Advertisement

Service Business

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 631–663 | Cite as

Triggering the internationalization of Malaysian quantity surveying firms

  • Chen Wang
  • Lincoln C. Wood
  • Hamzah Abdul-Rahman
  • Han Biao Ng
Empirical article

Abstract

Although there is an increasing trend of services being traded across borders, quantity surveying (QS) firms in the construction sector remain under-researched. The triggers for the increasing globalization of QS firms are not clear, nor how these triggers are perceived by managers at different levels. A questionnaire was administered in over 84 QS consultancy firms, and the results were analyzed using the repertory grid technique, allowing a comparison between the general respondents and a focus group of senior managers. The findings show that senior managers with significant experience realize the importance of a strong internal capability of the QS firm and the capability to develop innovative offerings, coupled with an awareness of the target market and the ability to secure revenue through key contracts. Firm- and location-specific factors were more important than other competitive advantages or foreign markets’ characteristics when deciding to globalize.

Keywords

Internationalization of services Quantity surveying firms Repertory grid Malaysia 

References

  1. Abdul-Aziz AR, Wong SS (2011) Business networks and internationalisation of contractors from developing countries: an explorative study. Eng Constr Archit Manag 18(3):282–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdul-Aziz AR, Ngau DP, Lim YM, Nuruddin AR (2011) Internationalization of Malaysian quantity surveying firms: Exploring the best fit models. Constr Manag Econ 29(1):49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdullah F, Haron I (2007) Profile of the quantity surveying practice in Malaysia. In: International conference on construction industry, 24–24 June 2007. Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  4. Abdul-Rahman H, Wang C, Eng KS (2011) Repertory grid technique in the development of Tacit-based Decision Support System (TDSS) for sustainable site layout planning. Autom Constr 20(7):818–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abdul-Rahman H, Wang C, Wood LC, Khoo YM (2014) Defects in affordable housing projects in Klang Valley, Malaysia. J Perform Constr Facil 28(2):272–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bharadwaj SG, Varadarajan PR, Fahy J (1993) Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: a conceptual model and research propositions. J Mark 57(4):83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calantone RJ, Kim D, Schmidt JB, Cavusgil ST (2006) The influence of internal and external firm factors on international product adaptation strategy and export performance: a three-country comparison. J Bus Res 59(2):176–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandran VGR, Rasiah R (2013) Firm size, technological capability, exports and economic performance: the case of electronics industry in Malaysia. J Bus Econ Manag 14(4):741–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen WT, Chen T, Lu CS, Liu S (2012) Analyzing relationships among success variables of construction partnering using structural equation modeling: a case study of Taiwan’s construction industry. J Civ Eng Manag 18(6):783–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleeve E (2009) The eclectic paradigm and foreign direct investment in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Proceedings of the 10th IAABD international academy of African business and development annual conference, 19–23 May 2009, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimitratos P, Lioukas S, Carter S (2004) The relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: the importance of domestic environment. Int Bus Rev 13(1):19–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doloreux D, Laperrière A (2014) Internationalisation and innovation in the knowledge-intensive business services. Serv Bus 8(4):635–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunning JH (1980) Toward an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests. J Int Bus Stud 11(1):9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elango B (2003) The effects of host country factors on the internationalization of the US reinsurance industry. J Insur Issues 26(2):93–113Google Scholar
  15. Fransella F (2003) International handbook of personal construct psychology. Wiley, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hessels J, Parker SC (2013) Constraints, internationalization and growth: a cross-country analysis of European SMEs. J World Bus 48(1):137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaffe DE, Nebenzahl DI (2001) National image and competitive advantage: theory and practice of country of origin. Copenhagen Business School Press, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  18. Javalgi RG, Martin CL (2007) Internationalization of services: identifying the building-blocks for future research. J Serv Mark 21(6):391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Javalgi RG, White DS (2002) Strategic challenges for the marketing of services internationally. Int Mark Rev 19(6):563–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelly GA (1991) The psychology of personal construct. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Konan DE, Maskus KE (2006) Quantifying the impact of services liberalization in a developing country. J Dev Econ 81(1):142–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kotha S, Rindova VP, Rothaermel FT (2001) Assets and actions: firm-specific factors in the internationalization of US Internet firms. J Int Bus Stud 32:769–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin D, Wood LC, Lu Q (2012) Improving business incubator service performance in China: the role of networking resources and capabilities. Serv Ind J 32(13):2091–2114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lovelock CH, Yip GS (1996) Developing global strategies for services businesses. Calif Manag Rev 38(2):64–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu JW, Beamish PW (2001) The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strateg Manag J 22(6–7):565–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyles MA, Park SH (2013) The life cycle of internationalization. Bus Horiz 56(4):405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacKay D (2003) An example inference task: clustering. In: Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 284–292Google Scholar
  28. Malaysian Ministry of International Trade and Industry (2013) Autonomous liberalisation. http://myservices.miti.gov.my/web/guest/autonomous. Retrieved 14 Aug 2016
  29. Mas-tur A, Soriano DR (2014) The level of innovation among young innovative companies: the impacts of knowledge-intensive services use, firm characteristics and the entrepreneur attributes. Serv Bus 8(1):51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mauri AJ, Jing L, Joao NDF (2013) The influence of strategic patterns of internationalization on the accuracy and bias of earnings forecasts by financial analysts. Int Bus Rev 22(4):725–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MIDA (2015) Malaysian Investment Development Authority. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. http://www.mida.gov.my/home/. Retrieved 16 Jan 2016
  32. Mithat UM, Akin K, Erin C, Cavusgil ST (2013) Do barriers to export vary for born globals and across stages of internationalization? An empirical inquiry in the emerging market of Turkey. Int Bus Rev 22(5):800–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peters WL (1994) Repertory grid as a tool for training needs analysis. Learn Org 1(2):23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. PSDC (2015) Professional Services Development Corporation International. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.: https://www.gmdu.net/corp-125706.html. Retrieved 16 Jan 2016
  35. Sapienza HJ, Autio E, George G, Zahra SA (2006) A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Acad Manag Rev 31(4):914–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shamsuddoha AK, Ali MY, Ndubisi NO (2009) Impact of government export assistance on internationalization of SMEs from developing nations. J Enterp Inf Manag 22(4):408–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shang Q, Poon JPH (2013) International spillovers, knowledge acquisition and transfer among Japanese firms in the United States. J Bus Econ Manag 14(3):535–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Slater P (1964) The principal components of a repertory grid. Vincent Adrew, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Suárez-Ortega SM, Álamo-Vera FR (2005) SMEs’ internationalization: firms and managerial factors. Int J Entrep Behav Res 11(4):258–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sun K, Lee S (2013) Determinants of degree of internationalization for US restaurant firms. Int J Hosp Manag 33:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Surroca J, Tribó JA, Waddock S (2010) Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strateg Manag J 31(5):463–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tan FB, Hunter MG (2002) The repertory grid technique: a method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS Q 26(1):39–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tatoglu E, Demirbag M, Kaplan G (2003) Motives for retailer internationalization to Central and Eastern Europe. Emerg Mark Fin Trade 39(4):40–57Google Scholar
  44. Xiao SS, Jeong I, Moon JJ, Chung CC, Chung J (2013) Internationalization and performance of firms in China: moderating effects of governance structure and the degree of centralized control. J Int Manag 19(2):118–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chen Wang
    • 1
  • Lincoln C. Wood
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hamzah Abdul-Rahman
    • 4
  • Han Biao Ng
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil EngineeringHuaqiao UniversityXiamenChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of ManagementThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.School of Information SystemsCurtin UniversityBentleyAustralia
  4. 4.Vice Chancellor’s OfficeInternational University of Malaya-WalesKuala LumpurMalaysia
  5. 5.Faculty of Built Environment, Centre for Construction Innovation and Project Management (CIPM)University of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations