Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Origin of the regional stress field along the Liquine-Ofqui Fault Zone (LOFZ), Southern Chilean Andes by means of FE simulation

  • Md. Rafiqul IslamEmail author
Article

Abstract

The Liquine-Ofqui Fault Zone (LOFZ) of southern Chilean Andes is one of the largest active strike-slip fault zones. There is an ongoing debate regarding the origin of the stress field along the LOFZ due to its complex geometry. This paper represents a study of the origins of the LOFZ regional stress field. Stress fields are calculated by finite element (FE) analysis. The two possible stress origins, i.e., oblique plate convergence and ridge collision/indenter tectonics of Chile ridge against Peru-Chile trench, have been emphasized in the present study. Three types of boundary conditions for the three particular models have been applied to calculate stress fields. Models are assumed to be elastic and plane stress condition. Modeling results are presented in terms of four parameters, i. e., orientation of maximum horizontal stress (σ H max), displacement vector, strain distribution, and maximum shear stress (τ max) contour line within the model. The results of the first model with oblique plate convergence show inconsistency between the geometric shape of the LOFZ and the distribution of the four parameters. Although more realistic results are obtained from the second model with normal ridge collision, there are few coincident in the LOFZ geometry and regional stress field. The third model with normal and oblique ridge collision is reasonable in understanding the origin of stress field and geometrical condition in the lithosphere of the LOFZ.

Key words

Liquine-Ofqui Fault Zone FE analysis Elastic rheology Oblique plate convergence Ridge collision 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assumpcao, M. 1992. The Regional Intraplate Stress Field in South America. Journal of Geophysical Research 97(B8), 11889–11903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrientos, S., Vera, E., Alvarado, P., and Monfret, T. 2004. Crustal Seismicity in Central Chile. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 16: 759–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck Jr, M.E. 1983. On the Mechanism of Tectonic Transport in the Zones of Oblique Subduction. Tectonophysics 93: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck Jr, M.E. 1988. Analysis of Late Jurassic-Recent Paleomagnetic Data from Active Plate Margins of South America. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 1: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barum, J. and Beaumont, C. 1995. Three-dimensional Numerical Experiments of Strain Partitioning at Oblique Plate Boundaries: Implications for Contrasting Tectonic Styles in theSouthern Coast Ranges, Calofornia, and central South Island, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research 100: 18059–18074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cande, S., Leslie, R. B., Parra, J. C., and Hobart, M. 1987. Interaction between the Chile Ridge and Chile Trench: Geophysical and Geothermal Evidence. Journal of Geophysical Research 92: 495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cembrano, J., Herve, H., and Lavenu, A. 1996. The Liquine Ofqui Fault Zone: a Long-lived Intra-arc Fault System in South Chile. Tectonophysics 259: 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cembrano, J., Schermer, E., and Lavenu, A., and Sanhueza, A. 2000. Contrasting Nature of Deformation Along an Intra-arc Shear Zone, the Liquine-Ofqui Fault Zone, Southern Chilean Andes. Tectonophysics 319: 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cembrano, J., Lavenu, A., Reynolds, P., Arancibia, G., Lepez, G.. and Sanhueza, A. 2002. Late Cenozoic Transpressional Ductile Deformation North of the Nazca-South America-Antarctic Triple Junction. Tectonophysics 354: 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, Jr., S. P. 1966. Handbook of Physical Constants. Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 97: 587.Google Scholar
  11. Coblentz, D. D. and Richardson, R. M. 1996. Analysis of the South American Intraplate Stress Field. J. Geophys. Res. 101(B4): 8643–8657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeMets, C. 1992. Oblique Convergence and Deformation along the Kuril and Japan Trenches. J. Geophys. Res. 97: 17615–17626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forsythe, R. D., and Nelson E. P. 1985. Geological Manifestations of Ridge Collision: Evidence from the Golfo de Penas-Taito Basin, Southern Chile. Tectonics 4: 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Islam, M.R., and Hayashi, D. 2008. Extensional Stresses in the Fold-and-thrust Belt of the Southernmost Andes. Bullettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 49: 223–228.Google Scholar
  15. Islam, M.R., Hayashi, D., and Kamruzzaman, A.B.M., 2008. Finite Element Modeling of Stress Distributions and Problems for Multi-slice Longwall Mining in Bangladesh, with Special Reference to the Barapukuria Coal Mine. International Journal of Coal Geology (article in press).Google Scholar
  16. Islam, M.R., and Hayashi, D. 2009. Extensional Stresses in the Colombian Eastern Cordillera Fold-and-thrust Belt, Northern Andes: Insights from 2D Finite Element Modeling. Geologica Acta (article in press).Google Scholar
  17. Harve, F. 1994. The Southern Andes between 39° and 44°S Latitude: the Geological Signature of a Transpressional Tectonic Regime Related to the Magmatic Arc. In: K.-J. Reutter, E. Schueber and P. J. Wigger (Editors), Tectonics of the Southern Central Andes. Springer, Berlin, 243–248 p.Google Scholar
  18. Hayashi, D. 2008. Theoretical Basis of FE Simulation Software Pakage. Bull. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ryukyus 85: 81–95.Google Scholar
  19. Introcaso, A., Pacino, M. C., and Fraga, H. 1992. Gravity, Isostasy and Andean Crustal Shortening Between Latitudes 30 and 35°S. Tectonophysics 205: 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lara, L. E., Lavenu, A., Cembrano, J., and Rodriguez, C. 2006. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 158: 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lange, D., Rietbrock, A., Haberland, C., Bataille, K., Dahm, T., Tilmann, F., and Fluh, E. R. 2007. Seismicity and Geometry of the South Chilean Subduction Zone (41.5°S–43.5°S): Implication for Controlling Parameters. Geophysical Res. Letter 34, LO6311, doi:10.1029/2006GL029190.Google Scholar
  22. Lavenu, A., and Cembrano, J. 1999. Compressional and Transpressional-stress Pattern for Pliocene and Quaternary Brittle Deformation in for Arc and Intra-arc Zones (Andes of Central and Southern Chile). Journal of Structural Geology 21: 1669–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCaffrey, R. 1992. Oblique Plate Convergence, Slip Vectors, and Forearc Deformation. Journal of Geophysical Research 97: 8905–8915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meijer, P. TH., and Wortel, M. J. R. 1992. The Dynamics of Motion of the South American Plate. Journal of Geophysical Research 97(B8): 11915–11931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson, E., Forsythe, R., and Arit, I. 1994. Ridge Collision Tectonics in Terrane Development. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 7: 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramos, V. A. 2005. Seismic Ridge Subduction and Topography: Foreland Deformation in the Paragonian Andes. Tectonophysics 399: 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richardson, R. M., and Coblentz, D. D. 1994. Stress Modeling in the Andes: Constraints on the South American Intraplate Stress Magnitudes. Journal of Geophysical Research 99(B11): 22015–22025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson, R. M., and Cox, B. L. 1984. Evolution of Oceanic Lithosphere: A Driving Force Study of the Nazca Plate. Journal of Geophysical Research 89(B12): 10043–10052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson, R. M. 1992. Ridge Forces, Absolute Motions, and the Intraplate Stress Field. Journal of Geophysical Research 97(B8): 11739–11748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tassara, A., Swain, C., Hackney, R., and Kirby, J. 2007. Elastic Thickness Structure of South America Estimated Using Wavelets and Satellite-derived Gravity Data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 253: 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tebben, S. F., Cande, S.C., Kovacs, L., Parra, J.C., LaBrecque, J.L., and Vergara, H. 1997. The Chile Ridge: A Tectonic Frame Work. Journal of Geophysical Research 102(B6): 12035–12059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Timoshenko, S. P., Goodier, J. N. 1970. Theory of Elasticity., McGraw Hill Book Company. London, 3rded, 567p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and Earth SciencesUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations