Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 26–35 | Cite as

Inventory and geometrical changes in small glaciers covering three Northern Patagonian summits using remote sensing and GIS techniques

  • Alfonso FernándezEmail author
  • José Araos
  • Jorge Marín


In the last few decades, a large quantity of research has been performed to elucidate the current behavior of glaciers in southern Chile, especially with respect to the volumetric changes in the outlets of the Northern and Southern Patagonian Icefields (NPI and SPI, respectively). Calculations have shown a generalized thinning and withdrawal, which greatly contributes to the increase in sea level attributed to the ice melt from non-polar glaciers. However, these icefields are surrounded by many small icecaps, which have yet to be studied in detail. A precise estimation of the volume of ice located in these mountain chains could provide new information with respect to this area’s exact contribution to the increase in sea level. Thus, this study presents an inventory of relatively small Northern Patagonian glaciers in the surrounding of the three summits: Mount Queulat, and the Macá and Hudson volcanoes. The study used remote sensing techniques in a GIS environment to determine the margins, surface areas, thickness changes and hypsometry for the glaciated zones. Landsat images from different dates were analyzed using standard band ratio and screen delineation techniques. Additionally, digital elevation models from different dates were compared using map algebra, calculating thickness changes. Based on the results, we propose that there are important volumetric changes in the glaciers studied, which could be explained by precipitation trends in a general context, and an influence of the glaciers’ sizes in some local response. Therefore, we suggest the exact contribution of the Patagonia to the increase in sea level corresponds to a regional pattern rather than just the behavior of a single ice field.


Glacier inventory thickness change digital elevation model morphometric measurement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aniya. M. 2001. Glacier variations of Hielo Patagónico Norte, Chilean Patagonia, since 1944/1945, with special reference to variations between 1995/1996 and 1999/2000. Bulletin of Glaciological Research 18: 55–63.Google Scholar
  2. Benn, D. and Evans, D. 1998. Glaciers & Glaciation. Arnold.Google Scholar
  3. Bown, F. and Rivera, A. 2007. Climate changes and recent glacier behaviour in the Chilean Lake District. Global and Planetary Change 59(1–4): 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrasco, J., Osorio, R., Casassa, G. 2008. Secular trend of the equilibrium-line altitude on the western side of the southern Andes, derived from radiosonde and surface observations. Journal of Glaciology 54(186): 538–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cogley, G. and McIntyre, M. 2003. Hess altitudes and other morphological estimators of glacier equilibrium lines. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 35(4): 482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Etzelmüller, B. 2000. On the quantification of surface changes using grid-based digital elevation models. Transactions in GIS 4(2): 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Falkner, E. 1995. Aerial mapping. Methods and Applications. CRC Press Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Fernández, A. 2006. Inventory and Thickness Changes on Corcovado Volcano. Anuario Hidrográfico y Oceanográfico de la Armada de Chile 57: 131–140. (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  9. Fernández, A., Rivera, A. and Rodrigo C. 2006. Recent Variations of Glaciers Located between 41°S and 49°S and their relationship with climatic changes. Revista Geográfica Panamerican Institute of Geography and History 139: 39–69. (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  10. Fisher, P. and Tate, N. 2006. Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 467–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gamache, M. 2004. Free and low cost datasets for international mountain cartography, available at 〈〉 (last access, december 2008).
  12. Hoelzle, M., Chinn T., Stumm, D., Paul, F., Zemp, M. and Haeberli, W. 2007. The application of glacier inventory data for estimating past climate change effects on mountain glaciers: A comparison between the European Alps and the Southern Alps of New Zealand. Global and Planetary Change 56: 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kerr, A. and Sugden D. 1994. The Sensitivity of the South Chilean snowline to climate change. Climate Change 28(3): 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kurowski, L. 1891. Die Höhe der Scneegrenze mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Finsteraarhorne-Gruppe. Penck’s Geographische Abhandlungen 5(1): 119–160.Google Scholar
  15. Lythe, M. Vaughan, D., and BEDMAP Consortium. 2001. BEDMAP, A new ice thickness and subglacial topographic model of Antarctica. Journal of Geophysical Research 106(B6): 11335–11351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Naranjo, J. and Stern, Ch. Holocene explosive activity of Hudson volcano, southern Andes. Bulletin of Volcanology 59: 291–306.Google Scholar
  17. NIMA, 1997. Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984: Its Defintions and Relationships with Local Geodetic Systems. NIMA tr8350.2 Third edition 4 july 1997. Bethesda, MD: National Imagery and Mapping Agency.Google Scholar
  18. Oerlemans, J. 2001. Glaciers and Climate Change. A.A. Balkema publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Orihashi, Y., Naranjo, J., Motoki A., Sumino H., Hirata, D., Anma H., Nagao K. 2004. Quaternary volcanic activity of Hudson and Lautaro volcanoes, Chilean Patagonia: New constraints from K-Ar ages. Revista Geológica de Chile 31(2): 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paul, F., Kääb A., Maisch M., Kellenberger, T., and Haeberli W. 2002. The new remote-sensing-derived Swiss glacier inventory I. Methods. Annals of Glaciology 34: 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pike, R. and Wilson, S. 1971. Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral, and geomorphic area-altitude analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin 82: 1079–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rabus, B., Eineder, M., Roth, A., and Bamler, R. 2003. the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission-A new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 57: 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reuter, H., Nelson, A., Jarvis, A. 2007. An evaluation of void filling interpolation methods for SRTM data. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 21(9): 983–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rignot, E., Rivera A. and Casassa G. 2003. Contribution of the Patagonia Icefields of South America to sea level rise. Science 302: 434–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rivera, A., Casassa, G., Acuña, C. and Lange, H. 2000. Recent Variations of Chilean Glaciers. Investigaciones Geográficas 34: 25–52. (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  26. Rivera, A. and Casassa, G. 1999. Volume changes on Pio XI glacier, Patagonia: 1975–1995. Global and Planetary Change 22: 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rivera, A. and Casassa, G. 2004. Ice elevation, areal and frontal changes of glaciers from National Park Torres del Paine, Southern Patagonia Icefield. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research 36(4): 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rivera, A., Benham T., Casassa G., Bamber J. and Dowdeswell J. 2007. Ice elevation and areal changes of glaciers from the Northern Patagonia Icefield, Chile. Global and Planetary Change 59: 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodríguez, E., Morris, Ch., and Belz, J. 2006. A global assessment of the SRTM performance. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 72(3): 249–270.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Faculty of Architecture, Urbanism and GeographyUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  2. 2.Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (Ceaza)La SerenaChile

Personalised recommendations