Advertisement

Service Business

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 539–561 | Cite as

Using the balanced scorecard on supply chain integration performance—a case study of service businesses

  • Hsin Hsin ChangEmail author
  • Chung-Jye Hung
  • Kit Hong Wong
  • Chin-Ho Lee
Case study

Abstract

Supply chains are indispensable to corporations that seek to serve suppliers and customers better, to boost organization performance, to strengthen competitiveness, and to achieve continuous success. Currently, corporations place great emphasis on both supply chains and on balanced scorecards (BSCs) to develop effective measures to evaluate firm performance. This study discusses the integration of supply chain and performance based on the BSC measures developed by Kaplan and Norton (Harv Bus Rev 71(5):134–147, 1993; Harv Bus Rev 74(1):75–85, 1996) and Brewer and Speh (J Bus Logist 21(1): 79–93, 2000). The research applies case studies and a conceptual framework, modifying propositions accordingly. The main objectives of this study are to discuss the construction and implementation of supply chains, to determine how to handle supply chain barriers and to evaluate supply chain integration performance using the idea of a BSC. Companies at different levels in the supply chain are better served by assigning different levels of importance to different types of integration. Case studies show that supply chain integration involves supplier, internal, and customer barriers. The results of these studies have suggested that integrated supply chains can be dominated by one controlling member, which can be located either upstream or downstream in the chain. A new finding in this study is that varying degrees of supply chain integration are obtained due to corporations’ different positions in an industry. The study provides some insights for firms in the process of implementing a supply chain management system.

Keywords

Balanced scorecard Supply chain integration Performance evaluation 

References

  1. Ahmad S, Schroeder RG (2001) The impact of EDI on delivery performance. Prod Oper Manag 10(1):16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akmanligil M, Palvia PC (2004) Strategies for global information systems development. Info Manag 42(1):45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alavi M, Carlson P (1992) A review of MIS research and disciplinary development. J Manag Info Syst 8(4):45–62Google Scholar
  4. Babich V, Burnetas AN, Ritchken PH (2007) Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 9(2):123–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beamon BM (1998) Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods. Int J Prod Econ 55(3):281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhagwat R, Sharma MK (2007) Performance measurement of supply chain management: a balanced scorecard approach. Comput Ind Eng 53(1):43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhatnagar R, Sohal AS (2005) Supply chain competitiveness: measuring the impact of location factors, uncertainty and manufacturing practices. Technovation 25(5):443–456Google Scholar
  8. Brewer PC, Speh TW (2000) Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance. J Bus Logist 21(1):79–93Google Scholar
  9. Bullinger H, Kühner M, Van Hoof A (2002) Analyzing supply chain performance using a balance measurement method. Int J Prod Res 40(15):3533–3543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buxmann P, Ahsen A, Díaz LM, Wolf K (2004) Usage and evaluation of SCM software—Results of an empirical study in the European automotive industry. Info Syst J 14(3):295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cai L, Liu X, Xiao Z, Liu J (2009) Improving supply chain performance: a systematic approach to analyzing iterative KPI accomplishment. Decis Support Syst 46(2):512–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang HH (2005) The Influence of continuous improvement and performance factors in total quality organizations. TQM Bus Excell 16(3):415–439Google Scholar
  13. Chang HH (2006) Technical and management perceptions of enterprise information systems importance, implementation, and benefits. Info Syst J 16(3):263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang HH (2009) An empirical study of evaluating SCM integration using the BSC in Taiwan. Serv Ind J 29(2):185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang HH, Wong KH (2010) Adoption of e-procurement and participation of e-marketplace on firm performance: trust as a moderator. Info Manag 47(5–6):262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang HH, Wang HW, Kao TW (2010) The determinant of long-term relationship on inter-organizational systems performance. J Bus Ind Mark 25(2):106–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chopra S, Meindl P (2001) SCM: strategy, planning, and operation. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  18. Choy KL, Lee WB, Lo V (2003) An intelligent supplier relationship management system for selecting and benchmarking suppliers. Int J Technol Manag 26(7):717–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Christopher M (1998) Logistics and supply chain management. Pitman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Corbett CJ, Blackburn JD, Van Wassenhove LN (1999) Partnerships to improve supply chains. Sloan Manage Rev 40(4):71–82Google Scholar
  21. Cousins PD, Spekman R (2003) Strategic supply and the management of inter- and intra-organizational relationships. J Purch Supply Manag 9(1):19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cox A (2001) Understanding buyer and supplier power: a framework for procurement and supply competence. J Supply Chain Manag 37(2):8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eisenhaeds KM (1989) Building theories form case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550Google Scholar
  24. Ellram LM, Tate WL, Billington C (2004) Understanding and managing the services supply chain. J Supply Chain Manag 40(4):17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farahani RZ, Elahipanah M (2008) A genetic algorithm to optimize the total cost and service level for just-in-time distribution in a supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fernandes KJ, Raja V, Whalley A (2006) Lessons from implementing the balanced scorecard in a small and medium size manufacturing organization. Technovation 26(5/6):623–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frohlich MT (2002) E-integration in the supply chain: barriers and performance. Decis Sci 33(4):537–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frohlich MT, Westbrook R (2001) Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. J Oper Manag 19(2):185–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gunasekaran A, Patel C, Tirtiroglu E (2001) Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. Int J Prod Oper Manag 21(1/2):71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gunasekaran A, Patel C, McGaughey RE (2004) A framework for supply chain performance measurement. Int J Prod Econ 87(3):333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffecker J, Goldenberg C (1994) Using the balanced scorecard to develop companywide performance measure. J Cost Manag 8(Fall):5–17Google Scholar
  32. Holweg M, Disney S, Holmstrom J, Smaros J (2005) Supply chain collaboration: making sense of the strategy continuum. Eur Manag J 23(2):170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Horvath L (2001) Collaboration: the key to value creation in SCM. Supply Chain Manag Int J 6(5):205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hult GT, Ketchen DJ, Slater SF (2004) Information processing, knowledge development, and strategic supply chain performance. Acad Manag J 47(2):241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jayaram J, Vickery S, Droge C (2000) The effects of information system infrastructure and the process improvement on supply chain performance. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 30(3/4):314–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 69(1):71–79Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1993) Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harv Bus Rev 71(5):134–147Google Scholar
  38. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harv Bus Rev 74(1):75–85Google Scholar
  39. Kotter JP (1995) Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harv Bus Rev 73(2):59–67Google Scholar
  40. Krause DR, Handfield RB, Scannell TV (1998) An empirical investigation of supplier development: reactive and strategic processes. J Oper Manag 17(1):39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lambert DM, Cooper MC (2000) Issues in supply chain management. Ind Mark Manag 29(1):65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee HL, Billington C (1992) Management supply chain inventory: pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Manag Rev 33(3):65–74Google Scholar
  43. Liker JK & Choi TY (2004) Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Business Review Dec.: 104-113Google Scholar
  44. Maloni MJ, Benton WC (1997) Supply chain partnerships: opportunities for operations research. Eur J Oper Res 101(3):419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mansini A, Van Wassenhove LN (2009) ERP competence-building mechanisms: an exploratory investigation of configurations of ERP adopters in the European and U.S. manufacturing sectors. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 11(2):274–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Minner S (2003) Multiple-supplier inventory models in supply chain management: a review. Int J Prod Econ 81(82):265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Narasimhan R, Jayaram J (1998) Causal linkages in SCM: an exploratory study of North American manufacturing firms. Decis Sci 29(3):579–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nitin Seth SG, Deshmukh PV (2006) A conceptual model for quality of service in the supply chain. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 36(7):547–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Park JH, Lee JK, Yoo JS (2005) A framework for designing the balance supply chain scorecard. Eur J Info Syst 14(4):335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Persson F, Olhager J (2002) Performance simulation of supply chain designs. Int J Prod Econ 77(3):231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harv Bus Rev 68(3):79–92Google Scholar
  52. Ramda TR, Morgan RM, Morton AR (2003) Efficient versus responsive supply chain choice. J Prod Innov Manage 20(6):430–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shepherd C, Günter H (2006) Measuring supply chain performance: current research and future directions. Int J Prod Perform Manag 55(3/4):242–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simon C, Pietro R, Mihalis G (2000) SCM: an analytical framework for critical literature review. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 6(1):67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Speckman RE, Spear J, Kamauff J (2002) Supply chain competence: learning as a key component. Supply Chain Manag 7(1):41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swinney R, Netessine S (2009) Long-term contracts under the threat of supplier default. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 11(1):109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tan KC, Lyman SB, Wisner JD (2002) Supply chain management: a strategic perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 22(6):614–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ward P, Zhou H (2006) Impact of IT integration and lean/JIT practices on lead-time performance. Decis Sci 37(2):177–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yin R (2003) Case study research design and method. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hsin Hsin Chang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chung-Jye Hung
    • 2
  • Kit Hong Wong
    • 1
  • Chin-Ho Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationNational Cheng Kung UniversityTaiwanR.O.C.
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryMedical College and Hospital, National Cheng Kung UniversityTaiwanR.O.C.

Personalised recommendations