Advertisement

Stability problems in road and pipeline constructions and their mitigation — Examples from Sakhalin and Azerbaijan

  • Jan NovotnýEmail author
Article
  • 136 Downloads

Abstract

The paper gives two examples of larger construction projects with typical stability problems. The first example is from Sakhalin Island in the Russian Far East. It is connected with a construction of oil and gas pipelines through the mountainous terrain in Makarov region. The region has an active geotectonic history and is highly affected by uncontrolled erosion and extensive landslips. Basic principles of landslide hazard mitigation are presented. The second example is from a motorway construction in Azerbaijan. This motorway leads from Baku to Russia through a seismo-tectonically active area at the toe of Caucasian mountains and in some places is situated in deep cuts at the toe of high slopes. This unsuitable routing, together with seismic activity, led to a slope stability failure of a slope affected by recent tectonic movements near the village of Devechi. Stability conditions and designed remedy measures are presented.

Keywords

Stability problems Roads Pipelines Mitigation Sakhalin Azerbaijan 

References

  1. Atkinson J (1980) An Introduction to the Mechanics of Soils and Foundations. McGraw-Hill College (UK). September 1, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Fookes PG, Hearn GJ, Tollin B (2004) Aligning oil and gas pipelines through the Makarov Mountains, Sakhalin Island, Russia. In: Sweeney, M. (ed.), Terrain and geohazard challenges facing onshore oil gas pipelines, Thomas Telford, London, pp 243–258.Google Scholar
  3. Hacikerimov Q (2007) About geodynamical situation of seismologic structure at Deveci district in areal Zejva on 18th of January 2007 (in Russian). MS of National geological research service in Azerbaijan.Google Scholar
  4. Hansen A, Francs CAM (1991) Characterization and mapping of earthquake triggered landslides for seismic zonation. In: 4th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Vol. I, Stanford, CA, USA, pp 149–195.Google Scholar
  5. Charman JH, Fookes PG, Hengesh J, Lee EM, Poloos-Pirallo S, Shilston DT, Sweeney M (2004) Terrain, ground conditions and geohazards: evaluation and implication for pipelines. In: Sweeney M (ed.), Terrain and Geohazard Challenges Facing Onshore Oil Gas Pipelines. Thomas Telford, London, pp 78–94.Google Scholar
  6. Mattiozzi P, Strom A (2008) Crossing active faults on the Sakhalin II onshore pipeline route: pipeline design and risk analysis. In: Santini A and Moraci N (eds.) Seismic Engineering Conference Commemorating the 1908 Messina and Regio Calabria Earthquake. American Institute of Physics. pp 1004–1013.Google Scholar
  7. Morgan RPC, Hann MJ, Shilston D, Mirtskhoulava TE, Nadirashvili V, Gasca AH, Clarke J, Sweeney M (2004) Use of terrain analysis as a basis for erosion risk assessment along pipeline rights-of-way: a case study from Georgia. In: Sweeney M (ed.), Terrain and Geohazard Challenges Facing Onshore Oil Gas Pipelines. Thomas Telford, London, pp 324–347.Google Scholar
  8. Nyman DJ, Thenhaus PC, Moscarda G (2009) Mitigation of fault crossing hazards for the AGT pipelines project through Azerbaijan and Georgia. In: Sweeney M (ed.), Terrain and Geohazard Challenges Facing Onshore Oil Gas Pipelines. Thomas Telford, London, pp 468–479.Google Scholar
  9. Panahi BM (2005) Mud volcanism, geodynamics and seismicity of Azerbaijan and the Caspian Sea Region. Mud Volcanoes, Geodynamics and Seismicity 51: 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sankey JE & Segrestin P (online 5.2009) Evaluation of seismic performance in Mechanicaly Stabilized Earth structures. http://www.reinforcedearth.com/Technical%20Papers/Evaluation%20of%20seismic%20performance%20in%20Mechanic ally%20Stabilized.pdf.
  11. Strakhov VN, Ulomov VI, Shumilina LS (1998) New Maps of General Seismic Zoning of North Eurasia, Izvestiya. Physics of the Solid Earth 34(10): 872–876. (Translated from Fizika Zemli, No. 10, 1998, pp. 92–96).Google Scholar
  12. Trifunac M, Brady A (1975) On the correlation of seismic intensity with peaks of recorded strong motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65: 139–162.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARCADIS Geotechnika a.s.Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Natural SciencePragueCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations