Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 84–90 | Cite as

Assessment of reproductive potential of different populations of Angelica glauca Edgew., a critically endangered Himalayan Medicinal Herb

  • Anil Kumar Bisht
  • Arvind BhattEmail author
  • R. S. Rawal
  • Uppeandra Dhar
Article

Abstract

Angelica glauca is one of the important medicinal plants and it is widely used by indigenous communities for different purposes. The present study analyzes variability in reproductive characters of A. glauca. The reproductive parts were found having significant positive correlation with altitude (e.g., number of umbellets /umber r= 0.857, p<0.05; umbel diameter r=0.735, p<0.05).

Keywords

Angelica glauca critically endangered Himalaya medicinal plant population reproductive potential 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Airi S, Rawal R.S, Dhar U and A.N. Purohit. 1997. Population studies on Podophyllum hexandrum Royle — A dwindling, medicinal plant of the Himalaya. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter. 110, 29–34.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous 1985. The Wealth of India: A dictionary of Indian raw materials and industrial products, Vol 1:A. Publication and information Directorate CSIR, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhatt, A. 2004. Viability and variability in genus Swertia with particular reference to swertia chirayita and Swertia angustifolia in Garhwal and Kumaon Himalaya. Ph.D thesis submitted to H.N.B. Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal.Google Scholar
  4. Bisht, A.K. 2002. Conservation and Propagation of a Crically endangered Medicinal Herb, Angelica glauca. Edgew. of western Himalaya. Ph.D thesis submitted to Kumaon University Nainital, Uttaranchal, INDIA.Google Scholar
  5. Chopra, R.N., S.L. Nayar, and I.C. Chopra. 1956. Glossary of Indian medicinal plants. Publication and Information Directorate, CSIR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  6. Collet, H. 1980. Flora Simlensis, A handbook of the flowering plants of Simla and neighbourhood. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun.Google Scholar
  7. Gaur, R.D. 1999. Flora of the District Garhwal North-West Himalaya (with ethnobotanical notes). Transmedia, Srinagar (Garhwal), India.Google Scholar
  8. Gupta, S.K., I.A Hamal, and A.K. Koul. 1989. Floral sex ratios in some andromonoecious umbellifers from Kashmir Himalayas. Journal of Plant Science Research 5: 1–7.Google Scholar
  9. Jamwal, M., and B.L. Kaul. 1997. Studies on floral-biology and breeding system of Apium graveolens L. (Celery). Journal of Non Timber Forest Products 4: 73–77.Google Scholar
  10. Joshi, G.C., K.C. Tewari, V. P. Tewari, and N. K. Pande. 2001. Ayurvedic medicinal plants of Uttaranchal. In Samasnt SS, Dhar U and Palni LMS (eds) Himalayan medicinal plants: Potential and prospects, pp 125–150. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  11. Koul, A.K., P. Koul, and I. Hamal. 1986. A Insects in relation to pollination of some umbellifers. Bulletin. B. S. I. 28: 1–4.Google Scholar
  12. Koul, P., N. Sharma, and A.K. Kaul. 1993. Pollination biology of Apiaceae. Current Science 65: 219–222.Google Scholar
  13. Llyod, D. G., C. J. Webb, and R.B. Primack. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants. II. Data on the temporal regulation of maternal investment. New Phytol 86: 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Llyod, D.G. 1979a. Parental strategies in angiosperms. Newzealand Journal of Botany 17: 595–606.Google Scholar
  15. Llyod, D.G. 1979b. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Llyod, D.G. 1980. Demographic factors and mating patterns in angiosperms In Solbrig OT (ed) Demography and evolution in plant populations, pp. 677–688. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Mac Arthur, R.H., and E.O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of Island. Biogeogrphy, Princeton.Google Scholar
  18. Mishra, C. and Rawat, G.S. 1998. Livestock Grazing and Biodiversity Conservation: Comments on Saberwal. Conservation Biology 12(3): 712–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Molur, S., and S. Walker. 1998. Report of the workshop “Conservation Assessment and Management Plan for Selected medicinal plants species of northern, northeastern and central India’ (BCCP-Endangered Species Project). Zoo Outreach Organization, Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Coimbatore, India.Google Scholar
  20. Mukherjee, P.K. 1978. A resume of Indian umbelliferae. Actes du Zeme Symp. Internal. Sur. Les Ombelliferes 47–70.Google Scholar
  21. Petanidou T. N., J.C.M. Den Nifs, and J.G.B Oostermeifer. 1995. Pollination ecology and constraints on seed set of the rare perennial Gentiana ceuciata L. in the Netherlands. Acta Bot Neer., 44: 55–74.Google Scholar
  22. Petit. C. and Thompson, J.D. (1998). Phenotypic selection and population differentiation in relation to habitat heterogeneity in Arrhenatherum elatius. J. Ecol., 86: 829–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Puterbaugh, M.N. 1998. The role of ants as flower visitors: experimental analysis in three plant species. Oikos 83: 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rawat G.S., and H.S. Rodgers. 1987. Alpine meadows of Uttar Pradesh. An ecological review. Proceedings Natural Rangeland Symposium 119–137.Google Scholar
  25. Samant S.S., U. Dhar, and L.M.S. Palni. 1998. Medicinal plants of Indian Himalaya. Hima Vikas Occassional Publication No-13, GBPIHED, Kosi, ALMORA, India.Google Scholar
  26. Sheldon, J.W., M.J Balick., and S.A. Larida. 1997. Medicinal plants: can utilization and conservation coexist? Advances in Economic Botany 12: 1–104.Google Scholar
  27. Snedechor, G.W., and W.G. Cochran. 1968. Statistical methods. Oxfords and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.Google Scholar
  28. Stephenson AG (1981). Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilkinson. 1986. SYSTAT: A system for statistics. Systat-Inc., Evaston IIGoogle Scholar
  30. Willson, M.A., and P.W. Price. 1977. The evaluation of inflorescence sizes in Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae). Evolution 31: 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wyatt, R. 1982. Inflorescence architecture: How flower number, arrangement and phenology affect pollination and fruitset. American Journal of Botany 69: 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anil Kumar Bisht
    • 1
  • Arvind Bhatt
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. S. Rawal
    • 1
  • Uppeandra Dhar
    • 1
  1. 1.G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development Kosi-KatarmalAlmoraIndia

Personalised recommendations