Advertisement

Sustainability Science

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 159–174 | Cite as

Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services: a literature review

  • Moinul Islam
  • Rintaro Yamaguchi
  • Yogi Sugiawan
  • Shunsuke ManagiEmail author
Special Feature: Review Article Future Scenarios for Socio-Ecological Production Landscape and Seascape
  • 368 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Feature: Future Scenarios for Socio-Ecological Production Landscape and Seascape

Abstract

Literatures on sustainability have developed dramatically over recent decades. These literatures have not only added an enormous number of dimensions, but also have challenged researchers to be able to conduct a comprehensive analysis of sustainability. The excessive use of natural capital (NC) might cause a decrease in sustainability. Depleting a type of NC and substituting it with another form of NC or with produced capital is not sustainable in the strong sense. In this review, we have focused on the importance of NC and ecosystem preservations for sustainable development. We value the NC of 140 nations by adopting the inclusive wealth approach. We also notice the impact of climate change and natural disaster on different geographic regions in the assessment of NC.

Keywords

Sustainability Inclusive wealth Natural capital Economic development Ecosystem services 

Notes

Funding

Funding was provided by Grant in Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan (MEXT): Grant in Aid for Specially Promoted Research (26000001).

References

  1. Arkema KK, Verutes GM, Wood SA, Clarke-Samuels C, Rosado S, Canto M, Rosenthal A, Ruckelshaus M, Guannel G, Toft J (2015) Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7390–7395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow KJ, Dasgupta P, Goulder LH, Mumford KJ, Oleson K (2012) Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environ Dev Econ 17:317–353.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x12000137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier EB (2007) Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. Econ Policy 22:178–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbier EB (2014) Economics: account for depreciation of natural capital. Nat News 515:32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbier EB, Burgess JC (2017) Natural resource economics, planetary boundaries and strong sustainability. Sustainability 9:1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbier EB, Koch EW, Silliman BR, Hacker SD, Wolanski E, Primavera J, Granek EF, Polasky S, Aswani S, Cramer LA (2008) Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science (80-.) 319:321–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiesura A, De Groot R (2003) Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective. Ecol Econ 44:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costanza R (2003) Social goals and the valuation of natural capital. Environ Monit Assess 86:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costanza R, Daly HE (1992) Natural capital and sustainable development. Conserv Biol 6:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costanza R, D’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’neill RV, Paruelo J (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Change 26:152–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dasgupta P, Duraiappah A, Managi S, Barbier E, Collins R, Fraumeni B, Gundimeda H, Liu G, Mumford KJ (2015) How to measure sustainable progress. Science (80-.) 350:748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Groot R, Brander L, Van Der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, Christie M, Crossman N, Ghermandi A, Hein L (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv 1:50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietz S, Neumayer E (2007) Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: concepts and measurement. Ecol Econ 61:617–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehrlich PR, Goulder LH (2007) Is current consumption excessive? A general framework and some indications for the United States. Conserv Biol 21:1145–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ekins P, Simon S, Deutsch L, Folke C, De Groot R (2003) A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecol Econ 44:165–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ekins P, Dresner S, Dahlström K (2008) The four-capital method of sustainable development evaluation. Environ Policy Gov 18:63–80Google Scholar
  19. El Serafy S (1998) Pricing the invaluable: the value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ 25:25–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (1989) The state of food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), QuebecGoogle Scholar
  21. FAO (2016) The State of food insecurity in the world 2015. Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress. Food and Agriculture Organization Publication, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujii H, Managi S (2016) An evaluation of inclusive capital stock for urban planning. Ecosyst Health Sustain.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1243 Google Scholar
  23. Guerry AD, Polasky S, Lubchenco J, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily GC, Griffin R, Ruckelshaus M, Bateman IJ, Duraiappah A, Elmqvist T (2015) Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: from promise to practice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7348–7355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartwick JM (1990) Natural resources, national accounting and economic depreciation. J Public Econ 43:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinterberger F, Luks F, Schmidt-Bleek F (1997) Material flows vs. ‘natural capital’: what makes an economy sustainable? Ecol Econ 23:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahn ME (2005) The death toll from natural disasters: the role of income, geography, and institutions. Rev Econ Stat 87:271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kubiszewski I, Costanza R, Dorji L, Thoennes P, Tshering K (2013) An initial estimate of the value of ecosystem services in Bhutan. Ecosyst Serv 3:e11–e21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li C, Zheng H, Li S, Chen X, Li J, Zeng W, Liang Y, Polasky S, Feldman MW, Ruckelshaus M (2015) Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7396–7401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacDonald DV, Hanley N, Moffatt I (1999) Applying the concept of natural capital criticality to regional resource management. Ecol Econ 29:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Missemer A (2018) Natural capital as an economic concept, history and contemporary issues. Ecol Econ 143:90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pearce D (1988) The sustainable use of natural resources in developing countries. Belhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Rajapaksa D, Islam M, Managi S (2017) Natural capital depletion: the impact of natural disasters on inclusive growth. Econ Disasters Clim Change 1:233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reyers B, Nel JL, O’Farrell PJ, Sitas N, Nel DC (2015) Navigating complexity through knowledge coproduction: mainstreaming ecosystem services into disaster risk reduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7362–7368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ricard D, Minto C, Jensen OP, Baum JK (2012) Examining the knowledge base and status of commercially exploited marine species with the RAM Legacy Stock Assessment Database. Fish Fish 13:380–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. SAUP (2011) The Sea Around Us Project database. Retrieved May 2011 and December 2016 [WWW Document]. http://www.seaaroundus.org/data/
  36. Schaefer M, Goldman E, Bartuska AM, Sutton-Grier A, Lubchenco J (2015) Nature as capital: advancing and incorporating ecosystem services in United States federal policies and programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7383–7389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stiglitz J, Sen A, Fitoussi J-P (2009) The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited. In: Reflections overview. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, ParisGoogle Scholar
  38. Sugiawan Y, Islam M, Managi S (2017) Global marine fisheries with economic growth. Econ Anal Policy 55:158–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tamaki T, Shin KJ, Nakamura H, Fujii H, Managi S (2017) Shadow prices and production inefficiency of mineral resources. Econ Anal Policy 57:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Toya H, Skidmore M (2007) Economic development and the impacts of natural disasters. Econ Lett 94:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. UNU-IHDP and UNEP (2012) Inclusive wealth report 2012: measuring progress toward sustainability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. UNU-IHDP and UNEP (2014) Inclusive wealth report 2014: measuring progress toward sustainability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Beukering PJH, Cesar HSJ, Janssen MA (2003) Economic valuation of the Leuser national park on Sumatra, Indonesia. Ecol Econ 44:43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Virto LR, Weber J-L, Jeantil M (2018) Natural capital accounts and public policy decisions: findings from a survey. Ecol Econ 144:244–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, Callejas Linares A, Susana López Falfán I, Méndez García J, Isabel Suárez Guerrero A, Guadalupe Suárez Guerrero M (1999) National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ 29:375–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)90063-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter S, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol, Soc, p 9Google Scholar
  47. Walker B, Pearson L, Harris M, Maler K-G, Li C-Z, Biggs R, Baynes T (2010) Incorporating resilience in the assessment of inclusive wealth: an example from South East Australia. Environ Resour Econ 45:183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. World Bank (2010) World development indicators. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  49. Xie G, Zhang C, Zhen L, Zhang L (2017) Dynamic changes in the value of China’s ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 26:146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamaguchi R, Managi S (2018) Backward-and forward-looking shadow prices in inclusive wealth accounting: an example of renewable energy capital. Mimeo, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moinul Islam
    • 1
    • 3
  • Rintaro Yamaguchi
    • 2
  • Yogi Sugiawan
    • 3
    • 4
  • Shunsuke Managi
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Urban InstituteKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.National Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukubaJapan
  3. 3.Departments of Urban and Environmental EngineeringKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  4. 4.Planning BureauNational Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (BATAN)JakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations