Heat shock protein 10 of Chlamydophila pneumoniae induces proinflammatory cytokines through Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4 in human monocytes THP-1

  • Z. Zhou
  • Y. Wu
  • L. Chen
  • L. Liu
  • H. Chen
  • Z. Li
  • C. Chen
Article

Abstract

Inflammatory response is the first line of infection. Previous studies have suggested that Chlamydophila pneumoniae heat shock protein (CHSP) 60 is present in human atheromata, and it plays an important role on the chronic infection elicited by C. pneumoniae. Here, we demonstrated in vitro the impact of heat shock protein 10 (HSP10) of C. pneumoniae on THP-1 cells and the role of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in the procedures of inflammatory response. The production of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1beta were induced by recombinant HSP10 dose-dependently, and the proinflammatory activity of HSP10 was greatly reduced by heating and deproteinization treatment. The expression of TLR4 and TLR2 on the cultured cells were determined by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence. Peritoneal macrophages isolated from wild-type (C3H/HeN) and TLR4-deficient mice (C3H/HeJ) were respectively stimulated with endotoxin-free proteins. Cytokine responses after stimulation were significantly different, depending on the presence of TLR4. The effect on cytokine expression was blocked by anti-TLR2 or anti-TLR4 MAb partially or dramatically. Thus, HSP10 of C. pneumoniae which could elicit inflammatory reactions in human monocytes may contribute to the inflammatory processes in Chlamydophila infection, and the effects were mediated by TLR4 and, to a lesser extent, TLR2.

Keywords

Chlamydophila pneumoniae Heat shock protein 10 Proinflammatory cytokines Toll-like receptors THP-1 

Introduction

Chlamydophila pneumoniae is an obligate intracellular pathogen which spread worldwide. The seroprevalence in the adult population is about 50∼70%, and nearly everybody has been infected at least once during his or her lifetime (Miyashita et al. 2008; Jha et al. 2009). The pathogen causes acute respiratory infections such as pneumonia and bronchitis and has been implicated in chronic processes including asthma and cardiovascular disease (Grayston et al. 1993; Hahn et al. 1998; Cook 1999; Cosentini et al. 2008; Blasi et al. 2009). Although the link between C. pneumoniae and atherosclerosis is well-accepted, little has been known about the mechanisms of C. pneumoniae-induced infections.

Inflammation seems to play a key role on the acute infections and chronic inflammatory diseases, and the cytokine response is one of its remarkable features. Several studies have confirmed C. pneumoniae triggers an inflammatory response in human and animal cells (Blessing et al. 2000; Yamamoto et al. 2005; Didion 2008). The pathogen could invade and replicate in the host cells and induce activation of chronic inflammation with cytokines release such as IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha, but the specific components of C. pneumoniae involved in these initiations is not well identified.

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are highly conserved molecules. Because of molecular mimicry of human homologous HSP, some microbial HSPs seem to induce humoral or cellular responses and involve in pathogenesis such as inflammation and autoimmunity. It was proven that HSP60 of C. pneumoniae can be detected in human atheroma and may take part in the development of lesions and directly activate monocytes/macrophages to secrete cytokines from cells (Kol et al. 1998, LaVerda et al. 2000). But very little is known about the role of HSP10 which is genetically and physiologically linked to HSP60.

The present study aimed to determine whether HSP10 were implicated in the inflammatory responses against infection and whether the TLRs (TLR2 and TLR4) were required for C. pneumoniae HSP10 (CHSP10)-induced cytokine expression by monocyte cells. For this purpose, we incubated cultured human monocytic cells with recombinant CHSP10 with or without anti-TLR antibodies and measured the effects of CHSP10 on IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha production.

Materials and Methods

Cells.

The human monocytic cell line THP-1 (American Type Culture Collection) and human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cell line A549 (China Center for Type Culture Collection, Wuhan University) were grown at 37°C with 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 medium (HyClone, Logan, UT). Human kidney cell line HEK293T (China Center for Type Culture Collection, Wuhan University) was cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (HyClone); all the cells were cultured in mediums contained 10% heat-inactivated fatal bovine serum (FBS; GIBCO; Langley, OK), 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin.

Reagents.

Neutralizing anti-human TLR4 MAb (HTA125), neutralizing anti-human TLR2 MAb (TL2.1), and isotype control MAb (Mouse IgG2a, κ Isotype Ctrl) as a blocking Ab were purchased from Biolegend (Clonetimes Biotech Co., Ltd, Changsa, China). CyTM2-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and CyTM3-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG were obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc. (Westgrove, PA). For reverse transcriptase reaction, the RevertAidTM First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas; Shenzhen, China) was applied. PCR amplification was performed with Taq DNA polymerase (Dongsheng Biotech; Zhejiang, China). Penicillin, ampicillin, polymyxin B (PMB), and Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 0111:B4) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). All other chemicals were obtained from commercial sources and were of analytical or reagent grade.

Peritoneal macrophages from C3H/HeN and C3H/HeJ.

A 4 ∼ 6-wk-ld C3H/HeN (Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd.) and C3H/HeJ female mice (Model Animal Research Center of Nanjing University) were fed with standard laboratory chow and water ad libitum. Macrophages were induced by injecting 1 mL of 5% sterile starch broth intraperitoneally, and peritoneal macrophages were collected 4 or 5 d later by peritoneal lavage with chilled serum-free culture medium. The macrophages were then incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C for 2 ∼ 4 h in RPMI-1640 culture medium supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin G and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. After three times vigorous washing, nonadherent cells were removed, and macrophages were incubated in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS in 96-well plate (HyClone) at 1 × 104 cells per well for cytokine assays.

Recombinant CHSP10 preparation.

CHSP10 recombinant plasmid was constructed with pQE30 vector (QIAGEN; Shanghai, China) and transformed into E. coli M15, induced, and purified as described elsewhere (Jiang et al. 2008). Briefly, cells were cultured in Luria-Bertani broth containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 100 μg/mL kanamycin, harvested by centrifugation, and disrupted by sonication on ice; soluble His-tagged protein CHSP10 was purified by nickel-chelate affinity resin (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Elution fractions were then analyzed by sodium dodecyl polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis using 15% running gel. The concentration of the purified protein was determined by BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce). To exclude possible LPS contamination, proteins were collected and mixed with 50 μg/mL polymyxin B (Sigma) or treated with Detoxi-GelTM Endotoxin Removing Gel (Pierce; IL). The endotoxin concentration of recombinant HSP10 was less than 60 pg/mL, as determined by the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay (Chinese Horseshoe Crab Reagent Manufactory, Ltd., Xiamen, China). The protein was stored at −135°C until it was used.

Stimulation experiments.

For stimulation of THP-1 or A549 cells with HSP10, approximately 3 × 105 cells per well were seeded into 24-well plate. After incubation for indicated conditions, cells were then stimulated with HSP10 using different concentrations or in different times. Cell-free supernatants were harvested after centrifugation and was stored at −70°C until use.

Heat, deproteinized treatments of CHSP10.

Heat experiment was performed by heating CHSP10 at 56°C for 30 min or 100°C for 20 min, respectively. Deproteinized treatments were performed by mixing purified proteins with 50% nickel-chelate affinity resin and incubating at room temperature for 1 h to bind the His-tagged CHSP10, and then the mixture was loaded onto a column. Flow-through was collected to incubate with resin again and purified as described above. As controls, CHSP10 samples without heating or deproteinization were incubated with THP-1 cells. Cell-free supernatants were harvested after 24 h incubation and kept at −70°C until cytokine measurements.

RT-PCR and immunofluorescent staining.

TLR4 and TLR2 expression was analyzed in THP-1 monocytes by RT-PCR and immunofluorescent staining. Total RNA was extracted from THP-1 or HEK293T cells using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Beijing, China); cDNA was synthesized according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primer sequences used for amplifications were as follows (Faure et al. 2000; Cheng et al. 2008): TLR4 forward, 5′-TGGATACGTTTCCTTATAAG -3′; TLR4 reverse, 5′-GAAATGGAGGCACCCCTT -3′ C; TLR2 forward, 5′-GCCAAAGTCTTGATTGATTGG -3′; TLR2 reverse, 5′-TTGAAGTTCT CCAGCTCCTG-3′; beta-actin forward, 5′-CTACAATGAGCTGCGTGTGG-3′; beta-actin reverse, 5′-AAGGAAGGCTGGAAGAGTGC-3′. PCR amplification was performed with Taq polymerase for one cycle at 94°C for 5 min, 32 cycles at 94°C for 45 s, 50°C (TLR4), 54°C (TLR2), or 52°C (beta-actin) for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min, followed by one cycle at 72°C for 10 min. Amplification products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide fluorescence. Surface expression of TLR4 and TLR2 on THP-1 cells was determined by using anti-human TLR4 and TLR2 MAb. THP-1 cells were cultured in the 24-well plate. After 12 ∼ 24 h, the medium was removed by centrifugation, and the cells were harvested. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 15 min at room temperature, blocked with phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min, and incubated with anti-TLR4 and anti-TLR2 antibodies in blocking buffer at 4°C overnight. Primary antibodies were detected with CyTM3- or CyTM2-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG in blocking buffer at room temperature for 30 min. In between the two steps, the cells were washed three times with centrifugation. At last, the coverslips were mounted on glass slides with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA 94010) and viewed under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse TE 2000-S).

Cytokine response to peritoneal macrophages from C3H/HeN and C3H/HeJ mice.

Resident macrophages from either C3H/HeJ or C3H/HeN mice were cultured in 96-well plates with RPMI 1640 medium, in a volume of 100 μL. The cells were stimulated with 20 μg/mL CHSP10 for 24 h at 37°C, respectively; the secreted cytokines IL-1beta,IL-6, and TNF-alpha in the culture supernatant were tested by using mouse ELISA kit (Neobioscience; Shenzhen, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Blocking experiments.

THP-1 cells were cultivated in 24-well tissue culture plates (HyClone), and blocking experiments were conducted by pretreating cells with 10 μg/mL neutralizing anti-human TLR4 MAb or/and neutralizing anti-human TLR2 MAb or isotype control MAb for 1 h at room temperature and then stimulated with CHSP10 for 24 h. The supernatants were collected and stored at −70°C until cytokine assays were performed.

Assays for IL-6, IL-1beta, and TNF-alpha.

Secretion of IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-6 was determined with the Duoset ELISA Development Systems (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The assays employ the quantitative sandwich ELISA technique, using monoclonal antibodies specific for the tested cytokines. In brief, 200 μL (IL-1beta and TNF-alpha)/100 μL (IL-6) standard, sample, or control were added to each well and incubated for 2 h at room temperature (RT). After aspirating and four washes, 200 μL conjugate/well were added and incubated for 1 ∼ 2 h at RT. Four washes later, 200 μL substrate solution was added to each well and incubated for 20 min (RT). Then, 50 μL stop solution was added, and optical density was determined using a microplate reader at 450 nm. The sensitivity of assay was 0.7 (IL-6), 1 (IL-1beta), and 1.6 pg/mL (TNF-alpha). All experiments were repeated three times.

Data and statistical analysis.

The results of all experiments were expressed as the mean ± SE of triplicate experiments. Data were compared using one-way analysis of variance combined with the Student’s t test, and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed by SPSS version 13.0.

Results

Effect of CHSP10 on proinflammatory cytokine expression in human monocytes THP-1 cells.

Dose-dependent curve was observed in presence of various concentrations of CHSP10 (0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 μg/mL), and a similar trend was found with inflammatory cytokines IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha released from THP-1 cells (Fig. 1). Low concentrations of prepared protein induced low levels of cytokine secretion, and high concentrations induced high levels of cytokine production. CHSP10 triggered lower synthesis of inflammatory cytokines comparable with HSP60 and HSP70 (data not shown). Of increasing concentrations tested, 20 or 30 μg/mL CHSP10 was the stronger inducers of cytokine production in THP-1 cells compared with 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 15 μg/mL CHSP10. As shown in Fig. 2, IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha production was increased in cultured cells stimulated with CHSP10, compared with that in nonstimulated control cells. The proinflammatory activity was also time-dependent. From 2 ∼ 60 h, cytokine production in the supernatant of stimulated cells was detected. The amounts of TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-1beta peaked at 12 h after stimulation. Interestingly, we have also used A549 for comparison in cytokine measurement with THP-1 in the same conditions, and no effect on TNF-alpha production was observed (Fig. 3). CHSP10 sensitivity to PMB was tested. As shown in Fig. 4, TNF-alpha level is unaffected by CHSP10 treated with PMB or not, while it significantly decreased in LPS control.
Figure 1.

Dose-dependent effects of recombinant proteins CHSP10 on the production of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 in THP-1 cells (3 × 105 cells/mL well). THP-1 cells were incubated for 24 h with or without CHSP10, at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 μg/mL. The culture supernatants were collected and assayed for TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 production. p < 0.001 for a comparison of the control and 1 μg/mL LPS.

Figure 2.

Time-dependent effects of recombinant proteins CHSP10 on the production of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 in THP-1 cells (3 × 105 cells/mL well). THP-1 cells were incubated with 20 μg/mL CHSP10. After stimulation for 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h, the culture supernatants were collected and assayed for TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 production.

Figure 3.

Dose–response curve for CHSP10-induced TNF-alpha production. THP-1 monocytic cells (open circles) or human alveolar epithelial cells A549 (filled circles) were incubated for 24 h with CHSP10, at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 μg/mL. The culture supernatants were collected and assayed for TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 production. p < 0.001 versus the control cells, A549, at the same concentrations of CHSP10.

Figure 4.

Effect of polymyxin B on the ability of CHSP10 and E. coli LPS to induce TNF-alpha production by THP-1 cells. Cells (3 × 105 cells/mL well) were cultured and then stimulated by CHSP10 or E. coli LPS (1 μg/mL) in the presence or absence of 50 μg/mL polymyxin B sulfate. After 24 h stimulation, supernatants were collected, and their content in TNF-alpha was analyzed by ELISA. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001 versus the control untreated with polymyxin B, using Student’s t test.

Stimulation of proinflammatory cytokines by heated or deproteinized CHSP10.

When CHSP10 was pre-heated at 56°C for 30 min before being added to THP-1, cytokine production decreased. However, when CHSP10 was boiled at 100°C for 20 min, hardly any cytokine induction was observed. Furthermore, we used the deproteinized CHSP10 to detect the ability of inducing inflammatory cytokines by LPS-free sample. Deproteinized CHSP10 almost did not induce any inflammatory responses compared with untreated control (Fig. 5).
Figure 5.

Effect of heat, deproteinization treatments of CHSP10 on TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 production by THP-1 cells. Human monocytic THP-1 cells (3 × 105 cells/mL well) were cultured and then stimulated by CHSP10 (20 μg/mL) or LPS (100 μg/mL), which was heated at 56°C for 30 min or 100°C for 20 min, or treated with deproteinization, respectively. Culture supernatants were harvested after 24 h; TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 levels were assessed by ELISA (IL-6 and IL-1beta, left, y axis; TNF-alpha, right, y axis). p < 0.0001 determined by comparison with untreated HSP10 using Student’s t test.

Stimulation experiments by CHSP10 in TLR4-deficient and wild-type mice macrophages.

Wild-type macrophages from C3H/HeN displayed a normal cytokine production after stimulation with CHSP10, whereas IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha expression from macrophages were significantly decreased in the C3H/HeJ mice deficient in TLR4 (Fig. 6). As for control, LPS stimulated cytokine expression in wild-type cells but had no effect on cytokine productions in TLR4-dificient cells.
Figure 6.

Role of TLR4 in CHSP10-induced cytokine production in mouse macrophages. Mouse macrophages (1 × 104 cells per well) which derived from C3H/HeJ (TLR4 mutant) and C3H/HeN (normal wild-type) mice were stimulated with CHSP10 (20 μg/mL) or LPS (1 μg/mL) for 24 h. Culture supernatants were harvested and assessed for IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IL-1beta by ELISA. Significant difference at p < 0.01 compared with C3H/HeN cells, as indicated in the figures.

The mRNA and protein expression of TLRs (TLR2 and TLR4) in THP-1 cells.

Both TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA were detected in THP-1, which is consistent with previous observation (Cheng et al. 2008). HEK293T which is known to be lack of TLRs was used as a negative control and neither of the two TLRs’ messages was observed in this cell line (Fig. 7A). We further confirmed our results by using immunofluorescence and flow cytometric analysis (data not shown). We observed that both TLR4 and TLR2 were expressed in THP-1 by immunostaining with anti-TLR2 MAb and anti-TLR4 MAb. However, immunofluorescence of THP-1 cells with isotype control IgG showed no TLR2 and TLR4 expression (Fig. 7B).
Figure 7.

Identification of TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA in human THP-1 and HEK 293 T cells. A, Expression of TLR2 (347 bp) and TLR4 (548 bp) in human THP-1 cells was analyzed by PCR following reverse transcription (lane 2). HEK 293 T cells without TLR2 and TLR4 were used as negative control (lane 3). RT-PCR analysis of beta-actin expression was used as control (lower panel, 528 bp). B, Expression of TLR2 and TLR4 in THP-1 were detected by immunofluorescence staining, green fluorescence indicated Cy2 conjugated anti-human TLR2 MAb and the red fluorescence showed Cy3 conjugated anti-human TLR4 MAb, blue fluorescence demonstrated nuclear counterstaining with Hoechst 33452. Negative control using IgG showed no reaction.

The effects of anti-TLR4 and anti-TLR2 MAb in the blocking experiments.

THP-1 was pre-incubated with neutralizing anti-human TLR4 MAb for 1 h and led to significant inhibitions (p < 0.05) of CHSP10-induced IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha production, and also significantly reduced the production of cytokines after stimulation by LPS originated from E. coli. Blockade of TLR2 by the neutralizing anti-human TLR2 antibody resulted in significant reduction of proinflammatory cytokine production induced by CHSP10 but had no effect on LPS-inducing cytokine production (data not shown). The control IgG did not have any effect (Fig. 8).
Figure 8.

TLR2 and TLR4 mediate in cytokine productions of THP-1 cells by CHSP10 and E. coli LPS. Cells were pre-incubated for 1 h at 37°C in the presence or absence of 10 μg/mL of various neutralizing MAbs: anti-TLR2, anti-TLR4, anti-TLR2 + TLR4, or isotypematched mouse IgG before adding of 20 μg/mL CHSP10 or 1 μg/ml E. coli LPS. Culture supernatants were harvested and assessed for IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IL-1beta by ELISA (IL-6 and IL-1beta, left y axis; TNF-alpha, right y axis). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, †p > 0.05 compared with untreated HSP10.

Discussion

Chronic C. pneumoniae infection might trigger the inflammatory reactions and induce the development of atherosclerosis (Romano et al. 2006). Clinical studies reported the presence of C. pneumoniae and the antibodies against it in human serum (Davidson et al. 1998; Kuo et al. 1993; Kuo and Campbell 2000). Proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 can be secreted after C. pneumoniae infection (Tiran et al. 2002; Yang et al. 2003; Rodriguez et al. 2010). Since inflammatory reactions may be involved in the development and progression of atherosclerosis, the components of C. pneumoniae which activate the host cells and initiate proinflammatory cytokines needs to be defined.

Chlamydial HSPs may induce chronic disease by antigenic stimulation and host cell activation (LaVerda et al. 1999; Jha et al. 2010). CHSP60 is the most important antigen reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of chlamydial infections. It had been detected in human atheroma, and antibody against it was particularly elevated in coronary heart disease patients. Mounting research displayed that CHSP60 is an inducer of inflammatory responses to endothelial cells and macrophages (Kol et al. 1998; Kol et al. 1999; Bulut et al. 2002). HSP10 (GroES), a cochaperonin to HSP60 (GroEL) shared the same GroE operons and co-expressed the GroE complex with HSP60. It is located in cytosol, cell membrane, intercellular space, and periphery with mounting evidence demonstration (Fossati et al. 2003; Jia et al. 2011) and may interact with various surrounding environment. The association between the presence of anti-HSP10 antibodies and adult onset asthma or Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection (Betsou et al. 1999 LaVerda et al. 2000; Betsou et al. 2003) indicated that CHSP10 had been exposed to the host components and triggered the immune system to produce the specific antibodies. Reports on the other organisms also proved HSP10 may play a role in the inflammation-related immunopathogenic process (Ragno et al. 1996; Henderson and Pockley 2010).

Cytokines, produced by a variety of cells, exert diversified functions in immune-related diseases. The main advantage is that they can induce innate immune mechanisms, and exert cytodestructive effects to eliminate the infectious agents. While the main disadvantage is that they affect the development of inflammatory reactions, which may contribute to destruction and pathologic processes directly or indirectly. In this study, we found that HSP10 from C. pneumoniae, like other organism-derived HSP10, could stimulate THP-1 cells to secrete proinflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 in a dose-dependent manner. The results suggested CHSP10 could also induce the monocytes to secrete the cytokines but did not play a major role, compared with other components such as HSP60 and HSP70 (data not shown). Yet, cytokines act in networks or cascades by diverse cell types; only several selected cytokines from THP-1 cell line is a limitation in our study in that it is difficult to reflect the biological functions of cytokines in C. pneumoniae infection in vivo comprehensively and systematically.

TLRs are innate immune receptors which have been reported to mediate the recognition and binding of bacterial antigens such as HSPs (Huang et al. 2009). It is responsible for initiating innate immunity and secretion of different sets of chemokines and cytokines by host cells. TLR2 and TLR4 are the most possible candidates for mediating cell activation and cytokine releasing by LPS and HSP60 of C. pneumoniae, but some controversy remains about the mechanism of how TLR2 and TLR4 act in cells activation (Prebeck et al. 2001; Sasu et al. 2001; Bulut et al. 2002; Netea et al. 2004). Here, we have investigated whether CHSP10 is a ligand for TLR2 or/and TLR4 and whether these TLRs were involved in CHSP10-responsive human monocytes THP-1. The confirmation of TLR2 and TLR4’s existence is an important key to initiate further research about their role in cell activation. Next, we found that macrophages derived from C3H/HeJ mice that express mutant TLR4 were nearly nonresponsive to CHSP10, confirmed a role of TLR4 in CHSP10-induced cell activation. In support of the data obtained above, we showed that blockade of TLR4 significantly reduced the production of IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha induced by CHSP10, and anti-TLR2 antibody just inhibited the proinflammatory cytokines secretion slightly. In terms of the responses, CHSP10 has been shown to stimulate production of proinflammatory cytokines through TLR4- and TLR2-mediated signals. Here, TLR4 was found to be more important than TLR2 in CHSP10-induced monocytes THP-1 activation. However, these observations cannot rule out the possibility that TLRs other than TLR2 and 4 are involved in CHSP10-induced responses to THP-1.

To our knowledge, endotoxin is able to induce the production of TNF-alpha by macrophages and monocytes via Toll-like receptor 4-mediated signal transduction pathways (Moreno et al. 2004; Youn et al. 2008). LPS contamination of the recombinant proteins is a possible factor for the effects on cells activation. Therefore, we conducted the removal of LPS from CHSP10 by Endotoxin Removing Gel or preincubation with polymyxin B. LPS is heat-resistant and is not easily destroyed by thermal treatment (Gao et al. 2006), while the protein can be broken by heat, which leads to changes of its function. A549, which was often used in vitro studies of C. pneumoniae infection (Törmäkangas et al. 2010), failed to produce TNF-alpha in our research. It is not consistent with what has been shown earlier for induction of TNF-alpha, IL-8, and IFN-gamma in A549 cells during C. pneumoniae infection (Yang et al. 2003). As cellular responses to stimuli are very complicated, and various cell lines exhibit different responses, it could be due to the different cell types used. Thus, we concluded that A549 cells may not be applicable to protein samples; in other words, it is insensitive to protein stimuli such as CHSP10. This implied that CHSP10 may not affect the epithelial cells in cytokine productions.

In summary, we demonstrated that CHSP10 can induce expression of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, and IL-6 in monocytes THP-1, and this induction predominantly depended on TLR4 and was only to a minor extent, TLR2-dependent. These observations provided a better understanding of cytokine release following C. pneumoniae infection. The role of CHSP10 in the inflammatory aspects of C. pneumoniae-induced infection will need to be further clarified.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30901352), Innovative Research Team in University of Hunan province (number: [2008] 51), Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate, and Hunan Provincial training and innovation base for post-graduate, for their financial support of this study.

References

  1. Blasi F.; Tarsia P.; Aliberti S. Chlamydophila pneumoniae. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15: 29–35; 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blessing E.; Lin T. M.; Campbell L. A.; Rosenfeld M. E.; Lloyd D.; Kuo C. Chlamydia pneumoniae induces inflammatory changes in the heart and aorta of normocholesterolemic C57BL/6 J mice. Infect. Immu. 68: 4765–4768; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betsou F.; Sueur J. M.; Orfila J. Serological investigation of Chlamydia trachomatis heat shock protein 10. Infect. Immun. 67: 5243–5246; 1999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Betsou F.; Sueur J. M.; Orfila J. Anti-Chlamydia pneumoniae heat shock protein 10 antibodies in asthmatic adults. FEMS. Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 35: 107–111; 2003.Google Scholar
  5. Bulut Y.; Faure E.; Thomas L.; Karahashi H.; Michelsen K. S.; Equils O.; Morrison S. G.; Morrison R. P.; Arditi M. Chlamydial heat shock protein 60 activates macrophages and endothelial cells through Toll-like receptor 4 and MD2 in a MyD88-dependent pathway. J. Immunol. 168: 1435–1440; 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng W.; Shivshankar P.; Zhong Y.; Chen D.; Li Z.; Zhong G. Intracellular interleukin-1alpha mediates interleukin-8 production induced by Chlamydia trachomatis infection via a mechanism independent of type I interleukin-1 receptor. Infect. Immun. 76: 942–951; 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook P. J. Antimicrobial therapy for Chlamydia pneumoniae: its potential role in atherosclerosis and asthma. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 44: 145–148; 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cosentini R.; Tarsia P.; Canetta C.; Graziadei G.; Brambilla A. M.; Aliberti S.; Pappalettera M.; Tantardini F.; Blasi F. Severe asthma exacerbation: role of acute Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Respir. Res. 9: 48; 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson M.; Kuo C. C.; Middaugh J. P.; Campbell L. A.; Wang S. P.; Newman W. P.; Finley J. C.; Grayston J. T. Confirmed previous infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR) and its presence in early coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 98: 628–633; 1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Didion S. P. Chlamydophila pneumoniae and endothelial activation: the smoke that precedes the fire of atherosclerosis? Circ. Res. 102: 861–863; 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fossati G.; Izzo G.; Rizzi E.; Gancia E.; Modena D.; Moras M. L.; Niccolai N.; Giannozzi E.; Spiga O.; Bono L.; Marone P.; Leone E.; Mangili F.; Harding S.; Errington N.; Walters C.; Henderson B.; Roberts M. M.; Coates A. R.; Casetta B.; Mascagni P. Mycobacterium tuberculosis chaperonin 10 is secreted in the macrophage phagosome: is secretion due to dissociation and adoption of a partially helical structure at the membrane? J. Bacteriol. 185: 4256–4267; 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faure E.; Equils O.; Sieling P. A.; Thomas L.; Zhang F. X.; Kirschning C. J.; Polentarutti N.; Muzio M.; Arditi M. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide activates NF-kappaB through toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) in cultured human dermal endothelial cells. Differential expression of TLR-4 and TLR-2 in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 11058–11063; 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Gao B.; Wang Y.; Tsan M. F. The heat sensitivity of cytokine-inducing effect of lipopolysaccharide. J. Leukoc. Biol. 80: 359–366; 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grayston J. T.; Aldous M. B.; Easton A.; Wang S. P.; Kuo C. C.; Campbell L. A.; Altman J. Evidence that Chlamydia pneumoniae causes pneumonia and bronchitis. J. Infect. Dis. 168: 1231–1235; 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hahn D. L.; Bukstein D.; Luskin A.; Zeitz H. Evidence for Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in steroid-dependent asthma. Ann. Allergy. Asthma. Immunol. 80: 45–49; 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henderson B.; Pockley A. G. Molecular chaperones and protein-folding catalysts as intercellular signaling regulators in immunity and inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 88: 445–462; 2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang Q. Q.; Sobkoviak R.; Jockheck-Clark A. R.; Shi B.; Mandelin A. M.; Tak P. P.; Haines 3rd G. K.; Nicchitta C. V.; Pope R. M. Heat shock protein 96 is elevated in rheumatoid arthritis and activates macrophages primarily via TLR2 signaling. J. Immunol. 182: 4965–4973; 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jha H. C.; Srivastava P.; Divya A.; Prasad J.; Mittal A. Prevalence of Chlamydophila pneumoniae is higher in aorta and coronary artery than in carotid artery of coronary artery disease patients. APMIS. 117: 905–911; 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jha R.; Vardhan H.; Bas S.; Salhan S.; Mittal A. Chlamydia trachomatis heat shock proteins 60 and 10 induce apoptosis in endocervical epithelial cells. Inflamm. Res. 60: 69–78; 2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jia H. B.; Halilou A. I.; Hu L.; Cai W. Q.; Liu J.; Huang B. Heat shock protein 10 (Hsp10) in immune-related diseases: one coin, two sides. Int. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2: 47–57; 2011.Google Scholar
  21. Jiang S. J.; Kuo C. C.; Berry M. W.; Lee A. W.; Campbell L. A. Identification and characterization of Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific proteins that activate tumor necrosis factor alpha production in RAW 264.7 murine macrophages. Infect. Immun. 76: 1558–1564; 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kol A. T.; Bourcier A. H.; Lichtman P.; Libby D. Chlamydial heat shock protein 60 localizes in human atheroma and regulates macrophage tumor necrosis factor-alpha and matrix metalloproteinase expression. Circulation 98: 300–307; 1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kol A. T.; Bourcier A. H.; Lichtman P.; Libby D. Chlamydial and human heat shock protein 60s activate human vascular endothelium, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages. J. Clin. Invest. 103: 571–577; 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuo C.; Campbell L. A. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in arterial tissues. J. Infect. Dis. 181(Suppl 3): S432–436; 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuo C. C.; Gown A. M.; Benditt E. P.; Grayston J. T. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in aortic lesions of atherosclerosis by immunocytochemical stain. Arterioscler. Thromb. 13: 1501–1504; 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LaVerda D.; Albanese L. N.; Ruther P. E.; Morrison S. G.; Morrison R. P.; Ault K. A.; Byrne G. I. Seroreactivity to Chlamydia trachomatis Hsp10 correlates with severity of human genital tract disease. Infect. Immun. 68: 303–309; 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LaVerda D.; Kalayoglu M. V.; Byrne G. I. Chlamydial heat shock proteins and disease pathology: new paradigms for old problems? Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 7: 64–71; 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miyashita N.; Ouchi K.; Kawasaki K.; Komura H.; Kawai Y.; Obase Y.; Kobashi Y.; Oka M. Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Chlamydophila pneumoniae-specific immunoglobulin M in acute respiratory tract infection. Respirology 13: 299–302; 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moreno C.; Merino J.; Ramírez N.; Echeverría A.; Pastor F.; Sánchez-Ibarrola A. Lipopolysaccharide needs soluble CD14 to interact with TLR4 in human monocytes depleted of membrane CD14. Microbes. Infect. 6: 990–995; 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Netea M. G.; Kullberg B. J.; Jacobs L. E.; Verver-Jansen T. J.; van der Ven-Jongekrijg J.; Galama J. M.; Stalenhoef A. F.; Dinarello C. A.; Van der Meer J. W. Chlamydia pneumoniae stimulates IFN-gamma synthesis through MyD88-dependent, TLR2- and TLR4-independent induction of IL-18 release. J. Immunol. 173: 1477–1482; 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ragno S.; Winrow V. R.; Mascagni P.; Lucietto P.; Di Pierro F.; Morris C. J.; Blake D. R. Asynthetic 10-kD heat shock protein (hsp10) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis modulates adjuvant arthritis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 103: 384–390; 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodriguez N.; Dietrich H.; Mossbrugger I.; Weintz G.; Scheller J.; Hammer M. Increased inflammation and impaired resistance to Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection in Dusp1(−/−) mice: critical role of IL-6. J. Leukoc. Biol. 88: 579–587; 2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Romano C. C.; Nuzzo I.; Cozzolino D.; Bentivoglio C.; Paolillo R.; Rizzo A. Relationship between Chlamydia pneumoniae infection, inflammatory markers, and coronary heart diseases. Int. Immunopharmacol. 6: 848–853; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prebeck S.; Kirschning C.; Dürr S.; da Costa C.; Donath B.; Brand K.; Redecke V.; Wagner H.; Miethke T. Predominant role of Toll-like receptor 2 versus 4 in Chlamydia pneumoniae-induced activation of dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 167: 3316–3323; 2001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sasu S.; LaVerda D.; Qureshi N.; Golenbock D. T.; Beasley D. Chlamydia pneumoniae and chlamydial heat shock protein 60 stimulate proliferation of human vascular smooth muscle cells via toll-like receptor 4 and p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. Circ. Res. 89: 244–250; 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tiran A.; Gruber H. J.; Graier W. F.; Wagner A. H.; Van Leeuwen E. B.; Tiran B. Aspirin inhibits Chlamydia pneumoniae-induced nuclear factor-kappa B activation, cytokine expression, and bacterial development in human endothelial cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22: 1075–1080; 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Törmäkangas L.; Markkula E.; Lounatmaa K.; Puolakkainen M.; Puolakkainen. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in polarized epithelial cell lines. Infect. Immun. 78: 2714–2722; 2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yamamoto H.; Watanabe T.; Miyazaki A.; Katagiri T.; Idei T.; Iguchi T.; Mimura M.; Kamijima K. High prevalence of Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodies and increased high-sensitive C-reactive protein in patients with vascular dementia. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 53: 583–589; 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang J.; Hooper W. C.; Phillips D. J.; Tondella M. L.; Talkington D. F. Induction of proinflammatory cytokines in human lung epithelial cells during Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Infect. Immun. 71: 614–620; 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Youn J. H.; Oh Y. J.; Kim E. S.; Choi J. E.; Shin J. S. High mobility group box 1 protein binding to lipopolysaccharide facilitates transfer of lipopolysaccharide to CD14 and enhances lipopolysaccharide-mediated TNF-alpha production in human monocytes. J. Immunol. 180: 5067–5074; 2008.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for In Vitro Biology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Zhou
    • 1
  • Y. Wu
    • 1
  • L. Chen
    • 1
  • L. Liu
    • 1
  • H. Chen
    • 1
  • Z. Li
    • 1
  • C. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Pathogenic Biology InstituteUniversity of South ChinaHengyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations