Advertisement

Place meanings on the urban waterfront: a typology of stewardships

  • Johan P. EnqvistEmail author
  • Lindsay K. Campbell
  • Richard C. Stedman
  • Erika S. Svendsen
Special Feature: Original Article Sense of place in social-ecological systems: From theory to empirical exploration

Abstract

Civic engagement in environmental management is often seen as linked to sense of place, sometimes with an assumption—explicit or implicit—that strong place attachment promotes a deeper stewardship commitment. This study challenges this idea by arguing that stewardship can develop along different pathways depending on people’s place meanings. We investigate sense of place and stewardship practices by examining three types of civic groups engaged in protecting and restoring waterfronts and water bodies in New York City: environmental groups, community groups and recreational groups. Using semi-structured interviews and Likert scale surveys, we assessed stewardship activities, place attachment and place meanings that group members (n = 31) associate with their site. Our findings show that place meanings help differentiate between groups based on how they currently view the site (as a place of work, a place of home, or a place of use), and the goals of their stewardship. Some groups work to restore what the place was previously, others work to protect what it currently is, while others work to transform their place into something new. These findings demonstrate how stewardship can develop along different pathways, and by taking place meanings into account we can extend knowledge about how sense of place is linked to behavior as well as better describe the different pathways. Place meanings thereby provide a basis for a typology of stewardships that helps describe different roles that civic engagement can take in environmental management.

Keywords

Civic engagement New York City Place attachment Place meanings Sense of place Stewardship 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the NY-NJ Harbor & Estuary Program, particularly Rob Pirani and Kate Boicourt (now with the Waterfront Alliance) who provided expert advice and input for this study before and during the fieldwork. We are also very thankful for the time taken by interviewees and others to meet with us, share their work and show their sites. We thank three pilot interviewees and the students and staff of the Human Dimensions Research Unit (now the Cornell Center for Conservation Social Sciences) at Cornell University’s Natural Resources Department, for input on our survey. The fieldwork was carried out by the first author with assistance from Ailbhe Murphy. We thank Vanessa Masterson, Maria Tengö, Amanda P. Hickey, Andrew Merrie, Erik Andersson, Thomas Hahn, Diego Galafassi and Morgan Grove for comments on early drafts of this manuscript, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable feedback. This study is funded by a core grant to the Stockholm Resilience Centre from Mistra, a grant from Sweden-America Association, and C.F. Liljevalch J:or’s travel grant. US Forest Service provided support for this research, especially through Michelle Johnson and during fieldwork.

Supplementary material

11625_2019_660_MOESM1_ESM.docx (53 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 54 kb)
11625_2019_660_MOESM2_ESM.docx (61 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 61 kb)
11625_2019_660_MOESM3_ESM.docx (54 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 55 kb)

References

  1. Adger WN, Barnett J, Chapin FS, Ellemor H (2011) This must be the place: underrepresentation of identity and meaning in climate change decision-making. Glob Environ Polit 11:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson E, Barthel S, Ahrné K (2007) Measuring social–ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecol Appl 17:1267–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson E, Barthel S, Borgström S et al (2014) Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. Ambio 43:445–453.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson E, Enqvist J, Tengö M (2017) Stewardship in urban landscapes. In: Bieling C, Plieninger T (eds) The science and practice of landscape stewardship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 222–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barthel S, Colding J, Elmqvist T, Folke C (2005) History and local management of a biodiversity-rich, urban cultural landscape. Ecol Soc 10:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beatley T, Newman P (2013) Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability 5:3328–3345.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bendt P, Barthel S, Colding J (2013) Civic greening and environmental learning in public-access community gardens in Berlin. Landsc Urban Plan 109:18–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boicourt K, Pirani R, Johnson ML et al (2016) Connecting with our waterways: an assessment of public access and stewardship in the New York, New Jersey Harbor Estuary. New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Brehm JM, Eisenhauer BW, Stedman RC (2013) Environmental concern: examining the role of place meaning and place attachment. Soc Nat Resour 26:522–538.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.715726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buytaert W, Zulkafli Z, Grainger S et al (2014) Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development. Front Earth Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2014.00026 Google Scholar
  12. Campbell LK (2006) Civil society strategies on urban waterways: stewardship, contention, and coalition building. MSc thesis. Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachisetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell LK (2007) New York City’s forgotten industrial waterway: assessment, goals, and indicators for long-term sustainability of the Newtown Creek. United Nations 15th Commission on SustainabilityGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell LK (2014) Constructing New York City’s urban forest: the politics and governance of the MillionTreesNYC Campaign. In: Sandberg AL, Bardekjian A, Butt S (eds) Urban forests, trees and greenspace. A policy perspective, Routledge, pp 242–260Google Scholar
  15. Campbell LK, Svendsen ES, Sonti NF, Johnson ML (2016) A social assessment of urban parkland: analyzing park use and meaning to inform management and resilience planning. Environ Sci Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.014 Google Scholar
  16. Chapin FS, Knapp CN (2015) Sense of place: a process for identifying and negotiating potentially contested visions of sustainability. Environ Sci Policy 53:38–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chapin FS, Kofinas GP, Folke C (2009) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Clary EG, Snyder M, Ridge RD et al (1998) Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:1516–1530.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Connolly JJ, Svendsen ES, Fisher DR, Campbell LK (2013) Organizing urban ecosystem services through environmental stewardship governance in New York City. Landsc Urban Plan 109:76–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connolly JJT, Svendsen ES, Fisher DR, Campbell LK (2014) Networked governance and the management of ecosystem services: the case of urban environmental stewardship in New York City. Ecosyst Serv 10:187–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Creswell JW (2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  22. Devine-Wright P, Howes Y (2010) Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study. J Environ Psychol 30:271–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Enqvist J, Tengö M, Bodin Ö (2014) Citizen networks in the Garden City: protecting urban ecosystems in rapid urbanization. Landsc Urban Plan 130:24–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Enqvist JP, West S, Masterson VA et al (2018) Stewardship as a boundary object for sustainability research: linking care, knowledge and agency. Landsc Urban Plan 179:17–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ernstson H (2011) Re-translating nature in post-apartheid Cape Town: the material semiotics of people and plants at Bottom Road. In: Heeks R (ed) understanding development through actor-network theory. London School of Economics, London, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  26. Ernstson H, Sörlin S (2009) Weaving protective stories: connective practices to articulate holistic values in the Stockholm National Urban Park. Environ Plan A 41:1460–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fisher DR, Campbell LK, Svendsen ES (2012) The organisational structure of urban environmental stewardship. Env Polit 21:26–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.643367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fisher DR, Svendsen ES, Connolly JJ (2015) Urban environmental stewardship and civic engagement—how planting trees strengthens the roots of democracy. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fresque-Baxter JA, Armitage D (2012) Place identity and climate change adaptation: a synthesis and framework for understanding. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 3:251–266.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Freudenburg WR, Frickel S, Gramling R (1995) Beyond the nature/society divide: learning to think about a mountain. Sociol Forum 10:361–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gustafson P (2001) Roots and routes: exploring the relationship between place attachment and mobility. Environ Behav 33:667–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gustafson P (2009a) Mobility and territorial belonging. Environ Behav 41:490–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gustafson P (2009b) more cosmopolitan, no less local. Eur Soc 11:25–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690802209689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hahn T, Nykvist B (2017) Are adaptations self-organized, autonomous, and harmonious? Assessing the social–ecological resilience literature. Ecol Soc 22(1)Google Scholar
  35. Horlings L (2016) Connecting people to place: sustainable place-shaping practices as transformative power. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 20:32–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huber M, Arnberger A (2015) Opponents, waverers or supporters: the influence of place-attachment dimensions on local residents’ acceptance of a planned biosphere reserve in Austria. J Environ Plan Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1083415 Google Scholar
  37. Ingalls M, Stedman RC, Kohout A (2019) When places collide: power, conflict and meaning at Malheur. Sustain Sci (this issue) Google Scholar
  38. Jelinek Boman J (2017) Nurturing urban environmental stewardship—a case study of Greenpoint, Brooklyn, New York. MSc thesis, Stockholm UniversityGoogle Scholar
  39. Jorgensen BS, Stedman RC (2001) Sense of place as an attitude: lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. J Environ Psychol 21:233–248.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krasny ME, Tidball KG (2012) Civic ecology: a pathway for Earth Stewardship in cities. Front Ecol Environ 10:267–273.  https://doi.org/10.1890/110230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krasny ME, Crestol SR, Tidball KG, Stedman RC (2014) New York City’s oyster gardeners: memories and meanings as motivations for volunteer environmental stewardship. Landsc Urban Plan 132:16–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Larson LR, Stedman RC, Cooper CB, Decker DJ (2015) Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 43:112–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewicka M (2005) Ways to make people active: the role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. J Environ Psychol 25:381–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Masterson V, Stedman RC, Enqvist J et al (2017a) The contribution of sense of place to social–ecological systems research: a review and research agenda. Ecol Soc 22:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Masterson V, Tengö M, Spierenburg M (2017b) Competing place meanings in complex landscapes: a social-ecological approach to unpacking community conservation outcomes on the Wild Coast, South Africa. Soc Nat Resour.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1347975 Google Scholar
  46. McMillen H, Campbell L, Svendsen E, Reynolds R (2016) Recognizing stewardship practices as indicators of social resilience: in living memorials and in a community garden. Sustainability 8:775.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McPhearson PT (2011) Toward a sustainable New York City: greening through urban forest restoration. In: Slavin M (ed) Sustainability in America’s cities. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, Washington, DC, pp 181–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McPhearson T, Hamstead ZA, Kremer P (2014) Urban ecosystem services for resilience planning and management in New York City. Ambio 43:502–515.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0509-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moore SA (2007) Alternative routes to the sustainable city: Austin, Curitiba, and Frankfurt. Lexington Books, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  50. Muñoz-Erickson TA, Campbell LK, Childers DL et al (2016) Demystifying governance and its role for transitions in urban social-ecological systems. Ecosphere 7:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murphy A, Enqvist JP, Tengö M (2019) Place-making to transform urban social-ecological systems: insights from the stewardship of urban lakes in Bangalore, India. Sustain Sci (this issue) Google Scholar
  52. Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA (2009) The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ Behav 41:715–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. NYC Department of Environmental Protection (2010) NYC Green infrastructure plan: a sustainable strategy for clean waterways. New York City, USA. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/pdf/green_infrastructure/NYCGreenInfrastructurePlan_LowRes.pdf
  54. NYC Department of Environmental Protection (2014) Jamaica Bay watershed protection plan 2014 update. New York, USA. https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dep/pdf/jamaica_bay/jbwpp_update_10012014.pdf
  55. Romolini M, Morgan Grove J, Ventriss CL et al (2016) Toward an Understanding of Citywide Urban Environmental Governance: An Examination of Stewardship Networks in Baltimore and Seattle. Environ Manage.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0704-4 Google Scholar
  56. Scannell L, Gifford R (2010) The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 30:289–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schultz L, Duit A, Folke C (2011) Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Dev 39:662–671.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shamai S (1991) Sense of place: an empirical measurement. Geoforum 22:347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith JW, Davenport M, Anderson DH, Leahy JE (2011) Place meanings and desired management outcomes. Landsc Urban Plan 101:359–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith JW, Siderelis C, Moore RL, Anderson DH (2012) The effects of place meanings and social capital on desired forest management outcomes: a stated preference experiment. Landsc Urban Plan 106:207–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stedman RC (1999) Sense of place as indicator of community sustainability. For Chron 75:765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stedman RC (2003) Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Soc Nat Resour 16:671–685.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stedman RC (2008) What do we ‘“mean”’ by place meanings? Implications of place meanings for managers and practitioners. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  64. Stedman RC (2016) Subjectivity and social-ecological systems: a rigidity trap (and sense of place as a way out). Sustain Sci 11(6):891–901.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0388-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stedman RC, Ingalls M (2014) Topophilia, biophilia and greening in the red zone. In: Tidball KG, Krasny ME (eds) Greening in the red zone: disaster, resilience and community greening, 1st edn. Springer, Netherlands, pp 129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Svendsen ES, Campbell LK (2008) Urban ecological stewardship: understanding the structure, function and network of community-based urban land management. Cities Environ 1:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Svendsen ES, Campbell LK (2010) Living memorials: understanding the social meanings of community-based memorials to September 11, 2001. Environ Behav 42:318–334.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510361871 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Svendsen ES, Campbell LK (2014) Community-based memorials to September 11, 2001: environmental stewardship as memory work. In: Tidball KG, Krasny ME (eds) Greening in the red zone: disaster, resilience, and community greening. Springer, Netherlands, pp 339–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Svendsen ES, Campbell LK, Fisher DR et al (2016) Stewardship mapping and assessment project: a framework for understanding community-based environmental stewardship. Newtown Square, USAGoogle Scholar
  70. Tidball KG, Krasny ME (2014) Greening in the red zone: disaster, resilience, and community greening. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tidball KG, Stedman RC (2012) Positive dependency and virtuous cycles: from resource dependence to resilience in urban social-ecological systems. Ecol Econ 86:292–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Uzzell D, Pol E, Badenas D (2002) Place identification, social cohesion, and environmental sustainability. Environ Behav 34:26–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. West S, Haider LJ, Masterson VA et al (2018) Stewardship, care and relational values. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 35:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yung L, Freimund WA, Belsky JM (2003) The politics of place: understanding meaning, common ground, and political difference on the rocky mountain front. For Sci 49:855–866Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.African Climate and Development Initiative, Department of Environmental and Geographical ScienceUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.U.S. Forest Service Northern Research StationNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Natural ResourcesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations