Temporal effect of 2,4-D on induction of embryogenic nuclellar cultures and somatic embryo development of ‘Carabao’ mango

  • B. L. Lad
  • S. Jayasankar
  • F. Pliego-Alfaro
  • P. A. Moon
  • R. E. Litz
Developmental Biology/Morphogenesis

Summary

Embryogenic nucellar cultures were established on B5 major salts, MS minor salts and organics, 400 mg/l−1 glutamine, 60 g/l−1 sucrose, 2 g/l−1 gellan gum, and 4.5 µM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). There was no clear relationship between developmental age of the nucellar explants and induction of embryogenic cultures. The temporal requirements for culture initiation and for induction of embryogenic competence from nucellar explants were determined by pulsing the cultures for 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, and 63 d. Culture initiation required a minimum 7–14 d pulse with 2,4-D, and was maximum after a 56-d pulse; however, embryogenic competence was optimum after a minimum of 28 d exposure to 2,4-D. Somatic embryogenesis occurred directly from the nucellar explants at low frequencies. Somatic embryo maturation only occurred following plating of suspensions onto semisolid medium, and was stimulated by 2.4–4.8 µM kinetin and 4.4 µM 6-benzyladenine.

Key words

induction somatic embryogenesis Mangifera indica 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ammirato, P. V. Patterns of development in culture. In: Henke, R. R.; Hughes, K. W.; Constantin, M. J., et al. eds. Tissue culture in forestry and agriculture. New York: Plenum Press; 1985:9–29.Google Scholar
  2. Ammirato, P. V. Organizational events during somatic embryogenesis. In: Green, C. E.; Somers, D. A.; Hackett, W. P., et al., eds. Plant tissue and cell culture. New York: Alan R. Liss; 1987:57–81.Google Scholar
  3. Ammirato, P. V.; Steward, F. C. Some effects of the environment on the development of embryos from cultured free cells. Bot. Gaz. 132:149–158; 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christianson, M. L.; Warnick, D. A. Competence and determination in the process of in vitro shoot organogenesis. Dev. Biol. 95:288–293; 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeWald, S. G.; Litz, R. E.; Moore, G. A. Optimizing somatic embryo production in mango. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 114:712–716; 1989a.Google Scholar
  6. DeWald, S. G.; Litz, R. E.; Moore, G. A. Maturation and germination of mango somatic embryos. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sic. 114:837–841; 1989b.Google Scholar
  7. Fujimura, T.; Komamine, A. Mode of action of 2,4-D and zeatin on somatic embryogenesis in a carrot cell suspension culture. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 99:1–8; 1980.Google Scholar
  8. Gamborg, O. L.; Miller, R. A.; Ojima, K. Plant cell cultures. I. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 50:151–158; 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halperin, W. Alternative morphogenetic events in cell suspensions. Am. J. Bot. 53:443–453; 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knight, R. J., Jr. Important mango cultivars and their descriptors. In: Litz, R. E., ed. Mango botany, production and uses. Wallingford, England: CAB International; 1997:543–565.Google Scholar
  11. Litz, R. E. The mango. In: Evans, D. A.; Sharp, W. R.; Ammirato, P. V., eds. Handbook of plant cell culture. Vol. 4. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.; 1986:612–625.Google Scholar
  12. Litz, R. E.; Hendrix, R. C.; Moon, P. A. Induction of embryogenic mango cultures as affected by genotype, explanting, 2,4-D and embryogenic nurse culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (in press); 1997.Google Scholar
  13. Litz, R. E.; Lavi, U. Biotechnology. In: Litz, R. E., ed. Mango botany, production and use. Wallingford, England: CAB International; 1997:401–423.Google Scholar
  14. Litz, R. E.; Mathews, V. H.; Moon, P. A., et al. Somatic embryos of mango (Mangifera indica L.). In: Redenbaugh, K., ed. Synseeds applications of synthetic seeds to crop improvement. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1993:409–425.Google Scholar
  15. Litz, R. E.; Moon, P. A.; Mathews, H., et al. Somatic embryogenesis in mango (Mangifera indica L.). In: Jain, S. M.; Gupta, P. K.; Newton, R. J., eds. Somatic embryogenesis in woody plants. Vol. 2. Angiosperms. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995:341–356.Google Scholar
  16. Maheshwari, P.; Rangaswamy, N. S. Polyembryony and in vitro cultures of embryos of Citrus and Mangifera. Indian J. Hortic. 15:272–282; 1958.Google Scholar
  17. Mathews, H.; Litz, R. E.; Wilde, D. H., et al. Stable integration and expression of β-glucuronidase and NPT II genes in mango somatic embryos. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 28P:172–178; 1992.Google Scholar
  18. Monsalud, M. J.; Mathews, H.; Litz, R. E., et al. Control of hyperhydricity in mango (Mangifera indica L.) somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 42:195–205; 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mukherjee, S. K. Introduction: botany and importance. In: Litz, R. E., ed. Mango, botany, production and uses. Wallingford, England: CAB International; 1997:1–19.Google Scholar
  20. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497; 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walker, K. A.; Wendeln, M. L.; Jaworski, E. G. Organogenesis in callus cultures of Medicago sativa. The temporal separation of induction processes from differentiation processes. Plant Sci. Lett. 16:23–30; 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for In Vitro Biology 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. L. Lad
    • 1
  • S. Jayasankar
    • 2
  • F. Pliego-Alfaro
    • 3
  • P. A. Moon
    • 2
  • R. E. Litz
    • 2
  1. 1.Konkan Krishi VidyapeethCollege of AgricultureRatnagiriIndia
  2. 2.Tropical Research and Education CenterUniversity of FloridaHomestead
  3. 3.Departamento de Biologia VegetalCampus de TeatinosMalagaSpain

Personalised recommendations