Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 15, Issue 7, pp 1597–1614 | Cite as

Effect of dry density on the liquefaction behaviour of Quaternary silt

  • Chong-lei Zhang
  • Guan-lu Jiang
  • Li-jun Su
  • Wei-ming Liu
  • Gong-dan Zhou
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Quaternary silt is widely distributed in China and easily liquefies during earthquakes. To identify the influence of the dry density on the liquefaction behaviour of Quaternary silt, 40 cyclic triaxial liquefaction tests were performed on loose silt (dry density ρd=1.460 g/cm3) and dense silt (ρd=1.586 g/cm3) under different cyclic stress ratios (CSRs) to obtain liquefaction assessment criteria, determine the liquefaction resistance, improve the excess pore water pressure (EPWP) growth model and clarify the relationship between the shear modulus and damping ratio. The results indicate that the initial liquefaction assessment criteria for the loose and dense silts are a double-amplitude axial strain of 5% and an EPWP ratio of 1. The increase in the anti-liquefaction ability for the dense silt is more significant under lower confining pressures. The CSR of loose silt falls well within the results of the sandy silt and Fraser River silt, and the dense silt exhibits a higher liquefaction resistance than the sand-silt mixture. The relationships between the CSR and loading cycles were obtained at a failure strain of 1%. The EPWP development in the dense and loose silts complies with the “fast-stable” and “fast-gentle-sharp” growth modes, respectively. The power function model can effectively describe the EPWP growth characteristics of the dense silt. Finally, based on the liquefaction behaviour of silt, a suggestion for reinforcing silt slopes or foundations is proposed.

Keywords

Liquefaction Quaternary silt Dry density Earthquake magnitude Liquefaction assessment Cyclic stress ratio 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study has been financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41761144077), the CAS “Light of West China” Program (Grant No. Y6R2240240), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (Grant No. QYZDB-SSW-DQC010), and the Sichuan science and technology plan project (Grant No. 2017JY0251). A special acknowledgement should be expressed to Dr. Wang Zhi-meng and M.S. Hu An-hua for their invaluable assistance in the performance of the tests in this paper.

