Sustainability Science

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 777–788 | Cite as

Towards an umbrella science of sustainability

Review Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Sustainability Science Innovation and Capacity Development

Abstract

Sustainability research has gained scholarly attention since the 1980s as the new science investigating the changes in social, environmental and economic systems and their impacts on the future of planetary life support systems. Whilst broad literature on sustainability has expanded significantly over the past decades, academic literature developing sustainability as a distinct science has received little attention. After more than two decades of sustainability research, the time has come for us to begin asking reflective questions about what sort of science we call sustainability science. How has the broader research on sustainability contributed to developing sustainability science as a unique discipline within the past two decades? How has the label science promoted or hindered the interdisciplinary project of integrating the natural and social sciences as well as arts and humanities in addressing human nature problems? I argue in this review paper that special efforts need to be made towards the building and positioning of sustainability as an umbrella science for global sustainability research. The benefits of the new sustainability science advocated for in this paper are that; a) it offers a universal definition of sustainability that accounts for both the needs of life and the capacity of planetary life support systems to provide for those needs and b) proposes ways of bridging gaps among different research traditions, facilitating cross disciplinary communication and addressing the challenge of multiple meanings and definitions of concepts facing sustainability research today.

Keywords

Sustainability science Social–ecological resilience Vulnerability, climate change adaptation Interdisciplinary research Transdisciplinary research 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my sincere thanks and appreciation to my supervisors, Drs Maureen Reed and Toddi Steelman, and Dr Brian Walker, for their comments on early drafts of this work. I also want to thank my colleague, Issahaka Fuseini, for his feedback on the manuscript. Finally, I want to acknowledge the SSHRC grant of my supervisor, Dr. Maureen Reed, for sponsoring my research stipends. Finally, I express my sincere appreciation to two anonymous reviews for their constructive feedback that has helped shape the paper in many ways.

References

  1. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):268–281. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Change 15(2):77–86. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahern NR, Kiehl EM, Sole M Lou, Byers J (2006) A review of instruments measuring resilience. Issues Compr Pediatric Nurs 29(2):103–125. doi:10.1080/01460860600677643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almstedt Å, Reed MG (2013) Introducing a framework for good and adaptive governance: an application to fire management planning in Canada’s boreal forest. For Chron 89(05):664–674. doi:10.5558/Tfc2013-119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes F (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conserv Biol 18(3):621–630. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x/full CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkes F (2010) Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future. Environ Conserv 37(04):489–500. doi:10.1017/S037689291000072X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes F, Jolly D (2002) Adapting to climate change: social–ecological resilience in a Canadian Western Arctic Community. Ecol Soc 5(2):18Google Scholar
  8. Bettencourt LMA, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(49):19540–19545. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102712108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bosselmann K (2008) The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  11. Brooks N, Neil Adger W, Mick Kelly P (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Glob Environ Change 15(2):151–163. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brundtland G (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: “our common future”. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8):765–781. doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark B, Button C (2011) Sustainability transdisciplinary education model: interface of arts, science, and community (STEM). Int J Sustain High Educ 12(1):41–54. doi:10.1108/14676371111098294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8059–8061. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231333100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crinall S, Henry T (2008) Waterwatch and art: “creating” space for students to understand science and connect with waterways. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain 4(6):55–64Google Scholar
  17. Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr. doi:10.1177/030913259602000407 Google Scholar
  18. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.8402002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cutter S, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E (2008) Community and regional resilience: perspectives from hazards, disasters, and emergency management. Community and Regional Resilience Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Webb JJ, Morath D (2009) Social vulnerability to climate variability hazards: a review of the literature. Final Report to Oxfam. http://adapt.oxfamamerica.org/resources/Literature_Review.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2014
  21. Duit A, Galaz V, Eckerberg K, Ebbesson J (2010) Governance, complexity, and resilience. Glob Environ Change 20(3):363–368. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fischer J, Manning AD, Steffen W, Rose DB, Daniell K, Felton A, Garneyy S, Gilna B, Heinsohn R, Lindenmayer BD, MacDonald B, Mills F, Newell B, Reid J, Robin L, Sherren K, Wade A (2007) Mind the sustainability gap. Trends Ecol Evol 22(12):621–624. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16(3):253–267. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31(5):437–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/ Google Scholar
  26. Füssel H-M (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Change 17(2):155–167. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 16(3):293–303. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hadorn GH, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60:119–128. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herrfahrdt-Pähle E, Pahl-Wostl C (2012) Continuity and change in social-ecological systems: the role of institutional resilience. Ecol Soc 17(2):8. doi:10.5751/ES-04565-170208 Google Scholar
  30. Holling C (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 4(1973):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holling C, Meffe G (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10(2):328–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howe PD, Yarnal B, Coletti A, Wood NJ (2013) The participatory vulnerability scoping diagram: deliberative risk ranking for community water systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103(2):343–352. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.754673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jeffcott SA, Ibrahim JE, Cameron PA (2009) Resilience in healthcare and clinical handover. Qual Saf Health Care 18(4):256–260. doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.030163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Hickler T, Hornborg A, Kronsell A, LÖvebrand E, Persson J (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6(1):69–82. doi:10.1007/s11625-010-0117-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kajikawa Y (2008) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3(2):215–239. doi:10.1007/s11625-008-0053-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kates R (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(49):19449–19450. doi:10.1073/pnas.1116097108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kates R, Clark W, Corell R, Hall J (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kauffman J, Arico S (2014) New directions in sustainability science: promoting integration and cooperation. Sustain Sci 2014:413–418. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0259-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kofinas PG (2009) Adaptive co-management in social–ecological governance. In: Chapin C, Stuart F, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) Principles of ecosystems stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer New York, New York, pp 77–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1(1):1–6. doi:10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(Suppl 1):25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levin SA (1998) Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1(5):431–436. doi:10.1007/s100219900037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lin K-H, Chang C-Y (2013) Everyday crises: marginal society livelihood vulnerability and adaptability to hazards. Prog Dev Stud 13(1):1–18. doi:10.1177/146499341201300101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mane E, Alinovi L, Melvin D (2010) Measuring resilience: a concept note on the resilience tool. Concept note. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/al920e/al920e00.pdf. Accesssed 10 May 2015
  45. Masten A, Powell J (2003) A resilience framework for research, policy, and practice. In: Luthar SS (ed) Resilience and vulnerability adaptation in the context of childhood adversities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Malone EL (2009) Vulnerability and resilience in the face of climate change: current research and needs for population information. Batelle, Richland, WA. http://www.populationaction.org/Publications/Working_Papers/Vulnerability_and_Resilience/Malone_resilience.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2014Google Scholar
  47. Mebratu D (1998) Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 9255(98):493–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller TR (2013) Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustain Sci 8(2):279–293. doi:10.1007/s11625-012-0180-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2014) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9(2):239–246. doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miner J (2008) Promoting environmental consciousness as a part of an arts curriculum. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain 1(4):105–110Google Scholar
  51. Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60(3):498–508. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Norberg J, Cummin SG (2008) Complexity theory for a sustainable future. In: Norberg SG, Jon C (eds). Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Brien K, Leichenko R, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Glob Environ Change 14(4):303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Byrne D, Dripps W, Nicholas KA (2014) Teaching and learning sustainability: an assessment of the curriculum content and structure of sustainability degree programs in higher education. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0251-y Google Scholar
  55. O’Keefe P, Westgate K, Wisner B (1976) Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature 260(5552):566–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. O’Neal M (1999) Measuring resilience. In: Annual meeting of the mid-south educational research association, pp 1–16. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED436574. Accessed 15 Jun 2015
  57. Pearce T, Smit B, Duerden F, Ford JD, Goose A, Kataoyak F (2009) Inuit vulnerability and adaptive capacity to climate change in Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories, Canada. Polar Record 46(02):157. doi:10.1017/S0032247409008602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peterson G, Allen C, Holling C (1998) Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1(1):6–18. doi:10.1007/s100219900002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pirages D (1994) Sustainability as an evolving process. Futures 26(March):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Polsky C, Neff R, Yarnal B (2007) Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: the vulnerability scoping diagram. Glob Environ Change 17(3–4):472–485. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Redman CL (2014) Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits? Ecol Soc 19(2):37. doi:10.5751/ES-06390-190237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schodl K, Leeb C, Winckler C (2015) Developing science–industry collaborations into a transdisciplinary process: a case study on improving sustainability of pork production. Sustain Sci 10(4):639–651. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0329-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scholz RW, Steiner G (2015) Transdisciplinarity at the crossroads. Sustain Sci 10(4):521–526. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0338-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schröter D, Polsky C, Patt A (2005) Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach. Adapt Strateg Glob Change 10:573–596. doi:10.1007/s11027-005-6135-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Spangenberg JH (2011) Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv 38(3):275–287. doi:10.1017/S0376892911000270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):282–292. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Steelman T, Nichols EG, James A, Bradford L, Ebersöhn L, Scherman V, Omidire F, Bunn ND, Twine W, McHale MR (2015) Practicing the science of sustainability: the challenges of transdisciplinarity in a developing world context. Sustain Sci 10(4):581–599. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0334-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stokols D, Lejano RP, Hipp J (2013) Enhancing the resilience of human–environment systems: a social ecological perspective. Ecol Soc 18(1):art7. doi:10.5751/ES-05301-180107
  69. Swanson D, Hiley J, Venema HD, Grosshans R (2007) Indicators of adaptive capacity to climate change for agriculture in the Prairie Region of Canada: an analysis based on Statistics Canada’s Census of Agriculture (Canadian electronic library. Documents collection). International Institute for Sustainable Development, WinnipegGoogle Scholar
  70. Tate E (2013) Uncertainty analysis for a social vulnerability index. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103(3):526–543. doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.700616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Turner BL (2010) Vulnerability and resilience: coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Glob Environ Change 20(4):570–576. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckleyg N, Kasperson JX, Luerse A, Martellog ML, Polskya C, Pulsiphera A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231335100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walker B, Holling C, Carpenter S, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/ Google Scholar
  74. Wall E, Marzall K (2006) Adaptive capacity for climate change in Canadian rural communities. Local Environ 11(4):373–397. doi:10.1080/13549830600785506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Westley F (2002) The devil in the dynamics. In: Gunderson CS, Holling LH (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 333–360Google Scholar
  76. Westman WE (1978) Measuring the inertia and resilience of ecosystems. Bioscience 28(11):705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wiek A, Iwaniec D (2013) Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0208-6 Google Scholar
  78. Zakour MJ, Gillespie DF (2013) Community disaster vulnerability. Springer New York, New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5737-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environment and Sustainability, College of Graduate StudiesUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations