Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Technology improvements and value changes for sustainable happiness: a cross-development analytical model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops an analytical model to calculate the amount by which individuals are expected to modify their values (the relationship between lifestyle and happiness, as measured by subjective well-being, SWB) and to adopt innovative technologies (to increase the sustainability of production and consumption, measured by the ecological footprint, EF) to allow current and future generations to achieve sustainable happiness (the pursuit of happiness that does not exploit other people, the environment, or future generations). The paper also examines the dependence of these changes on an individual’s concern for future generations and on their country’s current state of economic development. It is shown that individuals in better-off developed countries and individuals in worse-off developing countries can achieve sustainability with a reasonable level of value change (0–30 %) and a feasible degree of technological innovation (10–40 %), respectively. In contrast, individuals in better-off developing countries and individuals in worse-off developed countries must rely to an impractical degree of technological innovation (50–70 %) and to an unreasonable level of value change (40–70 %), respectively. Finally, individuals in developing countries differ from individuals in developed countries in terms of their potential to achieve sustainable happiness, by achieving sustainability at a low SWB (about 10 % of its maximum) and a high SWB (about 80 % of its maximum), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagliani M et al (2008) A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecol Econ 65:650–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner S, Quaas M (2010) Sustainability economics—general versus specific, and conceptual versus practical. Ecol Econ 69:2056–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonini A (2008) Cross-national variation in individual life satisfaction: effects of national wealth, human development, and environmental conditions. Soc Indic Res 87:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand F (2009) Critical natural capital revisited: ecological resilience and sustainable development. Ecol Econ 68:605–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KW, Kasser T (2005) Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Soc Indic Res 74:349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buenstorf G, Cordes C (2008) Can sustainable consumption be learned? A model of cultural evolution. Ecol Econ 67:646–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowel FA (1995) Measuring inequality. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P (1998) Population, consumption and resources: ethical issues. Ecol Econ 24:139–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Vires BJM, Petersen AC (2009) Conceptualising sustainable development: an assessment methodology connecting values, knowledge, worldviews and scenarios. Ecol Econ 68:1006–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (2008) Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. J Happiness Stud 9:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diffenbaugh NS (2013) Human well-being, the global emissions debt, and climate change commitment. Sustain Sci 8:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley R (2007) Progress, sustainability and human well-being: is a new worldview emerging? Int J Innov Sustain Dev 1:304–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht H-J (2009) Natural capital, subjective well-being, and the new welfare economics of sustainability: some evidence from cross-country regressions. Ecol Econ 69:380–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson T, Kjonstad BG, Barstad A (2014) Mindfulness and sustainability. Ecol Econ 104:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar-Tello MC, Bhamra T (2013) Happiness as a harmonising path for bringing higher education towards sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain 15:177–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell A, Gowdy JM (2007) Environmental degradation and happiness. Ecol Econ 60:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala N (2008) Measuring sustainability: why the EF is bad economics and bad environmental science. Ecol Econ 67:519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frame B, Brown J (2008) Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecol Econ 65:225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy J (2005) Toward a new welfare economics of sustainability. Ecol Econ 53:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gsottbauer E, van den Berg JCJM (2011) Environmental policy theory given bounded rationality and other-regarding preferences. Environ Resour Econ 49:263–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller M, Hadler M (2006) How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: an international comparative analysis. Soc Indic Res 75:169–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell JF (2014) Social norms, happiness, and the environment: closing the circle. Sustain: Sci Pract Policy 10:78–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrand S et al (2009) The relevance of ecological and economic policies for sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 11:853–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huesemann MH, Huesemann JA (2008) Will progress in science and technology aver or accelerate global collapse? A critical analysis and policy recommendations. Environ Dev Sustain 10:787–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R et al (2008) Development, freedom, and rising happiness. Perspect Psychol Sci 3:264–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories

  • Jabereen Y (2008) A new conceptual framework for sustainable development. Environ Dev Sustain 10:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallis G et al (2012) The economics of degrowth. Ecol Econ 84:172–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser T (2002) The high price of materialism. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger M, Rees WE (2010) Exporting natural capital: the foreign eco-footprint on Costa Rica and implications for sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain 12:547–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzes J et al (2009) A research agenda for improving national EF accounts. Ecol Econ 68:1991–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konchak W, Pascual U (2006) Converging economic paradigms for a constructive environmental policy discourse. Environ Sci Policy 9:10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratena K, Streicher G (2012) Spatial welfare economics vs. ecological footprint: a sensitivity analysis introducing strong sustainability. Environ Resour Econ 51:617–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lianos TP (2013) The world budget constraint. Environ Dev Sustain 15:1543–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lothgren M (1997) Generalised stochastic frontier production models. Econ Lett 57:255–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malghan D (2011) A dimensionally consistent aggregation framework for biophysical metrics. Ecol Econ 70:900–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffat I (2008) A preliminary analysis of composite indicators of sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 15:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran DD et al (2008) Measuring sustainable development—nation by nation. Ecol Econ 64:470–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motesharrei S, Riva J, Kalnay E (2014) Human and nature dynamics (HANDY): modeling inequality and use of resources in the collapse or sustainability of societies. Ecol Econ 101:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder KF (2007) Innovation for sustainable development: from environmental design to transition management. Sustain Sci 2:253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEF (2012) The happy planet index 1.0. www.neweconomics.org

  • O’Brien C (2008) Sustainable happiness: how happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Can Psychol 49:289–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quental N et al (2011) Sustainability: characteristics and scientific roots. Environ Dev Sustain 13:257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer JE (2011) The ethics of inter-temporal distribution in a warning planet. Environ Resour Econ 48:363–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabau GL (2010) Know, live and let live: towards a redefinition of the knowledge-based economy—sustainable development nexus. Ecol Econ 69:1193–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon UU (2010) A detailed look at three disciplines, environmental ethics, law and education to determine which plays the most critical role in environmental enhancement and protection. Environ Dev Sustain 12:1069–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven R (2005) Apparent quality-of-life in nations: how long and happy people live. Soc Indic Res 71:61–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venetoulis J, Talberth J (2008) Refining the ecological footprint. Environ Dev Sustain 10:441–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch H (2003) Freedom and rationality as predictors of cross-national happiness patterns: the role of income as a mediating variable. J Happiness Stud 4:295–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch H (2007) Environmental welfare analysis: a life satisfaction approach. Ecol Econ 62:544–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch H (2009) Implication of happiness research for environmental economics. Ecol Econ 68:2735–2742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White N (2007) Sharing resources: the global distribution of the ecological footprint. Ecol Econ 64:402–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWF (2010) Living planet report, Avenue du Mont-Blanc CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland

  • Zagonari F (2011) Which ethics will make us individually and socially happier? And cross development analytical model. J Happiness Stud 1:77–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zidansek A (2007) Sustainable happiness and happiness in nations. Energy 32:891–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziolkowska JR, Ziolkowski B (2011) Product generational dematerialization indicator: a case of crude oil in the global economy. Energy 36:5925–5934

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Fabio Zagonari

Authors
  1. Fabio Zagonari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Zagonari.

Additional information

Handled by Richard Bawden, Systemic Development Institute, Australia.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 70 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zagonari, F. Technology improvements and value changes for sustainable happiness: a cross-development analytical model. Sustain Sci 10, 687–698 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0311-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0311-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation