Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 209–217 | Cite as

Living in a high mountain border region: the case of the ‘Bhotiyas’ of the Indo-Chinese border region

  • Christoph Bergmann
  • Martin Gerwin
  • Marcus NüsserEmail author
  • William S. Sax
Article

Abstract

This article introduces one of South Asia’s most important border regions into academic discourse, namely, the Central Himalayan mountain rim separating India and the Tibetan Autonomous Region (People’s Republic of China). What makes this border region so interesting is a tangled interplay of changing environmental, cultural, and political forms to which the local populations constantly have to adapt in order to make a living there. We focused on the so-called ‘Bhotiyas’ of Uttarakhand, former trans-Himalayan traders whose ethnicity and livelihood was traditionally associated with the Indo-Chinese border that was sealed as a result of the India-China war in 1962. Drawing on the work of borderland scholarship, we identified the key processes and developments that changed the perspective of this area. Competing political aspirations as well as the ‘Bhotiyas’ countervailing strategies were considered equally important for understanding local livelihoods and identities within the dynamics of a ‘high mountain border region’. Through an exemplary analysis of historical differences of power in one ‘Bhotiya’ valley, we further explored the ways in which shifting socio-spatial constellations are creatively re-interpreted by the borderlanders.

Keywords

Uttarakhand trans-Himalayan trade Bhotiyas borderland study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, A. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, R. R. 1995. The Mexican-US Border: The Making of an Anthropology of Borderlands. In: Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 447–470.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. & L. O’Dowd. 1999. Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance. In: Regional Studies 33(7): 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, E. T. 1996 [1882]. The Himalayan Gazetteer. Volume Two, Part One. Reprint 1996, Dehra Dun: Natraj Publishers (Originally published under the title “The Himalayan Districts of the North Western Provinces of India”).Google Scholar
  5. Barth, F. 1969. ’Introduction.” In: F. Barth (ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organisation of Culture Difference. London: George Allen and Unwin. Pp. 9–38.Google Scholar
  6. Baud, M. & W. van Schendel. 1997. Toward a Comparative History of Borderlands. In: Journal of World History 8(2): 211–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, C. W. 1984. The Goat is Mine, the Load is Yours: Morphogenesis of “Bhotiya-Shauka”, U.P., India. Lund: University of Lund, Dept. of Social Anthropology (= Lund Studies in Social Anthropology, No. 1).Google Scholar
  8. Brown, C. W. 1987. Ecology, Trade and Former Bhotiya Identity. In: M. K. Raha (ed.), The Himalayan Heritage. Delhi: Gian Publishing House. Pp. 125–138.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, C. W. 1991–1992. What We Call ‘Bhotiyas’ are in Reality not Bhotiyas: Perspectives of British Colonial Conceptions. In: Joshi, M. P. / Fanger, A. C. & C. W. Brown (eds.), Himalaya: Past and Present, Volume II. Almora: Shree Almora Book Depot. Pp. 147–172.Google Scholar
  10. Das, J. C. & M. K. Raha 1981. Divergent Trends of Transformation among the Kumaon Bhotia. In: C. von Fürer-Haimendorf (ed.), Asian Highland Societies in Anthropological Perspective. New Delhi: Sterling Publisher. Pp. 250–265.Google Scholar
  11. Flynn, D. K. 1997. ’We are the Border’: Identity, Exchange, and the State along the Benin-Nigeria Border. In: American Ethnologist 24(2): 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forest Department. 1905. Petition Received from Certain Bhotias Complaining of the Insufficiency of Grazing near Ramnagar, dated 25th April 1905. File 61/1903-1907 Box 147, Commissioner Office Records, Regional Archives Naini Tal.Google Scholar
  13. Fürer-Haimendorf, C. von 1975. Himalayan Traders: Life in Highland Nepal. London: Cox & Wyman Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Gill, B. G. 2000. India’s Trade with Tibet: Early British Attempts. In: The Tibet Journal 25(4): 78–82.Google Scholar
  15. GOI — Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India. 2003. Census of India 2001. District Pithoragarh, Uttaranchal. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  16. Grierson, G. A. 1909. Linguistic Survey of India. Volume III, Tibeto-Burman Family. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gupta, A. & J. Ferguson. 1992. Beyond ‘Culture’: Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference. In: Cultural Anthropology 7(1): 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoon, V. 1996. Living on the Move: Bhotiyas of the Kumaon Himalaya. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Joshi, M. P. & C. W. Brown 1987. Some Dynamics of Indo-Tibetan Trade through Uttarakhanda (Kumaon-Garhwal), India. In: Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 30: 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. KBPF. 1947. The Report of the Kumaon Bhotiya Peoples’ Federation. Submitted Before the Minority Sub-Committee of the Constituent Assembly’s Advisory Committee on 17th April 1947. Kindly handed over by Dr. S. S. Pangtey (Sep. 2006).Google Scholar
  21. Kreutzmann, H. 2007. Grenzen und Handel. Geopolitische Implikationen im indisch-chinesischen Spannungsfeld. In: Geographische Rundschau 59(11): 4–11.Google Scholar
  22. Lamb, A. 1986. British and Tibet 1766–1910. London: Routledge (second revised edition).Google Scholar
  23. Messerschmidt, D. 1976. Ecological Change and Adaptation among the Gurungs of the Nepal Himalaya. In: Human Ecology 4(2): 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moorcroft, W. 1818. A Journey to Lake Manasarovar in Undes, a Province of Little Tibet. In: Asiatic Researches 12: 380–536.Google Scholar
  25. Moorcroft, W. & G. Trebeck 1976 [1837]. Travels in the Himalayan Provinces of Hindustan and the Panjab. Lahore: Faran Academy. (Volume I of II).Google Scholar
  26. Murray W. H. 1951. Scottish Himalayan Expedition, 1950. London: Dent.Google Scholar
  27. Nandy, S. N. & K. S. Rao 2001. Census 2001: Population Dynamics of Indian Himalaya. In: Envis Bulletin 9(2): 1–6.Google Scholar
  28. Nautiyal, S., Rao, K. S., Maikhuri, R. K. & K. G. Saxena 2003. Transhumant Pastoralism in the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. A Case Study in the Buffer Zone. In: Mountain Research and Development 23(3): 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nawa, K. 2000. Ethnic Categories and Their Usages in Byans, Far Western Nepal. In: European Bulletin of Himalayan Research 18: 36–57.Google Scholar
  30. Nüsser, M. 2006. Ressourcennutzung und nachhaltige Entwicklung im Kumaon-Himalaya (Indien). In: Geographische Rundschau 58(10): 14–22.Google Scholar
  31. Olson, C. S. & N. Bhattarai 2005. A Typology of Economic Agents in the Himalayan Plant Trade. In: Mountain Research and Development 25(1): 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pant, S. D. 1935. The Social Economy of the Himalayas. Based on a Survey in the Kumaon Himalayas. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  33. Patterson, G. N. 1962. Recent Chinese Policies in Tibet and towards the Himalayan Border States. In: The China Quarterly 12: 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Political Department. 1895. Rajwar of Askot, Almora Districts (Proceedings for August 1895 Nos. 18–22) File 24/1896–1897 Box 50, Commissioner Office Records, Regional Archives Naini Tal.Google Scholar
  35. Political Department. 1898. Correspondence of Lt.Col. E.E. Grigg, Commissionar Kumaon Division to Chief Secretary to Government, N. W. Provinces and Oudh (Proceedings for April 1898 Nos. 81–84). File 24/1898-1899 Box 51, Commissioner Office Records, Regional Archives Naini Tal.Google Scholar
  36. Political Department. 1999. Translation of a Report from Kharak Singh Pal, Political Peshkar, Garbyang, dated 1st August 1899. (Proceedings for September 1899 Nos. 104–111). File 62/1898-1899 Box 51, Commissioner Office Records, Regional Archives Naini Tal.Google Scholar
  37. Prasad, R. R. 1989. Bhotia Tribals of India. Dynamics of Economic Transformation. New Delhi: Gian Publishing House.Google Scholar
  38. Raper, F. V. 1812. Narrative of a Survey for the Purpose of Discovering the Sources of the Ganges. In: Asiatic Researches 11: 446–564.Google Scholar
  39. Rawat, D. S. & S. Sharma. 1997. The Development of a Road Network and Its Impact on the Growth of Infrastructure: A Study of Almora District in the Central Himalaya. In: Mountain Research and Development 17(2): 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reeves, P. 1991. Landlords and Governments in Uttar Pradesh. A Study of Their Relations until Zamindari Abolition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rizvi, J. 1999. Trans-Himalayan Caravans. Merchant Princes and Peasant Traders in Ladakh. New Delhi: Oxford.Google Scholar
  42. Roy, T. 2003. Changes in Wool Production and Usage in Colonial India. In: Modern Asian Studies 37(2): 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rumford, C. 2006. Introduction. Theorizing Borders. In: European Journal of Social Theory 9(2): 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saklani, D. P. 1998. Ancient Communities of the Himalaya. New Delhi: Indus Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  45. Schendel, W. van 2005. The Bengal Borderland. Beyond State and Nation in South Asia. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sharma, D. D. 1990. Tibeto-Himalayan Languages of Uttarakhand. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Sherring, C. A. 1906. Western Tibet and the British Borderland. The Sacred Country of Hindus and Buddhists. With an Account of the Government, religion and Customs of its Peoples. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  48. Silori, C. S. & R. Badola 2000. Medicinal Plant Cultivation and Sustainable Development. A Case Study in the Buffer Zone of the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Western Himalaya, India. In: Mountain Research and Development 20(3): 272–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spengen, W. van 2000. Tibetan Border Worlds. A Geohistorical Analysis of Trade and Traders. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
  50. Srivastava, R. P. 1953. Rang-Bang in the Changing Bhotia Life. In: Eastern Anthropologist 6(3–4): 190–203.Google Scholar
  51. Srivastava, R. P. 1966. Tribe-Caste Mobility in India and the Case of Kumaon Bhotias. In: C. von Fürer-Haimendorf (ed.), Caste and Kin in Nepal, India and Ceylon. Bombay: Asia Publishing House. Pp. 161–212.Google Scholar
  52. Sturgeon, J. C. 2004. Border Practices, Boundaries, and the Control of Resource Access: A Case Study from China, Thailand and Burma. In: Development and Change 35(3): 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Traill, G. W. 1991–1992 [1832]. Statistical Report on the Bhotiya Mehals of Kumaon. In: Joshi, M. P. / Fanger, A. C. & C. W. Brown (eds.), Himalaya: Past and Present, Vol. II. Almora: Shree Almora Book Depot. Pp. 99–154.Google Scholar
  54. Vandergeest, P. & N. L. Peluso. 1995. Territorialization and State Power in Thailand. In: Theory and Society 24(3): 385–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walker, A. 1999. The Legend of the Golden Boat: Regulation, Trade and Traders in the Borderlands of Laos, Thailand and Burma. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
  56. Walton, H. G. 1989 [1910]. British Garhwal. A Gazetteer, Volume XXXVI of the District Gazetteers of the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh. Dehra Dun: Uprenda Arora.Google Scholar
  57. Wendl, T. & M. Rösler. 1999. Introduction. Frontiers and Borderlands. The Rise and Relevance of an Anthropological Research Genre. In: Rösler, M. & T. Wendl (eds.), Frontiers and Borderlands: Anthropological Perspectives. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Bergmann
    • 1
  • Martin Gerwin
    • 2
  • Marcus Nüsser
    • 2
    Email author
  • William S. Sax
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social Anthropology, South Asia InstituteUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Department of Geography, South Asia InstituteUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations