Antitumor activity of chitosan from mayfly with comparison to commercially available low, medium and high molecular weight chitosans

Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Insects’ cuticles have a potential to be evaluated as a chitin source. Especially adults of aquatic insects like mayflies (order Ephemeroptera) swarm in enormous numbers in artificially lit areas while mating in spring and then die by leaving huge amounts of dead insects’ bodies. Here in this study, mayfly corpses were harvested and used for production of low MW chitosan. Dried mayfly bodies had 10.21% chitin content; mayfly chitin was converted into chitosan with efficiency rate of 78.43% (deacetylation degree, 84.3%; MW, 3.69 kDa). Cytotoxicity and anti-proliferative activity of mayfly and commercially available shrimp chitosans (low, medium, and high MW) were determined on L929 fibroblast and three different cancer types including HeLa, A549, and WiDr. Apoptosis and necrosis stimulating potential of mayfly and commercial chitosans were also evaluated on A549 and WiDr cells using acridine orange and propidium iodide dual staining to observe morphological changes in nuclei and thus to reveal the predominant cell death mechanism. The effects of chitosans have varied depending on cell types, concentration, and chitosan derivatives. Mayfly and low MW chitosans had a cytotoxic effect at a concentration of 500 μg mL−1 on non-cancer cells. At concentrations below this value (250 μg mL−1), mayfly and commercial chitosans except high MW one exhibited strong inhibitory activity on cancer cells especially A549 and WiDr cells. Mayfly chitosan induced early and late apoptosis in A549 cells, but late apoptosis and necrosis in WiDr cells. This study suggests that dead bodies of mayflies can be used for production of low MW chitosan with anti-proliferative activity.

Keywords

Mayfly Chitosan Insect cuticle Anticancer activity Cytotoxicity 

References

  1. Abdel Wahab SI, Abdul AB, Alzubairi AS, Mohamed Elhassan M, Mohan S (2009) In vitro ultramorphological assessment of apoptosis induced by zerumbone on (HeLa). J Biomed Biotechnol 2009:10.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/769568 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida EAMS, Facchi SP, Martins AF, Nocchi S, Schuquel ITA, Nakamura CV, Rubira AF, Muniz EC (2015) Synthesis and characterization of pectin derivative with antitumor property against Caco-2 colon cancer cells. Carbohydr Polym 115:139–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baskić D, Popović S, Ristić P, Arsenijević NN (2006) Analysis of cycloheximide-induced apoptosis in human leukocytes: fluorescence microscopy using annexin V/propidium iodide versus acridin orange/ethidium bromide. Cell Biol Int 30:924–932.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.06.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chien R-C, Yen M-T, Mau J-L (2016) Antimicrobial and antitumor activities of chitosan from shiitake stipes, compared to commercial chitosan from crab shells. Carbohydr Polym 138:259–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciapetti G, Granchi D, Savarino L, Cenni E, Magrini E, Baldini N, Giunti A (2002) In vitro testing of the potential for orthopedic bone cements to cause apoptosis of osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials 23:617–627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00149-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferreira IC, Heleno SA, Reis FS, Stojkovic D, Queiroz MJR, Vasconcelos MH, Sokovic M (2015) Chemical features of Ganoderma polysaccharides with antioxidant, antitumor and antimicrobial activities. Phytochemistry 114:38–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Forouzanfar MH, Foreman KJ, Delossantos AM, Lozano R, Lopez AD, Murray CJL, Naghavi M (2011) Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 378:1461–1484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harker J (1989) Mayflies (naturalists’ handbook) vol 13. Richmond Publishing, SloughGoogle Scholar
  10. Je J-Y, Cho Y-S, Kim S-K (2006) Cytotoxic activities of water-soluble chitosan derivatives with different degree of deacetylation. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16:2122–2126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang M, Ouyang H, Ruan P, Zhao H, Pi Z, Huang S, Yi P, Crepin M (2011) Chitosan derivatives inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res 31:1321–1328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee SH, Ryu B, Je JY, Kim SK (2011) Diethylaminoethyl chitosan induces apoptosis in HeLa cells via activation of caspase-3 and p53 expression. Carbohydr Polym 84:571–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leite M, Quinta-Costa M, Leite PS, Guimarães JE (1999) Critical evaluation of techniques to detect and measure cell death—study in a model of UV radiation of the leukaemic cell line HL60. Anal Cell Pathol 19:139–151.  https://doi.org/10.1155/1999/176515 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Li S-C, Yang X-M, Ma H-L, Yan J-K, Guo D-Z (2015) Purification, characterization and antitumor activity of polysaccharides extracted from Phellinus igniarius mycelia. Carbohydr Polym 133:24–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McGahon AJ, Martin SJ, Bissonnette RP, Mahboubi A, Shi Y, Mogil RJ, Nishioka WK, Green DR (1995) The end of the (cell) line: methods for the study of apoptosis in vitro. In: Schwartz LM, Osborne BA (eds) Methods in cell biology. Cell death, vol 46. Academic Press, London, pp 153–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)61929-9 Google Scholar
  16. Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Muzzarelli R, Muzzarelli C (2005) Chitosan chemistry: relevance to the biomedical sciences. In: Heinze T (ed) Polysaccharides I. Advances in polymer science, vol 186. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 151–209.  https://doi.org/10.1007/b136812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park JK, Chung MJ, Choi HN, Park YI (2011) Effects of the molecular weight and the degree of deacetylation of chitosan oligosaccharides on antitumor activity. Int J Mol Sci 12:266–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Pawlak A, Mucha M (2003) Thermogravimetric and FTIR studies of chitosan blends. Thermochim Acta 396:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rinaudo M (2006) Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 31:603–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shen K-T, Chen M-H, Chan H-Y, Jeng J-H, Wang Y-J (2009) Inhibitory effects of chitooligosaccharides on tumor growth and metastasis. Food Chem Toxicol 47:1864–1871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang W, Bo S, Li S, Qin W (1991) Determination of the Mark-Houwink equation for chitosans with different degrees of deacetylation. Int J Biol Macromol 13:281–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang R, Yang SG, Shim WS, Cui F, Cheng G, Kim IW, Kim DD, Chung SJ, Shim CK (2009) Lung-specific delivery of paclitaxel by chitosan-modified PLGA nanoparticles via transient formation of microaggregates. J Pharm Sci 98:970–984.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.21487 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Younes I, Frachet V, Rinaudo M, Jellouli K, Nasri M (2016) Cytotoxicity of chitosans with different acetylation degrees and molecular weights on bladder carcinoma cells. Int J Biol Macromol 84:200–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for In Vitro Biology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Tan
    • 1
  • M. Kaya
    • 2
  • A. Tevlek
    • 3
  • I. Sargin
    • 2
  • T. Baran
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and LettersAksaray UniversityAksarayTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science and LettersAksaray UniversityAksarayTurkey
  3. 3.Bioengineering Division, Institute of Science and EngineeringHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and LettersAksaray UniversityAksarayTurkey

Personalised recommendations