References

  1. Adhikari K, Subedi M, Sharma K, et al. (2018) Liquefaction Phenomenon in the Kathmandu Valley during the 2015 Earthquake of Nepal. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. International Journal of Geological and Environmental Engineering 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1999/1307-6892/81120
  2. Alibolandi M, Ziaie Moayed R (2015) Liquefaction potential of reinforced silty sands. International Journal of Civil Engineering 13(3):195–202. https://doi.org/10.22068/IJCE.13.3.195 Google Scholar
  3. ASTM, D.2487-98. (2011) Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. pp 238–247.Google Scholar
  4. Baziar MH, Sharafi H (2011) Assessment of silty sand liquefaction potential using hollow torsional tests-An energy approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 31(7):857–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baziar MH, Shahnazari H, Sharafi H (2011) A laboratory study on the pore pressure generation model for Firouzkooh silty sands using hollow torsional test. International Journal of Civil Engineering 9(2):126–34. https://doi.org/ijce.iust.ac.ir/article-1-489-en.html Google Scholar
  6. Belkhatir M, Arab A, Schanz T, et al. (2011) Laboratory study on the liquefaction resistance of sand-silt mixtures: effect of grading characteristics. Granular Matter 13(5): 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-011-0269-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beyzaei CZ, Bray JD, van Ballegooy S, et al. (2018) Depositional environment effects on observed liquefaction performance in silt swamps during the Canterbury earthquake sequence. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 107: 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Booker JR, Rahman MS, Seed HB (1976) GADFLEA: a computer program for the analysis of pore pressure generation and dissipation during cyclic or earthquake loading (No. PB-263947; EERC-76-24). California Univ., Berkeley (USA). Earthquake Engineering Research Center.Google Scholar
  9. Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2004) Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts and clays (p 131). Davis, California: Center for Geotechnical Modeling.Google Scholar
  10. Chen GX, Jin DD, Chang XD, et al. (2013) Review of soil liquefaction characteristics during major earthquakes in recent twenty years and liquefaction susceptibility criteria for soils. Rock and Soil Mechanics 34(10): 2737–2755. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2013.10.005 Google Scholar
  11. Chen XQ, Chen JG, Cui P, et al. (2018) Assessment of prospective hazards resulting from the 2017 earthquake at the world heritage site Jiuzhaigou Valley, Sichuan, China. Journal of Mountain Science 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4785-1
  12. Chegenizadeh A, Keramatikerman M, Nikraz H (2018) Liquefaction resistance of fibre reinforced low-plasticity silt. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 104: 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiaro G, Koseki J, Sato T (2012) Effects of initial static shear on liquefaction and large deformation properties of loose saturated toyoura sand in undrained cyclic torsional shear tests. Soils & Foundations 52(3): 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dashti H, Sadrnejad SA, Ganjian N (2017) Multi-directional modeling for prediction of fabric anisotropy in sand liquefaction. Computers and Geotechnics 92: 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dash HK, Sitharam TG (2009) Undrained cyclic pore pressure response of sand-silt mixtures: effect of nonplastic fines and other parameters. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 27(4): 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9252-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. El Takch A, Sadrekarimi A, El Naggar H (2016) Cyclic resistance and liquefaction behavior of silt and sandy silt soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 83: 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallagher PM, Mitchell JK (2002) Influence of colloidal silica grout on liquefaction potential and cyclic undrained behavior of loose sand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22(9–12): 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00126-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. GB50007-2002 (2002) Code for design of building foundation. Beijing China Architecture & Building Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. GB50487-2008 (2008) Code for water resources and hydropower engineering geological investigation. Beijing: Chinese Planning Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. GB50021-2001 (2009) Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering. China Architecture & Building Press. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. GB50111-2006 (2009) Code for seismic design of railway engineering. Beijing: China Planning Press. pp 44–45. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Georgiannou VN (2006) The undrained response of sands with additions of particles of various shapes and sizes. Géotechnique 56(9): 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.9.639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guo H, Jiang WL, Xie XS (2011) Late-Quaternary strong earthquakes on the seismogenic fault of the 1976 M s 7.8 Tangshan earthquake, Hebei, as revealed by drilling and trenching. Science China Earth Sciences 54(11): 1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-011-4218-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guo XJ, Cui P, Li Y, et al. (2016) The formation and development of debris flows in large watersheds after the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. Landslides 13(1): 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0541-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsu YH, Ge L, Chiang MH (2017) Effects of Cyclic Triaxial Loading Rates on Liquefaction Behavior of Fine-Grained Soils. Geotechnical Hazards from Large Earthquakes and Heavy Rainfalls. Springer, Tokyo. pp: 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56205-4_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang Y, Bao Y, Zhang M, et al. (2015) Analysis of the mechanism of seabed liquefaction induced by waves and related seabed protection. Natural Hazards 79(2): 1399–1408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1897-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hyde AF, Higuchi T, Yasuhara K (2006) Liquefaction, cyclic mobility, and failure of silt. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 132(6): 716–735. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:6(716) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Izadi AM, Luna R, Stephenson RW (2008) Liquefaction behavior of Mississippi river silts. In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, ASCE. pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/40975(318)93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karim ME, Alam MJ (2014) Effect of non-plastic silt content on the liquefaction behavior of sand-silt mixture. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 65: 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khan SA, Saeed Z, Khan A, et al. (2017) Assessment of soil liquefaction potential in defence housing authority, Karachi, Pakistan. International Journal of Economic Environment Geology 8(2): 63–68. https://doi.org/www.econ-environ-geol.org/pdf/aug2017/8.pdfGoogle Scholar
  32. Li ZY, Yuan XM (2016) Seismic damage summarization of site effect and soil liquefaction in 2016 Kaohsiung earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics 36(3): 1–7. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.13197/j.eeev.2016.03.1.lizy.001 Google Scholar
  33. Meng QK, Miao F, Zhen J, et al. (2016) Impact of earthquakeinduced landslide on the habitat suitability of giant panda in Wolong, China. Journal of Mountain Science 13(10): 1789–1805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3734-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Monkul MM, Yamamuro JA (2011) Influence of silt size and content on liquefaction behavior of sands. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 48(6): 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Monkul MM, Etminan E, Şenol A (2016) Influence of coefficient of uniformity and base sand gradation on static liquefaction of loose sands with silt. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 89: 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mahmoudi Y, Taiba AC, Belkhatir M, et al. (2016) Experimental investigation on undrained shear behavior of overconsolidated sand-silt mixtures: effect of sample reconstitution. Geotechnical Testing Journal 39(3): 515–523. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Okamura M, Noguchi K (2009) Liquefaction resistances of unsaturated non-plastic silt. Soils and Foundations 49(2): 221–229. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.49.221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Okamura M, Soga Y (2011) Effects of pore fluid compressibility on liquefaction resistance of partially saturated sand. Soil & Foundation 46(5): 695–700. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olson SM, Stark TD (2003) Yield strength ratio and liquefaction analysis of slopes and embankments. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 129(8): 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:8(727) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polito CP, Green RA, Dillon E, et al. (2013) Effect of load shape on relationship between dissipated energy and residual excess pore pressure generation in cyclic triaxial tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 50(11):1118–1128. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Polito CP, Green RA, Lee J (2008) Pore pressure generation models for sands and silty soils subjected to cyclic loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 134(10): 1490–1500. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1490) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Porcino DD, Diano V (2017) The influence of non-plastic fines on pore water pressure generation and undrained shear strength of sand-silt mixtures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 101: 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Price AB, DeJong JT, Boulanger RW, et al. (2016) Effect of Prior Strain History on the Cyclic Strength and CPT Penetration Resistance of Silica Silt. In Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress 2016. pp 1664–1674. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479742.142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Qing H, Yi L, Yi Z, et al. (2015) Experimental study of earthquake liquefaction of saturated silt in Wuhan area. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 20: 10103–10112. https://doi.org/www.ejge.com/2015/Ppr2015.0662ma.pdfGoogle Scholar
  45. Rahman MM, Baki MAL, Lo SR (2014) Prediction of undrained monotonic and cyclic liquefaction behavior of sand with fines based on the equivalent granular state parameter. International Journal of Geomechanics 14(2): 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sağlam S, Bakır BS (2014) Cyclic response of saturated silts. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering 61: 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.02.011 Google Scholar
  47. Seed HB, Martin PP, Lysmer J (1975) The generation and dissipation of pore-water pressures during soil liquefaction. Geotechnical report no. EERC 75–26. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.Google Scholar
  48. Shariatmadari N, Karimpour-Fard M, Shargh A (2017) Evaluation of liquefaction potential in sand-tire crumb mixtures using the energy approach. International Journal of Civil Engineering 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0202-y Google Scholar
  49. SL237-1999 (1999) Specification of Soil Test. China Water Resources and Hydropower Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  50. SL299-1999 (1999) Specification of Soil Test. China Water Resources Press, Beijing, China. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  51. Sivathayalan S, Ha D (2011) Effect of static shear stress on the cyclic resistance of sands in simple shear loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 48(10): 1471–1484. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stamatopoulos CA, Lopez-Caballero F, Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi A (2015) The effect of preloading on the liquefaction cyclic strength of mixtures of sand and silt. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 78: 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taiba AC, Belkhatir M, Kadri A, et al. (2016) Insight into the effect of granulometric characteristics on the static liquefaction susceptibility of silty sand soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 34(1): 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9951-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thevanayagam S (1998) Effect of fines and confining stress on undrained shear strength of silty sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 124(6): 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:6(479) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thevanayagam S, Veluchamy V, Huang Q, et al. (2016) Nonplastic silty sand liquefaction, screening, and remediation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 91: 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tsaparli V, Kontoe S, Taborda DMG, et al. (2017) An energybased interpretation of sand liquefaction due to vertical ground motion. Computers and Geotechnics 90: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang S, Luna R, Stephenson RW (2011) A slurry consolidation approach to reconstitute low-plasticity silt specimens for laboratory triaxial testing. Geotechnical Testing Journal 34(4): 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103529 Google Scholar
  58. Wang S, Luna R, Yang J (2016) Reexamination of effect of plasticity on liquefaction resistance of low-plasticity finegrained soils and its potential application. Acta Geotechnica 11(5): 1209–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0394-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wijewickreme D, Sanin MV, Greenaway GR (2005) Cyclic shear response of fine-grained mine tailings. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 42(5): 1408–1421. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yamamuro JA, Lade PV (1997) Static liquefaction of very loose sands. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 34(6): 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yamamuro JA, Covert KM (2001) Monotonic and cyclic liquefaction of very loose sands with high silt content. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 127(4): 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(314) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yamamuro JA, Wood FM, Lade PV (2008) Effect of depositional method on the microstructure of silty sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 45(11): 1538–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Processes, Institute of Mountain Hazards and EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering, School of Civil EngineeringSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityChengduChina
  3. 3.CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations