dsDNA and protein co-delivery in triticale microspores

Plant Tissue Culture


The efficiency of cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-mediated dsDNA transfection in triticale microspores was investigated through transient and stable integration of the β-glucoronidase (GUS) reporter gene and expression assays in microspore-derived embryos and plantlets. The RecA protein, usually associated with prokaryote homologous recombination, was also tested for its capacity to protect the linear transgene from degradation. Transfections mediated by the CPP nanocarriers Tat2 and Pep1 reduced the number of regenerated embryos from 158 in the control to 122 and 100, respectively. The co-delivery of CPP-dsDNA with RecA protein also resulted in fewer embryos, 87 and 104 for Tat2 and Pep1, respectively. Delivery of dsDNA with Tat2 or Pep1, without RecA, resulted in the highest frequencies of GUS activity in regenerated embryos, at 26%. Co-delivery with RecA decreased the percentage of GUS-positive embryos to 16%. Interestingly, co-delivered RecA-dsDNA reduced the loss of integrity of inserted genetic construct, as observed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the 5′ and 3′ ends. GUS activity was also detected in mature haploid and diploid plants. Of all treatments, 31 T0 plants tested positive for the GUS gene by quantitative PCR, although 50% were derived from the single treatment dsDNA-Tat2. The estimated copy number of the GUS transgene varied between four and eight. This study provides the foundations for CPP-mediated co-delivery of dsDNA and protein RecA in haploid microspore nuclei for functional genomic studies in crop species.


Cell-penetrating peptide Nanocarrier Microspore Transformation Stable expression RecA protein 


  1. Astriab-Fisher A, Sergueev D, Fisher M, Shaw BR, Juliano RL (2002) Conjugates of antisense oligonucleotides with the Tat and Antennapedia cell-penetrating peptides: effects on cellular uptake, binding to target sequences and biologic actions. Pharm Res 19:744–754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biet E, Maurisse R, Dutreix M, Sun JS (2001) Stimulation of RecA-mediated D-loop formation by oligonucleotide-directed triple-helix formation: guided homologous recombination (GOREC). Biochemistry 40:1779–1786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunaud V, Balzergue S, Dubreucq B, Aubourg S, Samson F, Chauvin S, Bechtold N, Cruaud C, DeRose R, Pelletier G, Lepiniec L, Caboche M, Lecharny A (2002) T-DNA integration into the Arabidopsis genome depends on sequences of pre-insertion sites. EMBO Rep 3:1152–1157Google Scholar
  4. Chen CP, Chou JC, Liu BR, Chang M, Lee HJ (2007) Transfection and expression of plasmid DNA in plant cells by arginine-rich intracellular delivery peptide without protoplast preparation. FEBS Lett 581:1891–1897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho MJ, Yano H, Okamoto D, Kim HK, Jung HR, Newcomb K, Le VK, Yoo HS, Langham R, Buchanan BB, Lemaux PG (2004) Stable transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) via microprojectile bombardment of highly regenerative, green tissues derived from mature seed. Plant Cell Rep 22:483–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chugh A, Eudes F (2007) Translocation and nuclear accumulation of monomer and dimmer of HIV-1Tat basic domain in triticale mesophyll protoplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 1768:419–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chugh A, Eudes F (2008a) Studies of uptake of cell-penetrating peptides and their cargoes in wheat immature embryos. FEBS J 275:2403–2414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chugh A, Eudes F (2008b) Cellular uptake of cell-penetrating peptides pVEC and transportan in plants. J Pept Sci 14:477–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chugh A, Amundsen E, Eudes F (2009) Translocation of cell-penetrating peptides and delivery of their cargoes in triticale microspores. Plant Cell Rep 28:801–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chugh A, Eudes F, Shim Y-S (2010) Cell-penetrating peptides: nanocarrier for macromolecule delivery in living cells. IUBMB Life 62:183–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark AJ, Margulies AD (1965) Isolation and characterization of recombination-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli K12. Proc Natl Acad Sci 53:451–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doyle JJ, Dickson EE (1987) Preservation of plant samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. Taxon 36:715–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eggenberger K, Birtalan E, Schröder T, Bräse S, Nick P (2009) Passage of Trojan peptides into plant cells. ChemBioChem 10:2504–2512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. El-Andaloussi S, Johansson HJ, Holm T, Langel U (2007) A novel cell-penetrating peptide, M918, for efficient delivery of proteins and peptide nucleic acids. Mol Theor 15:1820–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eudes F, Acharya S, Laroche A, Selinger LB, Cheng K-J (2003) A novel method to induce direct somatic embryogenesis, secondary embryogenesis and regeneration of fertile green cereal plants. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 73:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eudes F, Amundsen E (2005) Isolated microspore culture of 6× triticale cultivars. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 82:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Folling L, Olesen A (2002) Genetic transformation and hybridization. Plant Cell Rep 20:1098–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fominaya J, Gasset M, Garcia R, Roncal F, Albar JP, Bernad A (2000) An optimised amphiphilic cationic peptide as an efficient non-viral gene delivery vector. J Gene Med 2:455–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardner RV, Voloshin ON, Camerini-Otero RD (1995) The identification of the single-stranded DNA-binding domain of the Escherichia coli RecA protein. Eur J Biochem 233:419–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haliloglu K, Baenziger PS (2003) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated wheat transformation. Cereal Res Comm 31:9–16Google Scholar
  21. Henriques ST, Costa J, Castanho MA (2005) Translocation of betagalactosidase mediated by cell-penetrating peptide pep-1 into lipid vesicles and human HeLa cells is driven by membrane electrostatic potential. Biochemistry 44:10189–10198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heslop-Harrison JS (1992) Cytological techniques to assess pollen quality. In: Cresti M, Tiezzi A (eds) Sexual plant reproduction. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoebeeck J, Speleman F, Vandesompele J (2007) Real-time quantitative PCR as an alternative to Southern blot or fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of gene copy number changes. In: Hilario E, Mackay J (eds) Protocols for nucleic acid analysis by nonradioactive probes. Methods in molecular biology, vol 353. Humana, New York, pp 205–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jähne A, Becker D, Lörz H (1995) Genetic engineering of cereal plants: a review. Euphytica 85:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones SW, Christison R, Bundell K, Voyce CJ, Brockbank SMV, Newham P, Lindsay MA (2005) Characterisation of cell-penetrating peptide-mediated peptide delivery. Brit J Pharmacol 145:1093–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumlehn J, Serazetdinova L, Hensel G, Becker D, Loerz H (2006) Genetic transformation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) via infection of androgenetic pollen cultures with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Biotech J 4:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lanzov VA (2007) RecA homologous DNA transferase: functional activities and a search for homology by recombining DNA molecules. Mol Biol 41:467–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leipe DD, Aravind L, Grishin NV, Koonin EV (2000) The bacterial replicate helicase DNAB evolved from a RecA duplication. Genome Res 10:5–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Li W, Sun G, Liu J, Masilamany P, Taylor JH, Yan W, Kasha KJ, Pauls KP (2004) Inheritance of plant regeneration from maize (Zea mays L.) shoot meristem cultures derived from germinated seeds and the identification of associated RAPD and SSR markers. Theoret Appl Genet 108:681–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ogawa T, Yu X, Shinohara A, Engelman EH (1993) Similarity of the yeast Rad51 filaments to the bacterial RecA filament. Science 259:1896–1899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rauth S, Song KY, Ayares D, Wallace L, Moore PD, Kucherlapati R (1986) Transfection and homologous recombination involving single-stranded DNA substrates in mammalian cells and nuclear extracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci 83:5587–5591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reiss B, Klemm M, Kosak H, Schell J (1996) RecA protein stimulates homologous recombination in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:3094–3098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reiss B, Schubert I, Köpchen K, Wendeler E, Schell J, Puchta H (2000) RecA stimulates sister chromatid exchange and the fidelity of double-strand break repair, but not gene targeting, in plants transformed by Agrobacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:3358–3363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shim Y-S, Pauls KP, Kasha KJ (2009) Transformation of isolated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) microspores: II. Timing of pretreatment and temperatures relative to results of bombardment. Genome 53:175–190Google Scholar
  35. Tinland B (1996) The integration of T-DNA into plant genomes. Trends Plant Sci 1:178–184Google Scholar
  36. Travella S, Ross SM, Harden J, Everett C, Snape JW, Harwood WA (2005) A comparison of transgenic barley lines produced by particle bombardment and Agrobacterium-mediated techniques. Plant Cell Rep 23:780–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wender PA, Mitchell DJ, Pattabiraman ET, Pelkey ET, Steinman L, Rothbard JB (2000) The design, synthesis, and evaluation of molecules that enable or enhance cellular uptake: peptoid molecular transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13003–13008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weng H, Pan A, Yang L, Zhang C, Liu Z, Zhang D (2004) Estimating number of transgene copies in transgenic rapeseed by real-time PCR assay with HMG I/Y as an endogenous reference gene. Plant Mol Bio Rep 22:289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zheng MY, Liu W, Weng Y, Polle E, Konzak CF (2001) Culture of freshly isolated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) microspores treated with inducer chemicals. Plant Cell Rep 20:685–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ziemienowicz A, Shim YS, Matsuoka A, Eudes F, Kovalchuk I (2012) A novel method of transgene delivery into triticale plants using the Agrobacterium T-DNA-derived nano-complex. Plant Physiol. doi:10.1104/pp.111.192856

Copyright information

© The Society for In Vitro Biology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Youn-Seb Shim
    • 1
  • François Eudes
    • 1
  • Igor Kovalchuk
    • 2
  1. 1.Lethbridge Research CentreAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaLethbridgeCanada
  2. 2.University of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations