Advertisement

Synergistic induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes in co-cultures of bovine hepatocytic and sinusoidal cell lines

  • Miyako YoshiokaEmail author
  • Takato Takenouchi
  • Hiroshi Kitani
  • Keerthi S. Guruge
  • Noriko Yamanaka
Report
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Hepatocyte-derived cell lines provide useful experimental systems for studying liver metabolism. Unlike human and rodents, few hepatocyte-derived cell lines have been generated from cattle. Here, we established two immortalized bovine hepatocyte-derived cell lines (BH4 and BH5) via transfection with a SV40 large T-antigen construct. Morphological and immunocytochemical analyses revealed that BH4 and BH5 originated from hepatocytes and biliary-epithelial cells, respectively. A potent carcinogen, 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC), upregulated gene expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1 in BH4 and BH5, but only to levels less than one-fifteenth of those in primary cultured bovine hepatocytes. Phenobarbital (PB) also increased expression levels of CYP2B6, CYP2C18, and CYP3A4 in BH4 and BH, but at a lower level than 3-MC. By contrast, when BH4 or BH5 was co-cultured with previously established bovine liver sinusoidal cell lines and treated with 3-MC, the gene expression levels of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1 increased by 38~290%, compared with those in BH4 or BH5 cells cultured alone. PB-treated co-cultures of BH4 or BH5 cells and liver sinusoidal cell lines also showed synergistic increases in CYP2B6 and CYP2C18 expression. Together, the results suggest that these co-cultures could provide an in vitro model for investigations into pharmacological and toxicological properties of drugs in cattle liver.

Keywords

Hepatocytes Liver sinusoidal cells Bovine liver cell lines Cytochrome P450 mRNA expression 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 19K06431.

References

  1. Bhatia SN, Balis UJ, Yarmush ML, Toner M (1999) Effect of cell-cell interactions in preservation of cellular phenotype: cocultivation of hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells. FASEB J 13:1883–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhatia SN, Yarmush ML, Toner M (1997) Controlling cell interactions by micropatterning in co-cultures: hepatocytes and 3T3 fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 34:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Darwish WS, Ikenaka Y, El-Ghareeb ER, Ishizuka M (2010) High expression of the mRNA of cytochrome P450 and phase II enzymes in the lung and kidney tissues of cattle. Animal 4:2023–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dierickx PJ (1989) Cytotoxicity testing of 114 compounds by the determination of the protein content in Hep G2 cell cultures. Toxicol in Vitro 3:189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donato MT, Lahoz A, Castell JV, Gomez-Lechon MJ (2008) Cell lines: a tool for in vitro drug metabolism studies. Curr Drug Metab 9:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gleich A, Kaiser B, Schumann J, Fuhrmann H (2016) Establishment and characterization of a novel bovine SV40 large T-antigen-transduced foetal hepatocyte-derived cell line. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 52:662–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kitani H, Takenouchi T, Sato M, Yoshioka M, Yamanaka N (2010) A novel isolation method for macrophage-like cells from mixed primary cultures of adult rat liver cells. J Immunol Methods 360(1-2):47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kmiec Z (2001) Cooperation of liver cells in health and disease. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 161:III–XIII 1-151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Knowles BB, Howe CC, Aden DP (1980) Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines secrete the major plasma proteins and hepatitis B surface antigen. Science 209:497–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koide N, Sakaguchi K, Koide Y, Asano K, Kawaguchi M, Matsushita H, Takenami T, Shinji T, Mori M, Tsuji T (1990) Formation of multicellular spheroids composed of adult rat hepatocytes in dishes with positively charged surfaces and under other nonadherent environments. Exp Cell Res 186:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. LeCluyse EL (2001) Human hepatocyte culture systems for the in vitro evaluation of cytochrome P450 expression and regulation. Eur J Pharm Sci 13:343–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lerche C, Fautrel A, Shaw PM, Glaise D, Ballet F, Guillouzo A, Corcos L (1997) Regulation of the major detoxication functions by phenobarbital and 3-methylcholanthrene in co-cultures of rat hepatocytes and liver epithelial cells. Eur J Biochem 244:98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore JT, Moore LB, Maglich JM, Kliewer SA (2003) Functional and structural comparison of PXR and CAR. Biochem Biophys Acta 1619:235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ohno M, Motojima K, Okano T, Taniguchi A (2009) Induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes by phenobarbital in layered co-culture of a human liver cell line and endothelial cells. Biol Pharm Bull 32:813–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodriguez-Antona C, Donato MT, Boobis A, Edwards RJ, Watts PS, Castell JV, Gomez-Lechon MJ (2002) Cytochrome P450 expression in human hepatocytes and hepatoma cell lines: molecular mechanisms that determine lower expression in cultured cells. Xenobiotica 32:505–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Strain AJ (1999) Ex vivo liver cell morphogenesis: one step nearer to the bioartificial liver? Hepatology 29:288–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Takenouchi T, Iwamaru Y, Sato M, Yokoyama T, Shinagawa M, Kitani H (2007) Establishment and characterization of SV40 large T antigen-immortalized cell lines derived from fetal bovine brain tissues after prolonged cryopreservation. Cell Biol Int 31:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Takenouchi T, Yoshioka M, Yamanaka N, Kitani H (2010) Reversible conversion of epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes in SV40 large T antigen-immortalized rat liver cell lines. Cell Biol Int Rep 17(1):e00001.  https://doi.org/10.1042/CBR20100001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Waxman DJ (1999) P450 gene induction by structurally diverse xenochemicals: central role of nuclear receptors CAR, PXR, and PPAR. Arch Biochem Biophys 369:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Whitlock JP Jr (1999) Induction of cytochrome P4501A1. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 39:103–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Worboys PD, Carlile DJ (2001) Implications and consequences of enzyme induction on preclinical and clinical drug development. Xenobiotica 31:539–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yoshioka M, Nakajima Y, Ito T, Mikami O, Tanaka S, Miyazaki S, Motoi Y (1997) Primary culture and expression of cytokine mRNAs by lipopolysaccharide in bovine Kupffer cells. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 58:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yoshioka M, Takenouchi T, Kitani H, Okada H, Yamanaka N (2016) Establishment of SV40 large T antigen-immortalized bovine liver sinusoidal cell lines and their immunological responses to deoxynivalenol and lipopolysaccharide. Cell Biol Int 40:1372–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zancanella V, Giantin M, Lopparelli RM, Nebbia C, Dacasto M (2012) Constitutive expression and phenobarbital modulation of drug metabolizing enzymes and related nuclear receptors in cattle liver and extra-hepatic tissues. Xenobiotica 42:1096–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for In Vitro Biology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pathology and Pathophysiology Research DivisionNational Institute of Animal Health, NAROIbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Division of Animal SciencesInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, NAROIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations