Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 14, Issue 8, pp 1490–1499 | Cite as

Who is at risk in the French mountains? Profiles of the accident victims in outdoor sports and mountain recreation

  • Bastien SouleEmail author
  • Véronique Reynier
  • Brice Lefevre
  • Eric Boutroy


The risk of both severe and frequent injury associated with active pursuits in mountain areas is acknowledged. This phenomenon is all the most relevant to investigate in France that there is a growing enthusiasm for outdoor sports and recreation. This paper focuses on the social-demographic and sporting profiles of accident victims. Our intent is to better understand who is specifically at risk, while practicing mountain recreation, in the French mountains. Such identification doubtlessly constitutes an important asset in order to enhance prevention. Three critical activities are notably tackled, among some others: hiking, a widespread activity that exposes many practitioners to hazardous settings; mountaineering and ski touring, supposedly entailing the most severe injuries. In order to align the information collected, then provide estimations based on the reasoned crossing of these secondary data, we consulted and summarised all the databases that we knew of on the French territory: rescue team intervention reports, aggregated statistics from the sports ministry, sporting federation accident declarations, avalanche experts statistics, mountain guides union accident/incident reports, healthcare facilities admissions, etc. Only the sources considered to be the most reliable and representative were used, owing to the number of cases processed, the exhaustive nature of data collection, or the level of information detail available. Our method also included consultation of all the parties playing an active role in prevention, training and mountain rescue, thus ensuring a participative, co-constructive approach to the study with the people that have the best knowledge of victims’ profiles. Around fifty such parties were interviewed on the methods implemented, the benefits and limits of current data, and the main expectations in terms of accidentology progress, thus further enhancing the credibility of the study proposed in this paper. Our results show that the parent population profiles (in terms of age, gender, place of residence, etc.), weighted by the level of exposure (frequency of participation, level of engagement, etc.) appears to have an impact on the accident victim profiles. There is certainly a very marked gender bias and a serious age impact to be taken into account, as well as the influence of the level of experience, which counter certain preconceived ideas and which, at the very least, go against instinct. However, aside from a probable over-exposure of experienced or expert participants, much remains to be explained concerning the accident mechanisms and circumstances involved. At this stage, we regret the analytic deficiencies induced by a lack of knowledge concerning the parent populations in many cases, which makes interpretation difficult.


Mountain sports Outdoor recreation Accident victims profile 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This research was supported by the Petzl Foundation.


  1. Anderson K (1994) The Scottish mountain rescue study 1964-1993. Edinburgh: The Scottish Education DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahr R, Krosshaug T (2005) Understanding injury mechanisms: a key component of preventing injuries in sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine 39: 324–329. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm. 2005.018341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beedie P, Hudson S (2003) Emergence of mountain-based adventure tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 30: 625–643. DOI: 10.10160160-7383(03)00043-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianchi G, Brügger O (2013) Fatal Sports Accidents in Switzerland, 2000-2012. Bern: Swiss Council for Accident Prevention. (In French)Google Scholar
  5. Bianchi G, Niemann S, Brügger O (2016) Fatal Sports Accidents in Switzerland 2000-2015. Bern: Swiss Council for Accident PreventionGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowie WS, Hunt TK, Allen HA (1988) Rock climbing injuries in Yosemite National Park. The Western Journal of Medecine 149: 172–177Google Scholar
  7. Ciesa M, Grigolato S, Cavalli R (2015) Retrospective Study on Search and Rescue Operations in Two Prealps Areas of Italy. Wilderness & Environment Medecine 26: 150–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.wem.2014.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flores AH, Haileyesus T, Greenspan AI (2008) National estimates of outdoor recreational injuries treated in emergency departments, United States, 2004-2005. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 19: 91–98. DOI: 10.1580/07-WEME-OR-152.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heggie TW, Heggie TM (2004) Viewing lava safely: an epidemiology of hiker injury and illness in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 15: 77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heggie TW, Heggie TM (2009) Search and rescue trends associated with recreational travel in US national parks. Journal of Travel Medecine 16: 23–27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2008.00269.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holder Y, Peden M, Krug E, et al. (Eds) (2004) Guidelines for the surveillance of traumas. Geneva, World Health Organization & Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, USA). (In French)Google Scholar
  12. Miles BM, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, SageGoogle Scholar
  13. Lefevre B, Thiery P (2011) Main physical and sports activities practised in France in 2010. Sports Ministry Statistical Informations. (In French)Google Scholar
  14. Haran Larre T (2011) Hiking accidentology in mid-range mountains of North Basque Country. Prevention perspectives and observation of a population of injured hikers during the summer period-2006-2009. PhD thesis, University of Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux. (In French)Google Scholar
  15. Monasterio E (2005) Accident and fatality characteristics in a population of mountain climbers in New Zealand. The New Zealand Medical Journal 118: 1208.Google Scholar
  16. Mort A, Godden D (2011) Injuries to Individuals Participating in Mountain and Wilderness Sports: A Review. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 21: 530–536. DOI: 10.1097/JSM. 0b013e318234be97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rickard LN, Newman SB (2014) Accidents and accountability: Perceptions of unintentional injury in three national parks. Leisure Sciences 36: 88–106. DOI: 10.1080/01490400. 2014.860795 1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rigou A, Attoh-Mensah J, Geoffroy, et al (2013) An estimation of traumatic deaths related to the practice of sports activities in France in 2010. Sports Traumatology Journal 30: 159–165. (In French) DOI: 10.1016/j.jts.2013.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sharp B (2001) Strategies for improving mountain safety. Report from a research study sponsored by the Leverhulme Trust. University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  20. Walter M, Brugger O (2012) Avalanche accidents during ski touring and off-piste skiing: accident, risk factors and recommendations for prevention. Bern, Accident Prevention Office.Google Scholar
  21. Wild FJ (2008) Epidemiology of mountain search and rescue operations in Banff, Yoho, and Kootenay National Parks, 2003-2006. Wilderness & environmental medicine 19: 245–251. DOI: 10.1580/07-WEME-OR-141.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Vulnerabilities & Innovation in SportUniversity Claude Bernard Lyon 1VilleurbanneFrance
  2. 2.Laboratory Sport & Social EnvironmentUniversity Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations