A probabilistic view of debris flow
- 117 Downloads
Most debris flows occur in valleys of area smaller than 50 km2. While associated with a valley, debris flow is by no means a full-valley event but originates from parts of the valley, i.e., the tributary sources. We propose that debris flow develops by extending from tributaries to the mainstream. The debris flow observed in the mainstream is the confluence of the tributary flows and the process of the confluence can be considered as a combination of the tributary elements. The frequency distribution of tributaries is found subject to the Weibull form (or its generalizations). And the same distribution form applies to the discharge of debris flow. Then the process of debris flow is related to the geometric structure of the valley. Moreover, viewed from a large scale of water system, all valleys are tributaries, which have been found to assume the same distribution. With each valley corresponding to a debris flow, the distribution can be taken as the frequency distribution of debris flow and therefore provides a quantitative description of the fact that debris flow is inclined to occur at valley of small size. Furthermore, different parameters appear in different regions, suggesting the regional differentials of debris flow potential. We can use the failure rate, instead of the size per se, to describe the risk of a valley of a given area. Finally we claim that the valleys of debris flow in different regions are in the similar episode of evolution.
KeywordsDebris flow tributary probability distribution risk assessment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- CUI, P., CHEN, X. P., WANG, Y. Y., HU, K. H., and LI, Y. 2005. Jiangjia Ravine Debris Flows in the Southwestern China. In: Jakob, M., and Hungr, O. (eds.), Debris-flow Hazards and Related Phenomena. Springer-Verlag: 565–594.Google Scholar
- Iso, N., Yamakawa, K., Yonezawa, H., & Matsubara, T. 1980. Accumulation Rates of Alluvial Cones, Constructed by Debris-Flow Deposits, in the Drainage Valley of the Takahara River, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan. Geographical Review, Japan 53: 699–720.Google Scholar
- Jarvis, C.S. 1936. Flood in the United States. Geol. Surv. Water-Supply Pap. (U.S.) 771: 1–479.Google Scholar
- Johnson, A. M. 1970. Physical Process in Geology. Freeman, Cooper & Company. Pp. 450–458.Google Scholar
- Kalbfleisch J., & Prentice, R. 1980. The Statistical Analysis Failure Time Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- LI Yong, HU Kaiheng, CUI Peng, CHEN Xiaoqing, & YUE Zhongqi. 2002. Morphology of Valley of Debris Flow. Journal of Mountain Science 20(1): 1–11. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
- LI Yong, HU Kaiheng, YUE, Z.Q., and Tham, T.G. 2004. Termination and Deposition of Debris-Flow Surge. In: Landslides: Evaluation and Stabilization, Lacerda, Ehrlich, Fontoura & Sayao (eds). 2004 Taylor & Francis Group, London. Pp. 1451–1456.Google Scholar
- LI Yong, HU Pinghua, and HU Kaiheng. 2005. Distribution of Thickness of Debris Flow Deposition, World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2005, Raymond Walton — Editor, May 15–19, 2005, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.Google Scholar
- Rodriguz-Iturbe, I., Rinaldo, R.R. 1997. Fractal River Valleys: Chance and Self-Organization. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar