Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 315–326 | Cite as

A systems approach for analyzing vegetative and soil degradation in Arnigad micro-watershed of Indian Himalayan region

  • Mohit GeraEmail author
  • Prem L. Sankhayan
  • Ole Hofstad
Article

Abstract

This study analyzes the vegetative and soil degradation, measured as biomass and soil loss, for Arnigad micro-watershed located in Indian Himalayan state of Uttarakhand, in systems framework by using dynamic linear programming bio-economic model. The focus is at investigating the effects of alternate policy regimes, i.e., introduction of improved energy sources for cooking along with substitution of existing local livestock breeds with improved breed, reduction in human population growth and introduction of high yielding varieties of main crops including paddy, maize and wheat. The model horizon extended over a period of 25 years, i.e., from 2006 to 2030. It was found that the model scenario incorporating increased use of improved energy sources along with substitution of local cows by improved cows could be the most effective policy option in reducing vegetative and soil degradation. The vegetative biomass density declined to 19.76% compared to 35.24% in the BASE scenario and soil erosion loss was also lowered by 29.13%. Also, the reduction of population growth rate to half of the BASE scenario led to minor improvements in degradation. Introduction of high yielding varieties of main crops slightly increased vegetative degradation but reduced soil loss (8.35%) with respect to the BASE scenario. Such a phenomenon could be explained in terms of changed crop mix resulting in reduced amount of crop by-products requiring increased lopping of tree branches for animal fodder. The policy option of the increased use of improved energy sources along with substitution of improved breed of cows resulted in 9.58% higher income. Introduction of high yielding varieties of crops led to 1.92% increase in income, but the income decreased by 1.25 % when population growth was reduced to half. The usefulness of the model lies in analyzing the systems behavior in its entirety where the results can predict the possible direction of change as a result of manipulation in alternate economic regimes.

Keywords

Bio-economic model Dynamic linear programming Improved energy sources Vegetative and soil degradation Soil erosion Indian Himalayan region 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen J.C. and Barnes D.F. 1985. The Causes of Degradation in Developing Countries. Annu Assoc Am Geogr 75: 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous. 1999. Assessment Report on Mined Area Greening Project, Doon Valley. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. 2002. Glimpses of Doon Valley Project. Watershed Management Directorate, Government of Uttarakahnd, India, Pp. 15–20.Google Scholar
  4. Blaikie P.M. and Sadeque S.Z. 2000. Policy on High Places, Environment and Development in Himalayan Region. ICIMOD, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  5. Bontalakoti K.R., Joshi K., Mishra A.K., Kothyari B.P. and Pande R.K. 2000. Rainfall and Soil Erosion in the Bheta Gad Watershed of Uttar Pradesh in the Central Himalayas. In: Allen R., Schreier H., Brown S., Shah P.B., editors. The People and Resource Dynamics Project: First Three Years (1996–1999). ICIMOD, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  6. Burgess J.C. 1992. Economic Analysis of Causes of Tropical Deforestation. London: London Environmental and Economics Centre, IIED.Google Scholar
  7. Cain S.A. 1938. The Species Area Curve. American Midland Naturalist 21:46–181.Google Scholar
  8. Carter A.S. and Gilmour D.A. 1989. Increase in Tree Cover on Private Farmland in Central Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 22(10): 1437–1454.Google Scholar
  9. Champion H.G. and Seth S.K. 1968. Forest Types of India. Forest Research Institute, P.O.: New Forest, Dehradun, India: Govt. of India Publication. Pp. 48–56.Google Scholar
  10. Dregne H.E. 1992. Erosion and Soil Productivity in Asia. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47(1): 8–13.Google Scholar
  11. DSCWM. 1981. Hydrometreolaogy and Sediment Data for Phewa Watershed: 1979 Data. Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management, Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  12. Eckhholm E.P. 1976. Losing Ground. Washington, D.C.: World Watch Institute. Pp. 223.Google Scholar
  13. Enke S. 1971. Projected Costs and Benefits of Population Control. Kathmandu, Nepal: Centre for Economic Development and Administration.Google Scholar
  14. Gautam P.L. and Singh Vir. 2003. Operationalizing Sustainable Agriculture in the Mountains. Centre for Development Studies, Uttaranchal Academy of Administration, Naini Tal, India.Google Scholar
  15. Gilmour D.A. 1988. Not Seeing the Trees for the Forest: a Reappraisal of the Deforesataion Crisis in Two Hill Districts of Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 8(1): 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ICIMOD. 1998. People and Resource Dynamics: Jhiko Khola watershed. ICIMOD Newsletter 32:12–14.Google Scholar
  17. Ives J.D. and Masserli B. 1989. The Himalayan Dilemma: Reconciling Development and Conservation. London: Routedge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larson B.A. 1994. Changing the Economics of Environmental Degradation in Madgaskar: Lessons from National Environmental Action Plan Process. World Development 22: 671–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahat TBS., Griffin DM. and Shephered KR. 1987. Human Impacts on some Forests of the Middle Hills of Nepal. Part 3. Forests in the subistence economy of the Sindhu Palchok and Kabhe Palanchok. Mountain Research and Development 7(1): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maskey RB. and Joshi D. 1991. Soil and nutrient losses under different soil management in the middle mountains of Nepal. In: Shah PB., Schreier H., Brown SJ. and Riley KW., editors; Kathmandu.Google Scholar
  21. Misra MK., Sahu NC., Rao GB. and Nisanka S.K. 1995. Domestic Fuel Energy Consumption in an Indian Urban Ecosystem. Biomass and Bioenergy 9: 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moench M. and Bandyopadhyay J. 1986. People-forest Interaction: a Neglected Parameter in Himalayan Forest Management. Mountain Research and Development 6:3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Palo M. 1994. Population and Deforestation. In: Brown K., Pearce D., editors. The Causes of Tropical Deforestation: The Economic and Statistical Analysis of factors Giving Rise to the Loss of Tropical Forests. London: UCL Press Limited. p 42–56.Google Scholar
  24. Pulver E. and Nolan M. 1994. Effects of Population on Growth on Resource Management in Belize. UNDP workshop on population policy. Belmopan, Belize.Google Scholar
  25. Ravinderanath S. and Premnath S. 1997. Biomass Studies: Field Methods for Monitoring Biomass. New Delhi.: Oxford & IBH Publication Co. Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Robbe E. 1954. Report to the Government of Nepal on Forestry. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  27. Rock MT. 1996. The Stork, the Plow, Rural Social Structure, and Tropical Deforestation in Poor Countries. Ecological Economics 18:113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rubab S. and Kandpal T.C. 1996. A Methodology for Financial Evaluation of Biogas Technology in India using Cost Functions. Biomass and Bioenergy 10:11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sah B.P. 1996. Watershed Degradation and its Socio-economic Impacts using RS and GIS: A Case Study of Trijuga Watershed, Nepal [Dissertation (M.Sc.) NR 96-20.]. Bangkok, Thailand: AIT.Google Scholar
  30. Sah B.P., Honda K. and Murai S. 1997. Sub Watershed Prioritization for Watershed Management Using Remote Sensing and GIS. In Proceedings of 18th ACRS Conference, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  31. Sankhayan P.L., Gurung N., Sitaula B.K. and Hofstad O. 2003. Bio-economic Modeling of land Use and Forest Degradation at Watershed Level in Nepal. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 94(1): 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sankhayan P.L. and Hofstad O. 2001. An Economic Model for Analyzing Woodland Degradation in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Solberg B., editor; Guasdal, Norway. Scandinavian Forest Economics. p 308–329.Google Scholar
  33. Sen K.K., Rao K.S. and Saxena K.G. 1997. Soil Erosion due to Settled Upland Farming in the Himalaya: A case Study in Pranmati Watershed. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 4(1): 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharma R.J. and Kumar A. 2003. Livestock Care and Management Options in Watershed Management. Watershed Management in Himalaya: Concept and Strategy. Naini Tal, India: Centre for Development Studies, Uttaranchal Academy of Administration.Google Scholar
  35. Sharma S.D., Raina A.K., Gera M., Soni P. and Gupta M.K. 2005. Annual Report of the European Union Project on Himalayan Degradation. Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
  36. Shitindi E.F.K. 1996. On the Causes of Deforestation in Tanzania: An Economic Study [M.Phil. Economics Dissertation]. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
  37. Singh J.S. and Singh S.P. 1992. Forests of Himalaya. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nianital, India.Google Scholar
  38. Stoddart D.R. 1969. World Erosion and Sedimentation in Water. In: Chorley RJ, editor. Water, Earth and Man. Methuer, London.Google Scholar
  39. Sundriyal R.C. and Sharma E. 1996. Anthropogenic Pressure on Tree Structure and Biomass in the Temperate Forests of Mamlay Watershed in Sikkim. Forest Ecology and Management 81(1–3): 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tiwari D.N. 1990. Watershed Modeling Estimation of Surface Runoff and Soil Erosion Rate: a Case Study of Nakku Khola Watershed, Nepal [M.Sc. Thesis]. Bangkok.Google Scholar
  41. Thomson M. and Wartburton M. 1985. Decision Making under Contradicting Certainties: How to Save the Himalayas When You Can’t Find Out What’s Wrong With Them. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 12: 3–34.Google Scholar
  42. Tiwari P.C. 2000. Land Use Changes in Himalayas and their Impact on the Plains Ecosystem: Need for Sustainable Land Use. Land Use Ploicy 17(2): 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Govt. of J&KVanbhavan, Below Gumat, JammuIndia
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Natural Resource ManagementNorwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB)ÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations