Advertisement

When places collide: power, conflict and meaning at Malheur

  • Micah L. IngallsEmail author
  • Amy Kohout
  • Richard C. Stedman
Special Feature: Original Article Sense of place in social - ecological systems: From theory to empirical exploration
  • 28 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Feature: Sense of Place in Social - Ecological Systems: From Theory to Empirical Exploration

Abstract

Place meanings—notions of what a given location is, and what it ought to be—are critical to the social negotiations that produce regulatory and management regimes. These, in turn, contribute to the material social–ecological outcomes that determine both the sustainability of system processes and the ways in which costs and benefits are distributed across society. Ascribed meanings are foundational to the social determination of what constitutes a ‘desirable’ system state, a core concern of resilience-based approaches to managing sustainability transformations. However, place meanings are never simple or unitary—they are diverse, overlapping, and often contested. While such contestations over place meanings may remain latent, at times they erupt into overt social conflict wherein competing narratives of place find visceral, and even violent, expression. Taking a particular case—the armed standoff between ranchers and federal agents at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in the United States in early 2016—we examine the ways in which place meanings and associated place claims first informed and then gave rise to violent conflict, and explore the relevance of these for understanding social–ecological processes in contested places and implications for transformation toward sustainability. Tracing the origins of the conflict at Malheur through the contested histories of place-making in the American West, we argue: (1) place meanings are produced and compete across a highly uneven landscape of power wherein some place claims are privileged while others struggle to gain traction; (2) contested place meanings come to particular dominance when they achieve the status of ‘normal’—when they inform the taken-for-granted lenses through which society views a place. However, dominant claims are never hegemonic, always facing the threat of subaltern claims, and so the process of place-making is never finished; (3) place meanings and conflict over these are often brought to our attention in contemporary time involving local places, but they are typically the product of very pre-contemporary and non-local influences and trajectories, pointing to important cross-scalar relationships; and (4) conflict over place meanings and claims, while problematic and sometimes destructive, may also be generative. Conflict provides moments of opportunity wherein latent contestations are surfaced and made explicit, prompting new social negotiations that may lead to new and surprising outcomes. We also explore the implications of contestation over place meanings with regard to the production of social capital and possible roles that place attachment may play in fostering resilience within contested areas and informing efforts to navigate change toward more sustainable futures.

Keywords

Place-making Place meanings Conflict Social–ecological systems American West 

Notes

References

  1. Adger WN, Brown K, Tompkins EL (2006a) The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecol Soc 10(2):9Google Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Paavola J, Huq S, Mace MJ (2006b) Toward justice in adaptation to climate change. In: Adger WN, Paavola J, Huq S, Mace MJ (eds) Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT press, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  3. Agyeman J, Bullard RD, Evans B (2002) Exploring the nexus: bringing together sustainability, environmental justice and equity. Space Polity 6(1):77–90Google Scholar
  4. Ammon Bundy calls for the takeover of the Malheur Refuge [Video file] (2016). Liberty and firearms social club. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVPz7EpD1bU. Accessed 9 Aug 2016
  5. Archer MS (2007) Making our way through the world: human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Arts B, Buizer M (2009) Forests, discourses, institutions: a discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. For Policy Econ 11(5–6):340–347Google Scholar
  7. Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (eds) (2000) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Biesbroek R, Dupuis J, Jordan A, Wellstead A, Howlett M, Cairney P, Rayner J, Davidson D (2015) Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making. Nat Clim Change 5(6):493–494Google Scholar
  9. Brogden MJ, Greenberg JB (2005) The fight for the west: a political ecology of land-use conflicts in Arizona. In: Paulson S, Gezon LL (eds) Political ecology across spaces, scales, and social groups. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, pp 41–60Google Scholar
  10. Brown K, O’Neill S, Fabricius C (2013) Social science understandings of transformation. In: World social science report 2013: changing global environments. International Social Science Council. Paris: OCDE Publishing and UNESCO Publishing, pp 100–106.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203419-13-en
  11. Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2004) Spatial complexity, resilience, and policy diversity: fishing on lake-rich landscapes. Ecol Soc 9(1):8Google Scholar
  12. Cornley JE (1982) Waterfowl production at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, 1942–1980. In: Sabol K (ed) Transactions of the forty-seventh North American wildlife and natural resources conference. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Cote M, Nightingale AJ (2012) Resilience thinking meets social theory: situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Prog Hum Geogr 36(4):475–489.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425708 Google Scholar
  14. Crampton JW, Elden S (eds) (2007) Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 59–64Google Scholar
  15. Cresswell T (1996) In place-out of place: geography, ideology, and transgression. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  16. Cretney R (2014) Resilience for whom? Emerging critical geographies of socio-ecological resilience. Geogr Compass 8(9):627–640Google Scholar
  17. Cronon W (1991) Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. WW Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Cumming GS (2011) Spatial resilience in social–ecological systems. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Cumming G, Cumming DH, Redman C (2006) Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecol soc 11(1)Google Scholar
  20. Davidson DJ (2010) The applicability of the concept of resilience to social systems: some sources of optimism and nagging doubts. Soc Nat Resour 23(12):1135–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941921003652940 Google Scholar
  21. Derissen S, Quaas MF, Baumgärtner S (2011) The relationship between resilience and sustainability of ecological-economic systems. Ecol Econ 70(6):1121–1128Google Scholar
  22. Donahue DL (1999) The western range revisited: removing livestock from public lands to conserve native biodiversity, vol 5. University of Oklahoma Press, NormanGoogle Scholar
  23. Donaldson T (1880) The public domain: its history, with statistics. The Public Land Commission, United States Government, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  24. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16(3):253–267Google Scholar
  25. Foucault M (2007) Questions on geography. In: Crampton J, Elden S (eds) Space, knowledge and power: Foucault on geography. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 173–182Google Scholar
  26. Fresque-Baxter JA, Armitage D (2012) Place identity and climate change adaptation: a synthesis and framework for understanding. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 3(3):251–266Google Scholar
  27. Gramsci A (1973) Prison notebooks. Lawrence and Wishart, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Greider T, Garkovich L (1994) Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociol 59(1):1–24Google Scholar
  29. Gunderson LH (2001) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  30. Hirschman AO (1994) Social conflicts as pillars of democratic market society. Political Theory 22(2):203–218Google Scholar
  31. Hobman EV, Walker I (2015) Stasis and change: social psychological insights into social–ecological resilience. Ecol Soc 20(1):39Google Scholar
  32. Hyde AF (2011) Empires, nations & families: a history of the North American west, 1800–1860. University of Nebraska Press, OmahaGoogle Scholar
  33. Ingalls M (2017) Not just another variable: untangling the spatialities of power in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 22(3):20Google Scholar
  34. Ingalls M, Stedman R (2016) The power problematic: exploring the uncertain terrains of political ecology and the resilience framework. Ecol Soc 21(1):6Google Scholar
  35. Ingalls M, Stedman R (2017) Engaging with human identity in social–ecological systems: a dialectical approach. Hum Ecol Rev 23(1):45–64Google Scholar
  36. Jacoby Karl (2001) Crimes against nature: squatters, poachers, thieves, and the hidden history of American conservation. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  37. Kollmorgen WM (1969) The Woodsman’s assaults on the domain of the cattleman. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 59(2):215–238Google Scholar
  38. Langston N (2003) Where land and water meet: a western landscape transformed. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  39. Lebel L, Anderies JM, Campbell B, Folke C, Hatfield-Dodds S, Hughes TP, Wilson J (2006) Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social–ecological systems. Marine sciences faculty scholarship. Paper 52. University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USAGoogle Scholar
  40. Low SM, Altman I (1992) Place attachment. In: Low SM, Altman I (eds) Place attachment. Springer, Boston, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  41. Marshall NA, Park SE, Adger WN, Brown K, Howden SM (2012) Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity. Environ Res Lett 7(3):034022.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034022/meta Google Scholar
  42. Massey D (1999) Space/time, ‘science’ and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Trans Inst Br Geogr 24(3):261–276.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1999.00261.x Google Scholar
  43. Masterson V, Stedman R, Enqvist J, Tengö M, Giusti M, Wahl D, Svedin U (2017) The contribution of sense of place to social–ecological systems research: a review and research agenda. Ecol Soc 22(1):49Google Scholar
  44. Merrill KR (2004) The new deal’s west. In: Deverell W (ed) A companion to the American west. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller C (2001) Gifford Pinchot and the making of the modern environmental movement. Island Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  46. Nash R (1967) Wilderness and the American mind. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  47. Nash GD (1973) The American west in the twentieth century: a short history of an urban oasis. Prentice Hall Health, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  48. Okereke C (2006) Global environmental sustainability: intragenerational equity and conceptions of justice in multilateral environmental regimes. Geoforum 37(5):725–738Google Scholar
  49. Opie J (1998) Nature’s nation: an environmental history of the United States. Harcourt Brace, Fort WorthGoogle Scholar
  50. Pinchot G (1910) The fight for conservation. DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  51. Pred A (1984) Place as historically contingent process: structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 74(2):279–297.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1984.tb01453.x/full Google Scholar
  52. Ratner B, Meinzen-Dick R, May C, Haglund E (2013) Resource conflict, collective action, and resilience: an analytical framework. Int J Commons 7(1):183–208Google Scholar
  53. Rothman HK (1998) The greening of a nation? Environmentalism in the United States since 1945. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  54. Rowley WD (1985) US forest service grazing and rangelands: a history (no. 8). Texas A & M University Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  55. Sheridan TE (2007) Embattled ranchers, endangered species, and urban sprawl: the political ecology of the new American west. Annu Rev Anthropol 36:121–138Google Scholar
  56. Smith A, Stirling A (2010) The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecol Soc 15(1):11Google Scholar
  57. Spence MD (1999) Dispossessing the wilderness: indian removal and the making of the national parks. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Stedman RC (1999) Sense of place as an indicator of community sustainability. For Chronicle 75(5):765–770Google Scholar
  59. Stedman RC (2002) Toward a social psychology of place: predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environ Behav 34(5):561–581.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001 Google Scholar
  60. Stedman RC (2003) Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Soc Nat Resour 16(8):671–685Google Scholar
  61. Stedman RC (2008) What do we "mean" by place meanings? Implications of place meanings for managers and practitioners. Vols. General technical report PNW-GTR-744. In: Kruger LE, Hall TE, Stiefel MC (eds) Understanding concepts of place in recreation research and management. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  62. Stedman RC (2016) Subjectivity and social–ecological systems: a rigidity trap (and sense of place as a way out). Sustain Sci 11(6):891–901.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0388-y Google Scholar
  63. Stedman RC, Ingalls M (2014) Topophilia, biophilia and greening in the red zone. In: Tidball KG, Krasny ME (eds) Greening in the red zone. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 129–144Google Scholar
  64. Steinberg T (2013) Down to Earth: nature’s role in American history. Oxford University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  65. Stokowski PA (2002) Languages of place and discourses of power: constructing new senses of place. J Leis Res 34(4):368Google Scholar
  66. The Oregon standoff: a community divided. [Video file] (2016). Vice news. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NeHPgF_9E0. Accessed 11 Jan 2016
  67. Times LA (2016) Are the activists occupying Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon ‘terrorists’? http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0106-walker-oregon-malheur-terrorist-20160106-story.html. Accessed 15 May 2018
  68. Turner FJ (1986) [1893] The significance of the frontier in American history. In: Ridge M (ed) Frederick Jackson Turner: Wisconsin’s historian of the frontier. State Historical Society of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  69. United States Constitution (1787) National archives. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript. Accessed 25 Sept 2018
  70. Voß JP, Bornemann B (2011) The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecol Soc 16(2):9Google Scholar
  71. Walker P (2018) Sagebrush collaboration: how Harney county defeated the takeover of the Malheur Wildlife Refuge. Oregon State University Press, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  72. Walker B, Salt D (2012) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  73. Warren L (1997) The hunter’s game: poachers and conservationists in twentieth-century America. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  74. Weisiger M (2011) Dreaming of sheep in Navajo country. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  75. Williams M (1989) Americans & their forests: a historical geography. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  76. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter S, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):9Google Scholar
  77. Zimmerer KS (2006) Cultural ecology: at the interface with political ecology—the new geographies of environmental conservation and globalization. Prog Hum Geogr 30(1):63–78.  https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph591pr Google Scholar
  78. Zimmerer KS (2017) Bridging new sustainable development goals: global agendas and landscape stewardship The science and practice of landscape stewardship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 311–331.  https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316499016.031 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Development and EnvironmentUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of HistoryColorado CollegeColoradoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Natural Resources and EnvironmentCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations