Sustainability Science

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 279–293 | Cite as

Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories

Overview Article

Abstract

Over the last decade, sustainability science has emerged as an interdisciplinary and innovative field attempting to conduct problem-driven research that links knowledge to action. As the institutional dimensions of sustainability science continue to gain momentum, this article provides an analysis of emerging research agendas in sustainability science and an opportunity for reflection on future pathways for the field. Based on in-depth interviews with leading researchers in the field and a content analysis of the relevant literature, this article examines how sustainability scientists bound the social, political and normative dimensions of sustainability as they construct research agendas and look to link knowledge to social action. Many scientists position sustainability science as serving universal values related to sustainability and providing knowledge that is crucial to societal decision-making. The implications of these findings are discussed with an eye towards creating a space for a more democratic and reflexive research agenda for sustainability.

Keywords

Sustainability science Boundary work Reflexive Science and technology studies Knowledge to action Research agenda 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author owes a debt of gratitude to all of the interview subjects. Without their openness and generosity with their time, this article would not have been possible. It has benefitted from significant input from Ben A. Minteer, Daniel Sarewitz, Charles L. Redman and Arnim Wiek. Finally, the author would also like to thank Britt Crow and Tischa Muñoz-Erickson for valuable input. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0504248, IGERT in Urban Ecology at Arizona State University. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendation expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Supplementary material

11625_2012_180_MOESM1_ESM.doc (40 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 39 kb)

References

  1. Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environ Polit 3(4):24–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck U (1992) The risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bettencourt LMA, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(49):19540–19545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackstock KL, Carter CE (2007) Operationalizing sustainability science for a sustainability directive? Reflecting on three pilot projects. Geogr J 173(4):343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bocking S (2004) Nature’s experts: Science, politics, and the environment. New Rutgers University Press, BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun D (1998) The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science. Res Policy 27(8):807–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Diaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte A (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(5):1305–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8086–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cash DW, Borck JC, Patt AG (2006) Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: comparative analysis of El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(4):465–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(6):1737–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark WC (2010) Sustainable development and sustainability science. In report from toward a science of sustainability conference, Airlie Center, Warrenton (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Clark WC, Dickson N (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8059–8061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collingridge D, Reeve C (1986) Science speaks to power: the role of experts in policy. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Crow M (2007) None dare call it hubris: the limits of knowledge. Issues Sci Technol Winter:1–4Google Scholar
  15. Douglas HE (2009) Science, policy and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts and the environment. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  17. Friiberg Workshop Report (2000) Sustainability science. Statement of the Friibergh Workshop on Sustainability Science. Friiberg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  18. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibbons M (1999) Science’s new social contract with society. Nature 402:C81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gieryn TF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: trains and interests in professional interests of scientists. Am Sociol Rev 48:781–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gieryn TF (1999) Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Grunwald A (2004) Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: the need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society. Int J Foresight Innov Policy 1(1–2):150–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grunwald A (2007) Working towards sustainable development in the face of uncertainty and incomplete knowledge. J Environ Planning Policy Manage 9(3):245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hassan M (2001) Transition to sustainability in the twenty-first century: the contribution of science and technology, Report of the World Conference of Scientific Academies held in Tokyo, Japan, 15–18 May 2000. Int J Sustain High Educ 2(1):70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hulme M (2010) The idea of climate change: exploring complexity, plurality and opportunity. GAIA 19(3):171–174Google Scholar
  27. Jäger J (2009) Sustainability science in Europe. (Background paper prepared for European Commission’s DG for Research). Available from http://ec.europa.eu/research/sd/pdf/workshop2009/background_paper_sust_scienCe_workshop_october_2009.pdf
  28. Jamieson D (1995) Ecosystem health: some preventive medicine. Environ Values 4(4):333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jamieson D (1998) Sustainability and beyond. Ecol Econ 24:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jasanoff S (1987) Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Soc Stud Sci 17(2):195–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jasanoff S (1996) Science and norms in global environmental regimes. In: Hampson FO, Reppy J (eds) Earthly goods: environmental change and social justice. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  32. Jasanoff S (2004) Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: Jasanoff S (ed) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jasanoff S (2005) Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  34. Jasanoff S (2010) Testing time for climate science. Science 328(5979):695–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jasanoff S, Wynne B (1998) Science and decisionmaking. In: Rayner S, Malone E (eds) Human choice and climate change, vol. 1: the societal framework. Battelle, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  36. Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Hickler T, Hornborg A, Kronsell A, Lövbrand, Persson J (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6:69–82Google Scholar
  37. Kajikawa Y (2008) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3:215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kajikawa Y, Ohno J, Takeda Y, Matsushima K, Komiyama H (2007) Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network. Sustain Sci 2(2):221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kates RW (2011) From the unity of nature to sustainability science: ideas and practice. Center for International Development Working Paper No. 218, Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ et al (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kemp R, Rotmans J (2009) Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sci 42:303–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kinzig AP (2001) Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems 4:709–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kristjanson P, Reid RS, Dickson N, Clark WC, Romney D, Puskur R, MacMillan S, Grace D (2009) Linking international agricultural research knowledge with action for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(13):5047–5052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kumazawa T, Saito O, Kozaki K, Matsui T, Mizoguchi R (2009) Toward knowledge structuring of sustainability science based on ontology engineering. Sustain Sci 4:99–116Google Scholar
  46. Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Latour B (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Leach M, Scoones I, Stirling A (2010) Dynamic sustainabilities: technology, environment, social justice. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Levin SA, Clark WC (2010) Toward a science of sustainability. Report from toward a science of sustainability conference, Airlie Center, WarrentonGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provencher W, Redman CL, Schneider S, Taylor WW (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Loorbach D (2007) Transitions management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  52. Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2009) The practice of transitions management: examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures 42(3):237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279(5350):491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ludwig D, Hilborn R, Walters C (1993) Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. Ecol Appl 3(4):548–549Google Scholar
  55. Matson P (2009) The sustainability transition. Issues Sci Technol Summer 2009:39–42Google Scholar
  56. McMichael AJ, Butler CD, Folke C (2003) New visions for addressing sustainability. Science 302:1919–1920Google Scholar
  57. Miller C (2004) Resisting empire: globalism, relocation, relocalization, and the politics of knowledge. In: Jasanoff S, Martello ML (eds) Earthly politics: local and global environmental governance. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Miller T (2011) Constructing sustainability: a study of emerging research trajectories. Dissertation, Arizona State University, TempeGoogle Scholar
  59. Miller C, Sarewitz D, Light A (2009) Science, technology and sustainability: building a research agenda. Report National Science Foundation supported workshop, 8–9 September 2008Google Scholar
  60. National Research Council (1999) Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  61. Nelson R (2003) On the uneven evolution of human know-how. Res Policy 32:909–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Norton BG (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  64. Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing the sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, Collins S, Dobson A, Duke C, Gold B, Jacobson R, Kingsland S, Kranz R, Mappin M, Martinez ML, Micheli F, Morse J, Pace M, Pascual M, Palumbi S, Reichman OJ, Simons A, Townsend A, Turner M (2004) Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304(5675):1251–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, Collins S, Dobson A, Duke C, Gold B, Jacobson R, Kingsland S, Kranz R, Mappin M, Martinez M, Micheli F, Morse J, Pace M, Pascual M, Palumbi S, Reichman O, Simons A, Townsend A, Turner M (2005) Ecological science and sustainability for the 21st century. Front Ecol Environ 3:4–11Google Scholar
  67. Parris TM, Kates RW (2003) Characterizing a sustainability transition: goals, targets, trends, and driving forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raven PH (2002) Science, sustainability and the human prospect. Science 297(5583):954–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reid WV, Chen D, Goldfarb L, Hackman H, Lee YT, Mokhele K, Ostrom E, Raivio K, Rockström J, Schellnhuber HJ, Whyte A (2010) Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 330:916–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robinson J, Tansey J (2006) Co-production, emergent properties and strong interactive social research: the Georgia Basic Futures Project. Sci Public Policy 33(2):151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sagoff M (2008) The economy of the earth: philosophy, law, and the environment, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  74. Sarewitz D (1996) Frontiers of illusion: science, technology, and the politics of progress. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  75. Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 7(5):385–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sarewitz D (2010) Worldview: politicize me. Nature 467:26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sarewitz D, Kriebel D, Clapp R, Crumbley C, Hoppin P, Jacobs M, Tickner J (2010) The sustainable solutions agenda. Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes and Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, Arizona State University and University of Massachusetts, LowellGoogle Scholar
  78. Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Brock WA, Brovkin V, Carpenter SR, Dakos V, Held H, van Nes EH, Rietkerk M, Sugihara G (2009) Early-warning signs for critical transitions. Nature 461:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schellnhuber HJ (2009) Tipping elements in earth systems special feature: tipping elements in the earth system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(49):20561–20563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schoolman ED, Guest JS, Bush KF, Bell AR (2012) How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain Sci 7:67–80. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z Google Scholar
  81. Schwarz M, Thompson M (1990) Divided we stand: redefining politics, technology and social choice. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  82. Stokes D (1997) Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  83. Swart R, Raskin P, Robinson J (2004) Critical challenges for sustainability science. Science 297(5589):1994–1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Takacs D (1996) The idea of biodiversity: philosophies of paradise. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  85. Thompson PB (2010) The agrarian vision: sustainability and environmental ethics. University of Kentucky Press, LexingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Turner BL II, Matson P, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Hovelsrud-Broda GK, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Luers A, Martello ML, Mathiesen S, Naylor R, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A, Selin H, Tyler N (2003a) Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8080–8085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Turner BL II, Kasperson RE, Matson P, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Chistensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003b) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:445–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Walzer M (1994) Thick and thin: moral argument at home and abroad. South University of Notre Dame Press, BendGoogle Scholar
  90. Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6:203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  92. Wynne B (1996) Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and the public uptake of science. In: Irwin A, Wynne B (eds) Misunderstanding science?: the public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  93. Yarime M, Takeda Y, Kajikawa Y (2010) Towards an institutional analysis of sustainability science: a quantitative examination of the patterns of research collaboration. Sustain Sci 5(1):115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and PlanningPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations