High-efficiency somatic embryogenesis of a broad range of Brazilian Saccharum spp. hybrids (sugarcane) varieties using explants from previously established in vitro plants
- 52 Downloads
The current study assessed the embryogenic potential of different Brazilian Saccharum spp. hybrid (sugarcane) varieties, using explants from previously established in vitro plants, and determined the morphogenic capacity of calluses to regenerate plants during consecutive subcultures. After examining various explant lengths (1 to 15 mm) for callus initiation, an optimal length of 12 mm was determined, and 14 sugarcane varieties were studied. Callus induction occurred on Murashige and Skoog medium with 3.0 mg L−1 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, in the dark. After 40 d, calluses were divided according to their predominant type: the mucilaginous part remained in the dark on fresh induction medium, whereas the compact nodular callus fraction was transferred to a regeneration medium containing 1.86 mg L−1 1-naphthaleneacetic acid and 0.09 mg L−1 6-benzylaminopurine and was cultivated in light. This callus selection based on morphological type took place over three consecutive subcultures, spanning 22 wk. The embryogenic process was asynchronous and the formation of the first plants was registered at 6 wk of cultivation. The embryogenic callus regeneration rate was kept at over 60% until the third subculture in 13 of the 14 varieties examined. However, delayed regeneration was observed, likely due to the aging of calluses. The protocol reported here utilized the embryogenic potential of sugarcane varieties in combination with efficient and quick regeneration and should thus provide an attractive alternative source material for the production of transgenics and/or large-scale clonal multiplication of sugarcane.
KeywordsSaccharum spp. callus culture Selective subculture Morphogenic capacity Large-scale propagation Regeneration
We would like to thank Dr. Adriane Amaral (Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros, Aracaju, Brazil) for providing the biological material for the experiments.
GFN performed experiments, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript. ZGL helped with the morpho-anatomical and histochemical analyses. MP analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. JESP assisted in the selection and collection of sugarcane material in the field, designed experiments, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors agreed on the final version for publication.
Current research was partially funded by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Grant 305121/2015-4), by Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep, Grant 01.08.0597.01), and by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes/Embrapa 001-2011/Grant 39).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Ahloowalia BS, Maretzki A (1983) Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane. Plant Cell Rep 2:21–25Google Scholar
- Brasil (2016) Ministério da Agricultura. Cana-de-açúcar. http://www.agricultura.gov.br/vegetal/culturas/cana-de-acucar. Accessed 24 Aug 2016
- Conab, Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2018) Acompanhamento da safra brasileira: cana-de-açúcar, v.4, Safra 2017/18. Brasília, 73 pGoogle Scholar
- Dibax R, Alcantara GB, Machado MP, Bespalhok Filho JC, Oliveira RA (2011) Plant regeneration of sugarcane cv. RB931003 and RB98710 from somatic embryos and acclimatization. J Biotechnol Biodivers 2:32–37Google Scholar
- Falco MC, Mendes BMJ, Tulmann Neto A, Appezzato da Glória B (1996) Histological characterization of in vitro regeneration of Saccharum sp. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 8:93–97Google Scholar
- Gosal SS, Thind KS, Dhaliwal HS (1998) Micropropagation of sugarcane-an efficient protocol for commercial plant production. Crop Improv 25:167–171Google Scholar
- Johansen DA (1940) Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill Book, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Landell MGA, Campana MP, Figueiredo P, Xavier MA, Anjos IA, Dinardo-Miranda LL, Scarpari MS, Garcia JC, Bidóia MAP, Silva DN, Mendonça JR, Kanthack RAD, Campos MF, Brancalião SR, Petri RH, Miguel PEM (2012) Sistema de multiplicação de cana-de-açúcar com uso de mudas pré-brotadas (MPB), oriundas de gemas individualizadas. Ribeirão Preto: Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, 17 p. (IAC. Documentos, 109)Google Scholar
- Martínez-Estrada E, Caamal-Velázquez JH, Salinas-Ruíz J, Bello-Bello JJ (2017) Assessment of somaclonal variation during sugarcane micropropagation in temporary immersion bioreactors by intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 53:553–560Google Scholar
- Nogueira GF, Pio LAS, Pasqual M, Amaral A, Scherwinski-Pereira JE (2015) An approach on the in vitro maintenance of sugarcane with views for conservation and monitoring of plant nuclear DNA contents via flow cytometry. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 51:220–230Google Scholar
- Pola S, Mani S, Ramana T (2009) Long-term maintenance of callus cultures from immature embryo of Sorghum bicolor. World J Agric Sci 5:415–421Google Scholar
- Sané D, Aberlenc-Bertossi F, Gassama-Dia YK, Sagna M, Trouslot MF, Duval Y, Borgel A (2006) Histocytological analysis of callogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from cell suspensions of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). AoB Plant 98:301–308Google Scholar
- Sengar RS, Sengar K, Garg SK (2011) Biotechnological approaches for high sugarcane yield. Plant Sci Feed 1:101–111Google Scholar
- Simões Neto DE (2009) Variedades de cana–de–açúcar no Estado de Pernambuco contribuição do melhoramento Clássico da Ridesa–Ufrpe. Anais da Academia Pernambucana Ciên Agron 5–6:125–146Google Scholar
- Sindaçucar (2018) Sindicato da Indústria do Açúcar no Estado de Pernambuco. http://www.sindacucar-al.com.br/variedades/. Accessed 20 Dec 2018
- Singh RK, Kumar P, Tiwari NN, Rastogi J, Singh SP (2013) Current status of sugarcane transgenic: an overview. Adv Genet Eng 2:2–7Google Scholar
- Sobhakumari VP (2012) Assessment of somaclonal variation in sugarcane. Afr J Biotechn 11:15303–15309Google Scholar