Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 262–273 | Cite as

Natural Heritage value of Xinjiang Tianshan and global comparative analysis

  • Xiaoliang Xu
  • Zhaoping YangEmail author
  • Adayi Saiken
  • Shao Rui
  • Xinyu Liu
Article

Abstract

Xinjiang Tianshan is a serial natural property that has been nominated for World Heritage status. This paper presents a systematically comprehensive and comparative analysis of the heritage resources of Xinjiang Tianshan according to the World Heritage criteria. Its biological, ecological and aesthetic values, which are of global importance, are documented. It is concluded that Xinjiang Tianshan meets the world heritage criteria (vii) and (ix). Xinjiang Tianshan is compared with other mountain world heritage sites, mountains in Central Asia, the Tianshan Mountains outside China, and with the protected areas of the Tianshan Mountains on the Tentative List for World Heritage Sites, so as to provide objective data for the world heritage application.

Keywords

Xinjiang Tianshan Natural Heritage Heritage characteristics Heritage values Comparative analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen G, Cao LK, Chen Y (2003) Value of world natural heritage “Three Parallel Rivers”—scene diversity. Chinese Gardens 20(1): 22–26. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. Chen FB, Zhao YT, Lan LB (2002). Discussion on the value of world heritage for Jiajin Mountains Giant Panda Habitat of Sichuan. Journal of Mountain Research, 20(6): 687–693. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Hu RJ, Wang SJ, Su Z, et al. (2004). Physical geography of the Tianshan Moutains in China, Beijing, China. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing. pp 16–38. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Chris M (2005). World heritage thematic study for central asia, a regional overview. Working paper of IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) programme on protected areas. pp 9–11.Google Scholar
  5. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) (2004). The world heritage list: future priorities for a credible and complete list of natural and mixed sites. Working paper of IUCN on global theme study of world heritage natural sites. pp 12–14.Google Scholar
  6. Udvardy MDF (1975). A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world. INCN paper No. 18. Morges, Switzerland. pp 20–21.Google Scholar
  7. Mountaineering Expedition Team, CAS (1985). Geography of the Tianshan Tomur Peak, Urumqi, China. Xinjiang People’s Publishing House, Urumqi, pp 113–132. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Song F, Zhu JJ, Li YF (2009). Retrospection on the “integrity” principle of world heritage—review of the 4 concepts of the operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention. Chinese Gardens (5): 14–18. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. UNSECO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. p 3.Google Scholar
  10. Xiong KN, Xiao SZ, Liu ZQ, et al. (2008). Comparative analysis on world natural heritage value of South China Karst. Guizhou Normal University Paper 10(4): 17–27. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Yang ZP, Zhang XL, Di F, et al. (2010). Natural heritage values and comparative analyses of Kanas, China. Journal of Arid Land 2(3): 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoliang Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhaoping Yang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adayi Saiken
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shao Rui
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xinyu Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and GeographyChinese Academy of SciencesUrumqiXinjiang, China
  2. 2.Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations