Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 297–306 | Cite as

Forest cover change assessment in conflict-affected areas of northwest Pakistan: the case of swat and shangla districts

  • Faisal Mueen QamerEmail author
  • Sawaid Abbas
  • Rashid Saleem
  • Khurram Shehzad
  • Hassan Ali
  • Hammad Gilani


This study examines the spatial and temporal forest cover changes in Swat and Shangla districts to understand the deforestation pattern in context of the recent security conflict in these districts. We used multi-resolution satellite images to assess the long term deforestation from 2001 to2009 and also to identify episodic forest cutting areas appeared during the conflict period of Oct. 2007–Oct. 2008. There are only 58 ha of deforestation identified during the conflict period while 1268 ha of gross annual deforestation were assessed during last eight years. Most of the deforestation patches persist around the administrative boundaries at sub-district levels (tehsils) which can be attributed to ambiguity in unclear jurisdiction between the forest official. The results highlight that the forest cutting appeared in Swat and Shangla during the conflict period is not as significant when compared with the long term deforestation pattern in the area. On the one side the results of the study are supportive to the picture that emerges from international studies which report high rate of deforestation in the country and on the other side it negates any relation between the security situation and the increasing deforestation in the north western Pakistan. The study concludes that deforestation assessments require verification by independent sources of data, such as satellite imagery to improve our understanding of deforestation processes.


Forest cover change Deforestation Conflict-affected area GIS Pakistan 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ali T, Shahbaz B, Suleri A (2006) Analysis of myths and realities of deforestation in Northwest Pakistan: Implications for forestry extension. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8: 107–110.Google Scholar
  2. Ashraf S, Crossing K, Nadeem Q (2002) Integration of DEMs, Satellite Imagery and Field Data for Alpine Vegetation Mapping in Pakistan. In: 22nd ESRI International Users Conference.Google Scholar
  3. Conservation International (2005) Biodiversity Hotspots. Himalaya. Accessed on 4 May 2007.
  4. Coppin P, Jonckheere I, Nackaerts K, Muys B and Lambin E (2004). Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25(9):1565–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali Hazrat Bacha (2008) PESHAWAR: Swat forests at the mercy of militants. Dawn News, October 01, 2008, Wednesday. Acessed on 7 May 2012.
  6. Dove RM (1997) The shift of tree cover from forests to farms in Pakistan: a long and broad view. In: J.E.M. Arnold, Peter A. Dewees (eds.) Farms, trees and farmers: responses to agricultural intensification. Earthscan Publication Limited, London.Google Scholar
  7. FAO [United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization] (2011). State of the World’s Forests 2011, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzsimmons M (2003) Effects of deforestation and reforestation on landscape spatial structure in boreal Saskatchewan, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management 174: 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FSI [Forest Survey of India] (2005) State of Forest Report of 2005. Dehradun: Forest Survey of India.Google Scholar
  10. Giriraj A, Irfan-Ullah M, Murthy MSR, Beierkuhnlein C (2008). Modelling spatial and temporal forest cover change patterns (1973–2020): A case study from South Western Ghats (India). Sensors 8: 6132–6153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Government of Pakistan (1992). Forestry Sector Master Plan: National perspective. Islamabad, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  12. Haeusler T, Schnurr J, Fischer K (2000) Provincial Forest Resource Inventory (PFRI) North West Frontier Province — Pakistan.Google Scholar
  13. Jensen J (2005) Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  14. Joshi PK., Singh S, Agarwal S and Roy PS (2001) Forest cover assessment in western Himalayas, Himachal Pradesh using IRS 1C/1D WiFS data. Current Science, 80: 941–947.Google Scholar
  15. Kennedy RE (2009) Remote sensing change detection tools for natural resource managers: Understanding concepts and tradeoffs in the design of landscape monitoring projects. Remote Sensing of Environment 113:1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khan FK (1991). A Geography of Pakistan, Oxford, Karachi.Google Scholar
  17. Khan SR and Khan SR (2009) Assessing Poverty-Deforestation Links: Evidence from Swat, Pakistan. Ecological Economics 68(10): 2607–2618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geist HJ and Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52(2): 143–149. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143: PC AUDF]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2004) Remote sensing and image interpretation. fifth ed. John Wiley and Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd., Singapore.Google Scholar
  20. Mather P (2004) Computer Processing of Remotely Sensing Images-An introduction. third ed. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, England.Google Scholar
  21. Noss RF (1999) Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: a suggested framework and indicators. Forest Ecology and Management 115: 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nüsser M (2000) Change and persistence: contemporary landscape transformation in the Nanga Parbat Region, Northern Pakistan. Mountain Research and Development 20(4): 348–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Panta M, Kim K, Joshi C (2008) Temporal mapping of deforestation and forest degradation in Nepal: Applications to forest conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 256:1587–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pellegrini, L (2007). The Rule of The Jungle in Pakistan (2007) A Case Study on Corruption and Forest Management in Swat. FEEM Working Paper. FEEM. Milano, Venezia.Google Scholar
  25. Puyravaud JP. (2003). Standardizing the calculation of the annual rate of deforestation. Forest Ecology and Management 177(1–3):593–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qasim M, Hubacek K, Termansen M, Khan A (2011) Spatial and temporal dynamics of land use pattern in District Swat, Hindu Kush Himalayan region of Pakistan. Applied Geography 31(2): 820–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reddy CS, Rao KRM, Pattanaik C (2008) Assessment of largescale deforestation in Nawarangpur district, Orissa, India: A remote sensing based study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 154(1–4):325–35.Google Scholar
  28. Rafi KS, Yusuf M, Haq IU (2006) Assessing the Poverty-Environment Nexus: Evidence from Swat. Poverty Reduction and Environmental Management Program (PREM). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  29. Rogan J, Franklin J, Roberts DA (2002) A comparison of methods for monitoring multitemporal vegetation change using thematic mapper imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 80: 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rome S. (2005). Forestry in the princely state of Swat and Kalam (North-West Pakistan). IP6 Working Paper. Swiss National Centre for Competence in Research. Islamabad.Google Scholar
  31. Schickhoff U (1995). Himalayan forest-cover changes in historical perspective: a case study in the Kaghan valley, Northern Pakistan. Mountain Research and Development 15(1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shambaugh J, Oglethorpe J and Ham R (2000) The Trampled Grass: Mitigating the Impact of Armed Conflict on the Environment. Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  33. Skole DL, Tucker CJ (1993). Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science 260: 1905–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tekle K, Hedlund L (2000) Land-cover changes between 1958 and 1986 in Kalu District, Southern Wello, Ethiopia. Mountain Research and Development 20(1): 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vanasselt W (2003) Armed conflict, refugees and the environment. In World Resources 2002–2004 — Decisions for the Earth, Balance, Voice and Power. pp 25–27.Google Scholar
  36. Vijayaraj V, Younan NH, and O’Hara CG (2006) Concepts of Image Fusion in Remote Sensing Applications. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS 2006). July 31 2006–Aug. 4 2006. pp 3798–3801.Google Scholar
  37. Wani BA (2005) National forest policy review Pakistan. Ministry of Environment Local Government and Rural Development, Islamabad, Pakistan. [].Google Scholar
  38. Zhao YS (2003) Remote sensing application principles and methods, Beijing: Science press, pp253–254 (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faisal Mueen Qamer
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sawaid Abbas
    • 1
    • 3
  • Rashid Saleem
    • 1
  • Khurram Shehzad
    • 1
  • Hassan Ali
    • 1
  • Hammad Gilani
    • 2
  1. 1.World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) PakistanLahorePakistan
  2. 2.International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD)KathmanduNepal
  3. 3.Asian Institute of TechnologyBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations