Sustainability Science

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 867–876 | Cite as

Traps in and of our minds: relationships between human logic, dialectical traps and social-ecological traps

Special Feature: Original Article Traps! Expanding Thinking on Persistent Maladaptive States in Pursuit of Resilience
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Feature: Traps! Expanding Thinking on Persistent Maladaptive States in Pursuit of Resilience

Abstract

Social-ecological traps are theorized to be present when human actions affect feedbacks and drivers in social-ecological systems, which, in turn, lead to regime shifts that may alter ecosystem capacity to generate services on which human wellbeing depends, and this, in turn, triggers societal responses, where actors and institutions interact with ecological dynamics and unwittingly lock development into a vulnerable pathway. The key dynamic in this theorization seems to be that human action often predicates or initiates the series of cascading affects that determine the presence of, and, perhaps, the effectiveness of, social-ecological traps. However, what drives human action in this context? What logic, assumptions, decisions, world views, and other processes are implicated in this configuration? This paper first briefly reviews ecological identity and the problems of anthropocentricism, human exceptionalism, and human exemptionalism and introduces the term ecological disenfranchisement. Building upon this, the author invokes Horn’s logic and dialectical traps as a lens for understanding human roles and the prevalence of issues with ecological identities, within social ecological traps. Drilling further down, the paper illustrates these traps with short vignettes, in each case, attempting to link the human logical traps with larger system dynamics. Finally, the author proposes a chain of reasoning to serve as an example of how the presence of human logic traps (or entrapment) in a number of different spheres has an impact upon the larger system, and, perhaps, even predicts entrapment of the larger system. Future efforts to either understand social-ecological traps or navigate away or out of them must first take stock of the human logical traps that actors within the systems are influenced by, and that influence the large system(s).This paper argues that failing to account for human traps within will render most efforts to avoid or escape social-ecological traps futile.

Keywords

Social-ecological traps Logical traps Resilience Ecological disenfranchisement Human exceptionalism Human exemptionalism Agency 

References

  1. Allison HE, Hobbs RJ (2004) Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “Lock-in Trap” of the Western Australian agricultural region. Ecol Soc 9(1):3Google Scholar
  2. Argyris C (2010) Organizational traps: leadership, culture, organizational design. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyris C, Schön D (1996) Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Aristotle (2012) The Organon: The works of Aristotle on Logic CreateSpace Independent Publishing PlatformGoogle Scholar
  6. Axelrod LJ (1994) Balancing personal needs with environmental preservation: identifying the values that guide decisions in ecological dilemmas. J Soc Issues 50(3):85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunsma DL, Overfelt D, Picou JS (eds) (2007) The sociology of Katrina: perspectives on a modern catastrophe. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  8. Cairns J (1999) Exemptionalism vs environmentalism: the crucial debate on the value of ecosystem health. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 2(3):331–338Google Scholar
  9. Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2008) Adaptive capacity and traps. Ecol Soc 13(2):40Google Scholar
  10. Chawla L (1999) Life paths into effective environmental action. J Environ Educ 31(1):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cinner JE (2011) Social-ecological traps in reef fisheries. Glob Environ Change 21(3):835–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clayton S (2003) Environmental identity: a conceptual and an operational definition. In: Clayton S, Opotow S (eds) Identity and the natural environment. Press, Cambridge, M.I.T, pp 45–65Google Scholar
  13. Clayton S, Opotow S (eds) (2003) Identity and the natural environment: the psychological significance of nature. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Cochard R, Ranamukhaarachchi SL, Shivakoti GP, Shipin OV, Edwards PJ, Seeland KT (2008) The 2004 tsunami in Aceh and Southern Thailand: a review on coastal ecosystems, wave hazards and vulnerability. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 10(1):3–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costanza R (1987) Social traps and environmental policy: why do problems persist when technical solutions are available? Bioscience 37:407–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Costanza R, Cumberland J, Daly H, Goodland R, Norgaard R (1997) An introduction to ecological economics. CRC Press, FloridaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dorner D (1996) The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunlap RE (1980) Paradigmatic change in social science: from human exemptions to an ecological paradigm. Am Behav Sci 24(1):5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunlap RE, Catton WR Jr (1994) Struggling with human exemptionalism: the rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. Am Sociol 25(1):5–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD (1978) The “new environmental paradigm”. J Environ Educ 9:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ford JD, Ford LW (1994) Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Acad Manag Rev 19(4):756–785Google Scholar
  22. Haider JL, Quinlan A, Peterson GD (2012) Interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan. Plan Theory Pract 13:299–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harada K, Imamura F (2005) Effects of coastal forest on tsunami hazard mitigation—a preliminary investigation. In: Satake K (ed) Tsunamis, vol 23. Springer, Netherlands, pp 279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayward T (1994) Ecological thought. UK Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Hedberg BLT, Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (1976) Camping on seesaws: prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Adm Sci Q 21:41–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hettinger N (1996) Enhancing natural value? Hum Ecol Rev 3(1):8–11Google Scholar
  28. Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10(2):328–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horn RE (1983) Traps of traditional logic and dialectics: what they are and how to avoid them. Lexington Institute, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes TP (1994) Catastrophes, phase shifts, and large-scale degradation of a Caribbean coral reef. Science 265(5178):1547–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson D (1984) Toward a generative structure for describing logical error: comments on R. E. Horn’s Traps in Logical Thinking. Fourth Lexington Conference on TrialecticsGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Keller JE (1980) Adirondack wilderness: a story of man and nature. Syracuse University Press, SyracuseGoogle Scholar
  34. Kellert S (1997a) Kinship to mastery: biophilia in human evolution and development. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Kellert S (1997b) The value of life: biological diversity and human society. Island Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  36. Kellert S, Wilson E (eds) (1993) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Kretz L (2009) Open continuity. Ethics Environ 14(2):115–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manoli CC, Johnson B, Dunla RE (2007) Assessing children’s environmental worldviews: modifying and validating the new ecological paradigm scale for use with children. J Environ Educ 38(4):3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merchant C (1992) Radical ecology: the search for a livable world. Chapman, and Hall, Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Moxnes E (1998) Overexploitation of renewable resources: the role of misperceptions. J Econ Behav Organ 37:107–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moxnes E (2000) Not only the tragedy of the commons: misperceptions of feedback and policies for sustainable development. Syst Dyn Rev 16:325–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murphy R (1995) Sociology as if nature did not matter: an ecological critique. Br J Sociol 46:688–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Naess A (1988) Identification as a source of deep ecological attitudes. In: Tobias M (ed) Deep ecology. Avant Books, San Marcos, CAGoogle Scholar
  44. Nowak D, Dwyer J (2007) Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In: Kuser J (ed) Urban and community forestry in the northeast. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ostrom E (2008) Social traps and the problem of trust: theories of institutional design—by Bo Rothstein. Polit Psychol 29(1):136–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pickering A (2008) Against human exceptionalism. What does it mean to be human. University of Exeter, ExeterGoogle Scholar
  47. Platt J (1973) Social traps. Am Psychol 28:641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rees W (2003) Understanding urban ecosystems: an ecological economics perspective. Understanding urban ecosystems. Springer, New York, pp 115–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rideout BE, Hushen K, McGinty D, Perkins S, Tat J (2005) Endorsement of the new ecological paradigm in systematic and e-mail samples of college students. J Environ Educ 36(2):15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Riley S, Decker DJ, Enck JW, Curtis PD, Lauber B, Brown TL (2003) Deer populations up, hunter populations down: implications of interdependence of deer and hunter population dynamics on management. Ecoscience 10:455–461Google Scholar
  51. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Stuart IF, Chapin EF, Lambin T, Lenton M, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, Wit CAD, Hughes T, Leeuw SVD, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472–475Google Scholar
  52. Roszak T (1992) The voice of the earth. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Rothstein B (2005) Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sanchirico JN, Hanna SS (2004) Sink or swim time for U.S. fishery policy. Issues Sci Technol 21(1):45–52Google Scholar
  55. Smith K, Berg D (1987) Paradoxes of group life. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  56. Stanovich K (1999) Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Taylor & Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Staw B (1981) The escalation of commitment: a review and analysis. Acad Manag Rev 6:577–587Google Scholar
  58. Sterman JD (2008) Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Science 322:532–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stern P, Dietz T (1994) The value basis of environmental concern. J Soc Issues 50(3):65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stockholm Resilience Center (2012) Insight #5 social-ecological traps: interaction between social and ecological feedbacks can lock systems into unsustainable pathways, creating social-ecological traps. Research Insights. Stockholm, Sweden, Stockholm University http://www.stockholmresilience.org/download/18.3e9bddec1373daf16fa43c/INsights_Social-ecological+traps_111108-2.pdf, pp 4
  61. Thomashow M (1995) Ecological identity: becoming a reflective environmentalist. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomashow M (1998) The ecopsychology of global environmental change. Hum Psychol 26:275–300Google Scholar
  63. Tidball KG (2012) Urgent Biophilia: human-nature interactions and biological attractions in disaster resilience. Ecol Soc 17(2):5Google Scholar
  64. Tidball K, Stedman R (2013) Positive dependency and virtuous cycles: from resource dependence to resilience in urban social-ecological systems. Ecol Econ 86:292–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. United States (2006) The federal response to Hurricane Katrina: lessons learned. U. S. Executive Office of the President and Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  66. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2000) 1961 Interim Survey Report: Mississippi River Delta at and Below New Orleans, Louisiana. Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana, No Time to Lose: the Future of Louisiana U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District. Baton Rouge LA, US Army Corps of EngineersGoogle Scholar
  67. Vinther M, Reeves SA, Patterson KR (2004) From single-species advice to mixed-species management: taking the next step. ICES J Mar Sci 61:1398–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Waugh W L (ed) (2006) Shelter from the storm: repairing the national emergency management system after Hurricane Katrina. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  69. Williams J (2007) Thinking as natural: another look at human exemptionalism. Hum Ecol Rev 14(2):130–139Google Scholar
  70. Williams L (2012) He Whanaunga Tera: the politics and practice of an indigenous and intercultural approach to ecological well-being. In: Williams L, Roberts RA, McIntosh A (eds) Radical human ecology: intercultural and indigenous approaches. Ashgate Publishing LTD, Burlington, pp 397–419Google Scholar
  71. Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  72. Wilson EO (1993) Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In: Kellert S, Wilson EO (eds) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  73. Wimberley ET (2009) Nested ecology: the place of humans in the ecological hierarchy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  74. Winter D (1996) Ecological psychology: healing the split between planet and self. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. Woods J (2013) Errors of reasoning. Naturalizing the logic of inference. College PublicationsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations