Advertisement

The 2030 Agenda compared with six related international agreements: valuable resources for SDG implementation

  • Raymond SanerEmail author
  • Lichia Yiu
  • Christian Kingombe
Review Article
  • 28 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Concepts, Methodology, and Knowledge Management for Sustainability Science

Abstract

A recurrent problem in international organizations is the disappearance of institutional history and knowledge. The same can be said about international agreements unless the same key drafters/negotiators are involved in subsequent agreements which is rarely the case. This study provides an example how institutional memory embedded in international agreements can be preserved for the benefit of the next generation of policy negotiators. Hence, as a contribution to the broader reflection on how to align National Sustainable Development Plans with the implementation plan of 2030 Agenda, the purpose of the study is to present a comparative analysis of the 2030 Agenda with 6 outcome documents that were negotiated and agreed by the UN member countries in the domain of sustainability. This analysis aims to identify issues not covered or “unfinished business” in the 2030 Agenda and addressed in a more comprehensive manner or from different perspectives. The list of agreements and outcome documents included are Agenda 21, Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21, Outcomes of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, The Paris Agreement and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda on Financing for Development. Our findings show that these agreements tend to build on each other, not always in the most straightforward manner, but they constitute a complementary set of agreements documenting the existing knowledge and practices on sustainability development. For instance, the 2030 Agenda does not repeal Agenda 21 (1992) or any other of the six agreements analysed, which shows that these preceding international agreements are still relevant for domestication by the signatories. Rather, it is a summative document covering all three pillars of sustainable development (social, environmental and economic). Recommendations are made on what aspects of the previous agreements could be most relevant for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. These points need to be part of the outreach in supporting countries for national implementation of the SDGs. Future research examining the interrelated aspects of international agreements could benefit from applying the same approach of comparative text analysis. This, in turn, will allow for the leveraging of prior consensus and knowledge and add deeper insights to meta-level governance toward a sustainable future. It could also be argued that once the SDGs/2030 Agenda needs to be revisited/revised and be replaced, the approach used for this comparative study could become the model to avoid reinventing the wheel and acknowledge that we are all standing on the shoulders of far-sighted public figures whose innovative thinking should be acknowledged rather than forgotten.

Keywords

2030 Agenda SDGs International Agreements on Sustainable Development Comparative text analysis Policy Coherence on Sustainable Development International Relations of Sustainable Development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Written by Raymond Saner, Ph.D., Titular Professor, Basel University and Director Diplomacy Dialogue, CSEND; Lichia Yiu, Ed.D., President, CSEND, Geneva; and Christian Kingombe, Ph.D., co-founder of 4IP Group LLC with support from Davide Gardina, research assistant at CSEND, Geneva. Special thanks to Mrs Irena Zubcevic, Chief, Intergovernmental policy and review branch, Office of Intergovernmental Support and Coordination for Sustainable Development, UNDESA, for her insightful comments on previous drafts of this paper. This project has benefited from funding of previous unpublished work done for UNDESA.

References

  1. CEDRA (Climate change and Environmental Degradation Risk and Adaptation assessment). https://www.preventionweb.net/files/11964_CEDRAClimatechangeandEnvironmentalD.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  2. Coliste D, Pedercini M, Cornell S, Pedercini M, Cornell S (2017) Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: using integrated simulation models to assess effective policies. Sustain Sci Implement Sustain Dev Goals 12(6):921–931Google Scholar
  3. Dzebo A, Brandi C, Janetschek H, Savvidou G, Adams K, Chan S, Lambert C (2017) Exploring connections between the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Stockholm Environmental Institute (SEI) Policy Brief. 3 Nov 2017. https://mediamanager.sei.org/documents/Publications/SEI-PB-2017-NDC-SDG-Connections.pdf
  4. Eckerberg K, Mans N (eds) (2013) environmental policy integration in practice: shaping institutions for learning. Taylor & Francis Group, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellyatt H (2016) Shell faces further suit over Nigeria oil spills, CNBC, Oil and Gas. https://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/02/shell-faces-further-suit-over-nigeria-oil-spills.html. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  6. GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit) (2017) Climate change realities in Small Island Developing States in the Caribbean. GIZ, Eschborn, Germany. https://www.adaptationcommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Grenada-Study.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  7. Global 2030 (2016) Achievements and Unfinished Business of the Time-Bound MDG Targets; Berlin. http://global2030.net/file/global2030mdg_targets.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  8. Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  9. Harsono A (1996) Nike Accused of “Slave” Child Labor”, Albion Monitor. http://www.albionmonitor.com/9606a/nikelabor.html
  10. IAEG-SDG, Tier Classification for Global SDG Indicators as of 20 April 2017, accessed at https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/iaeg-sdgs/tier-classification/
  11. IEF - International Environmental Forum (2002) Implementing Agenda 21—Report of the Secretary-General. https://iefworld.org/wssd_sg.htm. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  12. ILO, Trade and Employment Studies, Geneva. http://www.ilo.org/employment/areas/trade-and-employment/WCMS_181200/lang–en/index.htm. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  13. IMF, World Bank, WTO (2017) Making Trade an Engine of Growth for All: The Case for Trade and for Policies to Facilitate Adjustment. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news17_e/wto_imf_report_07042017.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  14. Implementation of Agenda 21 (2012) The Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the outcomes of the World Summit on Sustainable Development and of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, A/C.2/67/L.45, 26 Nov 2012Google Scholar
  15. International Conference on Financing for Development held from 18–22 March 2002 in Monterrey, N.L., Mexico, documents can be retried at http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/ffdconf/
  16. Kajikawa Y, Saito O, Takeuchi K (2017) Academic landscape of 10 years of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 12:869–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolb R (2011) Lessons from the financial crisis: causes, consequences, and our economic future. Wiley Online Library, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  18. Leong A (2015) How the Paris Agreement and the SDGs Work Together. Stakeholder Forum’s Outreach Magazine, 10 Dec 2015, at COP 21 http://17goals.org/paris-agreement-sdgs/
  19. Lucena C, Gummer J (2012) Why Rio failed in the past and how it can succeed this time, The Guardian, 12 June 2012. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/jun/12/rio20-agenda-politicians-johngummer
  20. Millenium Development Goals (MDGs), 2000–2015, http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  21. Monterrey Consensus on Financing for Development, International Conference on Financing for Development (2002) Monterrey, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  22. Nieuwenkamp R (2015) Coorporate Accountability and the UN Sustainable Development Goals: how Responsible Business Conduct could and should play a decisive role, Friends for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. https://friendsoftheoecdguidelines.wordpress.com/2015/05/19/corporate-accountabilityand-the-un-sustainable-development-goals-how-responsible-business-conduct-couldand-should-play-a-decisive-role/. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  23. Paris Agreement, United Nations (2015) C.N.92.2016.TREATIES-XXVII.7.d Depositary Notification, 12 Dec 2015Google Scholar
  24. Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2008) Is the 2007 US subprime financial crisis so different? An international historical comparison. Am Econ Rev 98(2):339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rokaya P, Sheikholeslami R, Kurkute S, Nazarbakhsh M, Zhang F, Reed MG (2017) Multiple factors that shaped sustainability science journal: a 10-year review. Sustain Sci 12(6):855–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruaudel H, Morrison-Métois S (2017) Responding to refugee crises in developing countries: what can we learn from evaluations?, OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers, No. 37, OECD Publishing, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/ae4362bd-en
  27. Saner R (2008) The expert negotiator, Chapters 11. Martinus Nijhoff Publ, Leiden, pp 198–217Google Scholar
  28. Saner R, Michaelun V (2009) Negotiations between state actors and non-state actors: case analyses from different parts of the world, pp. 1–39, Republic of Letters, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  29. Saner R, Yiu L (2015) Participation of civil society organisations in the United Nations and in the aid effectiveness discourse and related standard-setting negotiations. In: Göymen K, Lewis R (eds) Public policymaking in a globalized world. Istanbul Policy Center, Istanbul, pp 149–185Google Scholar
  30. SDG Index and Dashboard Reports (2017) Global Responsibilities, International Spillovers in Achieving the Goals, G20 edition, Bertelsmann Stiftung, Frankurt, Germany, http://www.sdgindex.org/assets/files/2017/2017-SDG-Index-and-Dashboards-Report–G20.pdf
  31. SDG Indicators, Metadata repository; UNSTATS, June 2017. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  32. SDG Indicators, Metadata repository, (June 2018), UNSTATS, UN NY. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  33. Shalini I (2015) From Rio to Paris: The Climate Change Agreements that Mattered; The Quint. https://www.thequint.com/news/india/from-rio-to-paris-the-climate-changeagreements-that-mattered. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  34. SIDS Accelerated Modalities of Action, SIDS conference, 2014, Samoa (A/RES/69/15)Google Scholar
  35. Srinivas H (2015) Waste Management and Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs), Policy Analysis Series E-039. June 2015, GDRC. https://www.gdrc.org/uem/waste/waste_in_agenda21.html
  36. Stafford-Smith M, Griggs D, Griggs G, Owen G, Ullah F (2017) Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science 12(6):911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sustainability Science (2017) Special feature: sustainability science and implementing the sustainable development goals 12(6), ISSN: 1862-4065 (Print) 1862-4057Google Scholar
  38. Sustainable Development Goals (2015) Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, United Nations, New York. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  39. Takeuchi K, Osamu S, Lahoti S, Gondor D (2017) Growing up: 10 years of publishing sustainability science research. Sustain Sci 12(6):849–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. UNCTAD (2014) World Investment Report 2014, United Nations Geneva and New York. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2014_en.pdf. Accessed 5ec 2018
  41. UNECA (United Nations Economic Commission for Africa) (2001) Review and appraisal of the implementation of Agenda 21 in Africa. UNECA Committee on Sustainable Development Meeting (2nd: 26–29 Nov 2001: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). Addis Ababa. http://hdl.handle.net/10855/4727
  42. UNEP (1992) Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3–14 June 1992, Agenda 21. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  43. UNEP, Environment and Vulnerability. https://www.gdrc.org/uem/disasters/disenvi/environment-vulnerability.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  44. UNEP, Environment and vulnerability and poverty and climate change reducing the vulnerability of the poor through adaptation. http://www.oecd.org/env/cc/2502872.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  45. United Nations (1992) Agenda 21, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3–14 June 1992Google Scholar
  46. United Nations (1997) Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/S-19/2, General Distribution, and 19 September 1997Google Scholar
  47. United Nations (2012a) Implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the outcomes of the World Summit on Sustainable Development and of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, A/C.2/67/L.45, 26 Nov 2012Google Scholar
  48. United Nations (2012b) The future we want, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012, (A/66/L.56) Google Scholar
  49. United Nations (2015a) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, A/RES/70/1, General Distribution, 21 Oct 2015Google Scholar
  50. United Nations (2015b) Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the 3rd international conference on financing for development (Addis Ababa Action Agenda), endorsed by the General Assembly in its resolution 69/313 of 27 July 2015Google Scholar
  51. United Nations (2016) International trade as an engine for Development, Chapter II.D, United Nations, NY. http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/2016-IATF-Chapter2D.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  52. United Nations (2017a) Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals, Report of the Secretary-General, Economic and Social Council, Session 2017, E/2017/66, 11 May 2017Google Scholar
  53. United Nations (2017b) Repositioning the UN development system to deliver on the 2030 Agenda—Ensuring a Better Future for All, Report of the Secretary-General, Economic and Social Council, Agenda item 7 (a), advanced unedited version, 30 June 2017Google Scholar
  54. United Nations General Assembly (1997) Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/S-19/2, General Distribution, 19 September 1997Google Scholar
  55. United Nations General Assembly (2009) General Assembly resolution on “Doha Declaration on Financing for Development: outcome document of the Follow-up International Conference on Financing for Development to Review the Implementation of the Monterrey Consensus” (A/63/L.57). http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/doha/documents/Doha_Declaration_FFD.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
  56. United Nations General Assembly (2012) The future we want, Resolution adopted by the on 27 July 2012, (A/66/L.56)]Google Scholar
  57. United Nations General Assembly (2016) Resolution A/Res/71/223adopted by the GA members on 21 December 2016, titled “Implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the outcomes of the World Summit on Sustainable Development and of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. UNHABITAT (2015) Climate change-urban solutions. https://unhabitat.org/cop21/. Accessed 5 Dec 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Basel UniversityBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Centre for Socio-Eco-Nomic Development (CSEND)GenevaSwitzerland
  3. 3.4IP Group LLCGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations