Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 472–481 | Cite as

Availability and use of willow species in representative cold desert areas of northwestern himalaya, India

Article

Abstract

Willow species (Salix fragilis L. and S. alba L.) are important elements of cold desert agroforestry systems in the Lahaul valley, northwestern Himalaya. Their ability to grow through shoot-cuttings plantations under extreme and xeric climatic conditions of cold deserts, makes them ecologically suited and socially accepted for forestry programmes. Willow species in cold deserts may combat desertification and can thrive well in these areas as compared to any other species. Salix fragilis L. and S. alba L. are under cultivation in the Lahaul valley. However, S. fragilis is widely cultivated under the agroforestry and plantation forestry systems. In the Lahaul valley, willow species are used as subsistence resources and for socio-religious purposes. The present study was carried out to examine the vegetation analysis, density, diversity and distribution of willow species, present status and potential willow plantation sites and uses. The results of present study revealed that a higher species density was recorded at middle altitude villages (Jahlma-3,000 m asl and Hinsa-2,700 m asl), except, a higher density of S. fragilis was at Khoksar (3,200 m asl) in plantation forestry on south-facing slopes. In forests, S. fragilis was planted mainly along the water channels, resulted a low density. The shrubby willow species occurred naturally in the entire Lahaul valley up to an altitude of 3,850 m asl. 81% of households felt the scarcity of willow trees, whereas, 19% of households were satisfied with the willow trees they owned. The majority of willow species were planted in middle altitudes on privately owned irrigated lands. It was rated most potential prospective willow planting site by the farmers. Small size of land-holdings was one of the main constraints for establishing a large number of willow plantations. Commercial aspects of willow species need to be investigated to encourage the farmers to plant more willows further.

Keywords

Willow Agroforestry Forestry Species diversity Himalaya 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous (1995–1996) Annual Report. G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, India.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1883–1970) Index Kewensis Plantarum Phanerogamarum. Vol. 1–2 (1883–1885) and 15 Suppl. (1886–1970). Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Argus GW (1999) Classification of Salix in the New World. Bot Electron News No. 227. 5 July 1999. Available online: http://www.ou.edu/cas/botany-micro/ben/ben227.html (21-12-2012).Google Scholar
  4. Aswal BS, Mehrotra BN (1994) Flora of Lahaul-Spiti:A Cold Desert in North West Himalaya. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, India. pp 10–15.Google Scholar
  5. Behera MD, Kushwaha SPS (2007) An analysis of altitudinal behaviour of tree species in Subansiri district, Eastern Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation 16(6): 1851–1865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chowdhery HJ, Wadhwa BM (1984) Flora of Himachal Pradesh. Vols. 1–3. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, India.Google Scholar
  7. Chawla A, Rajkumar S, Singh KN, et al. (2008) Plant species diversity along an altitudinal gradient of Bhabha valley in western Himalaya. Journal of Mountain Science 5(2): 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1950) The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31(3): 434–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhaliwal DS, Sharma M (1999) Flora of Kullu District (Himachal Pradesh). Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, India.Google Scholar
  10. Dhar U, Vir J, Kachroo P, et al. (1994) Ladakh: An Update on Natural Resources. In: Pangtey YPS, Rawal RS (eds.), High altitudes of the Himalaya (biogeography, ecology and conservation). New Delhi: Gyanodaya Prakashan. pp 102–114.Google Scholar
  11. DOA (2009) Department of Agriculture Himachal Pradesh. District agriculture plan: Lahaul-Spiti, Himachal Pradesh. Vol. 7.Google Scholar
  12. Gilmour DA, Nurse MC (1991) Farmer initiatives in increasing tree cover in central Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 11(4): 329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grytnes JA, Vetaas OR (2002) Species richness and altitude: a comparison between null models and interpolated plant species richness along the Himalayan altitudinal gradient, Nepal. The American Naturalist 159(3): 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harcourt AFP (1871) The Himalayan Districts of Kooloo, Lahoul and Spiti. Reprinted in 1972. Delhi: Vivek Publishing House.Google Scholar
  15. Kala CP (2002) Medicinal Plants of Indian Trans-Himalaya.: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, India. p 200.Google Scholar
  16. Kershaw KA (1973) Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Körner C (2000) Why are there global gradients in species richness? Mountains might hold the answer. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 513–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuniyal CP, Vishvakarma SCR, Kuniyal JC, et al. (2002) Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) — a promising plant for land restoration in the cold desert Himalayas. In: Singh V., Khosla PK (eds.), Proceedings of the “International workshop on sea buckthorn. Sea buckthorn — a resource for health and environment in twenty first century”. New Delhi, India, 18–21 February 2001. pp 1–6.Google Scholar
  19. Kuniyal JC, Vishvakarma SCR, Singh GS, et al. (2004) Changing crop biodiversity and resource use efficiency of traditional versus introduced crops in the cold desert of the northwestern Indian Himalaya: a case of the Lahaul valley. Biodiversity and Conservation 13(7): 1271–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murti SK (2001) Flora of cold deserts of western Himalaya. Vol. I. Monocotyledons, Botanical survey of India, Calcutta, India. p. 452.Google Scholar
  21. Nair PKR (1984) Soil Productivity Aspects of Agroforestry. International Council for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  22. Nair PKR, Fernandes ECM, Wambugu PN, et al. (1984) Multipurpose leguminous trees and shrubs for agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems 2(3): 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nautiyal S, Maikhuri RK, Semwal RL, et al. (1998) Agroforestry systems in the rural landscape — a case study in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Agroforestry Systems 41: 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oinam SS, Rawat YS, Khoiyangbam RS, et al. (2005) Land use and land cover changes in Jahlma watershed of the Lahaul valley, cold desert region of the northwestern Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science 2(2): 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oinam SS, Rawat YS, Kuniyal JC, et al. (2008) Thermal supplementing soil nutrients through biocomposting of nightsoil in the northwestern Indian Himalaya. Waste Management 28(6): 1008–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pandey CB (1993) Working Plan for the Lahaul Forest Division (1993–94 to 2006–07). Department of Forests, Farming and Conservation, Govt. of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla. p.183.Google Scholar
  27. Ramakrishnan PS, Rao KS, Kothyari BP, et al. (1992) Deforestation in Himalaya: causes, consequences and restoration. In: Singh JS (ed.), Restoration of Degraded Land: Concepts and Strategies. Rastogi Publications, Meerut, India. pp 271–289.Google Scholar
  28. Ramakrishnan PS, Purohit AN, Saxena KG, et al. (1996) Conservation and Management of Biological Resources in Himalaya. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  29. Rawat YS (2006) Vegetational analysis, socio-economic and cultural aspects of Salix sp. in cold desert environment of the Lahaul valley, north-western Himalaya (HP). Ph.D. Thesis, Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal, U.K. India. p. 270.Google Scholar
  30. Rawat YS, Oinam SS, Vishvakarma SCR, et al. (2006) Willow (Salix fragilis Linn.): a multipurpose tree species under pest attack in the cold desert of Lahaul valley, northwestern Himalaya, India. Ambio 35(1): 43–48.Google Scholar
  31. Rawat YS, Vishvakarma SCR, Todaria NP, et al. (2009a) Salix fragilis L.: growth and survival of coppices in cold desert environment of the Lahaul valley, North West Himalaya. Indian Journal of Forestry 32(1): 23–30.Google Scholar
  32. Rawat YS, Vishvakarma SCR, Todaria NP, et al. (2009b) Fuel wood consumption pattern of tribal communities in cold desert of the Lahaul valley, North-Western Himalaya, India. Biomass and Bioenergy 33(11): 1547–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rawat YS, Vishvakarma SCR, Oinam SS, et al. (2010a) Diversity, distribution and vegetation assessment in the Jahlmanal watershed in cold desert of the Lahaul valley, north-western Himalaya, India. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 3: 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rawat YS, Vishvakarma SCR, Oinam SS, et al. (2010b) Salix fragilis L.: pollarding potential in dry temperate environment of the North-Western, Himalaya, India. Range Management & Agroforestry 31(1): 1–6.Google Scholar
  35. Saxena KG, Rao KS, Sen KK, et al. (2001) Integrated natural resource management: approaches and lessons from the Himalaya. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 14. Available online: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art14/ (19-12-2012).Google Scholar
  36. Schaff SD, Pezeshki SR, Shields FD Jr, et al. (2002) Effects of pre-planting soaking on growth and survival of black willow cuttings. Restoration Ecology 10(2): 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schaff SD, Pezeshki SR, Shields FD Jr, et al. (2003) Effects of soil conditions on survival and growth of black willow cuttings. Journal of Environmental Management 31(6): 748–763.Google Scholar
  38. Singh GS, Ram SC, Kuniyal JC, et al. (1996) Changing traditional land use patterns in the Great Himalayas: a case study of Lahaul valley. Journal of Environmental Systems 25(2): 195–211.Google Scholar
  39. Singh V, Singh B. (1998) Seabuckthorn (Hippophae L.) — a promising fodder species of dry temperate Himalaya. In: Proceedings of the “National symposium on feeding strategies for sustainable livestock production with emphasis on nonconventional feed and systems for protein evaluation in ruminants”. Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI), Palampur (HP, India). pp 138–141.Google Scholar
  40. Slik JWF, Keßler PJA, van Welzen PC, et al. (2003) Macaranga and Mallotus species (Euphorbiaceae) as indicators for disturbance in the mixed lowland dipterocarp forest of East Kalimantan (Indonesia). Ecological Indicators 2: 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sood SK, Nath R, Kalia DC, et al. (2001) Ethnobotany of cold desert tribes of Lahoul-Spiti (north west Himalaya). New Delhi: Deep Publications. p 228.Google Scholar
  42. Troup RS (1921) The silviculture of Indian trees. Vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp 951–957.Google Scholar
  43. Vetaas OR, Grytnes JA (2002) Distribution of vascular plant species richness and endemic richness along the Himalayan elevation gradient in Nepal. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11: 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vishvakarma SCR, Rawat YS, Oinam SS, et al. (2005) Kuhl irrigation: a community management system in cold desert of the Lahaul valley, northwestern Himalaya, India. In: Pradhan P, Gautam U (eds.), Proceedings of the third international seminar. Farmer managed irrigation systems and governance alternatives. Kathmandu, Nepal, 9–10 September 2004. pp 425–444.Google Scholar
  45. Vishvakarma SCR, Kuniyal JC, Rawat YS, et al. (2011) Cold desert agro-ecosystems: a case study from Lahaul valley, India. In: Saxena KG, Liang L, Xue X (eds.), Global Change, Biodiversity and Livelihoods in Cold Desert Region of Asia. United Nations University. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. pp 107–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Water Resources Research, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalPietermaritzburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations