Advertisement

Finding common ground: mapping the nomological networks of sustainability constructs for improved social marketing

  • Harry Beachcroft-ShawEmail author
  • Debbie Ellis
Original Article
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Sustainability Transitions, Management, and Governance

Abstract

Sustainability is a complex challenge that social marketing can assist in achieving. However, with its multidimensional composition and immense depth, the language of sustainability could be misinterpreted and misguide interventions. Examining macro-level literature and reliable yet different sources for information is key to developing effective social marketing programmes. In search of overlapping actions to reduce misinterpretation and misguidance, literature from degrowth and sustainable development as two constructs operating in the sustainability paradigm are thematically analysed according to the internal structure of a nomological network. Maps of each construct provide an overview of the linkages between their antecedents, components, strategies, actions outcomes and end-states from which general similarities and differences emerge. From this in-depth analysis of each construct, we find several actions that show positive overlaps in composition and linkages to their respective nomological networks. Comparing actions reveals a simpler language that is less open to misinterpretation and misguidance for social marketers. It is recommended that social marketers focus on these actions in developing effective social marketing programmes and explore them in greater detail to shape society toward a more sustainable future. We believe the method could be employed to map and better understand other complex phenomena.

Keywords

Social marketing Critical thinking Macro approach Degrowth Sustainable development Nomological network 

Notes

References

  1. Ackerman P, Beier M, Boyle M (2005) Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs? Psychol Bull 131:30–60.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcott B (2005) Jevons’ paradox. Ecol Econ 54:9–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcott B (2010) Impact caps: why population, affluence and technology strategies should be abandoned. J Clean Prod 18:552–560.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander S (2011) Property beyond growth: toward a politics of voluntary simplicity. Doctoral DissertationGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews C, Urbanska W (2010) Inspiring people to see that less is more. In: Starke L, Mastny L (eds) State of the world: transforming cultures from consumerism to sustainability. Island Press, Washington, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  6. Alexander S, Ussher S (2012) The voluntary simplicity movement: a multi-national survey analysis in theoretical context. J Consum Cult 12:66–86.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540512444019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andreasen A (1994) Social marketing: its domain and definition. J Public Policy Mark 13:108–114.  https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569401300109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andreasen A (1995) Marketing social change. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. Andreoni V, Galmarini S (2013) On the increase of social capital in degrowth economy. Proc Soc Behav Sci 72:64–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barling D, Lang T and Lele U (2012) Increasing resource efficiencies: sustainable production and consumption in food systems. In: UNEP, avoiding future famines: strengthening the ecological foundation of food security through sustainable food systems, pp 29–38. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/9274
  11. Basil D, Diaz-Meneses G, Basil M (2019) Social marketing in action: cases from around the world. Springer, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biggiero L (2018) Providing sound theoretical roots to sustainability science: systems science and (second-order) cybernetics. Sustain Sci 13:1323–1335.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0573-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biroscak BJ (2018) Policy, systems, and environmental change: reflections and suggestions for social marketers. Social Mark Q 24:127–131.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500418793306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Braun V, Clarke V (2013) Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. Sage, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  16. Brenkert G (2002) Ethical challenges in social marketing. J Public Policy Mark 21:14–25.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.21.1.14.17601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brennan L, Binney W (2008) Concepts in conflict: social marketing and sustainability. J Nonprofit Public Sect Mark 20:261–281.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10495140802224951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brennan L, Previte J, Fry M-L (2016) Social marketing’s consumer myopia: applying a behavioural ecological model to address wicked problems. J Social Mark 6:219–239.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-12-2015-0079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brooks J, Waring T, Monique Borgerhoff M, Richerson MP (2018) Applying cultural evolution to sustainability challenges: an introduction to the special issue. Sustain Sci 13:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0516-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brychkov D, Domegan C (2017) Social marketing and systems science: past, present and future. J Soc Mark 7:74–93.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-10-2016-0065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Byrne B (1984) The general/academic self-concept nomological network: a review of construct validation research. Rev Educ Res 54:427–456.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054003427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cattaneo C, Gavaldà M (2010) The experience of rurban squats in Collserola, Barcelona: what kind of degrowth? J Clean Prod 18:581–589.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chapman D, Zweig D (2005) Developing a nomological network for interview structure: antecedents and consequences of the structured selection interview. Pers Psychol 58:673–702.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00516.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Christen M, Schmidt S (2012) A formal framework for conceptions of sustainability—a theoretical contribution to the discourse in sustainable development. Sustain Dev 20:400–410.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Conroy D, Allen W (2010) Who do you think you are? An examination of how systems thinking can help social marketing support new identities and more sustainable living patterns. Australas Mark J 18:195–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crede M, Chernyshenko O, Stark S, Dalal R, Bashshur M (2007) Job satisfaction as mediator: an assessment of job satisfaction’s position within the nomological network. J Occup Organ Psychol 80:515–538.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X136180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Creswell J (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design : choosing among five approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  28. Cronbach L, Meehl P (1955) Construct vailidity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 52:281–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Demaria F, Schneider F, Sekulova F, Martinez-Alier J (2013) What is degrowth? From an activist slogan to a social movement. Environ Values 22:191–215.  https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X135815617251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dholakia N (2012) Being critical in marketing studies: the imperative of macro perspectives. J Macromark 33:220–225.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146711435844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Domegan C, McHugh P (2019) Macro-social marketing and the complexity of value co-creation. In: Kennedy AM (ed) Macro-social marketing insights: systems thinking for wicked problems. Routledge, New York, p 74Google Scholar
  32. Domegan C, McHugh P, Devaney M, Duane S, Hogan M, Broome BJ et al (2016) Systems-thinking social marketing: conceptual extensions and empirical investigations. J Mark Manag 32:1123–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. DuPisani J (2006) Sustainable development: historical roots of the concept. Environ Sci 3:83–96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430600688831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eagle L, Dahl S, Hill S, Bird S, Spotswood F, Tapp A (2013) Social marketing. Pearson Education Limited, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  35. Frame B, Newton B (2007) Promoting sustainability through social marketing: examples from New Zealand. Int J Consum Stud 31:571–581.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00600.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Freire-González J, Puig-Ventosa I (2015) Energy efficiency policies and the Jevons paradox. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5:69–79Google Scholar
  37. French J (2013) Social business, social behaviour and social marketing: three cornerstones of future social development. Soc Bus 3:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. French J, Gordon R (2015) Strategic social marketing. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. French J, Russell-Bennett R (2015) A hierarchical model of social marketing. J Soc Mark 5:139–159.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-06-2014-0042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. GEF (2011) Creating “Ecovillages” in rural Senegal—an innovative effort to generate multiple environmental benefits. https://www.thegef.org/news/creating-“ecovillages”-rural-senegal-—-innovative-effort-generate-multiple-environmental. Accessed 16 Aug 2017
  41. GFN (2017) Compare countries. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/compareCountries?type=earth&cn=5001&yr=2014. Accessed 21 Sept 2017
  42. Giddings B, Hopwood B, O’Brien G (2002) Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustain Dev 10:187–196.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gomiero T (2018) Agriculture and degrowth: state of the art and assessment of organic and biotech-based agriculture from a degrowth perspective. J Clean Prod 197:1823–1829.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gordon R (2018) Critical social marketing. In: Tadajewski M, Higgins M, Denegri-Knott J, Varman R (eds) The Routledge companion to critical marketing. Routledge, London, pp 83–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gordon R, Carrigan M, Hastings G (2011) A framework for sustainable marketing. Mark Theory 11:143–163.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111403218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gordon R, Gurrieri L (2014) Towards a reflexive turn: social marketing assemblages. J Soc Mark 4:261–278.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-02-2014-0015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Guest G, MacQueen K, Namey E (2011) Applied thematic analysis. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  48. Hamilton C (2010) Consumerism, self-creation and prospects for a new ecological consciousness. J Clean Prod 18:571–575.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hamilton C, Mail E (2003) Downshifting in Australia: a sea-change in the pursuit of happiness. The Australia Institute. https://www.tai.org.au/sites/default/files/DP50_8.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2013
  50. Hastings G, Domegan C (2014) Social marketing: from tunes to symphonies, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Herring H (2006) Energy efficiency—a critical view. Energy 31:10–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.04.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hopwood B, Mellor M, O'Brien G (2005) Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain Dev 13:38–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Infante Amate J, Gonzalez de Molina M (2013) ‘Sustainable De-Growth’ in agriculture and food: an agro-ecological perspective on spain’s agri-food system (year 2000). J Clean Prod 38:27–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. ISMA (2016) Social marketing definition. https://www.i-socialmarketing.org/social-marketing-definition#.W1h6KC2B2Rs. Accessed 30 Apr 2017
  55. Jabareen Y (2008) A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 10:179–192.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jackson R (2004) The ecovillage movement. Permaculture Magazine No. 40, Summer 2004. https://www.scribd.com/document/59209253/The-Ecovillage-Movement-by-Ross-Jackson. Accessed 22 Sept 2017
  57. Jackson T (2009) Prosperity without growth: economics for a finite planet. Earthscan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. John O, Caspi A, Robins R, Moffit T, Stouthamer-Loeber M (1994) The “Little Five”: exploring the nomological networks of the five-factor model of personality in adolescent boys. Child Dev 65:160–178.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00742.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jowett S (2009) Validating coach-athlete relationship measures with the nomological network. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 13:34–51.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10913670802609136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kajikawa Y, Tacoa F, Yamaguchi K (2014) Sustainability science: the changing landscape of sustainability research. Sustain Sci 9:431–438.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0244-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kennedy A-M (2016) Macro-social marketing. J Macromark 36:354–365.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146715617509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kennedy A-M (2017) Macro-social marketing research: philosophy, methodology and methods. J Macromark 37:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kilbourne W, McDonagh P, Prothero A (1997) Sustainable consumption and the quality of life: a macromarketing challenge to the dominant social paradigm. J Macromarketing 17:4–24.  https://doi.org/10.1177/027614679701700103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lairon D (2012) Biodiversity and sustainable nutrition with a food-based approach. In: Burlingame B and Dernini S (eds) Sustainable diets and biodiversity directions and solutions for policy, research and action, pp 30–35. Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium Biodiversity and Sustainable Diets United Against Hunger, 3–5 November 2010. FAO Headquarters, Rome. https://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3004e/i3004e.pdf
  65. Lang T (2012) Sustainable diets and biodiversity: the challenge for policy, evidence and behaviour change. In: Burlingame B and Dernini S (eds) Sustainable diets and biodiversity directions and solutions for policy, research and action, pp 20–27. Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium Biodiversity and Sustainable Diets United Against Hunger, 3–5 November 2010. FAO Headquarters, Rome. https://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3004e/i3004e.pdf
  66. Lee N, Kotler P (2020) Social marketing: changing behaviors for good, 6th edn. Sage, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  67. Lefebvre RC (2012) Transformative social marketing: co-creating the social marketing discipline and brand. J Soc Mark 2:118–129.  https://doi.org/10.1108/20426761211243955 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lietaert M (2010) Cohousing’s relevance to degrowth theories. J Clean Prod 18:576–580.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lorek S, Fuchs D (2013) Sustainable consumption governance—precondition for a degrowth path? J Clean Prod 38:36–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lorek S, Spangenberg J (2014) Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy—beyond green growth and green economies. J Clean Prod 63:33–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Martínez-Alier J (2012) Environmental justice and economic degrowth: an alliance between two movements. Cap Nat Soc 23:51–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2011.648839 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McKenzie-Mohr D (2011) Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. New Society Publishers, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  73. Moriarty P, Honnery D (2012) Preparing for a low-energy future. Futures 44:883–892.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. OECD/IEA (2016) Energy, climate change and environment: 2016 insights. Paris: IEA. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/ECCE2016.pdf
  75. Patton M (2002) Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  76. Peattie S, Peattie K (2011) Social marketing for a sustainable environment. In: Hastings G, Angus K, Carol B (eds) The SAGE handbook of social marketing. Sage, London, pp 343–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Peterson A, Zimmerman M (2004) Beyond the individual: toward a nomological network of organizational empowerment. Am J Community Psychol 34:129–145.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AJCP.0000040151.77047.58 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. R&D (2010) Degrowth declaration of the Paris 2008 conference. J Clean Prod 18:523–524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Elam G, Tennant R and Rahim M (2014) Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R (eds) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers, 2nd edn. Sage, London, pp 111–146Google Scholar
  80. Sachs J (2015) The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Scherr S, Uphoff N, Herren H (2012) Strategies for sustainable agricultural production systems. In: UNEP, avoiding future famines: strengthening the ecological foundation of food security through sustainable food systems, pp 39–48. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/9274
  82. Schoolman E, Guest J, Bush K, Bell A (2012) How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain Sci 7:67–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Scott Erickson G (2019) Akureyri on the verge: carbon neutral and beyond through targeted social marketing. In: Basil D, Diaz-Meneses G, Basil M (eds) Social marketing in action: cases from around the world. Springer, Cham, pp 311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sinkovics R, Penz E, Ghauri P (2008) Enhancing the trustworthiness of qualitative research in international business. Manag Int Rev 48:689–714.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0103-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sorman A, Giampetro M (2013) The energetic metabolism of societies and the degrowth paradigm: analyzing biophysical constraints and realities. J Clean Prod 38:80–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sorrel S (2015) Reducing energy demand: a review of issues, challenges and approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:74–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Spitzmuller M, Van Dyne L and Ilies R (2008) Organizational citizenship behavior: a review and extension of its nomological network. In: Barling J, Cooper CL (eds) The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior: volume I-micro approaches. Sage, London.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200448.n7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Spotswood F, French J, Tapp A, Stead M (2012) Some reasonable but uncomfortable questions about social marketing. J Soc Mark 2:163–175.  https://doi.org/10.1108/20426761211265168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Strange T, Bayley A (2008) Sustainable development: linking economy, society and environment. https://www.oecd.org/insights/sustainabledevelopmentlinkingeconomysocietyenvironment.htm. Accessed 4 Mar 2013
  90. Tadajewski M, Brownlie D (2008) Critical marketing: a limit attitude. In: Tadajewski M, Brownlie D (eds) Critical marketing: contemporary issues in marketing. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  91. Trainer T (2012) De-growth: do you realise what it means? Futures 44:590–599.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Truong V, Saunders S, Dong X (2019) Systems social marketing: a critical appraisal. J Soc Mark 9:180–203.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-06-2018-0062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tukker A (2013) Knowledge collaboration and learning by aligning global sustainability programs: reflections in the context of Rio.20. J Clean Prod 48:272–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. UN (2012) Rio+20: the future we want. Outcome of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio de Janerio, Brazil. https://rio20.un.org/sites/rio20.un.org/files/a-conf.216l-1_english.pdf.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2016
  95. UN (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2018
  96. UN (2018) Report of the secretary general. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/73/204&Lang=E. Accessed 5 Nov 2018
  97. UNDESA (no date) Sustainable consumption and production. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/sustainableconsumptionandproduction. Accessed 13 Nov 2016
  98. UNEP (2011) Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. Geneva: UNEP. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=126&menu=35. Accessed 14 May 2013
  99. UNEP (2013) Green economy and trade: trends, challenges and opportunities. https://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/GreenEconomyandTrade. Accessed 25 Sept 2015
  100. UNEP (2015) Sustainable consumption and production global edition: a handbook for policymakers. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1951Sustainable%20Consumption.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2016
  101. Vergragt P (2013) A possible way out of the combined economic-sustainability crisis. Environ Innov Soc Transit 6:123–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Victor P (2012) Growth, degrowth and climate change: a scenario analysis. Ecol Econ 84:206–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Waas T, Hugé J, Verbruggen A, Wright T (2011) Sustainable development: a bird’s eye view. Sustainability 3:1637–1661.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101637 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wymer W (2011) Developing more effective social marketing strategies. J Soc Mark 1:17–31.  https://doi.org/10.1108/20426761111104400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wymer W (2013) Deconstructing the brand nomological network. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 10:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-012-0091-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Law and Management StudiesUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalPietermaritzburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations