Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 17–31 | Cite as

Annual time-series analyses of total gaseous mercury measurement and its impact factors on the Gongga Mountains in the southeastern fringe of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

  • Wanze ZhuEmail author
  • Xuewu Fu
  • Xinbin Feng
  • Julia Y. Lu


Long-term monitoring programs for measurement of atmospheric mercury concentrations are presently recognized as powerful tools for local, regional and global studies of atmospheric long-range transport processes, and they could also provide valuable information about the impact of emission controls on the global budget of atmospheric mercury, their observance and an insight into the global mercury cycle. China is believed to be an increasing atmospheric mercury emission source. However, only a few measurements of mercury, to our knowledge, have been done in ambient air over China. The highly-time resolved atmospheric mercury concentrations have been measured at Moxi Base Station (102°72′ 29°92′N, 1640 m asl) of the Gongga Alp Ecosystem Observation and Experiment Station of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) from May 2005 to June 2006 by using a set of Automatic Atmospheric Mercury Speciation Analyzers (Tekran 2537A). Measurements were carried out with a time resolution of every 15 minutes. The overall average total gaseous mercury (TGM) covering the measurement periods was 4±1.38 ng·m−3 (N=57310), which is higher than the global background level of approximately 1.5∼2.0 ng·m−3. The measurements in all seasons showed a similar diurnal change pattern with a high concentration during daytime relative to nighttime and maximum concentration near solar noon and minimum concentration immediately before sunrise. The presence of diurnal TGM peaks during spring and summer was found earlier than that during autumn and winter. When divided seasonally, it was found that the concentrations of TGM were highest in winter with 6.13 ± 1.78 ng·m−3 and lowest in summer with 3.17 ± 0.67 ng·m−3. There were no significant differences in TGM among wind sectors during each season. Whereas Hg generally exhibited significant correlations with the parameters, such as temperature, saturated vapor pressure, precipitation, ultraviolet radiation (UV) and atmospheric pressure at the whole measurement stage, and the correlations varied seasonally. Our results suggest that the local or regional abundant geothermal activities, such as thermal spring, anthropogenic source processes and changes in meteorological conditions, regulate and affect Hg behavior in the study area.


Total gaseous mercury (TGM) diurnal variability seasonal variability meteorological factor Gongga Mountains 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker P.G.L., Brunke E.G., Slemr F. and Crouch A.M. 2002. Atmospheric mercury measurements at Cape Point, South Africa. Atmospheric Environment 36: 2459–2465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchard P., Froude F.A., Martin J.B., Dryfhout-Clark H. and Woods J.T. 2002. Four years of continuous total gaseous mercury (TGM) measurements at sites in Ontario, Canada. Atmospheric Environment 36(23): 3735–3743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke J., Hoyer M., Keeler G. and Scherbatskoy T. 1995. Wet deposition of mercury and ambient mercury concentration at a site in the lake Champlain basin. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 80: 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmichael G.R., Tang Y., Kurata G., Uno I., Streets D., Woo J.H., Huang H., Yienger J., Lefer B., Shetter R., Blake D., Atlas E., Fried A., Apel E., Eisele F., Cantrell C., Avery M., Barrick J., Sachse G., Brune W., Sandholm S., Kondo Y., Singh H., Talbot R., Bandy A., Thorton D., Clarke A. and Heikes B. 2003. Regional-scale chemical transport modeling in support of the analysis of observations obtained during the TRACE-P Experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research 108(d21) 8823, doi:10.1029/2002jd003117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ebinghaus R., Kock H.H., Temme C., Einax J.W., Loewe A.G., Richter A., Burrows J.P. and Schroeder W.H. 2002a. Antarctic springtime depletion of atmospheric mercury. Environmental Science & Technology 36(6): 1238–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ebinghaus R., Kock H.H., Coggins A.M., Spain T.G., Jennings S.G. and Temme C. 2002b. Long-term measurements of atmospheric mercury at Mace Head, Irish west coast, between 1995 and 2001. Atmospheric Environment 36: 5267–5276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feng X., Sommar J., Lindqvist O. and Hong Y. 2002. Occurrence, emission and deposition of mercury from coal combustion in the Province Guizhou, China. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 139: 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng X.B., Shunlin T., Lihai S.H., Haiyu Y., Jonas S. and Oliver L. 2003. Total gaseous mercury in the atmosphere of Guiyang, PR China. The Science of the Total Environment 304: 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald W.F. 1995. Is mercury increasing in the atmosphere? The need for an atmospheric mercury network (AMNET). Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 80: 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gustin M.S., Taylor G.E. and Maxey R.A. 1997. Effect of temperature and air movement on the flux of elemental mercury from substrate to the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research 102: 3891–3898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hao C.H., XiuSheng Y. and Christopher P. 2004. Trend and variation of total gaseous mercury (TGM) in the state of Connecticut, U.S.A. during 1997–1999. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 151: 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horvat M. 2002. Mercury as a global pollutant. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 274: 981–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hylander L.D. 2001. Global mercury pollution and its expected decrease after a mercury trade ban. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 125: 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iverfeldt A., Munthe J., Brosset C. and Pacyna J. 1995. Long term changes in concentration and deposition of atmospheric mercury over Scandinavia. Water, Air & Soil Pollution 80: 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jean C.J.B. and Augustine K.D. 2003. Increasing UV-B radiation at the earth’s surface and potential effects on aqueous mercury cycling and toxicity. Chemosphere 52: 1263–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jensen A. and Iverfeldt A. 1994. Atmospheric bulk deposition of mercury to the southern Baltic sea area. In: Watras, C.J., Huckabee, J.W. (Eds.), Mercury Pollution: Integration and Synthesis. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 221–229.Google Scholar
  17. Kim K.H., Lindberg S.E. and Meyers T.P. 1995. Micrometeorological measurements of mercury vapor fluxes over background forest soils in eastern Tennessee. Atmospheric Environment 29(2): 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim K.H. and Kim M.Y. 1999. The exchange of gaseous mercury across soil-air interface in a residential area of Seoul, Korea. Atmospheric Environment 33: 3153–3165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim K.H. and Kim M.Y. 2000. The effects of anthropogenic sources on temporal distribution characteristics of total gaseous mercury in Korea. Atmospheric Environment 34: 3337–3347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim K.H. and Kim M.Y. 2001a. Some insights into short-term variability of total gaseous mercury in urban air. Atmospheric Environment 35(1): 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim K.H. and Kim M.Y. 2001b. The temporal distribution characteristics of total gaseous mercury at an urban monitoring site in Seoul during 1999–2000. Atmospheric Environment 35: 4253–4263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim K.H., Kim M.Y., Kim J. and Lee G. 2002a. The concentration and fluxes of total gaseous mercury in a western coastal area of Korea late March 2001. Atmospheric Environment 36: 3413–3427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim K.H. and Kim M.Y. 2002b. A decadal shift in total gaseous mercury concentration levels in Seoul, Korea: Changes between the late 80s and the late 90s. Atmospheric Environment 36(4): 663–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim K.H., Kim M.Y., Kim J. and Lee G. 2003. Effects of changes in environmental conditions on atmospheric mercury exchange: Comparative analysis from a rice paddy field during the two spring periods of 2001 and 2002. Journal of Geophysical Research 108(D19): 4607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim K.H., Ebinghaus R., Schroeder W.H., Blanchard P., Kock H.H., Steffen A., Froude F.A., Kim M.Y., Sungmin H. and Kim J.H. 2005. Atmospheric mercury concentrations from several observatory sites in the northern hemisphere. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 50: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kock H.H., Bieber E., Ebinghaus R., Spain T.G. and Thees B. 2005. Comparison of long-term trends and seasonal variations of atmospheric mercury concentrations at the two European coastal monitoring stations Mace Head, Ireland, and Zingst, Germany. Atmospheric Environment 39: 7549–7556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lamborg C.H., Fitzgerald W.F., O’Donnell J. and Torgersen T. 2002. A non-steady-state compartmental model of global-scale mercury biogeochemistry with interhemispheric atmospheric gradients. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 66(7): 1105–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laurier P., Martin P., Conrad B., Philippe C. and Zhang H.H. 2005. A year of continuous measurements of three atmospheric mercury species (GEM, RGM and Hgp) in southern Québec, Canada. Atmospheric Environment 39: 1275–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee D.S., Dollard G.J. and Pepler S. 1998. Gas phase mercury in the atmosphere of the United Kingdom. Atmospheric Environment 32: 855–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu S., Nadim F., Perkins C., Carley R.J., Hoag G.E. and Lin Y. 2002. Atmospheric mercury monitoring survey in Beijing, China. Chemosphere 48: 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindqvist O., Johansson K., Aastrup M., Anderson A., Bringmark L. and Hovsenius G. 1991. Mercury in Swedish environment: recent research on causes, consequences and corrective methods. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 55: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindberg S.E., Meyers T.P., Taylor G.E., Turner R.R. and Schroeder W.H. 1992. Atmospheric/surface exchange of mercury in a forest: results of modeling and gradient approaches. Journal of Geophysical Research 97: 2519–2528.Google Scholar
  33. Mark A.E. and Mae S.G. 2002. Scaling of atmospheric mercury emissions from three naturally enriched areas: Flowery Peak, Nevada; Peavine Peak, Nevada; and Long Valley Caldera, California. The Science of the Total Environment 290: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Markus K., Stephen B., Wayne B., Pierrette B., Frank F., Bruno H., Karen M.D., Martin P., Laurier P., Keith P., Bill S., Alexandra S. and Rob T. 2003. Temporal and spatial variability of total gaseous mercury in Canada: results from the Canadian Atmospheric Mercury Measurement Network (CAMNet). Atmospheric Environment 37: 1003–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mukherjee A.B., Melanen M., Ekqvist M. and Verta M. 2000. Assessment of atmospheric mercury emissions in Finland. Science of the Total Environment 259: 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakagawa R. and Hiromoto M. 1997. Geographical distribution and background levels of total mercury in the air in Japan and in neighboring countries. Chemosphere 34(4): 801–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pacyna E.G. and Pacyna J.M. 2002. Global emission of mercury from anthropogenic sources in 1995. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 137: 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pai P., Karamchandani P. and Seigneur C. 1997. Simulation of the regional atmospheric transport and fate of mercury using a comprehensive Eulerian model. Atmospheric Environment 31: 2717–2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pirrone N., Keeler G.J. and Nriagu J.O. 1996. Regional differences in worldwide emissions of mercury to the atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment 30: 2981–2987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Poissant L. and Casimir A. 1998. Water-air and soil-air exchange rate of total gaseous mercury measured at background sites. Atmospheric Environment 32: 883–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schroeder W.H., Anlauf K.G., Barrie L.A., Lu J.Y., Steffen A., Schneeberger D.R. and Berg T. 1998. Arctic springtime depletion of mercury. Nature 394: 331–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schroeder W.H., Keeler G., Kock H., Roussel P., Schneeberger D. and Schaedlich F. 1995. International field intercomparison of atmospheric mercury measurement methods. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 80: 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schroeder W.H. and Munthe J. 1998. Atmospheric mercury-an overview. Atmospheric Environment 32(5): 809–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seigneur C., Vijayaraghavan K., Lohman K., Karamchandani P. and Scott C. 2004. Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology 38: 555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Slemr F. and Scheel H.E. 1998. Trends in atmospheric mercury concentrations at the summit of the Wank mountain, Southern Germany. Atmospheric Environment 32: 845–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Slemr F. and Langer E. 1992. Increase in global atmospheric concentrations of mercury inferred from measurements over the Atlantic Ocean. Nature 355: 434–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tan H., He J.L., Liang L., Lazoff S., Sommer J., Xiao Z.F. and Lindqvist O. 2000. Atmospheric mercury deposition in Guizhou, China. Science of the Total Environment 259: 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tienho K., Chengfen C.H., Andrius U. and Kestutis K. 2006. Atmospheric gaseous mercury in Northern Taiwan. Science of Total Environment 368: 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Urba A., Kvietkus K., Sakalys J., Xiao Z. and Lindqvist O. 1995. A new sensitive and portable mercury vapor analyzer Gardis-1A. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 80: 1305–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang Q., Shen W.G. and Ma Z.W. 2000. Estimation of mercury emission from coal combustion in China. Environmental Science & Technology 34: 2711–2713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wallschlager D., Turner R.R., London J., Ebinghaus R., Kock H.H., Sommar J. and Xiao Z. 1999. Factors affecting the measurement of mercury emissions from soils with flux chambers. Journal of Geophysical Research 104: 21859–21871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xiao Z.F., Munthe J., Schroeder W.H. and Lindqvist O. 1991. Vertical fluxes of volatile mercury over forest soil and lake surfaces in Sweden. Tellus 43B: 267–270.Google Scholar
  53. Young J.H., Thomas M.H., Soononn L., Philip K.H., Seungmuk Y., Wei L., James P., Lauren F., Michael M. and Chris A. 2004. Atmospheric gaseous mercury concentrations in New York State: relationships with meteorological data and other pollutants. Atmospheric Environment 38: 6431–6446CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wanze Zhu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xuewu Fu
    • 2
  • Xinbin Feng
    • 2
  • Julia Y. Lu
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Mountain Hazard and EnvironmentChinese Academy of SciencesChengduChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of GeochemistryChinese Academy of SciencesGuiyangChina
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry and BiologyRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations