The economics of current and future biofuels
- 2.4k Downloads
This work presents detailed comparative analysis on the production economics of both current and future biofuels, including ethanol, biodiesel, and butanol. Our objectives include demonstrating the impact of key parameters on the overall process economics (e.g., plant capacity, raw material pricing, and yield) and comparing how next-generation technologies and fuels will differ from today’s technologies. The commercialized processes and corresponding economics presented here include corn-based ethanol, sugarcane-based ethanol, and soy-based biodiesel. While actual full-scale economic data are available for these processes, they have also been modeled using detailed process simulation. For future biofuel technologies, detailed techno-economic data exist for cellulosic ethanol from both biochemical and thermochemical conversion. In addition, similar techno-economic models have been created for n-butanol production based on publicly available literature data. Key technical and economic challenges facing all of these biofuels are discussed.
KeywordsBiofuel Biodiesel Biobutanol Process economics Techno-economic analysis Transportation fuel Ethanol
NREL would like to thank the US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of the Biomass Program (OBP) for its continued leadership, support, and collaboration in the biofuels arena.
- Aden, A.; Ruth, M.; Ibsen, K.; Jechura, J.; Neeves, K.; Sheehan, J.; Wallace, R. Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. NREL report NREL/TP-510-32438, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/32438.pdf; 2002.
- Aspen Plus™ Release 2006.5. Aspen Technology, Cambridge, MA2006.Google Scholar
- BNDES. Sugarcane-based bioethanol: energy for sustainable development/coordination BNDES and CGEE. www.sugarcanebioethanol.org; 2008
- BP Biofuels News. Advanced biofuels, working together, two global leaders are creating the next generation of biofuels. http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=9021783&contentId=7041026; 2006.
- Cleantech News. UK firm plans biobutanol plant in India. http://www.cleantech.com/news/3550/uk-firm-plans-biochemical-plant-india; 2008
- Cobalt Biofuel News. Cobalt biofuels raises $25 million to commercialize next generation biofuel—biobutanol. http://www.cobaltbiofuels.com/news/news-item/series-c-round; 2008
- Dean B.; Dodge T.; Valle F.; Chotani G. Development of biorefineries—technical and economic considerations. Biorefineries—industrial process and products. In: Kamm B.; Gruber P. R.; Kamm M. (eds) Status quo and future directions, vol 1. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 67–83; 2006.Google Scholar
- Douglas J. M. Conceptual design of chemical processes. McGraw-Hill, New York. 1989.Google Scholar
- EIA. Biodiesel performance, costs and use. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/FTPROOT/environment/biodiesel.pdf; 2004
- EISA. EISA of 2007 calls for additional production of biofuels. http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/partner/stoel-rives-6442/news/article/2008/01/eisa-of-2007-calls-for-additional-production-of-biofuels-51063; 2007
- FO Lichts Ethanol production costs: a worldwide survey, a special study from FO Lichts and Agra CEAS Consulting. Agra Informa, Tunbridge Wells, Kent; 2007.Google Scholar
- Gevo News. Gevo, Inc secures cellulosic technology to make advanced biofuel. http://www.gevo.com/news_Cargill-pr_022609.php; 2009.
- Lin Y.; Blaschek N. P. Butanol production by butanol-tolerant strain of Clostridium acetobutylicum in extruded corn broth. Appl. Envirol. Microbiol. 45: 966–973; 1983.Google Scholar
- Merino S. T.; Cherry J. Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. Adv Biochem Engin Biotechnol 108: 95–120; 2007.Google Scholar
- NBB. Estimated US biodiesel production by fiscal year. http://www.biodiesel.org/pdf_files/fuelfactsheets/Production_Graph_Slide.pdf; 2009
- Peters M. S.; Timmerhaus K. D. Plant design and economics for chemical engineers. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York; 1991.Google Scholar
- Phillips, S.; Aden, A.; Jechura, J.; Dayton, D. Thermochemical ethanol via indirect gasification and mixed alcohol synthesis of lignocellulosic biomass. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden CO. NREL report no TP-510-41168. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy07osti/41168.pdf; 2007.
- Ramey, D.; Yang, S. H. Production of butyric acid and butanol from biomass final report. Work performed under contract no: DE-F-G02-00ER86106 USDOE Morgantown WV; 2004.Google Scholar
- RFA. Changing the climate, ethanol industry outlook. RFA, Washington, DC; 2008.Google Scholar
- Rodrigues, A. P. Participação dos fornecedores de cana na cadeia do açúcar e álcool. Congresso Internacional de Tecnologias na Cadeia Produtiva, Concana Uberaba, MG, março de; 2007.Google Scholar
- Seabra, J. E. A. Technical-economic evaluation of options for whole use of sugar cane biomass in Brazil. Campinas Faculdade de Engenharia Mecânica Universidade Estadual de Campinas 274p PhD thesis (In portuguese); 2007.Google Scholar
- Shapouri, H.; Salassi, M.; Fairbanks, N. The economics feasibility of ethanol production from sugar in the United States. USDA report; 2006Google Scholar
- Spake, A. DuPont develops world’s first advanced biofuel, biobutanol will be a high-energy petroleum alternative. http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2007/September/20070919163628ndyblehs0.6094019.html; 2007
- TetraVitae Bioscience. http://www.tetravitae.com; 2009
- USDA. USDA’s 2002 ethanol cost-of-production survey. Agricultural Economic Report Number 841; 2002Google Scholar
- USDA. USDA soybean projections, 2008–17. http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/soybeansoilcrops/2008baseline.htm#ussoybean; 2008
- Wallace, R.; Ibsen, K.; McAloon, A.; Yee, W. Feasibility study for co-locating and integrating ethanol production plants from corn starch and lignocellulosic feedstocks. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy05osti/37092.pdf; 2005
- Wooley, R.; Putsche, V. Development of an ASPEN PLUS physical property database for biofuels components. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO. NREL report no. MP-425-20685; 1996.Google Scholar