Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 131–139 | Cite as

The disastrous 23 July 2009 debris flow in Xiangshui Gully, Kangding County, Southwestern China

  • Chuan TangEmail author
  • Yonghong Yang
  • Yongchao Su
  • Jun Ding
  • Wenjie Huang


On 23 July 2009, a catastrophic debris flows were triggered by heavy rainfall in Xiangshui gully, Kangding county, southwestern China. This debris flow originating shortly after a rainstorm with an intensity of 28 mm per hour transported a total volume of more than 480×103 m3 debris, depositing the poorly sorted sediment including boulders up to 2–3 m in diameter both onto an existing debris fans and into the river. Our primary objective for this study was to analyze the characteristics of the triggering rainfall and the debris supply conditions, and to estimate debris-flow volume, mean velocity, and discharge. A comparison with adjacent rain-gage records indicates that debris flows in this setting can be produced in response to as little as 17 mm/hour or 3.5 mm/10-minute of rainfall intensity with relatively lower amount of cumulative antecedent rainfall. The field measurement and the interpretation of the Worldview image indicate that abundant landslides occurred on steep slopes within areas underlain by highly weathered granite. Using empirical equations that combine flow depth and channel slope, the mean velocity and discharge of the debris flow were estimated to be 9.2 m/s and 2150 m3/s, respectively. The results contribute to a better understanding of the conditions leading to catastrophic debris flows.


Debris flow Rainfall intensity Debris supply Deposition Velocity China 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bovis MJ, Jakob M (1999) The role of debris supply conditions in predicting debris flow activity. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24:1039–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caine N (1980) The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows. Geografiska Annaler 62A:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannon SH, Kirkham RM, Parise M (2001b) Wildfire-related debris-flow initiation processes, Storm King Mountain, Colorado. Geomorphology 39:171–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costa JE (1984) Physical geomorphology of debris flows. In: Costa JE, and Fleischer PJ, (eds) Developments and Applications of Geomorphology. New York, Springer-Verlag, pp 269–317Google Scholar
  5. Cui P, Ge YG, Zhuang JQ (2009) Soil evolution features of debris flow waste-shoal land. Journal of Mountain Science 6:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dong et al (2009) The role of the sediment budget in understanding debris flow susceptibility. Earth Surf Process Landforms 34:1612–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hu KH, Cui P, Wang CC, etal (2010) Characteristic rainfall for warning of debris flows. Journal of Mountain Science 7: 207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hungr O, Morgan GC, Kellerhals R (1984) Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 21:663–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hürlimann M, Copons R, Altimir J (2006) Detailed debris flow hazard assessment in Andorra, a multidisciplinary approach. Geomorphology 78:359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jakob M, Bovis M, Oden M (2005) The significance of channel recharge rates for estimating debris-flow magnitude and frequency. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30:755–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson AM (1984) Debris flow. In: Brunsden D, Prior DB (eds) Slope instability. Wiley, Chichester, pp 257–361Google Scholar
  12. Liu RZ, Ni JR, Borthwick AGL, Li ZS, Wai OWH (2006) Rapid zonation of abrupt mass movement hazard, Part II: Applications. Geomorphology 80(3–4): 226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pierson TC (1980) Erosion and deposition by debris flows at Mt. Thomas, North Canterbury, New Zealand. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 5: 227–247Google Scholar
  14. Prochaska AB, Santi PM, Higgins JD, Cannon SH (2008) A study of methods to estimate debris flow velocity. Landslides 5:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rickenmann D (1999) Empirical relationships for debris flows. Natural Hazards 19:47–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schuerch P, Densmore AL, McArdell BW, Molnar P (2006) The influence of landsliding on sediment supply and channel change in a steep mountain catchment. Geomorphology 78:222–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Suwa H, Okuda S (1983) Deposition of debris flows on a fan surface, Mt. Yakedake, Japan: Zeits. Geomorphologie, Suppl Band 46: pp 79–101Google Scholar
  18. Takahashi T (1981) Estimation of potential debris flows and their hazardous zones. Journal of Natural Disaster Science 3(1):57–89Google Scholar
  19. Tang C, Zhu J, Li WL (2009) Rainfall triggered debris flows after Wenchuan earthquake. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology 68:187–194Google Scholar
  20. Tang C, Zhu J, Qi X (2011a) Landslide hazard assessment of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake: a case study in Beichuan area. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 48:128–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tang C, Zhu J, Chang M, Ding J (2011b) An empirical-statistical model for predicting debris flow runout zones in the Wenchuan earthquake area. Quaternary International. In press. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2010.11.020Google Scholar
  22. Tecca PR and Genevois R (2009) Field observations of the June 30, 2001 debris flow at Acquabona (Dolomites, Italy). Landslides 6:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (Eds), Landslides Analysis and Control. Transportation Research Board Special Report, vol, 176. National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp:11–33Google Scholar
  24. Wieczorek GF (1987) Effect of rainfall intensity and duration on debris flows in central Santa Cruz Mountains, California. In: Costa JE, Wieczorek GF (eds) Debris Flows/Avalanches, Process, Recognition and Mitigation. Geological Society of America, Reviews in Engineering Geology 7:93–104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chuan Tang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yonghong Yang
    • 1
  • Yongchao Su
    • 1
  • Jun Ding
    • 1
  • Wenjie Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment ProtectionChengdu University of TechnologyChengduChina

Personalised recommendations