Influence of non-dimensional strength parameters on the seismic stability of cracked slopes
- 15 Downloads
Cracks in rock or soil slopes influence the stability and durability of the slopes. Seismic forces can trigger slope disasters, particularly in the cracked slopes. Considering the nonlinear characteristics of materials, the more generalized nonlinear failure criterion proposed by Baker is adopted. The influence of non-dimensional strength parameters on the stability of cracked slopes under earthquakes is performed using the upper bound limit analysis. The seismic displacement is calculated by adopting the logarithmic spiral failure surface according to the sliding rigid block model. Based on the existing studies, two methods for the stability analysis of cracked slopes under earthquakes are introduced: the pseudo-static method (with the factor of safety (Fs) as an evaluation index), and the displacement-based method (with the seismic displacement as an evaluation index). The pseudo-static method can only determine the instantaneous stability state of the cracked slope, yet the displacement-based method reflects the stability variation of cracked slopes during earthquakes. The results indicate that the nondimensional strength parameters affect the factor of safety and seismic displacement of slopes significantly. The non-dimensional strength parameter (n) controlling the curvature of strength function shapes on the slope stability is affected by other parameters. Owing to cracks, the effect of non-dimensional strength parameters on seismic displacement becomes more significant.
KeywordsCracked slopes Upper bound limit analysis (UBLA) Generalized nonlinear failure criterion Pseudo-static method Displacement-based method
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This study was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1501001); National Natural Science Foundation of China (51478477, 41672286, 51408511, 41530639 and 41761144080); Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2017JQ0042) and the program of China Scholarship Council.
- Baker R (2004) Nonlinear Mohr envelopes based on triaxial data. Journal of Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Engineering 130(5): 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:5(498) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- California Geological Survey (2008) Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California. California Geological Survey Special Publication 117A.Google Scholar
- Kramer SL, Smith MW (1997) Modified Newmark Model for Seismic Displacements of Compliant Slopes. Journal of Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Engineering 123(7): 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:7(635) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maksimovic M (1989) Nonlinear failure envelope for soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 115(4): 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:4(581) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rathje EM, Bray JD (2000) Nonlinear Coupled Seismic Sliding Analysis of Earth Structures. Journal of Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Engineering 126(11): 1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xu Q, Pei XJ, Huang RQ, et al. (2009) Large–scale landslides induced by the Wenchuan earthquake, Science Press, Beijing, China. (In Chinese) ISBN 978-7-03-026906-5Google Scholar
- Zhang Y, Chen G, Wu J, et al. (2012) Numerical Simulation of Seismic Slope Stability Analysis based on Tension–Shear Failure Mechanism. Geotechnical Engineering 43(2): 18–28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276353358 Google Scholar
- Zhao LH, Cheng X, Li L, et al. (2018) Reply to the discussion by Utili and Abd on “Seismic displacement along a log–spiral failure surface with crack using rock Hoek–Brown failure criterion”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 108(5): 201–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar