Advertisement

Sustainability Science

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 115–126 | Cite as

Participatory mapping to negotiate indigenous knowledge used to assess environmental risk

  • Catherine J. RobinsonEmail author
  • Kirsten Maclean
  • Ro Hill
  • Ellie Bock
  • Phil Rist
Special Feature: Original Article Weaving Indigenous and Sustainability Sciences to Diversify Our Methods (WIS2DOM)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Feature: Weaving Indigenous and Sustainability Sciences to Diversify Our Methods (WIS2DOM)

Abstract

The concept of “usable knowledge” is central to sustainability science, but most of the research that explores this concept focuses on the science–policy interface. This paper expands this scholarship by describing a participatory research methodology that aimed to facilitate knowledge sharing between indigenous peoples, and support indigenous community efforts to consider different knowledge claims and negotiate indigenous knowledge that could be used for environmental risk assessments and management responses. We draw on two case studies to show how a participatory mapping approach enabled Aboriginal people connected to the Girringun Indigenous Corporation (Girringun) in northern Australia to negotiate the knowledge needed to assess the environmental risks that affect their territories. Individuals painted and drew maps of their values, knowledge, and management aspirations for water and native vegetation. These maps were shared with the wider group to enable the consideration of different perspectives and the negotiation of agreed risks affecting local watersheds and native vegetation. These maps were also used to facilitate the design of knowledge partnerships among the Girringun tribal groups, staff, and other collaborators that are critical to re-framing and co-managing the environmental risks affecting this region of northern Australia.

Keywords

Indigenous rights Regional co-management agreements Mental maps Risk communication 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the CRC for Plant Biosecurity, CSIRO Land and Water, the Payne Scott Award, and the Centre for the Institute of the Environment and the Centre for Climate Adaptation Science and Solutions (CCASS). We also thank Dr Beau Austin and Colleen Corrigan for reviewing an earlier version of this paper and for the helpful advice from the anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E (2011) Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada’s arctic. Glob Environ Change 21:995–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bali A, Kofinas GP (2014) Voices of the Caribou people: a participatory videography method to document and share local knowledge from the North American human–Rangifer systems. Ecol Soc 19:16. doi: 10.5751/ES-06327-190216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber M, Jackson S, Shellberg J, Sinnamon V (2014) Working knowledge: characterising collective indigenous, scientific, and local knowledge about the ecology, hydrology and geomorphology of Oriners Station, Cape York Peninsula, Australia. Rangeland J 36:53–66. doi: 10.1071/RJ13083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manage 90:1692–1702. doi: 10.1071/RJ13083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borrini-Feyerabend G, Pimbert M, Farvar MT, Kothari A, Renard Y (2004) Sharing Power. Learning by doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world, IIED and IUCN/CEESP/CMWG. Cenesta, TehranGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowie R (2013) Indigenous self-governance and the deployment of knowledge in collaborative environmental management in Canada. J Can Stud 47:91–121Google Scholar
  7. Bryan J (2011) Walking the line: participatory mapping, indigenous rights and neoliberalism. Geoforum 42:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carnegie AJ, Lidbetter JR (2012) Rapidly expanding host range for Puccinia psidii sensu lato in Australia. Australas Plant Path 41:13–29. doi: 10.1007/s13313-011-0082-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapin M, Lamb Z, Threlkeld B (2005) Mapping indigenous lands. Annu Rev Anthropol 34:619–638. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coombes B, Johnson JT, Howitt R (2014) Indigenous geographies III. Methodological innovation and the unsettling of participatory research. Prog Hum Geogr. doi: 10.1177/0309132513514723 Google Scholar
  11. Cornell S, Berkhout F, Tuinstra W, Tàbara DJ, Jäger J, Chabay I, de Wit B, Langlais R, Mills D, Moll P, Otto IM, Peterson A, Pohl C, van Kerkhoff L (2014) Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environ Sci Policy 28:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies J, Hill R, Walsh FJ, Sandford M, Smyth D, Holmes MC (2013) Innovation in management plans for community conserved areas: experiences from Australian indigenous protected areas. Ecol Soc 18:14. doi: 10.5751/ES-05404-180214 Google Scholar
  13. Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Change 21:680–689. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edelman D (2009) Broader native title claims and the meaning of the term ‘traditional owners’. AIATSIS Native Title conference paper. National Native Title Tribunal, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  15. Eden S (2009) The work of environmental governance networks: traceability, credibility and certification by the Forest Stewardship Council. Geoforum 40:383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feit HA (1988) Self-management and state-management: forms of knowing and managing northern wildlife. In: Freeman MMR, Carbyn LN (eds) Traditional knowledge and renewable resource management in northern regions, Occasional Publication No. 23, Boreal Institute for Northern Studies, Edmonton, pp 72–91Google Scholar
  17. Gambold N (2002) The role of traditional ecological knowledge and skills in ‘modern’ indigenous land management and education. In: Walsh F, Mitchell P (eds) Planning for country: cross-cultural approaches to decision making on indigenous lands. Jurkurrpa Books, an imprint of IAD Press, Alice Springs, pp 142–147Google Scholar
  18. Girramay J, Gulnay D, Nywaigi W, Warungnu GB, Bandjin P (2013) Wabu jananyu: cultural plant use by the Girringun indigenous tribal groups of north Queensland. 3E Innovative for the Girringun Indigenous Corporation, CairnsGoogle Scholar
  19. Girringun (2012) Which way, same way? Regional indigenous protected areas and the interests of prescribed bodies corporate. Native title conference paper, echoes of Mabo—honour and determination, Townsville, 4 JuneGoogle Scholar
  20. Girringun Indigenous Corporation (2014) What is Girringun? www.girringun.com.au. Accessed 15 Sep 2014
  21. Hill R, Grant C, George M, Robinson CJ, Jackson S, Abel N (2012) A typology of indigenous engagement in Australian environmental management: implications for knowledge integration and social-ecological system sustainability. Ecol Soc 17:23. doi: 10.5751/ES-04587-170123 Google Scholar
  22. Hill R, Maclean K, Pert PL, Rist P, Joyce A, Schmider J, Tawake L (2013) Participatory evaluation of co-management in wet tropics country. Interim report. Report to the National Environmental Research Program. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, CairnsGoogle Scholar
  23. Howitt R (2002) Scale and the other: levinas and geography. Geoforum 33:299–313. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00006-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Howitt R (2014) The challenges of developing a dialogue between science and indigenous science. In: Johnson JT, Louis RP, Kliskey A (eds) Weaving indigenous and sustainability sciences: diversifying our methods (WIS2DOM Workshop), NSF Arctic Social Sciences Program Report, pp 59–75Google Scholar
  25. Hunt J, Smith D, Garling S, Sanders W (2008) Contested governance. Culture, power and institutions in indigenous Australia. Research monograph No. 29. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy and Research ANU, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson JT (2012) Place-based learning and knowing: critical pedagogies grounded in Indigeneity. GeoJournal 77:829–836. doi: 10.1007/s10708-010-9379-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson JT, Cant G, Howitt R, Peters E (2007) Creating anti-colonial geographies: embracing indigenous peoples’ knowledges and rights. Geogr Res 45:117–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00441.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kajikawa Y (2008) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3:215–239. doi: 10.1007/s11625-008-0053-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kates RW, Clark RW, Corell R et al (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642. doi: 10.1126/science.1059386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirchhoff CJ, Lemos MC, Dessai S (2013) Actionable knowledge for environmental decision making: broadening the usability of climate science. Annu Rev Environ Resour 38:393–414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-022112-112828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles and challenges. Sustain Sci 7:25–43. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lejano RP, Ingram H (2009) Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing. Environ Sci Policy 12(6):653–662. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindenfield L, Smith HM, Norton T, Grecu NC (2014) Risk communication and sustainability science: lessons from the field. Sustain Sci 9:119–127. doi: 10.1007/s11625-013-0230-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Louis RP (2007) Can you hear us now? Voices from the margin: using indigenous methodologies in geographic research. Geogr Res 45:130–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00443.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maclean K, Cullen L (2009) Research methodologies for the co-production of knowledge for environmental management in Australia. J Royal Soc NZ 39:205–208. doi: 10.1080/03014220909510581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maclean K, Robinson CJ (2011) Indigenous knowledge partnerships for water planning and assessment in the Wet Tropics region. CSIRO, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  37. Maclean K, Woodward E (2013) Photovoice evaluated: an appropriate visual methodology for indigenous water resource research. Geogr Res 51:94–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2012.00782.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maclean K, Robinson CJ, Natcher DC (2014) Consensus building or constructive conflict? Indigenous discursive strategies to enhance participation in natural resource management in Australia and Canada. Soc Nat Res. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2014.928396 Google Scholar
  39. MacMynowski DP (2007) Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecol Soc 12:20Google Scholar
  40. Margerum R, Robinson CJ (2014) Limitations of collaborative partnerships for sustainable water management. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 12:53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nygren A (1999) Local knowledge in the environment-development discourse: from dichotomies to situated knowledges. Crit Anthropol 19:267–288. doi: 10.1177/0308275X9901900304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manage 34:75–90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Padilla E, Kofinas GP (2014) “Letting the leaders pass”: barriers to using traditional ecological knowledge in comanagement as the basis of formal hunting regulations. Ecol Soc 19(2):7. doi: 10.5751/ES-05999-190207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reid WV, Berkes F, Wilbanks T, Capistrano D (2006) Bridging scales and knowledge systems. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  45. Robinson CJ (2001) Working towards regional agreements: recent developments in co-operative resource management in Canada’s British Columbia. Geogr Res 39:182–196. doi: 10.1111/1467-8470.00139 Google Scholar
  46. Robinson CJ, Wallington TJ (2012) Boundary work: engaging knowledge systems in comanagement of feral animals on Indigenous lands. Ecol Soc 17(2):16. doi: 10.5751/ES-04836-170216 Google Scholar
  47. Robinson CJ, Smyth D, Whitehead PJ (2005) Bush tucker, bush pets, and bush threats: co-management of feral animals in Australia’s Kakadu National Park. Consv Biol 19(5):1385–1391. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00196.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinson CJ, Gerrard E, May T, Maclean K (2014a) Australia’s indigenous carbon economy: a national snapshot. Geogr Res 52:123–132. doi: 10.1111/1745-5871.12049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson CJ, Taylor B, Vella K, Wallington T (2014b) Working knowledge for collaborative water planning. Int J Water Gov 2:43–60. doi: 10.7564/13-IJWG4 Google Scholar
  50. Rose DB (1996) Nourishing Terrains. Australian Aboriginal views of landscape and wilderness, Australian Heritage Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  51. Ross H, Grant C, Robinson CJ, Izurieta A, Smyth D, Rist P (2009) Co-management and indigenous protected areas in Australia: achievements and ways forward. Australas J Environ Manage 16:242–252. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2009.9725240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roux, DJ, Rogers, KH, Biggs, HC, Ashton PJ, Sergeant A (2006) Bridging the science–management divide: moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecol Soc 11(1):4. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art4/
  53. Tengö M, Brondizio E, Elmqvist T, Malmer P, Spierenburg M (2014) Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: the multiple evidence base approach. Ambio 43:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker B, Jojola T, Natcher D (2013) Reclaiming indigenous planning. McGill-Queen’s University Press, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  55. Walsh F, Mitchell P (2002) Planning for country. Cross-cultural approaches to decision-making on indigenous lands. Jukurrpa books, IAD Press, Alice SpringsGoogle Scholar
  56. Zurba M, Berkes F (2014) Caring for country through participatory art: creating a boundary object for communicating indigenous knowledge and values. Local Environ 19:821–836. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2013.792051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine J. Robinson
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Kirsten Maclean
    • 1
  • Ro Hill
    • 3
  • Ellie Bock
    • 4
  • Phil Rist
    • 5
  1. 1.CSIRO Land and WaterDutton ParkAustralia
  2. 2.The Northern InstituteCharles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia
  3. 3.CSIRO Land and WaterCairnsAustralia
  4. 4.Regional Advisory and Innovation Network (RAIN) PtyKentAustralia
  5. 5.Girringun Indigenous CorporationCardwellAustralia

Personalised recommendations