Advertisement

Sustainability Science

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 177–202 | Cite as

Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: a review of approaches, benefits, and risks

  • Benjamin L. Preston
  • Emma J. Yuen
  • Richard M. Westaway
Review Article

Abstract

There is growing demand among stakeholders across public and private institutions for spatially-explicit information regarding vulnerability to climate change at the local scale. However, the challenges associated with mapping the geography of climate change vulnerability are non-trivial, both conceptually and technically, suggesting the need for more critical evaluation of this practice. Here, we review climate change vulnerability mapping in the context of four key questions that are fundamental to assessment design. First, what are the goals of the assessment? A review of published assessments yields a range of objective statements that emphasize problem orientation or decision-making about adaptation actions. Second, how is the assessment of vulnerability framed? Assessments vary with respect to what values are assessed (vulnerability of what) and the underlying determinants of vulnerability that are considered (vulnerability to what). The selected frame ultimately influences perceptions of the primary driving forces of vulnerability as well as preferences regarding management alternatives. Third, what are the technical methods by which an assessment is conducted? The integration of vulnerability determinants into a common map remains an emergent and subjective practice associated with a number of methodological challenges. Fourth, who participates in the assessment and how will it be used to facilitate change? Assessments are often conducted under the auspices of benefiting stakeholders, yet many lack direct engagement with stakeholders. Each of these questions is reviewed in turn by drawing on an illustrative set of 45 vulnerability mapping studies appearing in the literature. A number of pathways for placing vulnerability mapping on a more robust footing are also identified.

Keywords

Vulnerability assessment Mapping Climate change Adaptation 

References

  1. Acosta-Michlik L, Espaldon V (2008) Assessing vulnerability of selected farming communities in the Philippines based on a behavioural model of agent’s adaptation to global environmental change. Glob Environ Change 18:554–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Kelly PM (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 4:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN, Vincent (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. C R Geosci 337:399–410Google Scholar
  4. Adger WN, Brooks N, Bentham G, Agnew M, Eriksen S (2004) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Technical Report Number 7, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. University of East Anglia, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  5. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 717–743Google Scholar
  6. Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Næss LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009a) Are there social limits to adaptation? Clim Change 93:335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Adger WN, Eakin H, Winkels A (2009b) Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Front Ecol Environ 7:150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Adhikari P (2006) Socio-economic indexes for areas: introduction, use and future directions. Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  9. AGO (Australian Greenhouse Office) (2006) Climate change impacts and risk management: a guide for business and government. Department of Environment and Heritage, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  10. Alessa LA, Klinskey AA, Busey R, Hinzman L, White D (2008) Freshwater vulnerabilities and resilience on the Seward Peninsula: integrating multiple dimensions of landscape change. Glob Environ Change 18:256–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Al-Jeneid S, Bahnassy M, Nasr S, El Raey M (2008) Vulnerability assessment and adaptation to the impacts of sea level rise on the Kingdom of Bahrain. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 13:97–104Google Scholar
  12. Alpar B (2009) Vulnerability of Turkish coasts to accelerated sea-level rise. Geomorph 107:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Asseng S, Dray A, Perez P, Su X (2010) Rainfall-human-spatial interactions in a salinity-prone agricultural region of the Western Australian wheat-belt. Ecol Model 221(5):812–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Glob Environ Politics 3(4):24–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) (2004) Disasters, development and people. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Barnett J, Dessai S, Jones RN (2007) Vulnerability to climate variability and change in East Timor. Ambio 36(5):372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Barnett J, Lambert S, Fry I (2008) The hazards of indicators: insights from the Environmental Vulnerability Index. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 98:102–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Baum S, Horton S, Choy DL, Gleeson B (2009) Climate change, health impacts and urban adaptability: case study of Gold Coast City. Research Monograph 11, Urban Program. Griffith University, Gold CoastGoogle Scholar
  19. Bayliss B, Brennan K, Eliot I, Finlayson M, Hall R, House T, Pidgeon B, Walden D, Waterman P (1997) Vulnerability assessment of predicted climate change and sea level rise in the Alligator Rivers Region, Northern Territory Australia. Supervising Scientist Report 123, Supervising Scientist, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  20. Berry PM, Rounsevell MDA, Harrison PA, Audsley E (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of agricultural land use and species to climate change and the role of policy in facilitating adaptation. Environ Sci Pol 9:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bostram A, Anselin L, Farris J (2008) Visualizing seismic risk and uncertainty: a review of related research. Ann NY Acad Sci 1128:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bouden M, Moulin M, Gosselin P (2008) The geosimulation of West Nile virus propagation: a multi-agent and climate sensitive tool for risk management in public health. Int J Health Geogr 7:35. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brooke C, Kinrade P (2006) Climate change impacts in Western Port. Report prepared for the Western Port Greenhouse Alliance by CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research and Marsden Jacob Associates, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  24. Brown VA (2005) Knowing: linking the knowledge cultures of sustainability and health. In: Brown VA, Grootjans J, Ritchie J, Townsend M, Verrinder G (eds) Sustainability and health: supporting global ecological integrity in public health. Earthscan, London; Allen and Unwin, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  25. Brown I, Jude S, Koukoulas S, Nicholls R, Dickson M, Walkden M (2006) Dynamic simulation and visualisation of coastal erosion. Comp Environ Urban Syst 30:840–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bryan B, Harvey N, Belperio T (2001) Distributed process modeling for regional assessment of coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise. Environ Model Assess 6:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Buddemeier RW, Smith SV, Swaney DP (2008) Coastal typology: an integrative “neutral” technique for coastal zone characterization and analysis. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 77:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bulto PLO, Rodriguez AP, Valencia AR (2006) Assessment of human health vulnerability to climate variability and change in Cuba. Environ Health Perspect 114:1941–1949Google Scholar
  29. Cao C, Lam NS-N (1997) Understanding scale and resolution effects in remote sensing and GIS. In: Quattrochi DA, Goodchild MF (eds) Scale in remote sensing and GIS. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 57–72Google Scholar
  30. Carter TR, Jones RN, Lu X, Bhadwal S, Conde C, Mearns LO, O’Neill BC, Rounsevell MDA, Zurek MB (2007) New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–171Google Scholar
  31. Cash D, Clark W (2001) From science to policy: assessing the assessment process. RWP01-045, Faculty Research Working Paper Series, John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Cash D, Moser SC (2000) Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Glob Environ Change 10:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cash D, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Jäger J (2002) Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: linking research, assessment and decision making. RWP02-046, Faculty Research Working Paper Series, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Chambers R (2006) Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: whose map? Who is empowered and who disempowered? Who gains and who loses? Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries 25:1–11Google Scholar
  35. Clark TW (2002) The policy process: a practical guide for natural resource professionals. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  36. Clark WC, Majone G (1985) The critical appraisal of scientific inquiries with policy implications. Sci Technol Hum Values 10:6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Clark GE, Moser SC, Ratick SJ, Dow K, Meyer WB, Emani S, Weigen J, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Schwarz HE (1998) Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: the case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 3:59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Corbett J (2009) Good practices in participatory mapping. International Fund for Agricultural Development, RomeGoogle Scholar
  39. CRED (the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters) (2009) EM-DAT online database Université Catholique de Louvain in Brussels, Belgium. Available from http://www.em-dat.net
  40. Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20:529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Cutter Sl, Emrich C (2005) Are natural hazards and disaster losses in the US increasing? EOS 86(41):381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90:713–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dahlstrom K, Salmons R (2005) Building economic and social information for examining the effects of climate change; generic socio-economic scenarios. Policy Studies Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Davis I (2004) Progress in analysis of social vulnerability and capacity. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London, pp 128–144Google Scholar
  46. DCC (2009) Climate change risks to Australia’s coasts: a first pass national assessment. Department of Climate Change, Australia. ISBN 9781-1-921298-71-4; available at http://www.climatechange.gov.au
  47. Demirkesen AC, Evrendilek F, Berberoglu S (2008) Quantifying coastal inundation vulnerability of Turkey to sea-level rise. Environ Monitor Assess 138:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Dessai S, Hulme M, Lempert R, Pielke R Jr (2009) Do we need more precise and accurate predictions in order to adapt to a changing climate? EOS 90:111–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Diffenbaugh NS, Giorgi F, Raymond L, Bi X (2007) Indicators of 21st century socioclimatic exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20195–20198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Döll P (2009) Vulnerability to the impact of climate change on renewable groundwater resources: a global-scale assessment. Environ Res Lett 4:035006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035006
  51. Dransch D, Rotzoll H, Poser K (2010) The contribution of maps to the challenges of risk communication to the public. Int J Digit Earth 3(3):292–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Duerden F (2004) Translating climate change impacts at the community level. Arctic 57(2):204–212Google Scholar
  53. Eakin H, Luers AL (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:365–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Eakin H, Winkels A, Sendzimir J (2009) Nested vulnerability: exploring cross-scale linkages and vulnerability teleconnections in Mexican and Vietnamese coffee systems. Environ Sci Policy 12:298–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ebert A, Kerle N, Stein A (2009) Urban social vulnerability assessment with physical proxies and spatial metrics derived from air- and spaceborne imagery and GIS data. Nat Hazards 48:275–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ebi KL, Burton I (2008) Identifying practical adaptation options: an approach to address climate change-related health risks. Environ Sci Policy 11(4):359–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ (2010) The impact of proxy based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol 47(2):377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Elliot P, Wartenberg D (2004) Spatial epidemiology: current approaches and future challenges. Environ Health Perspect 112:998–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. ESPACE (2007) Planning in a changing climate: the strategy. The Environment Department, Hampshire County Council, WinchesterGoogle Scholar
  60. Fekete A (2009) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Finch C, Emrich CT, Cutter SL (2010) Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans. Popul Environ 31:179–202. doi: 10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8 Google Scholar
  62. Fraser EDG, Dougill AJ, Mabee WE, Reed M, McAlpine P (2006) Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. J Environ Manag 78:114–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Frazier TG, Wood N, Yarnal B (2010) Stakeholder perspectives on land-use strategies for adapting to climate-change-enhanced coastal hazards: Sarasota, Florida. Appl Geogr 30(4):506–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Füssel H-M (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Füssel H-M (2008) Assessing adaptation to the health risks of climate change: what guidance can existing frameworks provide? Int J Environ Health Res 18(1):37–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change 75(3):301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Gaillard JC, Carmella ML, Pangilinan JD (2010) Participatory mapping for raising disaster risk awareness among the youth. J Conting Crisis Manag 18(3):131–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Gall M, Borden KA, Cutter SL (2009) When do losses count? Six fallacies of natural hazards loss data. Bull Am Meteor Soc 90:799–809. doi: 10.1175/2008BAMS2721.1 Google Scholar
  69. Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 16:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gbetibouo GA, Ringler C (2009) Mapping South African farming sector vulnerability to climate change and variability. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00885, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  71. Giorgi F (2008) Regionalization of climate change information for impact assessment and adaptation. WMO Bull 57(2):86–92Google Scholar
  72. Glass GE (2000) Update: spatial aspects of epidemiology: the interface with medical geography. Epidemiol Rev 22:136–139Google Scholar
  73. Godin B (2006) The linear model of innovation. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(6):639–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Gravelle G, Mimura N (2008) Vulnerability assessment of sea-level rise in Viti Levu, Fiji Islands. Sustain Sci 3:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Green M, Flowerdew R (1996) New evidence on the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Longley P, Batty M (eds) Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 41–54Google Scholar
  77. Green R, Bates LK, Smyth A (2007) Impediments to recovery in New Orleans’ upper and lower ninth ward: one year after Hurricane Katrina. Disasters 31:311–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Grumbine RE (1994) What is ecosystem-based management? Conserv Biol 8:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Hahn MB, Riederer AM, Foster SO (2009) The livelihood vulnerability index: a pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change—a case study from Mozambique. Glob Environ Change 19:74–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Hajer H (2003) Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sci 36:175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D’Agrosa C, Bruno JF, Casey KS, Ebert C, Fox HE, Fujita R, Heinemann D, Lenihan HS, Madin EMP, Perry MT, Selig ER, Spalding M, Steneck R, Watson R (2008) A Global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319:948–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Halpern BS, Kappel CV, Selkoe KA, Micheli F, Ebert CM, Kostgis C, Crain CM, Martone RG, Shearer C, Teck SJ (2009) Mapping cumulative human impacts to California Current marine ecosystems. Conserv Lett 2(3):138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Hammar-Klose ES, Pendleton EA, Thieler ER, Williams SJ (2003) Coastal vulnerability assessment of Cape Cod National Seashore to sea-level rise. Open-File Report 02-233, US Geological Survey, Woods HoleGoogle Scholar
  84. Hansen J, Holm L, Frewer L, Robinson P, Sandøe P (2003) Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite 41:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Hebb A, Mortsch L (2007) Floods: mapping vulnerability in the Upper Thames watershed under a changing climate. Report XI, Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  86. Herrick C, Sarewitz D (2000) Ex post evaluation: a more effective role for scientific assessments in environmental policy. Sci Technol Hum Values 25:309–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Hilhorst D, Bankoff G (2004) Introduction: mapping vulnerability. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  88. Hinkel J (2011) Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: towards a clarification of the science–policy interface. Glob Environ Change 21:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002
  89. Hulme M, Dessai S (2008) Ventures should not overstate their aims just to secure funding. Nature 453:979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. HVRI (Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute) (2009). The spatial hazard events and losses database for the United States, Version 7.0 [Online Database]. University of South Carolina Columbia, SC. Available from http://www.sheldus.org
  91. IPCC CZMS (1992) A common methodology for assessing vulnerability to sea level rise, 2nd revision. In: IPCC CZMS, global climate change and the rising challenge of the sea. Report of the Coastal Zone Management Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, The Hague, Appendix CGoogle Scholar
  92. Jäger J (1998) Current thinking on using scientific findings in environmental policy making. Environ Model Assess 3:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Janssen MA, Schoon ML, Ke W, Börner K (2006) Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Glob Environ Change 16:240–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Jones RN, Preston BL (2011) Adaptation and risk management. WIREs Clim Change. doi: 10.1002/wcc.97
  95. Kaiser J (2000) Ecologists hope to avoid the mistakes of previous assessment. Science 289:1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Karim MF, Mimura N (2008) Impacts of climate change and sea-level rise on cyclonic storm surge floods in Bangladesh. Glob Environ Change 18:490–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Kellstedt PM, Zahran S, Vedlitz A (2008) Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Anal 28:113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Change 47:325–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Keogh DU, Bell KL, Park JN, Cobon DH (2004) Formative evaluation to benchmark and improve climate-based decision support for graziers in Western Queensland. Aust J Exp Agr 44:233–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Kienberger S, Lang S, Zeil P (2009) Spatial vulnerability units–expert-based spatial modelling of socio-economic vulnerability in the Salzach catchment, Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:767–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Kinrade P, Justus M, Grey S, Preston BL, Benedyka S, Skinner Z (2008a) Impacts of climate change on settlements in the Western Port region. Climate change risks and adaptation. Prepared for the Western Port Greenhouse Alliance by Marsden Jacob Associates, Broadleaf Capital International, and the CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  102. Kinrade P, Preston BL, Macadam I, Fisher T, Whiteoak K, Wiedemann N, Mirams S (2008b) Impacts of climate change on settlements in the Western Port region. People, property and places. Prepared for the Western Port Greenhouse Alliance by Marsden Jacob Associates and the CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  103. Kistemann T, Dangendorf F, Schweikart J (2002) New perspectives in the use of geographical information systems (GIS) in environmental health sciences. Int J Hyg Envrion Health 205:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ, Mimura N (1999) Coastal adaptation to climate change: can the IPCC guidelines be applied? Mitig Adapt Strateg Global Change 4:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Kleinosky LR, Yarnal B, Fisher A (2007) Vulnerability of Hampton Roads, Virginia to storm-surge flooding and sea-level rise. Nat Hazards 40(1):43–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Krivoruchko K, Crawford CAG (2003) Assessing the uncertainty resulting from geoprocessing operations. GIS and Modeling Workshop Sept 25–26, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  107. Kropp JP, Block A, Reusswig F (2006) Semiquantiative assessment of regional climate vulnerability: the North-Rhine Westphalia study. Clim Change 76:265–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Sharples C, Mount R, Pedersen T, Lacey, M, Newton J, Jaskierniak D, Wallace L (2009) The Australian coastal smartline geomorphic and stability map version 1: project report. Prepared for Geoscience Australia and the Department of Climate Change by the School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, HobartGoogle Scholar
  109. Laska S, Morrow BH (2007) Social vulnerabilities and Hurricane Katrina: an unnatural disaster in New Orleans. J Mar Technol Soc J 40:16–26Google Scholar
  110. Lee T, Quinn MS, Duke D (2006) Citizen, science, highways, and wildlife: using a web-based GIS to engage citizens in collecting wildlife information. Ecol Soc 11(1):11. (online) http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art11/
  111. Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E, Burton I, Malone EL, Huq S (eds) (2005) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change. United Nations Development Program and the Global Environment Facility, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  112. Lipkus IM, Hollands JG (1999) The visual communication of risk. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 25:149–163Google Scholar
  113. Liu J, Fritz S, van Wesenbeeck CFA, Fuchs M, You L, Obersteiner M, Yang H (2008) A spatially explicit assessment of current and future hotspots of hunger in Sub-Saharan Africa in the context of global change. Glob Planet Change 64:222–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Luers AL, Lobell DB, Sklar LS, Addams CL, Matson P (2003) A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Glob Environ Change 13:255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Lynch AH, Tryhorn L, Abramson R (2008) Working at the boundary: facilitating interdisciplinarity in climate change adaptation research. Bull Am Meteor Soc Feb 2008:169–179. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-89-2-169
  116. Mastrandrea MD, Heller NE, Root TL, Schneider SH (2010) Bridging the gap: linking climate-impacts research with adaptation planning and management. Clim Change 100:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. McCall M (2003) Seeking good governance in participatory-GIS: a review of processes and governance dimensions in applying GIS to participatory spatial planning. Habitat Int 27:549–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Midgley G, Reynolds M (2004) Systems/operational research and sustainable development: towards a new agenda. Sustain Dev 12:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Moser SC (2009) Making a difference on the ground: the challenge of demonstrating the effectiveness of decision support. Clim Change 95:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Næss LO, Norland IT, Lafferty WM, Aall C (2006) Data and processes linking vulnerability assessment to adaptation decision-making on climate change in Norway. Glob Environ Change 16:221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, La Rovere EL, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Riahi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H-H, Sankovski S, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  122. NAST (National Assessment Synthesis Team) (2001) Climate change impacts on the United States: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. National assessment synthesis team, US global change research program. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  123. Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett V, Woodroffe C, Hay J (2008) Climate change and coastal vulnerability assessment: scenarios for integrated assessment. Sustain Sci 3:89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. NRC (National Research Council) (2007a) Successful response starts with a map: improving geospatial support for disaster management. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  125. NRC (National Research Council) (2007b) Analysis of global change assessments: lessons learned. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  126. O’Brien KL, Leichenko R, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J (2004) Mapping multiple stressors: climate change and economic globalisation in India. Glob Environ Change 14:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. CATMOG 38. GeoBooks, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  128. Oreskes N (2004) Science and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it? Environ Sci Policy 7:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. OST (Office of Science, Technology) (2002) Foresight futures 2020: revised scenarios and guidance. Department of Trade and Industry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  130. Oyekale AS, Bolaji MB, Olowa OW (2009) The effects of climate change on cocoa production and vulnerability assessment in Nigeria. Agric J 4:77–85Google Scholar
  131. Parrott R, Hopfer S, Ghetian C, Lengerich E (2007) Mapping as a visual health communication tool: promises and dilemmas. Health Commun 22:13–24Google Scholar
  132. Patiño L, Gauthier DA (2009) Integrating local perspectives into climate change decision making in rural areas of the Canadian prairies. Int J Clim Change Strateg Manag 1(2):179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Patt A, Klein RJT, de la Vega-Leinert A (2004) Taking the uncertainty in climate-change vulnerability assessment seriously. C R Geoscience 337:411–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Peduzzi P, Dao H, Herold C (2005) Mapping disastrous natural hazards using GIS. Nat Hazard 35:265–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Peppler R (2009) Old Indian ways of knowing the weather: weather predictions for the winters of 1950–51 and 1951–52. Fourth Syumposium on Policy and Socioeconomic Research, 89th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona, 10–16 January 2009. Available at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/143684.pdf
  136. Poumadere M, Mays C, Le Mer S, Blong R (2005) The 2003 heat wave in France: dangerous climate change here and now. Risk Anal 25:1483–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Preston BL, Jones RN (2008) Screening climatic and non-climatic risks to Australian catchments. Geogr Res 46:258–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Preston BL, Kay RC (2010) Managing climate risk in human settlements. In: Jubb I, Holper P, Cai W (eds) Greenhouse 2009. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 185–196Google Scholar
  139. Preston BL, Stafford-Smith M (2009) Framing vulnerability and adaptive capacity assessment. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship Working Paper, CSIRO, Aspendale and CanberraGoogle Scholar
  140. Preston BL, Brooke C, Measham TG, Smith T, Gorddard R (2009) Igniting change in local government: lessons learned from a bushfire vulnerability assessment. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 14:251–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Pruszak Z, Zawadzka E (2008) Potential implications of sea-level rise for Poland. J Coast Res 24:410–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Quan J, Oudwater N, Pender J, Martin A (2001) GIS and participatory approaches in natural resources research. Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, CharltamGoogle Scholar
  143. Reid CE, O’Neill MS, Gronlund CJ, Brines SJ, Brown DG, Diez-Roux AV, Schwartz J (2009) Mapping community determinants of heat vulnerability. Environ Health Perspect 117(11):1730–1736Google Scholar
  144. Reidlinger D, Berkes F (2001) Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Rec 37:315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Robertson HA, McGee TH (2003) Applying local knowledge: the contribution of oral history to wetland rehabilitation at Kanyapella Basin, Australia. J Environ Manage 69:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Schröter D, Acosta-Michlik L, Arnell AW, Araujo MB, Badeck F, Bakker M, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter T, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Erhard M, Espiñeira GZ, Ewert F, Fritsch U, Friedlingstein P, Glendining M, Gracia CA, Hickler T, House J, Hulme M, Kankaanpää S, Klein RJT, Krukenberg B, Lavorel S, Leemans R, Lindner M, Liski J, Metzger MJ, Meyer J, Mitchell T, Mohren F, Morales P, Moreno JM, Reginster I, Reidsma P, Rounsevell M, Pla E, Pluimers J, Prentice IC, Pussinen A, Sánchez A, Sabaté A, Sitch S, Smith B, Smith J, Smith P, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Thuiller W, Tuck G, van der Werf G, Vayreda J, Wattenback M, Wilson DW, Woodward FI, Zaehle S, Zierl B, Zudin S, Cramer W (2004) ATEAM final report 2004. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  147. Sharma U, Patwardhan A (2008) Methodology for identifying vulnerability hotspots to tropical cyclone hazard in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 13:703–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Shaw J, Taylor RB, Forbes DL, Ruz M-H, Solomon S (1998) Sensitivity of the coasts of Canada to sea-level rise. Bull Geol Survey Can 505:1–79Google Scholar
  149. Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S, Flanders D, Wiek A, Carmichael J, Robinson J, Cohen S (2009) Making local futures tangible—synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Glob Environ Change 19(4):447–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Sheppard SRJ (2005) Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environ Sci Policy 8:637–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Sietchiping R (2006) Applying an index of adaptive capacity to climate change in northwestern Victoria, Australia. Appl GIS 2:16.1–16.28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Simpson DM, Human RJ (2008) Large-scale vulnerability assessments for natural hazards. Nat Hazards 47:143–155Google Scholar
  153. Slocombe DS (1993) Implementing ecosystem-based management. Bioscience 43:612–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Smith TF, Brooke C, Measham TG, Preston BL, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Beveridge B, Morrison C (2009) Case studies of adaptive capacity. Prepared for the Sydney Coastal Councils Group by the University of the Sunshine Coast and the CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship, Sippy Downs and CanberraGoogle Scholar
  156. SOPAC (South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission) (2005) Building resilience in SIDS. The environmental vulnerability index. SOPAC and the United Nations Environment Programme, Suva and NairobiGoogle Scholar
  157. Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s quadrant—basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  158. Stott PA, Stone DA, Allen MR (2004) Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature 432:610–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Sullivan C, Meigh J (2005) Targeting attention on local vulnerabilities using an integrated index approach: the example of the climate vulnerability index. Water Sci Technol 51:69–78Google Scholar
  160. Thorton PK, Jones PG, Owiyo T, Kruska RL, Herrero M, Orindi V, Bhadwal S, Kristjanson P, Notenbaert A, Bekele N, Omolo A (2008) Climate change and poverty in Africa: mapping hotspots of vulnerability. AfJARE 2, March: 24–44Google Scholar
  161. Thow A, de Blois M (2008) Climate change and human vulnerability: mapping emerging trends and risk hotspots for humanitarian actors. Report to the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs by Maplecroft, BathGoogle Scholar
  162. Tighe M, Pollino CA, Cuddy SM, Whitfield S (2007) A Bayesian approach to assessing regional climate change pressures on natural resource conditions in the central west of NSW, Australia. International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2007), December 10–13, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  163. Torresan S, Critto A, Valle MD (2008) Assessing coastal vulnerability to climate change: comparing segmentation at global and regional scales. Sustain Sci 3:45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Tran LT, O’Neill RV, Smith ER (2010) Spatial pattern of environmental vulnerability in the Mid-Atlantic region, USA. Appl Geogr 30:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Trench B (2008) Towards and analytical framework of science communication models. In: Cheng D, Claessens M, Gascoigne T, Metcalfe J, Schiele B, Shi S (eds) Communicating science in social contexts. New models, new practices. Springer, New York, pp 119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Turner BL II, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Lueers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003a) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8074–8079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Turner BL II, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Hovelsrud-Broda G, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Luers A, Martello ML, Mathiesen S, Naylor R, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A, Selin H, Tyler N (2003b) Illustrating the coupled human–environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8080–8085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. UCD (University of Colorado at Denver) (2004) Natural hazards risk assessment for the state of Colorado. Prepared by the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center in support of the Colorado State Hazard Mitigation Plan, Division of Emergency Management, State of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  169. UKCIP (UK Climate Impacts Programme) (2000) Socio-economic scenarios for climate change impact assessment: a guide to their use in the UK Climate Impacts Programme. UKCIP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  170. UN National Assessment Synthesis Team (2001) The potential consequences of climate variability and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  171. Vandentorren S, Bretin P, Zeghnoun A, Mandereau-Bruno L, Croisier A, Cochet C, Ribéron J, Siberan I, Declerq B, Ledrans M (2006) August 2003 heat wave in France: risk factors for death of elderly people living at home. Eur J Public Health 16:583–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Vescovi L, Rebetz M, Rong F (2005) Assessing public health risk due to extremely high temperature events: climate and social parameters. Clim Res 30:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Vincent K (2004) Creating an index of social vulnerability to climate change for Africa. Working Paper 56, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  174. Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–288Google Scholar
  175. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM (1993) Some criteria for evaluating risk messages. Risk Anal 13:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. White GF (1974) Natural hazards. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  177. White N, Sutherst RW, Hall N, Whish-Wilson P (2003) The vulnerability of the Australian beef industry to impacts of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) under climate change. Clim Change 61:157–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB (2000) A geography of ecosystem vulnerability. Land Ecol 15:495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Wilbanks TJ, Kates RW (1999) Global change in local places: how scale matters. Clim Change 43:601–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Willows R, Connell R (2003) Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty, and decision-making. UKCIP Technical Report, UK Climate Impacts Programme, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  181. Wooldrige S, Done T (2004) Learning to predict large-scale coral bleaching from past events: a Bayesian approach using remotely sensed data, in situ data, and environmental proxies. Coral Reefs 23:96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Wrona FJ, Cash KJ (1996) The ecosystem approach to environmental assessment: moving from theory to practice. J Aquat Ecosyst Health 5:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Wu S-Y, Yarnal B, Fisher A (2002) Vulnerability of coastal communities to sea-level rise: a case study of Cape May County, New Jersey, USA. Clim Res 22:255–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Wynne B (1991) Knowledge in context. Sci Technol Hum Values 16(1):111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Wynne B (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science—hitting the notes but missing the music? Commun Genet 9(3):211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Yohe G, Malone E, Brenkert A, Schlesinger M, Mejia H, Lee D (2006) Global distributions of vulnerability to climate change. Integ Assess J 6(3):35–44Google Scholar
  187. Yusuf AA, Francisco H (2009) Climate change vulnerability mapping for Southeast Asia. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  188. Zeidler RB (1997) Climate change vulnerability and response strategies for the coastal zone of Poland. Climatic Change 36:151–173Google Scholar
  189. Zerger A, Smith DI (2003) Impediments to using GIS for real-time disaster decision support. Comput Environ Urban Syst 27:123–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science, United Nations University, and Springer 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin L. Preston
    • 1
  • Emma J. Yuen
    • 2
  • Richard M. Westaway
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA
  2. 2.CSIRO Climate Adaptation FlagshipAspendaleAustralia
  3. 3.IMS ConsultingBristolUK

Personalised recommendations