
  9. Ersoy H, Yalçınalp B, Arslan M, et al. (2016) Geological and geomechanical properties of the carbonate rocks at the eastern Black Sea Region (NE Turkey). Journal of African Earth Sciences. 123: 223–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.07.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gercek H (2007) Poisson’s ratio values for rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 44(1): 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gökçe MV (2015). The effects of bedding directions on abrasion resistance in travertine rocks. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 24(2): 196–207.  https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-1404-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gurocak Z, Solanki P, Alemdag S, Zaman M (2012) New consiredations for empirical estimation of tensile strength of rocks. Engineering Geology (145–146): 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guven IH (1993) 1:250000–Scaled geology and compilation of the Eastern Pontide. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA) of Turkey, Ankara (unpublished).Google Scholar
  14. Heidari M, Momeni AA, Rafiei B, et al. (2013) Relationship between petrographic characteristics and the engineering properties of Jurassic sandstones, Hamedan, Iran. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 46(5): 1091–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0333-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Helle HB, Pham NH, Carcione JM (2003) Velocity and attenuation in partially saturated rocks: Poroelastic numerical experiments. Geophysıcal Prospecting 51(6): 551–566.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2003.00393.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ISRM (International Sciety for Rock Mechanics) (2007) In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (Eds.) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring. p. 628Google Scholar
  17. Ji S, Marcotte D (2009) Correlations between poisson’s ratio and seismic wave velocities for some common rocks and sulfide ores. Tectonophysics 469(1): 61–72.Google Scholar
  18. Jianhong Y, Wu FQ, Sun JZ (2009) Estimation of the tensile elastic modulus using brazilian disc by applying diametrically opposed concentrated loads, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 46(3): 568–576.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.01.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kahraman S (2007) The correlations between the saturated and dry P–wave velocity of rocks,. Ultrasonics 46(4): 341–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2007.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahraman S, Gunaydin O (2009) The effect of rock classes on the relation between uniaxial compressive strength and point load index. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 68(3): 345–353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0195-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karakul H, Ulusay R (2012) Prediction of strength properties of rocks at different saturation conditions from P–wave velocity and sensitivity of P–wave velocity to physical properties. Hacettepe Earthscience (In Turkish) 33(3): 239–268.Google Scholar
  22. Karaman K, Kaya A, Kesimal A (2015a) Use of the point load index in estimation of the strength rating for the RMR system. Journal of African Earth Sciences 106: 40–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karaman K, Kaya A, Kesimal A (2015b) Effect of the specimen length on ultrasonic P–wave velocity in some volcanic rocks and limestones. Journal of African Earth Sciences 112: 142–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.09.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karakul H, Ulusay R (2013) Empirical correlations for predicting strength properties of rocks from P–wawe velocity under different degree of saturation. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 46(5): 981–999.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0353-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaya A, Karaman K (2016) Utilizing the strength conversion factor in the estimation of uniaxial compressive strength from the point load index. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 75: 341–357.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0721-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ketin İ (1966) Tectonic units of Anatolian. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA) 66:20–34.Google Scholar
  27. Lahskaripour GR (2002) Predicting mechanical properties of mudrock from index parameters. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 61(1): 73–77.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s100640100116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martinez JM, Benavente D, Garsia–del–Cura MA (2012) Comparison of the static and dynamic elastic modulus in carbonate rocks. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 71: 263–268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-011-0399-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moradian ZA, Behnia M (2009) Predicting the uniaxial compressive strength and staticoung’s modulus of intact sedimentary rocks using the ultrasonic test. International Journal of Geomechanics 9(1): 14–19.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2009)9:1(14) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pelin S (1977) Geological study of the area southeast of Alucra (Giresun), with special reference to its petroleum potential. Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Earthscience Publications, Trabzon, 13, p.103. (In Turkish)Google Scholar
  31. Saydam Ç (2002) Petrographic and organic geochemical properties of Late cretaseous sedimantery deposits in Eastern Pontides. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University Graduate School of Science, Trabzon, p. 203. (In Turkish)Google Scholar
  32. Singh TN, Sharma PK (2008) A correlation between P–wave velocity, impact strength index, slake durability index and uniaxial compressive strength. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 67(1): 17–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-007-0109-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tokel S (1972) Stratigraphical and volcanic history of the Gümüşhane Region, N.E. Turkey, University College, London.Google Scholar
  34. Török A, Váráshelyi B (2010) The influence of fabric and water content on selected rock mechanical parameters of travertine, examples from Hungary. Engineering Geology 115(3–4): 237–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tuğrul A, Zarif IH (1999) Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with engineering properties of selected granitic rocks from Turkey. Engineering Geology 51(4): 303–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(98)00071-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ulusay R, Tureli K, Ider MH (1994) Prediction of engineering properties of a selected litharenite sandstone from its petrographic characteristics using correlation and multivariable statistical techniques. Engineering Geology 38(1–2): 135–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(94)90029-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu J, Chen X, Li H, et al. (2015) Effect of freeze–thaw cycles on mechanical properties and permeability of red sandstone under triaxial compression. Journal of Mountain Science 12(1): 218–231.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2946-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological EngineeringGümüşhane UniversityGümüşhaneTurkey

Personalised recommendations