Advertisement

Journal of Mountain Science

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 247–258 | Cite as

Indigenous knowledge on soil classification of ethnic groups in Luang Prabang province of the Lao PDR

  • Linkham DouangsavanhEmail author
  • Vongpaphane Manivong
  • Anan Polthanee
  • Roengsak Katawatin
  • Yoshio Inoue
Article

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to demonstrate ethno-scientific elicitation techniques in retrieving indigenous knowledge at village-level, and to document the indigenous soil classification systems of different ethnic groups in Luang Prabang province in the Lao PDR. The study area comprised three villages — Nambo, Huaymaha and Thapo, in the Phonxay district of Luang Prabang province. Three ethnic groups were covered by the study — Hmong, Khmu and Lao Loum. All three ethnic groups used soil color as main criteria for soil classification. However, even within the same ethnic group, sometimes different villages have differences in the way they classify soils; this was apparent for the Hmong ethnic group in the villages of Huaymaha and Nambo. A significant difference of the Lao Loum ethnic group from the other two, was the emphasis used in classifying soil types according to their water holding capabilities. In contrast, the Khmu and Hmong classified many soil types in relation to their rock content (‘with rock’ or ‘pure rock’ sometimes being used). The results of the study suggest that the ethnic groups classify the soils in relation to their potential for different types of agricultural production.

Key words

Indigenous knowledge ethnic groups soil classification anthropological Lao PDR 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrera-Bassols, N and Zinck, J.A. 2000. Ethnopedology in a Worldwide Perspective. ITC (2000) Publication 77. Pp. 651.Google Scholar
  2. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 1997. Micro-projects Programme Phase II in Luang Prabang Province, District level baseline report. Micro-Projects Luang Prabang, Phase II, Planning Unit. February 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation (FAO). 1998. “World Reference Base for Soil Resources”, World Soil Resources Report Number 84, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  4. Lao-Swedish Upland Agriculture and Forestry Research Programme (LSUAFRP). 2001. Program Document. The Lao-Swedish Upland Agriculture and Forestry Research Programme. NAFRI. Vientiane. Pp. 27.Google Scholar
  5. Lao-Swedish Upland Agriculture and Forestry Research Programme (LSUAFRP). 2003. Report on Diagnostic Survey in Phonexay District. Socioeconomics Component. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane, Lao PDR.Google Scholar
  6. Lao-Swedish Upland Agriculture and Forestry Research Programme (LSUAFRP). 2003. Annual Technical Research Review and Planning Workshop. Lao-Swedish Upland Agriculture and Forestry Research Program, NAFRI, Vientiane.Google Scholar
  7. Lao-Swedish Upland Agriculture and Forestry Research Programme (LSUAFRP). 2003. Field Report on Land Use Planning and Land Management Activities in Phonsay District.Google Scholar
  8. Lao-Swedish Upland Agriculture and Forestry Research Program, NAFRI, Vientiane.Google Scholar
  9. Ministry of Communication, Transport, Post and Construction (MCTPC) and IUCN. 2000. Luang Prabang Province Environmental Inventory. Vientiane, Lao PDR.Google Scholar
  10. Polthanee, A. 2001. Indigenous Farming Practices and Knowledge in Northeast Thailand: Some Examples. Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.Google Scholar
  11. Souvanthong, P. 1994. National Report on Lao PDR. Shifting Agriculture. Its Social, Economic and Environmental Values Relative to alternative Land Uses or Sustainable Agricultural Development. International Training on Environment-Oriented Resource Planning in Intensive Agriculture 29 July to 23 August 1994, Germany.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linkham Douangsavanh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vongpaphane Manivong
    • 1
  • Anan Polthanee
    • 2
  • Roengsak Katawatin
    • 2
  • Yoshio Inoue
    • 3
  1. 1.Socio-economic Research SectionNational Agriculture and Forestry Research InstituteLao PDR
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureKhon Kaen UniversityThailand
  3. 3.National Institute for Agro-Environmental SciencesJapan

Personalised recommendations