Advertisement

A new temporary immersion system for commercial micropropagation of banana (Musa AAA cv. Grand Naine)

  • Jericó Jabín Bello-BelloEmail author
  • Carlos Alberto Cruz-Cruz
  • Juan Carlos Pérez-Guerra
Plant Tissue Culture
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

Temporary immersion systems (TIS) are among the best options for commercial micropropagation. However, although successes have been reported with TIS, it is necessary to establish the most suitable system. The aim of this research was to compare the efficiency of different banana (Musa AAA cv. Grand Naine) micropropagation systems. In addition, a liquid medium with partial immersion and a semi-solid culture medium were evaluated. At 28 d of culture, the number and length of shoots, number of leaves per shoot, chlorophyll content, stomatal index, and the percentage of closed stomata were recorded. Additionally, the survival percentage and ex vitro development of the plantlets were evaluated during acclimatization. Results showed that TIS have a higher multiplication rate with respect to partial immersion and semi-solid medium. The chlorophyll content, stomatal index, and stomata functioning were affected by the different culture systems. The different culture systems had no effect on the survival percentage, although morphological differences were observed during acclimatization. The SETIS™ bioreactor was more efficient and resulted in better development in the plants obtained in vitro and ex vitro, which proved this system to be a useful alternative for banana micropropagation.

Keywords

Temporary immersion systems Chlorophyll Stomata Acclimatization 

Notes

Funding information

The CONACYT-Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus Córdoba financially supported the study.

References

  1. Alvard D, Cote F, Teisson C (1993) Comparison of methods of liquid medium culture for banana micropropagation: effects of temporary immersion of explants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 32:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aragón CE, Escalona M, Capote I, Pina D, Cejas I, Rodríguez R, Cañal MJ, Sandoval J, Roels S, Deberch P, Gonzalez-Olmedo J (2005) Photosynthesis and carbon metabolism in plantain (Musa AAB) plantlets growing in temporary immersion bioreactors and during ex vitro acclimatization. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 41:550–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aragón CE, Escalona M, Rodriguez R, Cañal MJ, Capote I, Pina D, González-Olmedo J (2010) Effect of sucrose, light, and carbon dioxide on plantain micropropagation in temporary immersion bioreactors. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 46:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aragón CE, Sánchez C, Gonzalez-Olmedo J, Escalona M, Carvalho L, Amâncio S (2014) Comparison of plantain plantlets propagated in temporary immersion bioreactors y gelled medium during in vitro growth y acclimatization. Biol Plant 58:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asayesh MZ, Vahdati K, Aliniaeifard S, Askari N (2017) Enhancement of ex vitro acclimation of walnut plantlets through modification of stomatal characteristics in vitro. Sci Hortic 220:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Büssis D, Von Groll U, Fisahn J, Altman T (2006) Stomatal aperture can compensate altered stomatal density in Arabidopsis thaliana at growth light conditions. Funct Plant Biol 33:1037–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dale J, James A, Paul JY, Khanna H, Smith M, Peraza-Echeverria S, Garcia-Bastidas F, Kema G, Waterhouse P, Mengersen K, Harding R (2017) Transgenic Cavendish bananas with resistance to Fusarium wilt tropical race 4. Nat Commun 8:1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ducos JP, Labbe G, Lambot C, Pétiard V (2007) Pilot scale process for the production of pre-germinated somatic embryos of selected robusta (Coffea canephora) clones. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 43:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Escalona M, Lorenzo JC, Gonzalez B, Danquita M, Desjardins Y, Barroto CG (1999) Pinneaple (Ananas Comosus L. Merr), micropropagation in temporaty immersion system. Plant Cell Rep 18:743–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Etienne H, Berthouly M (2002) Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 69:215–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Etienne H, Bertrand B, Georget F, Lartaud M, Montes F, Dechamp E, Verdeil JL, Barry-Etienne D (2013) Development of coffee somatic and zygotic embryos to plants differs in the morphological, histochemical and hydration aspects. Tree Physiol 33:640–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fu X, Cheng S, Liao Y, Huang B, Du B, Zeng W, Jiang Y, Duan X, Yang Z (2018) Comparative analysis of pigments in red and yellow banana fruit. Food Chem 239:1009–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Georgiev V, Schumann A, Pavlov A, Bley T (2014) Temporary immersion systems in plant biotechnology. Eng. Life Sci 14:607–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harborne JB (1973) Nitrogen compounds. In: Harborne JB (ed) Phytochemical methods. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 166–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hazarika BN (2006) Morpho-physiological disorders in in vitro culture of plants. Sci Horti 108(2):105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Monja-Mio KM, Barredo PF, Herrera HG, Esqueda VM, Robert ML (2015) Development of the stomatal complex and leaf surface of Agave angustifolia Haw. ‘Bacanora’ plantlets during the in vitro to ex vitro transition process. Sci Hortic 189:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth y bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ramírez-Mosqueda MA, Iglesias-Andreu LG (2016) Evaluation of different temporary immersion systems (BIT®, BIG, and RITA®) in the micropropagation of Vanilla planifolia Jacks. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 52:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roels S, Noceda C, Escalona M, Sandoval J, Canal MJ, Rodríguez R, Debergh P (2006) The effect of headspace renewal in a temporary immersion bioreactor on plantain (Musa AAB) shoot proliferation and quality. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 84:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Steingroewer J, Bley T, Georgiev V, Ivanov I, Lenk F, Marchev A, Pavlov A (2013) Bioprocessing of differentiated plant in vitro systems. Eng Life Sci 13:26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tisserat B, Vandercook CE (1985) Development of an automated plant culture system. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 5:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vervit (2018) SETIS™ Bioreactor Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. http://www.setis-systems.be. Cited 10 de Feb 2018
  23. Vieira LN, Fraga HPF, dos Anjos KG, Puttkammer CC, Scherer RF, da Silva DA, Guerra MP (2015) Light-emitting diodes (LED) increase the stomata formation and chlorophyll content in Musa acuminate (AAA) ‘Nanicão Corupá’ in vitro plantlets. Theor Exp Plant Physiol 27:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang F, Chen ZH, Shabala S (2017) Hypoxia sensing in plants: on a quest for ion channels as putative oxygen sensors. Plant Cell Physiol 58:1126–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilken D, Gonzalez EJ, Gerth A, Gómez-Kosky R, Schumann A, Claus D (2014) Effect of immersion systems, lighting, and TIS designs on biomass increase in micropropagating banana (Musa spp. cv. ‘Grande naine’AAA). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 50:582–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilkinson H (1979) The plant surface (mainly leaf). In: Metcalfe CR, Chalk L (eds) Anatomy of dicotyledons. Claredon Press, Oxford, pp 97–165Google Scholar
  27. Wu HC, Kuo ML, Chen CM (2018) Promotion of vegetative growth in force-ventilated Protea cynaroides L. explants cultured in modified temporary immersion culture vessels. HortScience 53:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu Z, Zhou G (2008) Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. J Exp Bot 59:3317–3325CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for In Vitro Biology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CONACYT-Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus CórdobaAmatlán de los ReyesMexico
  2. 2.Universidad Veracruzana-Facultad de Ciencias QuímicasOrizabaMexico
  3. 3.VERVIT bvbaZelzateBelgium

Personalised recommendations