Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Subsurface flow processes in sloping cropland of purple soil

  • Jialilang Tang
  • Bo ZhuEmail author
  • Tao Wang
  • Xunqiang Cheng
  • Meirong Gao
  • Henry Lin
Article

Abstract

Subsurface flow is a prominent runoff process in sloping lands of purple soil in the upper Yangtze River basin. However, it remains difficult to identify and quantify. In this study, in situ runoff experimental plots were used to measure soil moisture dynamics using an array of time domain reflectometry (TDR) together with overland flow and subsurface flow using isolated collecting troughs. Frequency of preferential flow during rainfall events and the controls of subsurface flow processes were investigated through combined analysis of soil properties, topography, rainfall intensity, initial wetness, and tillage. Results showed that subsurface flow was ubiquitous in purple soil profiles due to well-developed macropores, especially in surface soils while frequency of preferential flow occurrence was very low (only 2 cases in plot C) during all 22 rainfall events. Dry antecedent moisture conditions promoted the occurrence of preferential flow. However, consecutive real-time monitoring of soil moisture at different depths and various slope positions implied the possible occurrence of multiple subsurface lateral flows during intensive storms. Rainfall intensity, tillage operation, and soil properties were recognized as main controls of subsurface flow in the study area, which allows the optimization of management practices for alleviating adverse environmental effects of subsurface flow in the region.

Keywords

Subsurface lateral flow Purple soil Soil moisture Sloping land Land use 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahuja LR, Elswaify SA, Rahman A (1976) Measuring hydrologic properties of soil with a double-ring infiltrometer and multiple-depth tensiometers. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40: 494–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allaire SE, Roulier S, Cessna AJ (2009) Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques. Journal of Hydrology 378: 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson AE, Weiler M, Alila Y, Hudson RO (2009) Dye staining and excavation of a lateral preferential flow network. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13: 935–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauters TWJ, DiCarlo DA, Steenhuis TS, Parlange JY (1998) Preferential flow in water-repellent sands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62: 1185–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clothier BE, Green SR, Deurer M (2008) Preferential flow and transport in soil: progress and prognosis. European Journal of Soil Science 59: 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunne T, Black RD (1970) Partial area contributions to storm runoff in a small New-England watershed. Water Resources Research 6: 1296–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Famiglietti JS, Rudnicki JW, Rodell M (1998) Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect: Rattlesnake Hill, Texas. Journal of Hydrology 210: 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fedoroff N (1997) Clay illuviation in Red Mediterranean soils. Catena 28: 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fu T, Ni JP, Wei, CF, Xie DT (2003) Research on the nutrient loss from purple soil under different rainfall intensities and slopes. Plant Nutrtion and Fertilizer Science 9: 71–74. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Garre S, Koestel J, Gunther T, Javaux M, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2010) Comparison of heterogeneous transport processes observed with electrical resistivity tomography in two soils. Vadose Zone Journal 9: 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gong ZT (1999) Chinese soil taxonomy. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Graham CB, Woods RA, McDonnell JJ (2010) Hillslope threshold response to rainfall: (1) A field based forensic approach. Journal of Hydrology 393: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang L, Ding SW, Dong Z, Zhang GY (1998) Study on nutrient losses of purple soil in Three Gorges Reservoir region. Chinese Journal of Soil Water Conservation 4: 8–13. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Jarvis NJ (2007) A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality. European Journal of Soil Science 58: 523–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim HJ, Sidle RC, Moore RD (2005) Shallow lateral flow from a forested hillslope: Influence of antecedent wetness. Catena 60: 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klute A (Ed.) (1986) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  17. Leij FJ, Russell WB, Lesch SM (1997) Closed-form expressions for water retention and conductivity data. Ground Water 35: 848–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li ZM, Zhang XW, He YR, Tang SJ (1991) Purple soil in China (A). Science Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
  19. Lin H (2006) Temporal stability of soil moisture spatial pattern and subsurface preferential flow pathways in the shale hills catchment. Vadose Zone Journal 5: 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin H, Zhou X (2008) Evidence of subsurface preferential flow using soil hydrologic monitoring in the Shale Hills catchment. European Journal of Soil Science 59: 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mosley MP (1982) Subsurface flow velocities through selected forest soils, South Island, New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology 55: 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oberdorster C, Vanderborght J, Kemna A, Vereecken H (2010) Investigating preferential flow processes in a forest soil using time domain reflectometry and electrical resistivity tomography. Vadose Zone Journal 9: 350–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orlandini S, Mancini M, Paniconi C, Rosso R (1996) Local contributions to infiltration excess runoff for a conceptual catchment scale model. Water Resources Research 32: 2003–2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ovalles FA, Collins ME (1986) Soil-landscape relationships and soil variability in North Central Florida. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50: 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pachepsky YA, Timlin DJ, Rawls WJ (2001) Soil water retention as related to topographic variables. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65: 1787–1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qiu Y, Fu BJ, Wang J, Chen LD (2001) Soil moisture variation in relation to topography and land use in a hillslope catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Hydrology 240: 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rasmussen TC, Baldwin RH, Dowd JF, Williams AG (2000) Tracer vs. pressure wave velocities through unsaturated saprolite. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reynolds WD, Bowman BT, Brunke RR, Drury CF, Tan CS (2000) Comparison of tension infiltrometer, pressure infiltrometer, and soil core estimates of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64: 478–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang JL, Zhang B, Gao C, Zepp H (2008) Hydrological pathway and source area of nutrient losses identified by a multi-scale monitoring in an agricultural catchment. Catena 72: 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taumer K, Stoffregen H, Wessolek G (2005) Determination of repellency distribution using soil organic matter and water content. Geoderma 125: 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taumer K, Stoffregen H, Wessolek G (2006) Seasonal dynamics of preferential flow in a water repellent soil. Vadose Zone Journal 5: 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Torres R, Alexander LJ (2002) Intensity-duration effects on drainage: Column experiments at near-zero pressure head. Water Resources Research 38, 1240, doi: 1210.1029/2001WR001048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weiler M, Flühler H (2004) Inferring flow types from dye patterns in macroporous soils. Geoderma 120: 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xiong Y, Li QK (1986) Soils in China. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Zhu B, Wang T, You X, Gao MR (2008) Nutrient release from weathering of purplish rock. Pedosphere 18: 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu B, Wang T, Kuang FH, Luo ZX, Tang JL, Xu TP (2009) Measurements of Nitrate Leaching from a Hillslope Cropland in the Central Sichuan Basin, China. Soil Science Society of America Journal 73: 1419–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu Q, Lin H (2011) Influences of soil, terrain and crop growth on soil moisture variation from transect to farm level scale. Geoderma 163: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jialilang Tang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bo Zhu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tao Wang
    • 1
  • Xunqiang Cheng
    • 1
  • Meirong Gao
    • 1
  • Henry Lin
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Mountain Hazards and EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations