Advertisement

Sustainability Science

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 463–481 | Cite as

Envisioning sustainable water futures in a transdisciplinary learning process: combining normative, explorative, and participatory scenario approaches

  • Flurina SchneiderEmail author
  • Stephan Rist
Original Article

Abstract

Competing water demands for household consumption as well as the production of food, energy, and other uses pose challenges for water supply and sustainable development in many parts of the world. Designing creative strategies and learning processes for sustainable water governance is thus of prime importance. While this need is uncontested, suitable approaches still have to be found. In this article we present and evaluate a conceptual approach to scenario building aimed at transdisciplinary learning for sustainable water governance. The approach combines normative, explorative, and participatory scenario elements. This combination allows for adequate consideration of stakeholders’ and scientists’ systems, target, and transformation knowledge. Application of the approach in the MontanAqua project in the Swiss Alps confirmed its high potential for co-producing new knowledge and establishing a meaningful and deliberative dialogue between all actors involved. The iterative and combined approach ensured that stakeholders’ knowledge was adequately captured, fed into scientific analysis, and brought back to stakeholders in several cycles, thereby facilitating learning and co-production of new knowledge relevant for both stakeholders and scientists. However, the approach also revealed a number of constraints, including the enormous flexibility required of stakeholders and scientists in order for them to truly engage in the co-production of new knowledge. Overall, the study showed that shifts from strategic to communicative action are possible in an environment of mutual trust. This ultimately depends on creating conditions of interaction that place scientists’ and stakeholders’ knowledge on an equal footing.

