Advertisement

Fractal measures of drainage network to investigate surface deformation from remote sensing data: A paradigm from Hindukush (NE-Afghanistan)

  • Syed Amer MahmoodEmail author
  • Richard Gloaguen
Article

Abstract

This approach represents the relative susceptibility of the topography of the earth to active deformation by means of geometrical distinctiveness of the river networks. This investigation employs the fractal analysis of drainage system extracted from ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM-30m resolution). The objective is to mark active structures and to pinpoint the areas robustly influenced by neotectonics. This approach was examined in the Hindukush, NE-Afghanistan. This region is frequently affected by deadly earthquakes and the modern fault activities and deformation are driven by the collision between the northward-moving Indian subcontinent and Eurasia. This attempt is based on the fact that drainage system is strained to linearize due to neotectonic deformation. Hence, the low fractal dimensions of the Kabul, Panjsher, Laghman, Andarab, Alingar and Kocha Rivers are credited to active tectonics. A comprehensive textural examination is conducted to probe the linearization, heterogeneity and connectivity of the drainage patterns. The aspects for these natural textures are computed by using the fractal dimension (FD), lacunarity (LA) and succolarity (SA) approach. All these methods are naturally interrelated, i.e. objects with similar FD can be further differentiated with LA and/or SA analysis. The maps of FD, LA and SA values are generated by using a sliding window of 50 arc seconds by 50 arc seconds (50″ × 50″). Afterwards, the maps are interpreted in terms of regional susceptibility to neotectonics. This method is useful to pinpoint numerous zones where the drainage system is highly controlled by Hindukush active structures. In the North-Northeast of the Kabul block, we recognized active tectonic blocks. The region comprising, Kabul, Panjsher, Andrab, Alingar and Badakhshan is more susceptible to damaging events. This investigation concludes that the fractal analysis of the river networks is a bonus tool to localize areas vulnerable to deadly incidents influencing the Earth’s topography and consequently intimidate human lives.

Keywords

Fractal Drainage network Lacunarity Succolarity Surface deformation and Hindukush 

References

  1. Allen M, Jackson J, Walker R (2004) Late Cenozoic reorganization of the Arabia-Eurasia collision and the comparison of short-term and long-term deformation rates. Tectonics 23: TC2008, DOI:10.1029/2003TC001530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batty M, Longley P (1994) Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. London: Academic Press. P 394.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Zion Y, Sammis CG (2003) Characterization of fault zones. Pure and Applied Geophysics 160: 677–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bull BW (2007). Tectonic Geomorphology of Mountains: A New Approach to Paleoseismology. Blackwell Publishing. p 316.Google Scholar
  5. Dombradi E, Timar G, Gabor B, Sierd C, Frank H (2007). Fractal dimension estimations of drainage network in the Carpathian-Pannonian system. Global and Planetary Change 58(1–4): 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dong P (2000). Test of a new lacunarity estimation method for image texture analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21(17): 3369–3377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong P (2009) Lacunarity analysis of raster datasets and 1D, 2D. Computers and Geosciences 35(10): 2100–2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dougherty G, Henebry GM (2001) Fractal signature and lacunarity in the measurement of the texture of trabecular bone in clinical CT images. Medical Engineering & Physics 23(6): 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feagina RA, Wub XB, Feaginc T (2007) Edge effects in lacunarity analysis. Ecological Modelling 201(3–4): 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foroutan-pour K, Dutilleul P, Smith DL (1999) Advances in the implementation of the box-counting method of fractal dimension estimation. Applied Mathematics and Computation 105(2–3): 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaetani M, Zanchi A, Angiolini L, Olivini G, Sciunnach D, Brunton H, Nicora A, Mawson R (2004) The carboniferous of western Karalorum (Pakistan). Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 23(2): 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardner RH, Hargrove WW, Pretegaard K, Perlmutter M (1996) Lacunarity analysis: A general technique for the analysis of spatial patterns. Physical Review E 53(5): 5461–5468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gloaguen R, Marpu PR, Niemeyer I (2007) Automatic extraction of faults and fractal analysis from remote sensing data. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 14: 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gloaguen R., Kaessner A, Wobbe F, Shahzad F, Mahmood SA (2008) Remote sensing analysis of crustal deformation using river networks. In: IEEE International Geosciences and Remote Sensing Symposium, Boston, USA. pp. IV-1–IV-4.Google Scholar
  15. Guillermo RA, Gerardo MEP, Piccoloa MC, Pierini J (2004) Fractal analysis of tidal channels in the Bahia Blanca Estuary (Argentina). Geomorphology 57: 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harp EL, Crone AJ (2006) Landslides triggered by the October 8, 2005, Pakistan earthquake and associated landslidedammed reservoirs. In: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1052. p 10.Google Scholar
  17. Lawrence RD, Khan SH, Tanaka T (1992) Chaman Fault, Pakistan-Afghanistan. In: Buckman RC, Hancock PL. Major Active Faults of the World, Results of the IGCP Project 206. pp 196–223.Google Scholar
  18. Mahmood SA, Shahzad F, Gloaguen R (2008) Remote sensing analysis of quaternary deformation in the Hindukush-pamir region. In: 33rd International Geological Congress, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  19. Mahmood SA, Shahzad F, Gloaguen R (2009) Remote sensing analysis of quaternary deformation using river networks in Hindukush region. In: IEEE International Geosciences and Remote Sensing Symposium, Cape Town, South Africa. pp II-369–II-372.Google Scholar
  20. Mandelbrot BB (1983) The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W H Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Martinez MD, Lana X, Burgueño A, Serra C (2007) Lacunarity, predictability and predictive instability of the daily pluviometric regime in the Iberian Peninsula. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 14(2): 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marwan N, Saparin P, Kurths J (2007) Measures of complexity for 3D image analysis of trabecular bone. European Physical Journal Special Topics 143: 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Melo RHC, Conci A (2008) Succolarity: Defining a method to calculate this fractal measure. In: 15th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. pp 291–294.Google Scholar
  24. Melo RHC, Vieira EA, Conci A (2006) Characterizing the lacunarity of objects and image sets and its use as a technique for the analysis of textural patterns. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4179: 208–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moreira I. Fractais (1999) In: Nussenzveig H (Org.). Complexidade e caos. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ/COPEA. pp 51–82. (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
  26. O’Callaghan J, Mark D (1984) The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing 28(3): 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plotnick RE, Gardner RH, O’Neil RV (1993) Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. Landscape Ecology 8(3): 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson J, Beck R, Gnos E, Vincent RK (2000) New structural and stratigraphic insights for northwestern Pakistan from field and Landsat Thematic Mapper data. GSA Bulletin 112(3): 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruleman CA (2005). Annotated bibliography for Quaternary faulting and geomorphic/tectono-morphic development of Afghanistan. In: Progress Report for Afghan Geologic Hazards Activities: U.S. Geological Survey Internal Report. p 12.Google Scholar
  30. Shahzad F, Mahmood SA, Gloaguen R (2009) Drainage network and lineament analysis: an approach for Potwar Plateau (Northern Pakistan). Journal of Mountain Science 6: 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tarboton D, Bras R, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (1991) On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes 5: 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turcotte DL (1992) Fractals and chaos in geology and geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 221.Google Scholar
  33. Valous NA, Sun DW, Allen P, Mendoza F (2010). The use of lacunarity for visual texture characterization of pre-sliced cooked pork ham surface intensities. Food Research International 43: 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Watterson J (1986) Fault dimensions, displacements and growth. Pure and Applied Geophysics 124(1–2): 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wheeler RL, Bufe CG, Johnson ML, Dart RL (2005). Seismotectonic map of Afghanistan with annotated bibliography. In: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report. p 31.Google Scholar
  36. Wobus CW, Whipple KX, Kirby E, Snyder NP, Johnson J, Spyropolou K, Crosby B, Sheehan DD (2006) Tectonics from topography: Procedures, promise and pitfalls. In: Willett SD, Hovius N, Brandon MT, Fisher DM. Tectonics, Climate and Landscape Evolution. GSA Special Paper 398: 55–74.Google Scholar
  37. Zhang T, Tang G, Liu X, Zhou Y, Jia D (2007) Multi-scale structure of channel network in Jiuyuangou drainage basin. In: Geoinformatics 2007: Geospatial Information Science. p 6753.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Remote Sensing Group, Institute of GeologyFreiberg University of Mining and TechnologyFreibergGermany
  2. 2.Department of Space ScienceUniversity of the PunjabLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations