Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 136–145 | Cite as

Water consumption of a six-year-old river red gum plantation in the Southern Zagros Mountains, Iran

  • Masoud Edraki
  • Sayyed Ahang KowsarEmail author
  • Ali Asghar Mehrbakhsh
  • Ali Bordbar


Water is the most important limiting factor in the development of arid environments; therefore, optimization of water use is a necessity in desert reclamation projects. Evapotranspiration of a 6-year-old river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.) plantation, located in a sedimentation basin of an artificial recharge of the Gareh Bygone Plain groundwater system in Iran’s southern Zagros Mountains, was studied during a 7-month period. A neutron moisture probe was used to monitor soil water changes in the root zone. Soil water depletion following rapid drainage for blocks receiving relatively high, medium and low volumes of floodwater were 809.6, 312.4, and 203.1 mm, respectively, for a 150-day period. Soil water potential during most of the study period was below −1.5 MPa. This study proves that river red gum in not a suitable species for desertification control where water conservation is of vital importance. Flood irrigation of trees on 8 Aug. 1991 provided the opportunity to throw doubt upon the claim of summer dormancy of river red gum.


Water consumption Eucalyptus camaldulensis desertification control Iran 



artificial recharge of groundwater




Gareh Bygone Plain


neutron moisture probe


sedimentation basin


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armitage F.B. 1985. Irrigated forestry in arid and semiarid lands: A synthesis. IDRC, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
  2. Biddiscombe E.F., Rogers A.L., Allison H. and Field R.L. 1985. Response of ground water levels to rainfall and to leaf growth of farm plantations near salt seeps. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam) 78: 19–34.Google Scholar
  3. Bosch J.M. and Smith R.E. 1989. The effect of afforestation of indigenous scrub forest with Eucalyptus on streamflow from a small catchment in the Transvaal, South Africa. South Africa Forestry Journal 150:7–17.Google Scholar
  4. Cary J.W. 1971. Energy levels of water in a community of plants as influenced by soil moisture. Ecology 52: 710–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassel D.K. and Nielsen D.R. 1986. Field capacity and available water capacity. In: Kulte A. (ed.), Methods of soil analysis, Part I. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. Pp 901–926.Google Scholar
  6. Cornish P.M. and Vertessy R.A. 2001. Forest age-induced changes in evapotranspiration and water yield in a eucalypt forest. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam) 242:43–63.Google Scholar
  7. Gardner W.H. 1986. Water content. In: Kulte A.(ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part I. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. Pp 493–544.Google Scholar
  8. Greenwood E.A.N., Klein L., Beresford J.D. and Watson G.D. 1985. Differences in annual evaporation between grazed pasture and Eucalyptus species in plantations on a saline farm catchment. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam) 78: 261–278.Google Scholar
  9. Hillel D.1971. Soil and water: Physical principles and processes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Jackson R.D. 1972. On the calculation of hydraulic conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 36:380–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kowsar A. 1991. Floodwater spreading for desertification control: An integrated approach. Desertification Control Bulletin (UNEP) 19:3–18.Google Scholar
  12. Kowsar S.A. 1998a. Floodwater-the softest hardware. Tiempo 28:17–21.Google Scholar
  13. Kowsar S.A. 1998b. Aquifer management: A key to food security in the deserts of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Desertification Control Bulletin (UNEP) 33: 24–28.Google Scholar
  14. Lesch W. and Scott D.F. 1997. The response in water yield to thinning of Pinus patula and Eucalyptus grandis plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 99:295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Linden E. 1990. The last precious drop. Time 136(20): 34–40.Google Scholar
  16. Mabbutt J.A. 1987. Implementation of the Plan of Action to Combat Desertification: Progress since UNCOD. Land Use Policy 4:371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohammadnia M. and Kowsar S.A. 2003. Clay translocation in the artificial recharge of a groundwater system in the southern Zagros Mountains, Iran. Mountain Research and Development 23:50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Naderi A.A., Kowsar S.A. and Sarafraz A.A. 2000. Reclamation of a sandy desert through floodwater spreading. I: Sediment-induced changes in selected soil chemical and physical properties. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (Iran) 2: 9–20.Google Scholar
  19. Pooladian A. and Kowsar S.A. 2000. Aquifer management: A prelude to rehabilitation of salinized soils. Desertification Control Bulletin (UNEP) 36: 78–82.Google Scholar
  20. Putuhena W.M. and Cordery I. 2000. Some hydrological effects of changing forest cover from eucalypts to Pinus radiata. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 100:59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ritchie J.T. 1980. Climate and soil water. In: Murphy L.S., Welch L.F. and Doll E.C. (eds.), Moving up the yield curve: Advance and obstacles. ASA Special Publication 39. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. Pp 1–23.Google Scholar
  22. Ritchie J.T. and Johnson B.S. 1990. Soil and plant factors affecting evaporation. In: Stewart B.A. and Nielsen D.R. (eds.), Irrigation of agricultural crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA. Pp 363–390.Google Scholar
  23. Roberts S., Vertessy R.A. and Grayson R.G. 2000. Transpiration from Eucalyptus sieberi (L.Johnson) forests of different age. Forest Ecology and Management 143:153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roohipour H. 1985. Moisture fluctuations in the sand dunes of Khuzistan. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Jundishapur University (in Farsi).Google Scholar
  25. Sharma M.L. 1984. Evapotranspiration from a eucalyptus community. Agricultural Water Management 8:41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soil Survey Staff. 1998. Keys to soil taxonomy. 8th edition. United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington, D.C. United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  27. Starr J.R. and Stoll D.C. 1987. U.S. foreign policy on water resources in the Middle East. The Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Sveshnikova V.M. 1973. Water regime of plants under the extreme conditions of high mountain deserts of Pamirs. In: Slatyer R.O. (ed.), Plant response to climatic factors. Proceedings of the Uppsala Symposium. UNESCO, Paris. Pp 555–561.Google Scholar
  29. Tanner C.B. and Simonson R.W. 1993. History of soil science: Franklin Hiram King-pioneer scientist. Soil Science Society of America Journal 57:286–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor S.A. 1960. Principles of dry land crop management in arid and semi-arid zones. In: Plant-water relationships in arid and semi-arid conditions. Reviews of research. Arid Zone Research-XV, UNESCO, Paris. Pp191–203.Google Scholar
  31. Wullschleger S.D., Meinzer F.C. and Vertessy R.A. 1998. A review of whole-plant water use studies in trees. Tree Physiology 18:499–512.Google Scholar
  32. Yazdian A.R. and Kowsar S.A. 2003. Agha Jari Formation: A potential source of ammonium and nitrate nitrogen fertilizers. Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology (Iran) 5:153–163.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masoud Edraki
    • 1
  • Sayyed Ahang Kowsar
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ali Asghar Mehrbakhsh
    • 2
  • Ali Bordbar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Primary IndustriesSunraysia Horticultural CentreMilduraAustralia
  2. 2.Fars Research Center for Agriculture and Natural ResourcesShiraz, I.R.Iran

Personalised recommendations