Sustainability Science

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 379–398 | Cite as

Let’s play transformations! Performative methods for sustainability

Review Article

Abstract

Coping with global environmental change demands new forms of civic engagement and interaction able to transform passive audiences attending to the drama of unsustainability into committed actors for sustainability. This entails linking diverse sources of scientific knowledge with personal experiences, emotion and ethical judgments. In this paper, we assess the potential as well as the limitations of innovative theatre-based participatory tools and methods aimed at supporting sustainability learning and agent transformation. To this aim, we first review a series of experiences using theatrical performance and introduce the notion of performative methods. Second, we assess to what extent these new approaches can be of relevance in environmental action research and sustainability science, practice and learning. Finally, we list a series of key research questions to further guide methodological innovation in this promising area of sustainability science and practice. Our findings show a growing and successful use of such methodologies worldwide, both in academia and in implementation-oriented approaches. An increasing number of topics and complexity is being embraced by these methods, offering a fertile ground for innovation in participatory sustainability science.

Keywords

Applied drama Performative methods Global environmental change Sustainability learning Theatre Transformation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Grant (FI-DGR-2011) from the Catalan Government. We would like to thank Katharine N. Farrell for her reflections and for providing the opportunity for developing the theatrical workshop at ICTA, as well as Arnim Scheidel, Fiona Thomas and Ilan Chabay for their helpful feedback. Also special thanks to all the participants of ICTA’s workshop, and to Inma Pascual and Óscar F. Vega, for their fantastic work as co-facilitators. J. David Tàbara would like to acknowledge the Knowledge, Learning and Societal Change project (www.klscproject.org), the support of the Global Climate Forum (www.globalclimateforum.org) and of Carlo C. Jaeger in particular. Finally, we would like to thank the insightful comments of the anonymous reviewers which greatly helped us to improve the final text.

Supplementary material

11625_2014_245_MOESM1_ESM.docx (38 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 37 kb)

References

  1. Badham M (2010) The menace of measurement: a discussion about arts indicators. Saskatchewan Arts Alliance, University of MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  2. Barone T, Eisner EW (eds) (2012) Arts based research. Sage Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker C (1994) Herbert Marcuse and the subversive potential of art. In: Becker Carol (ed) The subversive imagination: artists, society, and social responsibility. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger P, Luckmann N (1967) The social construction of reality. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackstock KL, Kelly GJ, Horsey BL (2006) Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecol Econ 60:726–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boal A (1992) Games for actors and non-actors. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Boal A (1998) Legislative theatre using performance to make politics. Routledge, London (Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005)Google Scholar
  8. Bonnaud-Antignac A, Grenier MH, Mouzard A, Amar M (2009) Enseignement de la relation médecin–patient en pédiatrie à des étudiants de médecine à partir de la méthode du Théâtre-Forum. Neuropsychiatrie de l’Enfance et de l’Adolescence 57(6):510–516. doi: 10.1016/j.neurenf.2009.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Centre for Arts-informed Research (CAIR) (2000) http://www.utoronto.ca. Accessed Nov 2012
  10. Chilton G (2013) Altered inquiry: discovering arts-based research through an altered book. Int J Qual Methods 2013:12Google Scholar
  11. Colby S, Haldeman L (2007) Peer-led theater as a nutrition education strategy. J Nutr Educ Behav 39(1):48–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.09.007 Google Scholar
  12. Conrad D (2004) Exploring risky youth experiences: popular theatre as a participatory, performative research method. Int J Qual Methods 3(1):12–25Google Scholar
  13. Cornwall A, Chakavanda M, Makumbirofa S, Shumba G, Mawere A (1989) The use of community theatre in project evaluation: an experimental example from Zimbabwe. Sustain Agric Progr RRA Notes 6:30–37Google Scholar
  14. Dewey J (2008) El Arte Como Experiencia. Paidós Estética 45, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  15. Dieleman H (2012) Transdisciplinary artful doing in spaces of experimentation and imagination. Transdiscipl J Eng Sci 3:44–57Google Scholar
  16. Dieleman H, Huisingh D (2006) Games by which to learn and teach about sustainable development: exploring the relevance of games and experiential learning for sustainability. J Clean Prod 14(9–11):837–847. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dolan J (2001) Performance, Utopia, and the “Utopian performative”. Theatre J 53(3):455–479. doi: 10.1353/tj.2001.0068 (Project MUSE)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. EEA (2010) State and outlook 2010: assessment of global megatrends, Luxembourg: European Environment Agency. http://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/europe-and-the-world/megatrends
  19. Eisner M (2008) Art and knowledge. In: Knowles JG, Cole AL (eds) Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: perspective, methodologies, example and issues. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  20. Etherton M, Prentki T (2006) Drama for change? Prove it! Impact assessment in applied theatre. Res Drama Educ J Appl Theatre Perform 11(2):139–155. doi: 10.1080/13569780600670718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finley S (2008) Arts-based research. In: Knowles JG, Cole AL (eds) Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: perspective, methodologies, example and issues. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  22. Forrest M (2007) A reflection on arts-based research. Paideusis 16(2):3–13Google Scholar
  23. Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Giannachi G, Stewart N (eds) (2005) Performing nature: explorations in ecology and the arts. Peter Lang, BernGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodman N (1969) Languages of art: an approach to a theory of symbols. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Gray R, Sinding C, Ivonoffski V, Fitch M, Hampson A, Greenberg M (2000) The use of research-based theatre in a project related to metastatic breast cancer. Health Expect 3(2):137–144. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00071.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guhrs T, Rihoy L, Guhrs M (2006) Using theatre in participatory environmental policy making. Particip Learn Act 55:87–93 Google Scholar
  28. Hamel S (2013) When theatre of the oppressed becomes theatre of the oppressor. Res Drama Educ J Appl Theatre Perform 18(4):403–416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris D (2007) Pathways to embodied empathy and reconciliation after atrocity: former boy soldiers in a dance/movement therapy group in Sierra Leone. Intervention 5(3):203–231Google Scholar
  30. Heddon D, Mackey S (2012) Environmentalism, performance and applications: uncertainties and emancipation. Res Drama Educ J Appl Theater Perform 17(2):163–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hirsch Hadorn G, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60(1):119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Horwitz EB, Kowalski J, Anderberg UM (2010) Theater for, by and with fibromyalgia patients. Evaluation of emotional expression using video interpretation. Arts Psychother 37(1):13–19. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2009.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ingold T (2011) Being alive: essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Jäger J (2009) Sustainability science in Europe. DG Research, European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  35. Kagan S (2010) Cultures of sustainability and the aesthetics of the pattern that connects. Futures J Policy Plan Futures Stud 42(10):1094–1101Google Scholar
  36. Kagan S (2011) Aesthetics of sustainability: a transdisciplinary sensibility for transformative practices. Transdiscipl J Eng Sci 2:65–73Google Scholar
  37. Kagan S (2012) Toward global (environ)mental change transformative art and cultures of sustainability. Heinrich Böll Foundation, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaptani E, Yuval-Davis N (2008) Participatory theatre as a research methodology: identity, performance and social action among refugees. Sociol Res Online 13(5):2. doi: 10.5153/sro.1789 Google Scholar
  39. Kasemir BJ, Jäger C, Jaeger C, Gardner MT (eds) (2003) Public participation in sustainability science. A handbook. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I et al (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kershaw B (2007) Theatre ecology: environments and performance events. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Knowledge, Learning and Societal Change (KLSC) (2011) Finding paths to a sustainable future, science plan, international human dimensions programme on global environmental change www.proclim.ch/4dcgi/klsc/en/newstype?klsc-news
  43. Knowles J, Cole A (2008) Arts-informed research. In: Knowles JG, Cole AL (eds) Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: perspective, methodologies, example and issues. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuppers P (2000) Toward the unknown body: stillness, silence, and space in mental health settings. Theatre Topics 10(2):129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kuppers P (2007) Community performance: an introduction. Routledge Editors, OxonGoogle Scholar
  46. Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(Supplement 1):25–43. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leavy P (2009) Method meets art: arts-based research practice. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Lehtonen A (2012) Future thinking and learning in improvisation and a collaborative devised theatre project within primary school students. Proc Soc Behav Sci 45:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maanen HV (2009) How to study art worlds—on the societal functioning of aesthetic values. Amsterdam University Press, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mabala R, Allen KB (2002) Participatory action research on HIV/AIDS through a popular theatre approach in Tanzania. Eval Progr Plan 25(4):333–339. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7189(02)00044-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Madison DS, Hamera J (eds) (2006) The Sage handbook of performance studies. SAGE Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  52. Mauser W, Klepper G, Rice M, Schmalzbauer BS, Hackmann H, Leemans R, Moore H (2013) Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Curr Opin Env Sustain 5(3):420–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mavrocordatos A (1988) Theatre for development, participatory monitoring and cultural feedback. PLA Notes CD-ROM 2001:29–33Google Scholar
  54. May TJ (2007) Beyond Bambi: toward a dangerous ecocriticism in theatre studies. Theatre Topics 17(2):95–110. doi: 10.1353/tt.2008.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mbizvo E (2006) Essay theatre: a force for health promotion. Med Creativity 368:30–31Google Scholar
  56. McKay M, Bright S (2005) Dementia care: learning through drama. Pract Dev Health Care 4(1):18–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McNiff S (2008) Arts-based research. In: Knowles JG, Cole AL (eds) Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: perspective, methodologies, example and issues. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 83–92Google Scholar
  58. Mda Z (1993) When people play people: development communication through theatre. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Metcalf SM, Veiga MM (2012) Using street theatre to increase awareness of and reduce mercury pollution in the artisanal gold mining sector: a case from Zimbabwe. J Clean Prod 37:179–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Miller TR (2012) Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustain Sci 8(2):279–293. doi: 10.1007/s11625-012-0180-6 Google Scholar
  61. Miller TR, Wiek A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2013) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci. doi: 10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6 Google Scholar
  62. Newell AF, Carmichael A, Morgan M, Dickinson A (2006) The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies. Interact Comput 18(5):996–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Newell AF, Morgan ME, Gibson L, Forbes P (2011) Experiences with professional theatre for awareness raising. Interact Comput 23(6):594–603. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2011.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nicholson H (2005) Applied drama. Theatre and Performance Practices. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  65. Nisker J, Martin DK, Bluhm R, Daar AS (2006) Theatre as a public engagement tool for health-policy development. Health Policy 78(2–3):258–271. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. O’Shea M (2012) Embodying and performing sustainability, Ph.D. thesis presented at the Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  67. Osnes B (2012) Voice strengthening and interactive theatre for women’s productive income-generating activities in sustainable development. J Sustain Dev 5(6):49–52. doi: 10.5539/jsd.v5n6p49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Osnes B (2013) Engaging women’s voices through theatre for energy development. Renew Energy 49:185–187. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pierre Brans J, Macharis C (1997) Play theatre a new way to teach O.R. Eur J Oper Res 99(2):241–247. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00339-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pohl C (2008) From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environ Sci Policy 11(1):46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pohl C, Rist S, Zimmermann A, Fry P, Gurung GS, Schneider F, Wiesmann U (2010) Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci Public Policy 37(4):267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pretty J, Guijt I, Thompson J, Scones I (1995) Participatory learning and action: a trainer’s guide. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
  73. Ravetz J (1997) The science of ‘what-if?’. Futures 29(6):533–539. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00026-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber H, Nykvist B, De Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry WJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32Google Scholar
  75. Rolfe A, Mienczakowski J, Morgan S (1995) A dramatic experience in mental health nursing education. Nurse Educ Today 15(3):224–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rolling JH (2010) A paradigm analysis of arts-based research and implications for education. Stud Art Educ S1(2):102–114Google Scholar
  77. Rosenbaum M, Ferguson K, Herwaldt L (2005) In their own words: presenting the patient’s perspective using research-based theatre. Med Educ 39:622–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rossiter K, Kontos P, Colantonio A, Gilbert J, Gray J, Keightley M (2008) Staging data: theatre as a tool for analysis and knowledge transfer in health research. Soc Sci Med 66(1):130–146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Salas-Zapata WA, Rios-Osorio LA, Trouchon-Osorio AL (2012) Typology of scientific reflections needed for sustainability science development. Sustain Sci 8(4):607–612. doi: 10.1007/s11625-012-0183-3 Google Scholar
  80. Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, USAGoogle Scholar
  81. Sinner A, Leggo C, Irwin RL, Gouzouasis P, Grauer K (2006) Arts-based educational research dissertations: reviewing the practices of new scholars. Can J Educ 29(4):1223–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Snow S, D’Amico M, Tanguay D (2003) Therapeutic theatre and well-being. Arts Psychother 30(2):73–82. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4556(03)00026-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Snyder-Young D (2011) Rehearsals for revolution? Theatre of the oppressed, dominant discourses, and democratic tensions. RiDE J Appl Theatre Perform 16(1):29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Souto-Manning M (2011) Playing with power and privilege: theatre games in teacher education. Teach Teach Educ 27(6):997–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Springgay S, Irwin RL, Kind S (2008) A/r/tographers and living inquiry. In: Knowles JG, Cole AL (eds) Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspective, methodologies, example and issues. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 83–92Google Scholar
  86. Sullivan G (2010) Art practice as research: inquiry in visual arts. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  87. Tàbara JD (2013) A new vision of open knowledge systems for sustainability. Opportunities for social scientists, World Social Science Report 2013. International Social Science Council, UNESCO, Paris, pp 112–118Google Scholar
  88. Tàbara JD, Chabay I (2013) Coupling human information and knowledge systems with social–ecological systems change. Reframing research, education and policy for sustainability. Environ Sci Policy 28:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2012) Global environmental outlook (GEO-5). UNEP, Nairobi. http://www.unep.org/geo/geo5.asp
  90. van Kerkhoff L (2013) Developing integrative research for sustainability science through a complexity principles-based approach. Sustain Sci 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11625-013-0203-y
  91. Whatmore S (2006) Materialist returns: practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cult Geogr 13(4):600–609Google Scholar
  92. Wickson F, Carew AL, Russell AW (2006) Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 38(9):1046–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wiek A, Iwaniec D (2013) Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11625-013-0208-6
  94. Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–218. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wiek A, Ness B, Brand FS, Schweizer-Ries P, Farioli F (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(S1):5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zammit-Lucia J (2012) Message and meaning: re-defining environmentalism. Sustainable Learning Working Paper Series No. 3. http://sustainable-learning.org/workingpapers/new-working-papers

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA)Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB)Cerdanyola del VallésSpain
  2. 2.Global Climate Forum (www.globalclimateforum.org)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations