Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the application of assessment of granular debris flow hazards with case study
- 498 Downloads
Numerical simulation has been widely applied to the assessment of debris flow hazards. In East Asia and especially Taiwan, the most widely used numerical programs are FLO-2D and Debris-2D. Although these two programs are applied to the same engineering tasks, they are different in many aspects. These two programs were compared according to their fundamental theories, input and output data, computational algorithms and results. Using both programs, the simulations of a real debris flow with abundant granular material induced by landslides at Xinfa village in southern Taiwan are performed for comparison. The simulation results show that Debris-2D gives better assessment in hazard area delineating and flow depth predicting. Therefore, Debris-2D is better for simulation of granular debris flows.
KeywordsDebris flow assessment Program comparison FLO-2D Debris-2D
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chang JJ (2011) On Deposition Length of Debris-flow at Hsia-Hsinkai tribe, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, in 2009 Morakot Typhoon. Master Thesis, Department of Civil engineering, National Kaoshiung University of Applied Sciences, Chinese Taipei.Google Scholar
- Chen SC, Wu CY, Huang BT (2007) Risk assessment of debris flow disaster in Songhe village. Journal of Chinese Soil and Water Conservation 38(3):287–298. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
- FLO-2D Software, Inc. (2006) FLO-2D Users manual (Version 2006.01), Arizona, USAGoogle Scholar
- HEC-HMS (2010) Hydrological Engineering Center-Hydrological Modeling System, User’s manual (Version 3.4), US Army Corps of Engineers.Google Scholar
- Lin CW, Lin WH, Kao MC (2011a) Geological map of Taiwan scale 1:50,000. Central Geological Survey, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Chinese Taipei. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
- Lin DG, Hsu SY, Chao CH, et al. (2008) Applications of simulation technique on hazard zone delineation and damage assessment of debris flow. Journal of Chinese Soil and Water Conservation 39(4):311–319. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
- Liu KF, Lee FC (1997) Experimental analysis on impact mechanism of granular flow. Chinese Journal of Mechanics 13(1):87–100. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
- Liu KF, Lee FC, Tsai SP (1997) The flow field and impact force on a debris dam. Proceedings of the First International conference on Debris-flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment. Taipei, Taiwan. pp 737–746.Google Scholar
- Liu KF, Li HC (2007) The assessment of debris flow emergency measures. City and Planning 34(1):57–73. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Liu KF, Wu YH (2010) The Assessment of Debris Flow Hazard in Korea Using Debris-2D. INTERPRAEVENT 2010-International Symposium in Pacific Rim, Taipei, Taiwan. pp 820–827.Google Scholar
- Soil and Water Conservation Bureau (2010) The Investigation of vulnerability factors and risk analysis of debris flow potential creeks. Soil and Water Conservation Bureau, Chinese Taipei. (In Chinese)Google Scholar