Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 259–270 | Cite as

Integrated indicators-based gradation of cultivated land quality in mountainous region of Southwestern China

  • Shao Jing’an 
  • Wei Chaofu Email author
  • Xie Deti 
  • Zhou Yan 
Article

Abstract

The gradation of cultivated land is to assess the suitability of cultivated land for agricultural production in terms of natural and economic properties of land. It can be used to evaluate sustainability of land use and soil management practices. Formal and informal surveys, Delphi and comprehensive index method are adopted to identify appropriate integrated indicators, and measure the gradation of cultivated land quality. The determination of integrated indicators presents three basic features of cultivated land quality: stable plant productivity, social acceptability and maintenance of environmental quality. Pronounced concentration-dissipation law of total function score value occurs in paddy field units, with three ranges, i.e., 79∼68.5, 68.5∼59 and 59∼51. Total function score value in dryland units mainly ranges from 40 to 70, but slight concentration-dissipation law of each unit is still observed, with four ranges, i.e., 79∼68, 68∼51, 51∼37 and 37∼15. Paddy field quality is divided into three gradations, and the scales are 18 220.9 ha, 5410.6 ha and 2890.9 ha. Dryland quality is classified into four gradations, and the scales are 1548.6 ha, 8153.8 ha, 3316.3 ha and 685.2 ha. The total function score value of every gradation unit is conformed to the results of farmers’ assessment. Research results meet with the needs of accurate degree of the gradation of cultivated land quality. Integrated indicators-based gradation of cultivated land assessment accords with the characteristics of land resources and human preference in the mountains of southwestern China. This study will be useful to promote the monitoring of cultivated land quality, and to supply fine ground and knowledge for establishing appropriate cultivated land management practices in Southwestern China.

Keywords

Integrated indicator cultivated land gradation mountainous region China 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen R.B., Hewitt A.E., Partridge T.R.. 1995. Predicting land use suitability from vegetation and landform in depleted semiarid grassland, New Zealand. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32(1): 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deng Xiangzheng, Huang Jikun, Rozelle S., Uchida E.. 2006. Cultivated land conversion and potential agricultural productivity in China. Land Use Policy, 23(4): 372–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. English N.B., Weltzin J.F., Fravolini A., Thomas L., Williams D.G.. 2005. The influence of soil texture and vegetation on soil moisture under rainout shelters in a semi-desert grassland. Journal of Arid Environments, 63(1): 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feng Zhiming, Yang Yanzhao, Zhang Yaoqi, Zhang Pengtao, Li Yiqing. 2005. Grain-for-green policy and its impacts on grain supply in West China. Land Use Policy, 22(4): 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geissen V., Guzman G.M.. 2006. Fertility of tropical soils under different land use systems—a case study of soils in Tabasco, Mexico. Applied Soil Ecology, 31(1–2): 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hubacek K., Vazquez J.. 2002. The Economics of Land Use Change. Interim Report. Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
  7. Hurni H.. 1988. Principles of soil conservation for cultivated land. Soil Technology, 1(2): 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng Rongye, Tan Zhihao, Huang Jinsong, Ye Fang, Zhou Shenglu. 2004. Discussion on improvement of method for utilization coefficient and economic coefficient calculation in farmland classification: a case study in Wuxi city. Economic Geography, 22(2): 246–249. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Karlen D.L., Ditzler C.A., Andrews S.S.. 2003. Soil quality: why and how? Geoderma, 114(3–4): 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Komatsu Y., Tsunekawa A., Ju H.. 2005. Evaluation of agricultural sustainability based on human carrying capacity in drylands — a case study in rural villages in Inner Mongolia, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 108(5): 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin G.C.S., Ho S.P.S.. 2003. China’s land resources and land-use change: insights from the 1996 land survey. Land Use Policy, 20(2): 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu Jiyuan, Liu Mingliang, Tian Hanqin, Zhuang Dafang, Zhang Zengxiang, Zhang Wen, Tang Xianming, Deng Xiangzheng. 2005a. Spatial and temporal patterns of China’s cropland during 1990–2000: An analysis based on Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(4): 442–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu Jiyuan, Zhan Jinyan, Deng Xiangzheng. 2005b. Spatio-temporal Patterns and Driving Forces of Urban Land Expansion in China during the Economic Reform Era. Ambio, 34(6): 450–455.Google Scholar
  14. Mottet A., Ladet S., Coqué N., Gibon A.. 2006. Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: A case study in the Pyrenees. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(2–4): 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Okoli C., Pawlowski S.D.. 2004. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1): 15–29.Google Scholar
  16. Paudel G.S., Thapa G.B.. 2004. Impact of social, institutional and ecological factors on land management practices in mountain watersheds of Nepal. Applied Geography, 24(1): 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rasul G., Thapa G.B.. 2004. Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh: an assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives. Agricultural Systems, 79(3): 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reeves D.W.. 1997. The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping system. Soil Till. Res. 43(1–2): 131–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shao Jing’an, Wei Chaofu, Xie Deti. 2005. Index system of agricultural land classification and gradation in County districts of undeveloped western region. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science), 31(6): 1133–1137. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Shi T., Gill R.. 2005. Developing effective policies for the sustainable development of ecological agriculture in China: the case study of Jinshan County with a systems dynamics model. Ecological Economics, 53(2): 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tao Fulu, Yokozawa M., Hayashi Y., Lin Erda. 2003. Future climate change, the agricultural water cycle, and agricultural production in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95(1): 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shao Jing’an 
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wei Chaofu 
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Xie Deti 
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhou Yan 
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Resource and EnvironmentSouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Chongqing Key Lab. of Digital AgricultureChongqingChina
  3. 3.College of Resource and EnvironmentGuizhou UniversityGuiyangChina

Personalised recommendations