Keywords

Socio-economic scenarios Visions of the future Water use Water governance Participatory Transdisciplinary 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project is affiliated to the NRP61 (Sustainable water management). The authors wish to thank the MontanAqua research team and the members of the stakeholder group RegiEau for helpful assistance, fruitful discussions and inspiring collaboration. We also express our gratitude to Marlène Thibault for English proof reading of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aeberhard A, Rist S (2009) Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland. Ecol Econ 68:1171–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcamo J (2008) Developments in integrated environmental assessment. In: Joseph A (ed) The SAS approach: combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 123–150Google Scholar
  3. Alroe HF, Noe E (2010) Multiperspectival science and stakeholder involvement: beyond transdisciplinary integration and consensus. In: Darnhofer I, Grötzer M (eds), Building sustainable rural futures. Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium 4–7 July 2010, Vienna (Austria), pp 527–533Google Scholar
  4. Beniston M, Stoffel M, Hill M (2011) Impacts of climatic change on water and natural hazards in the Alps: can current water governance cope with future challenges? Examples from the European “ACQWA” project. Environ Sci Policy 14:734–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonriposi M (2013) Analyse systémique et prospective des usages de l’eau dans la region de Crans-Montana-Sierre (Suisse). Thèse de doctorat. Université de Lausanne, Institut de Géographie et Durabilité, GéovisionsGoogle Scholar
  6. Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: its nature and validity. Syst Pract Act Res 11(1):9–21Google Scholar
  7. Cosgrove CE, Cosgrove WJ (2012) The United Nations World Water Development Report–No 4. The dynamics of global water futures: driving forces 2011–2050, vol 2. UNESCOGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniell KA, White I, Ferrand N, Ribarova IS, Coad P, Rougier J-E, Hare M, Jones NA, Popova A, Rollin P, Perez P, Burn S (2010) Co-engineering participatory water management processes: theory and insights from Australian and Bulgarian interventions. Ecol Society 15(4):11. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art11/. Accessed on 26 August 2013
  9. Du Toit DR, Biggs H, Pollard S (2011) The potential role of mental model methodologies in multistakeholder negotiations: integrated water resources management in South Africa. Ecol Soc 16(3):21Google Scholar
  10. Elden M, Levin M (1991) Cogenerative learning: bringing participation into action research. In: Whyte WF (ed) Participatory action research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, pp 127–142Google Scholar
  11. Flick U (2005) Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einfuehrung. Reinbek bei Hamburg, Rowohlt TaschenbuchGoogle Scholar
  12. Forsyth S, Brooks DB (2011) Applying water soft path analysis in an agricultural region of Canada. Water Int 36:894–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franks T, Cleaver F (2009) Analysing water governance: a tool for sustainability? Proc Inst Civil Eng Eng Sustain 162:207–213Google Scholar
  14. GEF (2013) TDA/SAP Methodology. Identify, quantify, and set priorities for environmental transboundary problems. Web-version http://manuals.iwlern.net/tda-sap-methodology Accessed on 26 August 2013
  15. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Harmancioglu NB, Fedra K, Barbaros F (2008) Analysis for sustainability in management of water scarce basins: the case of the Gediz River Basin in Turkey. Desalination 226:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartmuth G, Huber K, Rink D (2008) Operationalization and contextualization of sustainability at the local level. Sustain Dev 16:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirsch Hadorn G, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ISSKA (2010) Bassins versants karstiques et modèles 3D autour de Montana. Version provisoire. Internal reportGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim J, Furumai H (2012) Assessment of rainwater availability by building type and water use through GIS-based scenario analysis. Water Resour Manage 26:1499–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kok K, van Vliet M, Bärlund I, Dubel A, Sendzimir J (2011) Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: experiences from the SCENES project. Technol Forecast Soc Change 78:835–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuylenstierna JL, Björklund G, Najlis P (1997) Sustainable water future with global implications: everyone’s responsibility. Nat Resour Forum 21:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawhon M, Murphy JT (2012) Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: insights from political ecology. Prog Hum Geogr 36:354–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lienert J, Monstadt J, Truffer B (2005) Future scenarios for a sustainable water sector: a case study from Switzerland. Environ Sci Technol 40:436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. March H, Therond O, Leenhardt D (2012) Water futures: reviewing water-scenario analyses through an original interpretative framework. Ecol Econ 82:126–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mobjörk M (2010) Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: a refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 42:866–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moran D, MacLeod M, McVittie A, Lago M, Oglethorpe D (2007) Dynamics of water use in Scotland. Water Environ J 21:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moriarty PB, Batchelor CH, Laban P, Fahmy H (2010) Developing a practical approach to ‘light IWRM’ in the Middle East. Water Altern 3:122–136Google Scholar
  29. Mylopoulos N, Kolokytha E, Loukas A, Mylopoulos Y (2012) Agricultural and water resources development in Thessaly, Greece in the framework of new European Union policies. Int J River Basin Manag 7:73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nassauer JI, Corry RC (2004) Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 19:343–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niklaus M (2012) An object-oriented approach for mapping current land use/land cover in the study area Crans-Montana-Sierre, Valais. Masterarbeit der Universität Bern, SchweizGoogle Scholar
  32. Nowotny H (2000) Re-thinking science: from reliable to socially robust knowledge. In: Weiss M (ed) Jahrbuch 2000 des Collgeium Helveticum der ETH Zürich. vdf, Zürich, pp 221–244Google Scholar
  33. Nowotny H, Gibbons M, Scott P (2001) Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Palomo I, Marín-López B, López-Santiago C, Montes C (2011) Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Doñana social-ecological system in Southwestern Spain. Ecol Soc 16(1):23. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss11/art23/ Google Scholar
  35. Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2007) Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Oekom, MunichGoogle Scholar
  36. Pollard S, Du Toit D (2008) Integrated water resource management in complex systems: how the catchment management strategies seek to achieve sustainability and equity in water resources in South Africa. Water SA (IWRM Special Edition) 34(6). Available at http://www.wrc.org.za
  37. Ray C (1999) Endogenous development in the era of reflexive modernity. J Rural Stud 15(3):257–267Google Scholar
  38. Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Renner R, Schneider F, Hohenwallner D, Kopeinig C, Kruse S, Lienert J, Link S, Muhar S (2013) Meeting the challenges of transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable water governance. Mt Res Dev 33(3):234–247Google Scholar
  40. Reynard E (2000) Gestion patrimoniale et intégrée des ressources en eau dans les stations touristiques de montagne. Les cas de Crans-Montana-Aminona et Nendaz (Valais). Thèse présentée à la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université de LausanneGoogle Scholar
  41. Reynard E, Bonriposi M (2012) Water use management in dry mountains of Switzerland: the case of Crans-Montana-Sierre area. In: Nemenyi M, Heil B (eds) The impact of urbanization, industrial, agricultural and forest technologies on the natural environment. Nyugat-Magyarorszagi Egytem Sopron, Hungary, pp 281–301Google Scholar
  42. Rinaudo JD, Montginoul M, Varanda M, Bento S (2012) Envisioning innovative groundwater regulation policies through scenario workshops in France and Portugal. Irrigation Drainage 61:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rist S, Chiddambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesmann U (2006) “It was hard to come to mutual understanding…” Multidimensionality of social learning processes in natural resource use in India, Africa and Latin America. J Syst Pract Action Res 19:219–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rist S, Chiddambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesmann U, Zimmermann A (2007) Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: the role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. J Rural Stud 23:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roux DJ, Rogers KH, Biggs HC, Ashton PJ, Sergeant A (2006) Bridging the science-management divide: moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecol Soc 11: Article 4. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss11/art14/
  46. Schaldach R, Koch J, Aus der Beek T, Kynast E, Flörke M (2012) Current and future irrigation water requirements in pan-Europe: an integrated analysis of socio-economic and climate scenarios. Glob Planet Change 94–95:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schneider F (2011) Approaching water stress in the Alps: Transdisciplinary co-production of systems, target and transformation knowledge. In: Borsdorf A, Stötter J, Veulliet E (eds) Managing Alpine Future II—Inspire and drive sustainable mountain regions. Proceedings of the Innsbruck Conference, November 21–23, 2011. (=IGF-Forschungsberichte 4). Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider F, Fry P, Ledermann T, Rist S (2009) Social learning processes in Swiss soil protection—The ‘From Farmer—To Farmer’ project. Hum Ecol 37:475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smits S, Pollard S, Du Toit D, Butterworth J, Moriarty P (2004) Modelling scenarios for water resources management in the Sand River Catchment, South Africa (WHIRL Project working paper; no. 8). NRI, Chatham, UKGoogle Scholar
  50. Soliva R (2007) Agricultural decline, landscape change, and outmigration: debating the sustainability of three scenarios for a Swiss mountain region. Mt Res Develop 27:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Soliva R, Ronningen K, Bella I, Bezak P, Cooper Tamsin, Egil Flo B, Marty P, Potter C (2008) Envisioning upland futures: stakeholder responses to scenarios Europe’s mountain landscapes. J Rural Stud 24:56–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1997) Grounded theory in practice. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  53. Swart RJ, Raskin P, Robinson J (2004) The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Glob Environ Change 14:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vinck D (1999) Les objets intermédiaires dans les réseaux de coopération scientifique. Contribution à la prise en compte des objets dans les dynamiques sociales. Rev Fr Sociol 2:385–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Viviroli D, Archer DR, Buytaert W, Fowler HJ, Greenwood GB, Hamlet AF, Huang Y, Koboltschnig G, Litaor MI, Lopez-Moreno JI, Lorentz S, Schädler B, Schreier H, Schwaiger K, Vuille M, Woods R (2011) Climate change and mountain water resources: overview and recommendations for research, management and policy. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:471–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Voinesco A (2012) Le glacier de la Plaine-Morte: épaisseur de glace et bilan de masse. Msc Thesis, University of FribourgGoogle Scholar
  57. Walz A, Lardelli C, Behrendt H, Grêt-Regamey A, Lundström C, Kytzia S, Bebi P (2007) Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling. Landsc Urban Plan 81:114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. WCED (1987) Report of the World commission on environment and development: our common future. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm. Accessed 28 January 2013
  59. Wiek A, Larson K (2012) Water, people, and sustainability—a systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes. Water Resour Manage 26:3153–3171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wollenberg E, Edmunds D, Buck L (2000) Using scenarios to make decisions about the future: anticipatory learning for the adaptive co-management of community forests. Landsc Urban Plan 47:65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), and Institute of GeographyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations